Back to Search Start Over

Prospective Clinical Study of Precision Oncology in Solid Tumors.

Authors :
Sohal, Davendra P. S.
Rini, Brian I.
Khorana, Alok A.
Dreicer, Robert
Abraham, Jame
Procop, Gary W.
Saunthararajah, Yogen
Pennell, Nathan A.
Stevenson, James P.
Pelley, Robert
Estfan, Bassam
Shepard, Dale
Funchain, Pauline
Elson, Paul
Adelstein, David J.
Bolwell, Brian J.
Source :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Mar2016, Vol. 108 Issue 3, p1-3. 3p. 1 Chart, 1 Graph.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

Systematic studies evaluating clinical benefit of tumor genomic profiling are lacking. We conducted a prospective study in 250 patients with select solid tumors at the Cleveland Clinic. Eligibility required histopathologic diagnosis, age of 18 years or older, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and written informed consent. Tumors were sequenced using FoundationOne (Cambridge, MA). Results were reviewed at the Cleveland Clinic Genomics Tumor Board. Outcomes included feasibility and clinical impact. Colorectal (25%), breast (18%), lung (13%), and pancreatobiliary (13%) cancers were the most common diagnoses. Median time from consent to result was 25 days (range = 3-140). Of 223 evaluable samples, 49% (n = 109) of patients were recommended a specific therapy, but only 11% (n = 24) received such therapy: 12 on clinical trials, nine off-label, three on-label. Lack of clinical trial access (n = 49) and clinical deterioration (n = 29) were the most common reasons for nonrecommendation/nonreceipt of genomics-driven therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00278874
Volume :
108
Issue :
3
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
113660984
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv332