Back to Search Start Over

Thrombolytic-Enhanced Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Prolonged Cardiac Arrest.

Authors :
Spinelli, Elena
Davis, Ryan P.
Xiaodan Ren
Sheth, Parth S.
Tooley, Trevor R.
Iyengar, Amit
Sowell, Brandon
Owens, Gabe E.
Bocks, Martin L.
Jacobs, Teresa L.
Yang, Lynda J.
Stacey, William C.
Bartlett, Robert H.
Rojas-Peña, Alvaro
Neumar, Robert W.
Ren, Xiaodan
Source :
Critical Care Medicine. Feb2016, Vol. 44 Issue 2, pe58-e69. 12p.
Publication Year :
2016

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To investigate the effects of the combination of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and thrombolytic therapy on the recovery of vital organ function after prolonged cardiac arrest.<bold>Design: </bold>Laboratory investigation.<bold>Setting: </bold>University laboratory.<bold>Subjects: </bold>Pigs.<bold>Interventions: </bold>Animals underwent 30-minute untreated ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest followed by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 6 hours. Animals were allocated into two experimental groups: t-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (t-ECPR) group, which received streptokinase 1 million units, and control extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (c-ECPR), which did not receive streptokinase. In both groups, the resuscitation protocol included the following physiologic targets: mean arterial pressure greater than 70 mm Hg, cerebral perfusion pressure greater than 50 mm Hg, PaO2 150 ± 50 torr (20 ± 7 kPa), PaCO2 40 ± 5 torr (5 ± 1 kPa), and core temperature 33°C ± 1°C. Defibrillation was attempted after 30 minutes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.<bold>Measurements and Main Results: </bold>A cardiac resuscitability score was assessed on the basis of success of defibrillation, return of spontaneous heart beat, weanability from extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and left ventricular systolic function after weaning. The addition of thrombolytic to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly improved cardiac resuscitability (3.7 ± 1.6 in t-ECPR vs 1.0 ± 1.5 in c-ECPR). Arterial lactate clearance was higher in t-ECPR than in c-ECPR (40% ± 15% vs 18% ± 21%). At the end of the experiment, the intracranial pressure was significantly higher in c-ECPR than in t-ECPR. Recovery of brain electrical activity, as assessed by quantitative analysis of electroencephalogram signal, and ischemic neuronal injury on histopathologic examination did not differ between groups. Animals in t-ECPR group did not have increased bleeding complications, including intracerebral hemorrhages.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>In a porcine model of prolonged cardiac arrest, t-ECPR improved cardiac resuscitability and reduced brain edema, without increasing bleeding complications. However, early electroencephalogram recovery and ischemic neuronal injury were not improved. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00903493
Volume :
44
Issue :
2
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Critical Care Medicine
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
112544383
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000001305