Back to Search Start Over

Randomized clinical trial assessing whether additional massage treatments for chronic neck pain improve 12- and 26-week outcomes.

Authors :
Cook, Andrea J.
Wellman, Robert D.
Cherkin, Daniel C.
Kahn, Janet R.
Sherman, Karen J.
Source :
Spine Journal. Oct2015, Vol. 15 Issue 10, p2206-2215. 10p.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

<bold>Background Context: </bold>This is the first study to systematically evaluate the value of a longer treatment period for massage. We provide a framework of how to conceptualize an optimal dose in this challenging setting of nonpharmacologic treatments.<bold>Purpose: </bold>The aim was to determine the optimal dose of massage for neck pain.<bold>Study Design/setting: </bold>Two-phase randomized trial for persons with chronic nonspecific neck pain. Primary randomization to one of five groups receiving 4 weeks of massage (30 minutes 2x/or 3x/wk or 60 minutes 1x, 2x, or 3x/wk). Booster randomization of participants to receive an additional six massages, 60 minutes 1x/wk, or no additional massage.<bold>Patient Sample: </bold>A total of 179 participants from Group Health and the general population of Seattle, WA, USA recruited between June 2010 and August 2011 were included.<bold>Outcome Measures: </bold>Primary outcomes self-reported neck-related dysfunction (Neck Disability Index) and pain (0-10 scale) were assessed at baseline, 12, and 26 weeks. Clinically meaningful improvement was defined as greater than or equal to 5-point decrease in dysfunction and greater than or equal to 30% decrease in pain from baseline.<bold>Methods: </bold>Clinically meaningful improvement for each primary outcome with both follow-up times was analyzed using adjusted modified Poisson generalized estimating equations (GEEs). Secondary analyses for the continuous outcomes used linear GEEs.<bold>Results: </bold>There were no observed differences by primary treatment group at 12 or 26 weeks. Those receiving booster dose had improvements in both dysfunction and pain at 12 weeks (dysfunction: relative risk [RR]=1.56 [1.08-2.25], p=.018; pain: RR=1.25 [0.98-1.61], p=.077), but those were nonsignificant at 26 weeks (dysfunction: RR=1.22 [0.85-1.74]; pain: RR=1.09 [0.82-1.43]). Subgroup analysis by primary and booster treatments found the booster dose only effective among those initially randomized to one of the 60-minute massage groups.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>"Booster" doses for those initially receiving 60 minutes of massage should be incorporated into future trials of massage for chronic neck pain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15299430
Volume :
15
Issue :
10
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Spine Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
109915438
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.06.049