Back to Search Start Over

Distinct pro-vigilant profile induced in rats by the mGluR5 potentiator LSN2814617.

Authors :
Loomis, Sally
McCarthy, Andrew
Baxter, Christopher
Kellett, Daniel
Edgar, Dale
Tricklebank, Mark
Gilmour, Gary
Source :
Psychopharmacology. Nov2015, Vol. 232 Issue 21/22, p3977-3989. 13p. 2 Diagrams, 1 Chart, 4 Graphs.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

While treatment options are available, excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) remains a significant unmet medical need for many patients. Relatively little rodent behavioural pharmacology has been conducted in this context to assess potential pro-vigilant compounds for their ability to restore functional capacity following experimentally induced sleep loss. Male Wistar rats were prepared for electroencephalographic (EEG) recording and subject to 11 h of sleep restriction using a biofeedback-induced cage rotation protocol. A simple response latency task (SRLT) was used to behaviourally index sleep restriction and the effects of pro-vigilant compounds: modafinil, d-amphetamine, caffeine, and the mGlu5-positive allosteric modulator LSN2814617. Sleep restriction resulted in a consistent, quantified loss of non-rapid eye movement (NREM) and REM sleep that impaired SRLT performance in a manner suggestive of progressive task disengagement. In terms of EEG parameters, all compounds induced wakefulness. Amphetamine treatment further decreased SRLT performance capacity, whereas the other three compounds decreased omissions and allowed animals to re-engage in the task. Caffeine and modafinil also significantly increased premature responses during this period, an effect not observed for LSN2814617. While all compounds caused compensatory sleep responses, the magnitude of compensation observed for LSN2814617 was much smaller than would be predicted to result from the prolongation of wakefulness exhibited. Using simple response latencies to index performance, an mGlu5 PAM dramatically increased wakefulness and improved functional capacity of sleep-restricted animals, without eliciting a proportionate compensatory sleep response. This effect was qualitatively distinct from that of amphetamine, caffeine and modafinil. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00333158
Volume :
232
Issue :
21/22
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Psychopharmacology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
110261429
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-015-3936-8