Back to Search Start Over

Examining the feasibility of an economic analysis of dyadic developmental psychotherapy for children with maltreatment associated psychiatric problems in the United Kingdom.

Authors :
Boyer, Nicole R. S.
Boyd, Kathleen A.
Turner-Halliday, Fiona
Watson, Nicholas
Minnis, Helen
Source :
BMC Psychiatry. 2014, Vol. 14 Issue 1, p1-23. 23p.
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Background Children with maltreatment associated psychiatric problems are at increased risk of developing behavioural or mental health disorders. Dyadic Developmental Psychotherapy (DDP) was proposed as treatment for children with maltreatment histories in the USA, however, being new to the UK little is known of its effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. As part of an exploratory study, this paper explores the feasibility of undertaking economic analysis of DDP in the UK. Methods Feasibility for economic analysis was determined by ensuring such analysis could meet key criteria for economic evaluation. Phone interviews were conducted with National Health Service staff and social service therapists trained and accredited or in the process of becoming accredited DDP practitioners. Three models were developed to represent alternative methods of DDP service delivery. Once appropriate comparators were determined, economic scenarios were constructed. Cost analyses were undertaken from a societal perspective. Finally, appropriate outcome measurement was explored through clinical opinion, literature and further discussions with clinical experts. Results Three DDP models were constructed: DDP Full-Basic, DDP Home-Based and DDP Long- Term. Two potential comparator interventions were identified and defined as Consultation with Carers and Individual Psychotherapy. Costs of intervention completion per case were estimated to be: £6,700 (DDP Full-Basic), £7,100 (Consultations with Carers), £7,200 (DDP Home-Based), £11,400 (Individual Psychotherapy) and £14,500 (DDP Long-Term). None of the models of service delivery were found to currently measure effectiveness consistently. The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was deemed an appropriate primary outcome measure, however, it does not cover all disorders DDP intends to treat and the SDQ is not a direct measure of health gain. Inclusion of quality of life measurement is required for comprehensive economic analysis. Conclusions Economic analysis of DDP in the UK is feasible if vital next steps are taken to measure intervention outcomes consistently, ideally with a quality of life measurement. An economic analysis using the models constructed could determine the potential cost-effectiveness of DDP in the UK and identify the most efficient mode of service delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1471244X
Volume :
14
Issue :
1
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
BMC Psychiatry
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
100326076
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-014-0346-0