Back to Search Start Over

Relationship between paediatric CT scans and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: assessment of the impact of underlying conditions.

Authors :
de Gonzalez, Amy Berrington
Salotti, Jane A
McHugh, Kieran
Little, Mark P
Harbron, Richard W
Lee, Choonsik
Ntowe, Estelle
Braganza, Melissa Z
Parker, Louise
Rajaraman, Preetha
Stiller, Charles
Stewart, Douglas R
Craft, Alan W
Pearce, Mark S
Berrington de Gonzalez, Amy
Source :
British Journal of Cancer. 2/16/2016, Vol. 114 Issue 4, p388-394. 7p. 5 Charts, 2 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>We previously reported evidence of a dose-response relationship between ionising-radiation exposure from paediatric computed tomography (CT) scans and the risk of leukaemia and brain tumours in a large UK cohort. Underlying unreported conditions could have introduced bias into these findings.<bold>Methods: </bold>We collected and reviewed additional clinical information from radiology information systems (RIS) databases, underlying cause of death and pathology reports. We conducted sensitivity analyses excluding participants with cancer-predisposing conditions or previous unreported cancers and compared the dose-response analyses with our original results.<bold>Results: </bold>We obtained information from the RIS and death certificates for about 40% of the cohort (n∼180 000) and found cancer-predisposing conditions in 4 out of 74 leukaemia/myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) cases and 13 out of 135 brain tumour cases. As these conditions were unrelated to CT exposure, exclusion of these participants did not alter the dose-response relationships. We found evidence of previous unreported cancers in 2 leukaemia/MDS cases, 7 brain tumour cases and 232 in non-cases. These previous cancers were related to increased number of CTs. Exclusion of these cancers reduced the excess relative risk per mGy by 15% from 0.036 to 0.033 for leukaemia/MDS (P-trend=0.02) and by 30% from 0.023 to 0.016 (P-trend<0.0001) for brain tumours. When we included pathology reports we had additional clinical information for 90% of the cases. Additional exclusions from these reports further reduced the risk estimates, but this sensitivity analysis may have underestimated risks as reports were only available for cases.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>Although there was evidence of some bias in our original risk estimates, re-analysis of the cohort with additional clinical data still showed an increased cancer risk after low-dose radiation exposure from CT scans in young patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00070920
Volume :
114
Issue :
4
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
British Journal of Cancer
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
113033946
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2015.415