(1069) - A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Chimney Graft Versus Percutaneous Perfusion Techniques for Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.

MLA

Cakici, M., et al. “(1069) - A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Chimney Graft Versus Percutaneous Perfusion Techniques for Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.” Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, vol. 35, Apr. 2016, pp. S382–83. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1102.

APA

Cakici, M., Ozcinar, E., Inan, B. M., Durdu, S. M., Sarıcaoglu, C. M., Aral, A., Sirlak, M., & Akar, R. A. (2016). (1069) - A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Chimney Graft Versus Percutaneous Perfusion Techniques for Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock. Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, 35, S382–S383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1102

Chicago

Cakici, M., E. Ozcinar, B.M. Inan, S.M. Durdu, C.M. Sarıcaoglu, A. Aral, M. Sirlak, and R.A. Akar. 2016. “(1069) - A Retrospective Cohort Analysis of Chimney Graft Versus Percutaneous Perfusion Techniques for Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Patients with Refractory Cardiogenic Shock.” Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation 35 (April): S382–83. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2016.01.1102.