Back to Search Start Over

Setting benchmark revision rates for total hip replacement: analysis of registry evidence.

Authors :
Kandala, Ngianga-Bakwin
Connock, Martin
Pulikottil-Jacob, Ruth
Sutcliffe, Paul
Crowther, Michael J.
Grove, Amy
Mistry, Hema
Clarke, Aileen
Source :
BMJ: British Medical Journal. 3/14/2015, Vol. 350 Issue 7999, ph756-h756. 1p. 1 Chart.
Publication Year :
2015

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Is the 2000 benchmark for revision rates for both total hip replacement and resurfacing arthroplasty in England and Wales of 10% at 10 years optimal? SUMMARY ANSWER: The revision rate benchmark should be at least halved from 10% at 10 years to 5% at 10 years. WHAT IS KNOWN AND WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Revision rates vary between different types of total hip replacement device. Data up to 2012 showed that 10 year revision rates were less than 5% for five frequently used categories of device, and revision rates were higher for men than for women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
17561833
Volume :
350
Issue :
7999
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BMJ: British Medical Journal
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
101811867
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h756