Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating women with ovarian cancer for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: missed opportunities.

Authors :
Meyer LA
Anderson ME
Lacour RA
Suri A
Daniels MS
Urbauer DL
Nogueras-Gonzalez GM
Schmeler KM
Gershenson DM
Lu KH
Meyer, Larissa A
Anderson, Meaghan E
Lacour, Robin A
Suri, Anuj
Daniels, Molly S
Urbauer, Diana L
Nogueras-Gonzalez, Graciela M
Schmeler, Kathleen M
Gershenson, David M
Lu, Karen H
Source :
Obstetrics & Gynecology. May2010, Vol. 115 Issue 5, p945-952. 8p.
Publication Year :
2010

Abstract

<bold>Objective: </bold>To estimate the incidence of genetic counseling referral for ovarian cancer patients who are at substantial risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.<bold>Methods: </bold>An analysis was performed of new ovarian cancer patients who were seen at a comprehensive cancer center from January 1, 1999, through December 31, 2007. Patients at substantial (more than 20-25%) risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation were identified and records reviewed for referral to genetic counseling. Time to referral was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.<bold>Results: </bold>A total of 3,765 epithelial ovarian cancer patients were seen during the 9-year period. On average, 23.8% of patients met substantial-risk criteria for BRCA mutations. In 1999, only 12% of patients at substantial-risk were referred. Referral improved over time with 48% referred in 2007 (P<.001). Newly diagnosed patients were more often referred for genetic counseling than new patients with recurrent disease or those seen as second opinions. African-American women meeting substantial-risk criteria were less likely to be referred than were white or Hispanic women (P=.009).<bold>Conclusion: </bold>Although dictated family history was accurate, interpretation of risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations and subsequent referral to genetic counseling was poor. Although there was significant improvement over time, 50% of substantial-risk patients still were missed. Systematic efforts to identify those ovarian cancer patients at substantial risk for a BRCA1 or BRCA2 are necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00297844
Volume :
115
Issue :
5
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
105181348
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181da08d7