Search

The article reports that the British National Curriculum assessments were introduced following the introduction of a National Curriculum to schools in England and Wales under the Education Reform Act 1988. Governments of all persuasions have seen them as an essential tool for raising standards and holding schools, in particular primary schools, accountable. It mentions that teacher unions which represented majority of primary school teachers wanting them replaced by teacher assessment alone.

The article provides information on the criticisms and concerns raised by education professionals regarding SATs exams. Dr. Mary Bousted highlighted the demotivating and stressful nature of SATs for both students and staff, with subjects outside of English and Maths being squeezed from timetables.

The article offers the author's insights on the negative impact of external testing on school children. Topics include the introduction of key stage 2 mathematics and English examinations known as Satandard Assessment Tasks (Sats in primary schools, the anxiety on children and teachers brought by these tests, and the Year 1 phonics screening tests.

The article provides information on methods to access the pupils' writing by primary schools' teachers on the bases of Sats, standardized test used for college admissions. Topics discussed aspects of moderation of writing, analysis of Teaching resources (Tes) investigation on moderators who are trained to inspect teacher assessments of pupils' writing for local authorities, and views of Michael Tidd, deputy head of Edgewood Primary school, on the same.

The article discusses comments of General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) on use of Scholastic Assessment Tests (SATs) and General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) by Ofsted. The government confirmed that Ofsted would use results from SATs and GCSEs to judge the impact of school curriculums. ASCL's Geoff Barton argued that the impact of pandemic would affect the results and would make no sense.

The article informs that according to a survey by NAHT, school leaders warn that 2022 standard assessment tests (SATs) results will be useless. It mentions primary schools had experienced severe disruption due to COVID-19 in 2022, just as much as in 2020 and 2021, and the disruption had not been felt evenly, as some schools had been harder hit by staff and pupil absences than others, which meant that children had experienced very different teaching and learning.

The article offers information on effectiveness of test optional policies for universities enrolling for standardized testing. Topics discussed include information on decline in underrepresented minority students enrollment; impact on impact student diversity from test optional policies; and underscore of college entrance exams like the Standard Assessment Tasks by minority students.

The article explores the growth mindset theory and whether it is something that is unworkable in schools. Topics discussed include result of a study on the impact of the concept on the SATS scores of 10- and 11-year-olds, warning of Carol Dweck, the Stanford University psychologist who developed the concept, on the misconceptions that have sprung up around her work, and things to note about the evaluation, carried out by the National Institute of Economic and Social Research.

The article looks at a study by UCL Institute of Education which found fear of poor Standard Assessment Tests (SATs) results is driving headteachers to separate pupils by ability despite the impact on children's self-esteem and confidence. It mentions separating children in relation to SATs, included dividing by ability into sets, and in some schools, pupils were moved from their normal class to different rooms/teachers. It also mentions strong desire for change following the COVID-19 crisis.

The article offers information on the Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs) Club in Great Britain. Topics discussed include involvement of several Year 6 teachers with the administration of Sats; explanation of the grammatical terminology at Sats; and administration and display of several tests at Sats.

The article presents information on primary assessment in Great Britain. Topics discussed include why schools want more change for 2017 after so much upheaval in 2016, changes that were made to education, success of the changes to the writing test, results of the Sats week showing that 61 per cent of pupils had achieved the expected standard in reading, writing and maths.

The article discusses the British government's proposal to administer key stage 1 statutory assessment tests (Sats) to Year 2 children in infant, or first, schools, despite a decision to scrap testing of primary school students. According to the article, school heads have warned that the move could lead to a further decline in schools specializing in under-7 education in the country. Comments from school leaders are included.

The article offers educational news briefs. People request the government to include British sign language as an academic qualification General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) in the curriculum. Worried teachers discloses the effects of austerity on the students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Sats maths test to be tougher than expected for the applicants.

The article reports on the use of the Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs) to deny the increase of pay for teachers in Great Britain. Topics include the allegation of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) against contempt treatment in teachers through unreliable discredited test, the concern of Department for Education (DfE) and Office for Standards in Education (Ofsted) over the Sats results, and the statement of Ian Murch of NUT on the cases of denial of pay progression in 2016.

The article presents ways in which teachers in Great Britain can reduce students' anxiety for the Year 6 Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats), the tests that ranks schools against each other. It talks about the opposition to tougher Sats introduced in 2014 including the reading and writing test issues and the teaching union's concerns on student's wellbeing and teacher workload. It informs about the stringent rules including the instructions, reporting arrangements, and posting off the papers.

The article discusses the concerns surrounding Great Britain's Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats), the tests meant for evaluating a school's performance. It talks about the pressure on children to perform well, the National Education Union conference members' vote for a ballot to boycott the tests, and the government's proposition to remove Sats as a cause for intervention. It states that Sats are formal tests as it involves complex procedures and rules for the students and the administration.

In this article, the author focuses on educational policy of the Great Britain regarding Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs). Topics discussed include need of students for different styles of learning such as Houdini-style; teaching of modem languages as an academic subject; and misuse of personal pronouns and editing of prepositions in English language.

The article reports on the demand for reforms of the Association of School and College Leaders (ASCL) to the system for judging primary schools in England to make it fairer on schools and better for children. The move is driven by concerns about the negative impact on schools and children of the intense focus placed on Key Stage 2 Standard Assessments Tasks (SATs) results. One of the proposals is the need for the government to work with others to develop clear aims for primary education.

The author reflects on the positive effect of the philosophy of Slow Education on primary school pupils in England. She shares her observation on the educational experiment at the St. Silas' Church of England Primary School, noting that Slow Education is fostering independent learners. She examines the connection between the educational philosophy and the improving Standard Assessment Tasks scores of the pupils. Views of traditionalist on the teaching style are also discussed.

The article reports on the publication and implementation of the new national curriculum assessment in England implemented in 2016. Topics include the calls of the House of Commons Education Committee to the government on its role for the communication of the changes in the assessment, the roles of the Standards and Testing Agency (STA) for the root and branch review, and the disappointment of the government on the failure of the committee to recognize the quality nature of the assessment.

The article discusses the reliability of Standard Assessment Tasks statutory evaluation in primary schools in England when carried out by group activities.

The article discusses how Sats tests for six- and seven-year-olds in Great Britain will be made non-statutory from 2023 and how there will still be a teacher-mediated assessment in Reception.

The article details the views of various executives in the education sector in Great Britain on the improvement in the results of the 2017 national curriculum assessments (SATs). Association of Teachers and Lecturers' general secretary (GS) Mary Bousted talked about the negative effect of SATs on children's education. National Union of Teachers' GS Kevin Courtney commented on the percentage of 11-year-old students who had not reached the expected standard in reading, writing, and mathematics.

Statistics are given regarding the results of the standard assessment tasks (Sats), which includes the proportion of Year 6 students who reached the expected standard in reading, writing and maths.

The article reports that Great Britain's Department of Education has urged parents, who tweet questions from Standard Assessment Tasks (SATs) tests in primary schools in England, to remove any information related to the SATs papers as it give advantage to pupils in the upcoming tests.

The article presents abstracts of British government documents on topics including the impact of learning below level 2 on further education (FE) success, the financial governance of academy trusts, and provisional information on 2013 key stage 2 national curriculum tests.

In this article, the author discusses specifications for the Standard Assessment Tasks of Great Britain; and mentions role of science as an essential part of primary learning and need to get children involved in practical science.

Several letters to the editor are presented in response to articles in previous issues including "Sound phonics strategies for secondary schools," "No more heroes: heads told to pave way for new blood," and one on Standard Assessment Tasks in Great Britain resits in Year 7 in June 10, 2016 issue.

The article presents the views of the author on Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats) and education policy in secondary education in the Great Britain. Topics discussed include change that have incurred in education policy of the country to be started in December 2017; multiplication test in primary and summer schools while transition; and ranking of secondary schools on the basis of number of students passed.

The article offers information on topics related to primary education in Great Britain such as the study on the lack of language and social skills of four and five year old children when beginning school, the writing levels by five years old deaf children, and the Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats).

The article offers the author's insights on policy and education on Great Britain. Topics discussed include the impact of the Year 2 Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats) tests on schools and students, the role of the National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) to address concern about the tests, and educating children with a combination of literacy and numeracy.

The article reports on schools in England's North East area. It mentions their exceedance of other educational institutions on General Certificate of Secondary Education (GCSE) and SATS (Standard Assessment Tests). It also notes that the analysis from consultancy firm Education Datalab indicates their significant performance.

The article reports on the reminder of the Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) to its inspectors on areas affected by the 2010 key stage 2 Sats boycott. Topics include the challenges that inspectors may face including the difficulty in tracking the students progress entering the 7th grade where tracking the students progress will be based on the previous assessment results. Data showing the number of students affected by the boycott and schools boycotted in 2010 are also presented.

The article discusses the educational argument on the shortcomings of the Standard Assessment Tasks (Sats) in Great Britain amid the changes in the culture of gaming around the tests since its inception in late 1980s.

A correction to the article "Harvard Under Fire," published in the November 29, 2014 issue, is presented.

The article presents information taken from a British Department for Education (DfE) report based on a phonics screening test and national curriculum assessments at key stage one in England. According to the report, white working class boys and special education needs (SEN) students experienced the most difficulties with phonics. Also covered are gender differences in achievement levels and the attainment gaps.

The article comments on the struggle of many school children in Great Britain in the key subjects of reading, writing and maths (3Rs) based on the results of the 2011 National Curriculum Assessments at Key age 1 in England. Schools Minister Nick Gibb agreed with the results and stressed the importance of an understanding of the 3Rs to attaining success in later life. The UK Literacy Association was skeptical of the tests conducted by the Department of Education.