Back to Search Start Over

A phase II comparative study of gross tumor volume definition with or without PET/CT fusion in dosimetric planning for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): primary analysis of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515.

Authors :
Bradley J
Bae K
Choi N
Forster K
Siegel BA
Brunetti J
Purdy J
Faria S
Vu T
Thorstad W
Choy H
Bradley, Jeffrey
Bae, Kyounghwa
Choi, Noah
Forster, Ken
Siegel, Barry A
Brunetti, Jacqueline
Purdy, James
Faria, Sergio
Vu, Toni
Source :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics. Jan2012, Vol. 82 Issue 1, p435-441.e1. 1p.
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

<bold>Background: </bold>Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0515 is a Phase II prospective trial designed to quantify the impact of positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) compared with CT alone on radiation treatment plans (RTPs) and to determine the rate of elective nodal failure for PET/CT-derived volumes.<bold>Methods: </bold>Each enrolled patient underwent definitive radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (≥ 60 Gy) and had two RTP datasets generated: gross tumor volume (GTV) derived with CT alone and with PET/CT. Patients received treatment using the PET/CT-derived plan. The primary end point, the impact of PET/CT fusion on treatment plans was measured by differences of the following variables for each patient: GTV, number of involved nodes, nodal station, mean lung dose (MLD), volume of lung exceeding 20 Gy (V20), and mean esophageal dose (MED). Regional failure rate was a secondary end point. The nonparametric Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-ranks test was used with Bonferroni adjustment for an overall significance level of 0.05.<bold>Results: </bold>RTOG 0515 accrued 52 patients, 47 of whom are evaluable. The follow-up time for all patients is 12.9 months (2.7-22.2). Tumor staging was as follows: II = 6%; IIIA = 40%; and IIIB = 54%. The GTV was statistically significantly smaller for PET/CT-derived volumes (98.7 vs. 86.2 mL; p < 0.0001). MLDs for PET/CT plans were slightly lower (19 vs. 17.8 Gy; p = 0.06). There was no significant difference in the number of involved nodes (2.1 vs. 2.4), V20 (32% vs. 30.8%), or MED (28.7 vs. 27.1 Gy). Nodal contours were altered by PET/CT for 51% of patients. One patient (2%) has developed an elective nodal failure.<bold>Conclusions: </bold>PET/CT-derived tumor volumes were smaller than those derived by CT alone. PET/CT changed nodal GTV contours in 51% of patients. The elective nodal failure rate for GTVs derived by PET/CT is quite low, supporting the RTOG standard of limiting the target volume to the primary tumor and involved nodes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
03603016
Volume :
82
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
104618417
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.09.033