"Mudanças Climáticas" e "Aquecimento Global" - Nova Formatação e Paradigma para o Pensamento Contemporâneo?

It is necessary to emphasize, first, the environmental problem which is not weather problems. Some areas of science are increasingly walking through winding roads, instead of rationalizing the Universe, preach the exact opposite. It will use its "fame" of impartiality, neutrality etc. precisely to legitimize certain actions that can only be seen as mythological. The Climate Science works for other purposes and purposes and not to understand the atmosphere within the geographic stratum. Importantly it very well, because no one asks why the Climatology and Meteorology will now determine how all humans on the planet should live? And why did not it happen? Simply because the big three are evoked fears of mankind: Death, the Future and Change. Anything can happen, but always in the future for people who do not exist, but we do not care about those who live today. When we say that no matter what we do, nothing will change the Earth's climate, environmental movements like to say that there is an authorization to destroy everything, creating again a mixture of real and specific problems that can be solved with phenomena that escape to our domain. Here is the great fallacy of the environmental movement. It uses the logic of consistency (or inconsistency). In other words, either you accept it or not accept anything. Anyway, what has been implementing an international policy is something we could pre-set as an eco-imperialism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]