Back to Search Start Over

Retesting young STI clinic visitors with urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the Netherlands; response to a text message reminder and reinfection rates: a prospective study with historical controls.

Authors :
Kampman, C. J. G
Koedijk, F. D. H.
Driessen-Hulshof, H. C. M.
Hautvast, J. L. A.
van den Broek, I. V. F.
Kampman, Cjg
Koedijk, Fdh
Driessen-Hulshof, Hcm
Hautvast, Jla
van den Broek, Ivf
Source :
Sexually Transmitted Infections. Mar2016, Vol. 92 Issue 2, p124-129. 6p. 2 Charts, 1 Graph, 1 Map.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>The objective of this study is to assess the effect of reminder text messages 6 months after the initial treatment on retest and chlamydia reinfection rates in young heterosexuals compared with a historical control group and to assess factors associated with both outcomes.<bold>Methods: </bold>Heterosexual people (aged 16-23 years), testing positive for urogenital chlamydia, were offered a retest after 6 months. Participants received a text message reminder at 6 months after the initial chlamydia diagnosis. Rates of retest uptake and the result of the retest were analysed using Cox regression. Prevalence ratios (PRs) were calculated to identify factors associated with these outcomes. Furthermore, the retest rate was compared with the retest rate of a historical control group.<bold>Results: </bold>30.6% (253/838) of the study group returned within 5-8 months compared with 9.2% (140/1530) in the historical control group. Women and persons who were not notified for a sexually transmitted infection (STI) at inclusion were more likely to return for a retest. 20.4% (56/275) of participants had a chlamydia reinfection upon retesting. Reinfection was higher in participants reporting STI-related symptoms (PR 3.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.6) and in participants who were notified for an STI at retest (PR 5.3, 95% CI 2.4 to 11.5).<bold>Conclusions: </bold>A text message reminder appeared to have a clear, positive impact on the resulting retest rate. These results also indicate that retesting is necessary to identify chlamydia reinfections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13684973
Volume :
92
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Sexually Transmitted Infections
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
113402439
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/sextrans-2015-052115