Back to Search
Start Over
Screening for Down syndrome: practice patterns and knowledge of obstetricians and gynecologists.
- Source :
-
Obstetrics & Gynecology . Jan2006, Vol. 107 Issue 1, p11-17. 7p. - Publication Year :
- 2006
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To assess obstetricians' practice patterns and knowledge regarding screening for Down syndrome. METHODS: A questionnaire was mailed to 1,105 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Fellows and Junior Fellows in 2004. RESULTS: Sixty percent of questionnaires were returned. Statistical analyses were limited to the 532 practicing obstetricians. Greater than 80% felt their training and experience qualified them to counsel patients about genetic issues in pregnancy. However, 45% rated their residency training regarding prenatal diagnosis as barely adequate or nonexistent. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists publications were rated by 86% as an important source of information on genetic counseling. Seventy-eight percent of practitioners counsel all obstetric patients about risks for fetal aneuploidy, and 67% provide counseling for heritable genetic abnormalities. Although the majority (99%) offer second-trimester Down syndrome screening, only 55% also offer first-trimester screening for Down syndrome. Almost one half (49%) use the quad screen, and 6% offer integrated first- and second-trimester screening. The majority (88%) routinely offer amniocentesis to patients who are at elevated risk for genetic abnormalities, whereas 44% also offer chorionic villus sampling. Few (2%) perform chorionic villus sampling. CONCLUSION: Most obstetricians manage patients at risk for fetal genetic abnormalities according to American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists educational materials. This survey identified deficiencies related to Down syndrome screening, including a limited number of practitioners performing chorionic villus sampling and physicians' own perception that training regarding genetic counseling should be improved. Educational strategies are needed to address these deficiencies before first-trimester screening programs are widely implemented. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00297844
- Volume :
- 107
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 106328190
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000190215.67096.90