Relative benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention for angina pectoris and multivessel coronary disease in women versus men (one-year results from the Stent or Surgery Trial)

MLA

Zhang Z, et al. “Relative Benefit of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina Pectoris and Multivessel Coronary Disease in Women versus Men (One-Year Results from the Stent or Surgery Trial).” American Journal of Cardiology, vol. 93, no. 4, Feb. 2004, pp. 404–09. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.032.

APA

Zhang Z, Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM, Spertus JA, Booth J, Nugara F, Stables RH, & Vaccarino V. (2004). Relative benefit of coronary artery bypass grafting versus stent-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention for angina pectoris and multivessel coronary disease in women versus men (one-year results from the Stent or Surgery Trial). American Journal of Cardiology, 93(4), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.032

Chicago

Zhang Z, Weintraub WS, Mahoney EM, Spertus JA, Booth J, Nugara F, Stables RH, and Vaccarino V. 2004. “Relative Benefit of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting versus Stent-Assisted Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Angina Pectoris and Multivessel Coronary Disease in Women versus Men (One-Year Results from the Stent or Surgery Trial).” American Journal of Cardiology 93 (4): 404–9. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2003.10.032.