Tanrının Varlığının Ontolojik Kanıtı.

What is meant in this paper is that the expression „exists‟ is, against its logical nature, combined with the proper name here, not with a concept name. For Frege, this is not only „linguistically improper‟, but also logically „nonsensical‟. For instance, „Africa exists‟ and „ Socrates exists‟. In the paper it is explained the conjunctive combination of the characteristics of the concept. Thus the note „existence is a feature‟ belongs more under the sign for existence. Consequently, Frege does not deal with God as a concept but a proper name, and based upon that the existence cannot be included as a characteristic, he tries to point out that it is not a scientific proof for the existence of God. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]