Reliability using the universal classification of acute myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment classification.

MLA

Gonzalez MA, et al. “Reliability Using the Universal Classification of Acute Myocardial Infarction Compared to ST-Segment Classification.” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, vol. 12, no. 4, July 2011, pp. 210–16. EBSCOhost, widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=104581989&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.

APA

Gonzalez MA, Marzouq RA, Nasir S, Hazarika S, Burris MB, Saunders C, Porterfield CP, Eilen DJ, Gonzalez Kde J, Patel AA, Prieto-Gonzalez M, Graham T 3rd, Awadallah S, Rose JD, Cascio WE, & Multidisciplinary Atherosclerosis Prevention Program (MAPP). (2011). Reliability using the universal classification of acute myocardial infarction compared to ST-segment classification. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, 12(4), 210–216.

Chicago

Gonzalez MA, Marzouq RA, Nasir S, Hazarika S, Burris MB, Saunders C, Porterfield CP, et al. 2011. “Reliability Using the Universal Classification of Acute Myocardial Infarction Compared to ST-Segment Classification.” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 12 (4): 210–16. http://widgets.ebscohost.com/prod/customlink/proxify/proxify.php?count=1&encode=0&proxy=&find_1=&replace_1=&target=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&site=eds-live&scope=site&db=asx&AN=104581989&authtype=sso&custid=ns315887.