Back to Search
Start Over
Setting benchmark revision rates for total hip replacement: analysis of registry evidence.
- Source :
-
BMJ: British Medical Journal . 3/14/2015, Vol. 350 Issue 7999, ph756-h756. 1p. 1 Chart. - Publication Year :
- 2015
-
Abstract
- STUDY QUESTION: Is the 2000 benchmark for revision rates for both total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty in England and Wales of 10% at 10 years optimal? SUMMARY ANSWER: The revision rate benchmark should be at least halved from 10% at 10 years to 5% at 10 years. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Revision rates vary between different types of total hip replacement device. Data up to 2012 showed that 10 year revision rates were less than 5% for five frequently used categories of device, and revision rates were higher for men than for women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 17561833
- Volume :
- 350
- Issue :
- 7999
- Database :
- Academic Search Index
- Journal :
- BMJ: British Medical Journal
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 101811867
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h756