Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of the effect of oral verapamil on clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Verapamil Slow-Release for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events After Angioplasty (VESPA) Trial.

Authors :
Bestehorn H
Neumann F
Büttner HJ
Betz P
Stürzenhofecker P
von Hodenberg E
Verdun A
Levai L
Monassier JP
Roskamm H
Bestehorn, Hans-Peter
Neumann, Franz-Josef
Büttner, Heinz Joachim
Betz, Peter
Stürzenhofecker, Peter
von Hodenberg, Eberhard
Verdun, Antoine
Levai, Laszlo
Monassier, Jean Pierre
Roskamm, Helmut
Source :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). Jun2004, Vol. 43 Issue 12, p2160-2165. 6p.
Publication Year :
2004

Abstract

<bold>Objectives: </bold>We investigated the effect of oral verapamil on clinical outcome and angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). <bold>Background: </bold>Thus far, there is no established systemic pharmacologic approach for the prevention of restenosis after PCIs. Five small studies reported encouraging results for calcium channel blockers. <bold>Methods: </bold>Our randomized double-blind trial included 700 consecutive patients with successful PCI of a native coronary artery. Patients received the calcium channel blocker verapamil, 240 mg twice daily for six months, or placebo. Primary clinical end point was the composite rate of death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) during one-year follow-up; the angiographic end point was late lumen loss at the six-month follow-up angiography. <bold>Results: </bold>We obtained complete clinical follow-up in 95% of the patients, and scheduled angiography was performed in 94%. The proportion of patients treated with stents was 83%. The primary clinical end point was reached in 67 (19.3%) patients on verapamil and in 103 (29.3%) patients on placebo (relative risk [RR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.48 to 0.89]; p = 0.002). This difference between the groups was driven by TVR (17.5% with verapamil vs. 26.2% with placebo; RR 0.67 [95% CI 0.49 to 0.93]; p = 0.006). Late lumen loss was 0.74 +/- 0.70 mm with verapamil and 0.81 +/- 0.75 mm with placebo (p = 0.11). Compared with placebo, verapamil reduced the rate of restenosis > or =75% (7.8% vs. 13.7%; RR 0.57 [95% CI 0.35 to 0.92]; p = 0.014). <bold>Conclusions: </bold>Verapamil compared with placebo improves long-term clinical outcome after PCI of native coronary arteries by reducing the need for TVR. This was caused by a reduction in the rate of high-grade restenosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07351097
Volume :
43
Issue :
12
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
106473266
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2004.02.047