Back to Search Start Over

Polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting versus new generation zotarolimus-eluting stents in coronary artery disease: the Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting versus Zotarolimus-eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) trial.

Authors :
Massberg S
Byrne RA
Kastrati A
Schulz S
Pache J
Hausleiter J
Ibrahim T
Fusaro M
Ott I
Schömig A
Laugwitz KL
Mehilli J
Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results: Test Efficacy of Sirolimus- and Probucol-Eluting Versus Zotarolimus- Eluting Stents (ISAR-TEST 5) Investigators
Massberg, Steffen
Byrne, Robert A
Kastrati, Adnan
Schulz, Stefanie
Pache, Jürgen
Hausleiter, Jörg
Ibrahim, Tareq
Source :
Circulation. 8/2/2011, Vol. 124 Issue 5, p624-632. 9p.
Publication Year :
2011

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Durable polymer coatings have been implicated in mid- and long-term adverse events after drug-eluting stent implantation. A polymer-free dual-drug sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and a new generation permanent polymer zotarolimus-eluting stent are recently developed technologies demonstrating encouraging results. <bold>Methods and Results: </bold>In a clinical trial with minimal exclusion criteria, we randomly assigned 3002 patients to treatment with sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents versus zotarolimus-eluting stents. The trial was designed to demonstrate noninferiority of the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stents. The primary end point was the combined incidence of cardiac death, target-vessel-related myocardial infarction, or target-lesion revascularization at 1-year follow-up. Follow-up angiography was scheduled at 6 to 8 months. The sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of occurrence of the primary end point (13.1% versus 13.5%, respectively, P(noninferiority)=0.006; hazard ratio=0.97, 95% confidence interval, 0.78 to 1.19; P(superiority)=0.74). The incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was low in both groups (1.1% versus 1.2%, respectively; hazard ratio=0.91 [95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.84], P=0.80). With regard to angiographic efficacy, there were no differences between the sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent and the zotarolimus-eluting stent in terms of either in-segment binary angiographic restenosis (13.3% versus 13.4% respectively; P=0.95) or in-stent late luminal loss (0.31±0.58 mm versus 0.29±0.56 mm, respectively; P=0.46). <bold>Conclusion: </bold>In this large-scale study powered for clinical end points, a polymer-free sirolimus- and probucol-eluting stent was noninferior to a new generation durable polymer-based zotarolimus-eluting stent out to 12 months. <bold>Clinical Trial Registration: </bold>http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier NCT 00598533. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00097322
Volume :
124
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Circulation
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
108194041
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.026732