Search

Your search keyword '"~|Dept of Agriculture ' showing total 138,178 results
Start Over Author "~|Dept of Agriculture

Refine your results

more »

more »

more »

more »

more »

more »

more »

more »
138,178 results on '"~|Dept of Agriculture '

1. Phase 2 Seattle Dietary Biomarkers Development Center (P2-SDBDC)

Author

United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA), University of Nebraska, University of Washington, Duke University, and Marian Neuhouser, Professor, Cancer Prevention Program Head

Published
2025

6. Cottonseed Oil Versus Matched PUFA Effects

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and Jamie Cooper, PhD, Professor, Department Head of Kinesiology, Director of UGA Obesity Initiative

Published
2024

9. Southern California Nutrition Incentive Program (SCNIP)

Author

The California Endowment, The Ecology Center, Center for Good Food Purchasing, Northgate Gonzalez Markets, Latino Health Access, California Department of Health Services, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), and Kay Rhee, Associate Professor of Pediatrics

Published
2024

11. Health Without Barriers/Salud Sin Barreras

Author

Colorado State University Extension-La Plata County, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), University of Colorado, Denver, and Colorado Health Foundation

Published
2024

13. Phase 1 Seattle Dietary Biomarkers Development Center (P1-SDBDC)

Author

United States Department of Agriculture - National Institute of Food and Agriculture (USDA-NIFA), University of Nebraska, University of Washington, Duke University, and Marian Neuhouser, Professor, Cancer Prevention Program Head

Published
2024

21. THIS-WIC Telehealth Solutions: Evaluation With North Carolina WIC Clients

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services, RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

22. Evaluating Telehealth Solutions in WIC: Wisconsin WIC Clients

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Wisconsin Department of Health and Family Services, RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

23. South Carolina WIC Telehealth Solution

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

24. Telehealth Intervention Strategies for WIC (THIS-WIC)- Michigan

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), State of Michigan WIC Program, RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

25. THIS-WIC Vermont Breastfeeding Education Application Feasibility Study

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Vermont WIC, RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

26. Georgia: Technology and WIC - A Comprehensive Approach to Public Health

Author

United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Georgia Department of Public Health, Division of Health Promotion, RTI International, and Erin Hennessy, Assistant Professor, Division of Nutrition Interventions, Communication and Behavior Change Director ad interim, ChildObesity180 Friedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy

Published
2024

42. Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education through the Land-Grant University System. SNAP-Ed FY2019: A Retrospective Review of Land-Grant University SNAP-Ed Programs and Impacts

Author

US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), Yetter, Dylan, and Tripp, Simon

Abstract

The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) is a signature federal program that in FY2019 provided financial assistance to 35 million low-income Americans. SNAP is a focused program that increases food access, reduces hunger, and improves the nutrition and health of low-income American families. It is in the interest of the nation and individuals that SNAP recipients be equipped with evidence-based information to guide the selection of healthy food purchases with their SNAP benefits and to engage in food preparation practices and behaviors that lead to improved health and quality of life outcomes. The provision of this information is accomplished through a formal SNAP-Education (SNAP-Ed) program. The United States' unique system of land-grant universities plays a central role in the delivery of SNAP-Ed across the nation. Land-grant universities (LGUs) are the home to Cooperative Extension, a long-standing outreach system that delivers educational content and best-practice knowledge to individuals and families at a local level. The report are the results of a detailed survey administered to the LGUs engaged in SNAP-Ed. The Community Nutrition Education (CNE) Logic Model was used as the foundation for collecting data for this report, similar to the previous reports generated for the LGU System. The goal of the FY2019 report is to provide a national "snapshot" of SNAP-Ed programs implemented through the LGU system. [The report was prepared by TEConomy Partners, LLC. It was prepared at the request of Cooperative Extension Service Directors/Administrators through the National Land-Grant University SNAP-Ed Assessment. Cover title varies: "SNAP-Ed FY2019: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education through the Land-Grant University System. A Retrospective Review of Land-Grant University SNAP-Ed Programs and Impacts."]

Published
2020

44. Reducing Food Insecurity During COVID-19

Author

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Krupp Family Foundation, and Waldron Charitable Fund

Published
2023

46. Mitigating the Health Effects of Desert Dust Storms Using Exposure-Reduction Approaches (MEDEA)

Author

University of Crete, Soroka University Medical Center, Cyprus University of Technology, Department of Labor Inspection, Ministry of Labor, Welfare and Social Insurance, Cyprus, Department of Meteorology, Ministry of Agriculture, Rural Development and Environment, Cyprus, Cyprus Broadcasting Corporation, E.n.A Consulting LP, and Panayiotis Yiallouros, Professor

Published
2023

47. A Fundamental Asymmetry in Human Memory: Old [not equal to] Not-New and New [not equal to] Not-Old

Author

US Department of Agriculture (USDA), Brainerd, C. J., Bialer, D. M., Chang, M., and Upadhyay, P.

Abstract

In recognition memory, anything that is objectively new is necessarily not-old, and anything that is objectively old is necessarily not-new. Therefore, judging whether a test item is new is logically equivalent to judging whether it is old, and conversely. Nevertheless, a series of 10 experiments showed that old? and new? judgments did not produce equivalent recognition accuracy. In Experiments 1-4, wherein subjects made old? or new? judgments about test items, new? judgments yielded more accurate performance for old items than old? judgments did, and old? judgments yielded more accurate performance for new items than new? judgments did. This same violation of logical equivalence was observed in Experiments 5-10, wherein subjects made similar? judgments as well as old? and new? ones. In short, old? and new? judgments displayed consistent Judgment × Item crossovers, rather than equivalence. Response latencies were used to test the hypothesis that Judgment × Item crossovers were due to certain judgment-item combinations provoking more deliberate, thorough retrieval than other combinations. There was no support for that hypothesis, but the data were consistent with an earlier theory, which posits that latency depends on the extent to which judgments or items slant retrieval toward accessing verbatim traces.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results