Back to Search Start Over

Chiral quizalofop-ethyl and its metabolite quizalofop-acid in soils: Enantioselective degradation, enzymes interaction and toxicity to Eisenia foetida.

Authors :
Ma, Lin
Liu, Hui
Qu, Han
Xu, Yangguang
Wang, Peng
Sun, Mingjing
Zhou, Zhiqiang
Liu, Donghui
Source :
Chemosphere. Jun2016, Vol. 152, p173-180. 8p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

An enantioselective chromatographic method to analyze enantiomers of quizalofop-ethyl and its metabolite quizalofop-acid was established using a high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) on (R, R) Whelk-O 1 column. The enantioselective degradation kinetics of quizalofop-ethyl and quizalofop-acid in three soils were investigated. Moreover, the interaction with urease and catalase in the soils and the acute toxicity to Eisenia foetida of quizalofop-ethyl were also determined in order to assess their metabolism mechanism and environmental risk. From the results, quizalofop-ethyl was configurationally stable and was hydrolyzed rapidly to quizalofop-acid, which also degraded enantioselectively but slowly, and the inversion of the S-(−)-quizalofop-acid into the R-(+)-quizalofop-acid was observed in Xinxiang soil. In addition, quizalofop-ethyl and quizalofop-acid enantioselectively affected urease activity but not catalase. The acute toxicity assays to earthworm indicated that the racemic quizalofop-ethyl and quizalofop-acid were more toxic than quizalofop-p-ethyl and quizalofop-p-acid respectively, dramatically, the toxicity of the metabolite was much higher than the parent compound. These results revealed the enantioselective degradation of quizalofop-ethyl and quizalofop-acid, and the differences of toxicity among the enantiomers of the parent compound and the metabolite, which should be considered in future environmental risk evaluation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00456535
Volume :
152
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Chemosphere
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
114176518
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.084