Search

Background: To investigate the relationship between anxiety and white coat hypertension (WCH) using the hospital anxiety and depression scale-anxiety (HADS-A) score. Methods: Participants lacking a pre-existing diagnosis of hypertension but displaying increased office blood pressure were included in this study. Subsequently, they were classified as either newly diagnosed sustained hypertension (SustHT) or white coat hypertension (WCH) patients, as determined by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring measurements. The assessment of their anxiety levels was conducted using the HADS-A questionnaire. We performed regression, comparative, and sensitivity analyses to elucidate the association between anxiety and WCH. Results: In this cohort of 303 consecutive individuals (mean age 54 years, 46% female), 81 (26.7%) patients were diagnosed with WCH. Those with WCH were younger (49 vs. 56 years, P < .001), had higher heart rate (85 vs. 76 bpm, P < .001) and exhibited a female predominance (56% vs. 43%, P = .049) compared to individuals with SustHT. The HADS-A was higher in WCH than in SustHT (9.0 ± 2.9 vs. 6.6 ± 2.6, P < .001). Furthermore, HADS-A showed positive correlation with systolic and diastolic pressures measured in the outpatient clinic (r=0.523 and r=0.387, respectively; P < .001 for both). The full model with HADS-A had better discriminatory power (Harrell's c-index 0.82 vs. 0.77, P = .0025), increased calibration, and a greater net benefit than the base model without. The ROC curve analysis, using a cut-off of >6 for HADS-A, demonstrated a sensitivity of 76.5% and specificity of 53.6% in detecting WCH (Area Under the Curve=0.72, P < .001). Conclusions: Our study revealed that individuals with WCH, in comparison to those with SustHT, exhibit a higher level of anxiety as indicated by HADS-A. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Egyptian Heart Journal is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Hypertension is a leading cause of premature mortality and morbidity. Recent guidelines advocate for out-of-office blood pressure monitoring, including ambulatory and home BP monitoring, to better identify hypertension phenotypes like masked hypertension, white coat hypertension, and sustained hypertension. However, clinical inertia persists due to a lack of robust evidence on the effectiveness of screening these phenotypes and their association with cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the relationship between various hypertension phenotypes and future cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality to support the broader implementation of out-of-office BP monitoring. Main body Following PRISMA, Cochrane, and MOOSE guidelines, we conducted a comprehensive search in Pubmed, OvidSP, and Cochrane Central databases up to October 17, 2023. Eligible studies reported associations between hypertension phenotypes and cardiovascular or all-cause mortality, with normotension as the reference group. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models. Eight studies with 15,327 participants were included. Masked hypertension was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (pooled HR 2.05, 95% CI 1.69–2.48). Sustained hypertension also showed a higher risk (pooled HR 2.42, 95% CI 2.12–2.76). WCH did not significantly increase cardiovascular mortality risk (pooled HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.98–1.42). For all-cause mortality, neither masked hypertension (pooled HR 2.10, 95% CI 0.91–4.88) nor white coat hypertension (pooled HR 1.96, 95% CI 0.71–5.42) showed significant increases. Conclusion Masked hypertension and sustained hypertension are linked to higher cardiovascular mortality compared to normotension, highlighting the importance of out-of-office BP monitoring to identify and manage high-risk phenotypes effectively. Further high-quality studies are needed to generalize these findings and support policy changes.

Purpose of Review: This review aims to inform the reader of the complexity of blood pressure responses when comparing blood pressure measured in the medical environment to that outside the medical environment. In addition, we summarize what is known about current predictors of white coat hypertension, reevaluate the relationship of white coat hypertension to cardiovascular outcomes, and provide some clinical guidance on management. Recent Findings: Differences in outcomes exist when white coat effect occurs in unmedicated people versus the white coat effects in those on antihypertensive therapy. Summary: White coat hypertension is relatively common, carries a small but definite increase in cardiovascular risk, and is prone to conversion to sustained hypertension. Future research will hopefully tease out the roles of ancillary findings that characterize a white coat hypertensive (like modest elevations in creatinine, glucose and triglycerides) in the elevated cardiovascular risk, and test the effectiveness of mitigation strategies in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is considered the gold standard for proper diagnosis of hypertension. Yet, access to ABPM in the U.S. is limited, and the extent of coverage by commercial health plans remains uncertain, potentially limiting access to ABPM among commercially insured patients. Objective: This study aims to assess the net cost impact of using ABPM in comparison to clinical blood pressure monitoring (CBPM) in the U.S. over a 5-year time period. Design methods: Using a Markov Model, we estimate the 5-year cumulative cost impact of using ABPM to confirm a prior diagnosis of primary hypertension using CBPM to avoid treatment for white-coat hypertension (WCH) in a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients from a U.S. healthcare system perspective. The probability and cost inputs for the model were derived from available literature. Base-case model parameters were varied to account for different scenarios. Results: Base-case results indicate using ABPM instead of CBPM over 5 years saves a total of $348,028, reflecting an average per-person-per-year (PPPY) cost saving of $70. In sensitivity analyses, almost all cases reveal ABPM as a cost-saving approach compared to CBPM, with cost savings reaching up to $228 PPPY in the highest hypertension treatment cost model. Regression results reveal that ABPM was cost-saving compared to CBPM if ABPM annual payment rates are $100 or less and annual hypertension treatment costs are ⩾$300. Conclusion: The potential cost-savings of using ABPM instead of CBPM found in our simulation model underscores the need for confirmatory research using real-world data to support increased use of ABPM as the standard diagnostic approach for hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is a prevalent complication of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining ABPM and to identify barriers to ABPM in this pediatric patient population. METHOD: In this retrospective analysis of patients with CKD stage 3-5 who were seen in one academic medical centers outpatient Pediatric Nephrology clinics between 2018 and 2021, we performed logistic regression to evaluate for associations between demographic factors and odds of having an ABPM. RESULT: Among 96 patients included in the study, 48 patients carried a diagnosis of hypertension. 31 patients had ABPM performed with usable data. In those who had ABPM done, 21 had normotension and 10 had undertreated hypertension. Our study also showed 1 had masked hypertension and 5 had white coat hypertension or effect. We did not find a statistically significant difference in those who did or did not undergo ABPM evaluation based on gender, previous diagnosis of hypertension, distance from clinic, language preference, or racial or ethnic identity. CONCLUSION: ABPM is a useful tool in our CKD population for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We did not identify specific barriers to ABPM in our CKD population, and there were no differences in patients who obtained ABPM when looking at specific demographic and disease characteristics. Given these findings, we recommend focusing on areas of future improvement in spheres of patient and provider education as well as better quantification using surveys to further illuminate barriers.

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of white coat hypertension (WCH) compared to home-based blood pressure (BP) measurements and assess anxiety levels among individuals with WCH using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. An observational cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2021 to April 2022 on individuals visiting the Outpatient Departments (OPDs) of Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar. In-hospital and home BP recordings were performed, and anxiety levels were assessed using the Beck Anxiety Inventory. A sample size of 213 normotensive individuals was selected using a non-probability convenience sampling technique. Data were collected using structured questionnaires, analyzed using IBM SPSS version 26 and MS Excel 2019, and presented in tables and charts. Among the 213 respondents aged 14-67 years, comprising 164 (77%) males and 49 (23%) females, 22 (10.3%) exhibited BP readings above 140/90 in the OPD, indicative of WCH, while registering normal readings below 140/90 at home. The Beck anxiety index scores of these 22 individuals revealed varying degrees of anxiety, with 2 (9.1%) classified as Minimal, 6 (27.3%) as mild, 12 (54.5%) as Moderate, and 2 (9.1%) as severe anxiety. The prevalence of WCH underscores its clinical significance in predicting prehypertension, cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), and target organ damage. However, the propensity for labile BP in clinical environments may lead to misinterpretation, prompting unnecessary pharmacological interventions and exacerbating physical, mental, and financial distress for patients. Thus, widespread education on WCH among healthcare professionals and the public is crucial. Additionally, home-based BP measurements and ambulatory BP monitoring are advocated as preferred alternatives to mitigate the potential risks associated with WCH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Paediatrics & Family Medicine / Pediatria i Medycyna Rodzinna is the property of Medical Communications Sp. z o.o. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Arterial stiffness represents an independent predictor of the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. Early identification of high-risk individuals is necessary for effective prevention and targeted interventions. Carotid wall echo-tracking is a modern method for an accurate evaluation of the structural and functional properties of carotid arteries. This study aimed to assess age and sex-specific reference values of the echo-tracking parameters of carotid stiffness in 400 healthy children and adolescents and to evaluate the potential early effect of elevated blood pressure and overweight in 69 overweight normotensives, 45 white coat hypertensives, and 44 essential hypertensives. Stiffness index β, pressure–strain elastic modulus (Ep), arterial compliance (AC), and pulse wave velocity β (PWV β) were evaluated using Aloka ProSound F75. Both white coat and essential hypertension were associated with impaired carotid wall properties with the greatest effect on Ep, followed by PWV β, index β, and AC. The excess weight showed a weaker effect on Ep and PWV β. This is the first study to compare the effects of white coat and essential hypertension on carotid arterial stiffness assessed using the echo-tracking technique in childhood and adolescence with direct application of pediatric reference values specific to age and sex. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Hypertension is a prevalent complication of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining ABPM and to identify barriers to ABPM in this pediatric patient population. Method In this retrospective analysis of patients with CKD stage 3–5 who were seen in one academic medical center’s outpatient Pediatric Nephrology clinics between 2018 and 2021, we performed logistic regression to evaluate for associations between demographic factors and odds of having an ABPM. Result Among 96 patients included in the study, 48 patients carried a diagnosis of hypertension. 31 patients had ABPM performed with usable data. In those who had ABPM done, 21 had normotension and 10 had undertreated hypertension. Our study also showed 1 had masked hypertension and 5 had white coat hypertension or effect. We did not find a statistically significant difference in those who did or did not undergo ABPM evaluation based on gender, previous diagnosis of hypertension, distance from clinic, language preference, or racial or ethnic identity. Conclusion ABPM is a useful tool in our CKD population for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We did not identify specific barriers to ABPM in our CKD population, and there were no differences in patients who obtained ABPM when looking at specific demographic and disease characteristics. Given these findings, we recommend focusing on areas of future improvement in spheres of patient and provider education as well as better quantification using surveys to further illuminate barriers.

Background: The main benefit of home-based blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) is the potential approach to reduce the risk of white-coat hypertension (HTN) and to encourage patients to take ownership of their condition. This study was conducted to assess the role of HBPM in treatment follow-up in a cohort of hypertensive patients. Materials and methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted from December 2017 to May 2018. A total of 100 patients fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were selected by purposive sampling from Medicine Outdoor of Dhaka Medical College Hospital (DMCH). In total, 100 hypertensive patients were enrolled, and informed consent was obtained. Subsequently, the study subjects received information and training on BP self-management and performed 2 resting measurements per day for 4 days per week for 3 months. All measurements were performed using validated BP monitors. The study endpoints included patient awareness, attainment of BP goals, adherence to antihypertensive treatment, lifestyle modification, assessment of discrepancy between office and HBPM, and white coat HTN or masked HTN at 3 months. SPSS version 22.0 was used for data analysis and reporting. Results: Overall, the mean age was 57.76 ±12.60 years with a range of 34 - 80 years. Males were more prevalent than females, and the ratio was 1.17:1. The majority of cases (76.0%) had established HTN with a history of taking medication, whereas others were non-compliant with medications. Among them 47% had obesity, and 24% had diabetes mellitus. Of the patients, 91% adherence to HBP monitoring, 84.0% adherence to medication, and 75.0% achieved their target BP. The achievement of target blood pressure was significantly higher among the study subjects who adhered to HBP monitoring, and the p-value was < 0.04 (Fisher's Exact test). Conclusion: In a cohort of patients with arterial hypertension, information, and training on BP selfmeasurement and direct involvement of patients using HBPM led to improvement in BP control and could be an effective method by incorporating it into the usual care of hypertensive patients in the hypertension management center of the community. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of telemedicine in blood pressure (BP) management when compared to conventional care. We initiated a hypertension telehealth clinic in our urban primary care clinic and through this study aim to evaluate the strengths and limitations of telemedicine in hypertension (HTN) control. The primary outcome of the study is to identify the proportion of patients with improved HTN. Secondary outcomes included identifying: predictors for lower BP, predictors of missing telehealth appointments, and comorbid conditions that are more likely to necessitate use of more than 1 antihypertensive medication. Methods and Analysis: Patients seen in the HTN telehealth clinic from May 1st, 2022 to October 31st, 2022 were identified. A retrospective chart review was done to compare the BP during in-person visit prior to first telehealth visit, telehealth visit home BP readings and last recorded in-office BP on chart at end of study period. Descriptive statistical analysis, Chi Square test, and multivariable logistic regression was used to analyze data. Results: Of the 234 appointments, 83% were conducted and 154 patients were seen. A remarkable decrease in percentage of patients with BP >140/90 was seen when comparing in-office visit BP to first telehealth visit home BP, 72% versus 45% respectively. No remarkable difference was noted in percentage of patients with BP >140/90 when comparing first telehealth visit home BP to last in-office BP recorded on chart, 45% and 41% respectively. Patients with diabetes had lower odds of missing appointments, adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.34 ([0.12-0.91], P =.03). Patients with partners were more likely to have lower BP at the telehealth visit, aOR:3.2 ([1.15-9.86], P =.03) while patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (aOR 0.27 ([0.08-0.77], P =.02) and CAD, aOR 0.24 ([0.06-0.8], P =.03) were less likely to have lower BP. Conclusion: The study demonstrated telemedicine as a great tool to prevent overtreatment of hypertension as significant difference between in-office BP and home BP during telehealth visits was noted. We did not see a significant change in blood pressure when comparing home BP at first telehealth visit to the last in-person clinic BP at end of study period. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Hypertension is a prevalent complication of Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) and Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosis. The aim of our study was to assess the usefulness of obtaining ABPM and to identify barriers to ABPM in this pediatric patient population. Method: In this retrospective analysis of patients with CKD stage 3–5 who were seen in one academic medical center's outpatient Pediatric Nephrology clinics between 2018 and 2021, we performed logistic regression to evaluate for associations between demographic factors and odds of having an ABPM. Result: Among 96 patients included in the study, 48 patients carried a diagnosis of hypertension. 31 patients had ABPM performed with usable data. In those who had ABPM done, 21 had normotension and 10 had undertreated hypertension. Our study also showed 1 had masked hypertension and 5 had white coat hypertension or effect. We did not find a statistically significant difference in those who did or did not undergo ABPM evaluation based on gender, previous diagnosis of hypertension, distance from clinic, language preference, or racial or ethnic identity. Conclusion: ABPM is a useful tool in our CKD population for the diagnosis and management of hypertension. We did not identify specific barriers to ABPM in our CKD population, and there were no differences in patients who obtained ABPM when looking at specific demographic and disease characteristics. Given these findings, we recommend focusing on areas of future improvement in spheres of patient and provider education as well as better quantification using surveys to further illuminate barriers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hypertension is an important morbidity factor. The prognostic consequences of the white-coat effect have been studied extensively. The repercussion on the circadian rhythm of urinary water and salt excretion in the same subgroup remain, conversely, among the open topics. Postulating an impaired diurnal sodium and volume excretion we decided to investigate both, in subjects with or without a white-coat effect, in the general population. A sample of 1023 subjects, has been considered. We collected 24-h urine samples, divided in day and night, and we measured the blood pressure with an Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM). ABPM values were then compared with physician collected in-office values to assign subjects to the group with or without the white-coat effect. Concerning the circadian pattern of urinary sodium excretion, we found no significant differences between the groups. There was instead in the white-coat effect group a higher night/day ratio of urinary water excretion. The white-coat effect, has been considered a potential hypertension precursor, and its consequent handling could be prospectively relevant in hypertension prevention. The absence of repercussions on the urinary circadian sodium excretion pattern and on the potentially related risk factors in subjects with a white coat effect is reassuring. The clinical significance of the impact on the night/day ratio of water excretion needs to be further investigated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The prevalence of obesity-related co-morbidities is rising parallel to the childhood obesity epidemic. High blood pressure (BP), as one of these co-morbidities, is detected nowadays at increasingly younger ages. The diagnosis of elevated BP and hypertension, especially in the childhood population, presents a challenge to clinicians. The added value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in relation to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in obese children is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown how many overweight and obese children have an abnormal ABPM pattern. In this study we evaluated ABPM patterns in a population of overweight and obese children and adolescents, and compared these patterns with regular OBP measurements. Methods In this cross-sectional study in overweight or obese children and adolescents aged 4–17 years who were referred to secondary pediatric obesity care in a large general hospital in The Netherlands, OBP was measured during a regular outpatient clinic visit. Additionally, all participants underwent a 24-hour ABPM on a regular week-day. Outcome measures were OBP, mean ambulatory SBP and DBP, BP load (percentage of readings above the ambulatory 95th blood pressure percentiles), ambulatory BP pattern (normal BP, white-coat hypertension, elevated BP, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension), and BP dipping. Results We included 82 children aged 4–17 years. They had a mean BMI Z-score of 3.3 (standard deviation 0.6). Using ABPM, 54.9% of the children were normotensive (95% confidence interval 44.1–65.2), 26.8% had elevated BP, 9.8% ambulatory hypertension, 3.7% masked hypertension, and 4.9% white-coat hypertension. An isolated night-time BP load > 25% was detected in almost a quarter of the children. 40% of the participants lacked physiologic nocturnal systolic BP dipping. In the group of children with normal OBP, 22.2% turned out to have either elevated BP or masked hypertension on ABPM. Conclusions In this study a high prevalence of abnormal ABPM patterns in overweight or obese children and adolescents was detected. Additionally, OBP poorly correlated with the child’s actual ABPM pattern. Herewith, we emphasized the usefulness of ABPM as an important diagnostic tool in this population.

Background: The diagnosis of hypertension and hypertension-induced target organ injury by the 2022 American Heart Association (AHA) ambulatory blood pressure threshold as compared with 2014 AHA and 2016 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) thresholds has not been evaluated. Methods: In a cross-sectional study (n = 291, aged 5–18 years, at a tertiary care outpatient clinic), we compared 2022 AHA with 2014 AHA and ESH thresholds (revised with 2018 adult ESH thresholds where applicable) to diagnose ambulatory hypertension (AH), and detect ambulatory arterial stiffness index (AASI) and left ventricular target organ injury (LVTOI). Results: The 2022 AHA threshold diagnosed significantly more AH (53%) than the 2014 AHA (42%, p < 0.01) and ESH (36%, p < 0.001) thresholds. The 2022 AHA threshold demonstrated only a moderate agreement with the 2014 AHA (kappa (k) = 0.77) and ESH (k = 0.66) thresholds to diagnose AH. Adjusted logistic regression analysis found that only the 2022 AHA threshold predicted elevated AASI significantly (odds ratio 2.40, 95% CI 1.09, 5.25, p = 0.02; AUC 0.61, p < 0.01). In those with elevated AASI, more participants had AH by the 2022 AHA threshold (72%) than the 2014 AHA (46%, p = 0.02) and ESH (48%, p = 0.03) thresholds. AH defined by the 2022 AHA threshold continued to maintain higher odds, larger AUC, and higher sensitivity to identify LVTOI than the 2014 AHA and ESH thresholds; however, the difference did not reach a statistically significant level. Conclusions: AH defined by the 2022 AHA threshold diagnoses more children with hypertension and identifies more children with hypertension-induced target organ injury than the 2014 AHA and ESH thresholds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: White-coat hypertension (WCH) is associated with higher cardiovascular risk and increased all-cause mortality in the general population. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are differences in primary laboratory findings and pulse wave velocity (PWV) between prehypertensive patients with and without WCH. Materials and Methods: This study included healthy 62 patients (37 women, 25 men) with prehypertension without medication based on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring [ABPM]) from one family practice in Health center Zagreb-West. Patients were divided into two groups depending on having WCH (>20 mmHg difference from in office SBP from average ABPM SBP values). Basic laboratory, anthropometric, 24h ambulatory blood pressure, and pulse wave velocity (PWV) measurements were done in all patients. Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis’s test and descriptive statistics were used in data processing in Statistica v.12.0. Results: WCH was found in 11 patients (17,7 %). Prehypertensive patients with WCH had significantly higher fasting glucose (median 5.7 [5.0–5.8] vs 5.3 [5.4–6.1] mmol/L;p < 0.001) and higher PWV (median 8.1 [7.1-8.8] vs. 9.0 [8.3–10.0] m/s; p=0.008). Patients with WCH had higher PWV in all three examined age groups (40–49 years p=0,074; 50-59 years p=0,003; 60-70 years p < 0,001). No differences were found in the concentration of potassium, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, and body mass index (median 25.6kg/m2). Conclusion: This pilot study indicates the possible existence of accelerated atherosclerosis in prehypertensive individuals with WCH. It is necessary to conduct research on a larger sample to confirm these findings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A comprehensive approach to hypertension requires out-of-office determinations by home or ambulatory monitoring. The 4 phenotypes comparing office and out-of-office pressures in treated and untreated patients include normotension, hypertension, white-coat phenomena, and masked phenomena. Components of out-of-office pressure may be equally as important as mean values. Nighttime pressures are normally 10%-20% lower than daytime (normal "dipping") pressures. Abnormalities include dipping more than 20% (extreme dippers), less than 10 % (nondippers), or rising above daytime (risers) and have been associated with elevated cardiovascular risk. Nighttime pressure may be elevated (nocturnal hypertension) in isolation or together with daytime hypertension. Isolated nocturnal hypertension theoretically changes white-coat hypertension to true hypertension and normotension to masked hypertension. Pressure normally peaks in the morning hours ("morning surge") when cardiovascular events are most common. Morning hypertension may result from residual nocturnal hypertension or an exaggerated surge and has been associated with enhanced cardiovascular risk, especially in Asian populations. Randomized trials are needed to determine whether altering therapy based solely on either abnormal dipping, isolated nocturnal hypertension, or an abnormal surge is justified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Systemic arterial hypertension is increasingly recognised and can have serious adverse consequences in cats. Unfortunately, the act of measuring blood pressure itself may cause an increase in blood pressure, known as situational hypertension. It is currently unknown how often this phenomenon occurs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of persistent hypertension and situational hypertension in an elderly population of cats in a first-opinion clinic and to assess which factors were associated with systolic hypertension. Methods: In this prospective study, systolic blood pressure was measured in 185 cats aged ⩾10 years using the Doppler sphygmomanometry method according to the recommendations of the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine consensus statement. Age, sex, body weight, body condition score, position during blood pressure measurement and apparent stress level were assessed. If a systolic blood pressure >160 mmHg was found, measurements were repeated to evaluate if persistent hypertension or situational hypertension was present. The first set of blood pressure measurements were used for all the statistical analyses. Results: The median systolic blood pressure for this population was 140 mmHg. The prevalence of persistent hypertension was at least 14.6% and situational hypertension at least 5.4%. Factors significantly associated with hypertension were age, higher apparent stress levels and a sitting position during measurement. Sex, body weight or body condition score did not significantly influence systolic blood pressure. Conclusions and relevance: Both persistent hypertension and situational hypertension are common in elderly cats. There are no reliable parameters to distinguish between the two, underlining the importance of a standard protocol and repeating measurements during a follow-up visit when hypertension is found. Age, demeanour and body position during blood pressure measurement influenced blood pressure in this population of elderly cats. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The guidelines contain data on modern approaches to blood pressure assessment, the basic rules for its measurement, data interpretation, making conclusion, including with combined evaluation of clinical and ambulatory measurement data. Information on the diagnosis of hypertension, evaluation of the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy using clinical and ambulatory blood pressure measurement, both with their separate and combined use, is reflected. Aspects related to the measurement of blood pressure when standing and the diagnosis of hypotension are briefly covered. The guidelines are intended for primary care physicians (internists, general practitioners, cardiologists, neurologists and other specialists), students of medical universities and postgraduate education institutions.

Background Obtaining 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure ( BP ) is recommended for the detection of masked or white-coat hypertension. Our objective was to determine whether the magnitude of the difference between ambulatory and clinic BP s has prognostic implications. Methods and Results We included 610 participants of the AASK (African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension) Cohort Study who had clinic and ambulatory BPs performed in close proximity in time. We used Cox models to determine the association between the absolute systolic BP ( SBP ) difference between clinic and awake ambulatory BPs (primary predictor) and death and end-stage renal disease. Of 610 AASK Cohort Study participants, 200 (32.8%) died during a median follow-up of 9.9 years; 178 (29.2%) developed end-stage renal disease. There was a U-shaped association between the clinic and ambulatory SBP difference with risk of death, but not end-stage renal disease. A 5- to

Abstract Background The agreement between the commonly used ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) thresholds to diagnose ambulatory hypertension in children (patient’s 24-h mean ABP classified by 24-h 95th ABP percentile threshold, American Heart Association [AHA] threshold, or patient’s day and night mean ABP classified by day-night 95th ABP percentile thresholds) is not known. We evaluated the agreement among 24-h ABP threshold, AHA threshold, and day-night ABP thresholds to diagnose ambulatory hypertension, white coat hypertension (WCH) and masked hypertension (MH). Methods In a cross-sectional study design, we analyzed ABP recordings from 450 participants with suspected hypertension from a tertiary care outpatient hypertension clinic. The American Academy of Pediatrics thresholds were used to diagnose office hypertension. Results The 24-h ABP threshold and day-night ABP thresholds classified 19% ABP (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15–0.23) differently into ambulatory normotension/hypertension (kappa [κ], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.51–0.66). Ambulatory hypertension diagnosed by 24-h ABP threshold in 27% participants (95% CI, 0.22–0.32) was significantly lower than that by day-night ABP thresholds in 44% participants (95% CI, 0.37–0.50; P

Background and objectives: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring has become useful in the diagnosis and management of hypertensive individuals. In this study we tried to know the role of office and ambulatory BP in treated hypertensive patients. Methods and patients: Prospective cohort of 561 treated hypertensive patients were enrolled in the study. Hypertension definitions were according to JNC 8 classification. Office BP and ambulatory BP monitoring was done according to defined protocol. Results: From a subgroup of 158 treated hypertensive patients, 91(16.2%) patients were having white coat hypertension (p value 0.00 by Pearson chi square test). In a subset of 403 patients who were having controlled BP on the day of enrolment as well as on the day of attaching ambulatory BP monitor; 98 (17.4%) patients were having masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUCH). In addition there was very significant percentage of non-dippers and reverse dippers. In our study we found that office BP has a moderate to low specificity and sensitivity and low negative predictive value for overall control in treated hypertensive patients. Conclusion: Ambulatory BP monitoring should be included in the management protocol of treated hypertensive patients, for the optimal BP control.

Seasonal variation of blood pressure (BP) is a topic in cardiology that has gained more attention throughout the years. Although it is extensively documented that BP increases in seasons coupled with lower temperatures, there are still many gaps in this knowledge field that need to be explored. Notably, seasonal variation of BP phenotypes, such as masked and white coat hypertension, and the impact of air pollution, latitude, and altitude on seasonal variation of BP are still poorly described in the literature, and the levels of the existing evidence are low. Therefore, further investigations on these topics are needed to provide robust evidence that can be used in clinical practice.

Background: The prevalence of obesity-related co-morbidities is rising parallel to the childhood obesity epidemic. High blood pressure (BP), as one of these co-morbidities, is detected nowadays at increasingly younger ages. The diagnosis of elevated BP and hypertension, especially in the childhood population, presents a challenge to clinicians. The added value of ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) in relation to office blood pressure (OBP) measurements in obese children is unclear. Furthermore, it is unknown how many overweight and obese children have an abnormal ABPM pattern. In this study we evaluated ABPM patterns in a population of overweight and obese children and adolescents, and compared these patterns with regular OBP measurements. Methods: In this cross-sectional study in overweight or obese children and adolescents aged 4–17 years who were referred to secondary pediatric obesity care in a large general hospital in The Netherlands, OBP was measured during a regular outpatient clinic visit. Additionally, all participants underwent a 24-hour ABPM on a regular week-day. Outcome measures were OBP, mean ambulatory SBP and DBP, BP load (percentage of readings above the ambulatory 95th blood pressure percentiles), ambulatory BP pattern (normal BP, white-coat hypertension, elevated BP, masked hypertension, ambulatory hypertension), and BP dipping. Results: We included 82 children aged 4–17 years. They had a mean BMI Z-score of 3.3 (standard deviation 0.6). Using ABPM, 54.9% of the children were normotensive (95% confidence interval 44.1–65.2), 26.8% had elevated BP, 9.8% ambulatory hypertension, 3.7% masked hypertension, and 4.9% white-coat hypertension. An isolated night-time BP load > 25% was detected in almost a quarter of the children. 40% of the participants lacked physiologic nocturnal systolic BP dipping. In the group of children with normal OBP, 22.2% turned out to have either elevated BP or masked hypertension on ABPM. Conclusions: In this study a high prevalence of abnormal ABPM patterns in overweight or obese children and adolescents was detected. Additionally, OBP poorly correlated with the child's actual ABPM pattern. Herewith, we emphasized the usefulness of ABPM as an important diagnostic tool in this population. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Neck pain is a common musculoskeletal disorder encountered by physiotherapists. However, it may be the early manifestation of more alarming conditions, such as cardiovascular diseases mimicking musculoskeletal pain. Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a congenital heart defect consisting of a small opening between the right and the left atrium. A 56-year-old male presented with neck pain and head heaviness as primary complaints. The cardiovascular profile and the behavioral symptoms led the physiotherapist to find an exaggerated blood pressure response during exercise; in addition to subtle neurological signs, this prompted the physiotherapist to make an urgent referral. At the emergency department a PFO was diagnosed. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this is the first case to describe a rare clinical presentation of a PFO presenting neck pain as primary complaint. This case report emphasizes the importance for physiotherapists to be able to triage patients for conditions outside their scope suggestive of further medical investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Stress is considered as one of the factors associated with the development of many diseases, including the cardiovascular system. The history of studying stress as a risk factor for hypertension began in the first half of the 20th century and continued after the introduction of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) into clinical practice. Then it turned out that there is normotension, stable hypertension and latent hypertension: masked (when clinical BP is within the normal range, and arterial hypertension is recorded according to ABPM and/or self-monitoring of BP) and white coat hypertension (increased BP during a visit to the doctor when normal values of blood pressure according to ABPM or self-monitoring of BP). Currently, both variants of latent hypertension are classified as stress-induced arterial hypertension. Several models have been proposed for the study of stress, but two of them are more common in clinical studies: the Karasek model (based on an imbalance between job demands and job decision latitude) and the Siegrist model (based on an imbalance of effort and reward). There are only few studies in where attempts have been made to link the increase in BP with the parameters of stress response (for example, with hormonal levels) or genetic predisposition. The review discusses the most significant studies of stress-induced arterial hypertension published to date.

Abstract Background Arterial hypertension is facing some changes in the last years. Its prevalence is increasing in elderly subjects. This growing prevalence is due to longer survival of the population worldwide, among other factors. On the other hand, recent guidelines have insisted in the relevance of out of office blood pressure measurements, to improve diagnostic and management of hypertension. Therefore, elderly subjects with hypertension could benefit from out of office blood pressure measurements, like ambulatory blood pressure measurements; nevertheless, there are very few or no specific recommendations regarding this. Aim In this review, we will gather the most important information about this subject. Results As hypertension in the elderly has some specific characteristics related to aging of the cardiovascular system, the most important aspect could be that these characteristics make ambulatory blood pressure measurement suitable for its use in elderly. Among those a higher prevalence of white coat hypertension, white coat phenomenon, and a higher nocturnal blood pressure and higher prevalence of nondipper and riser pattern, represent aspects that should be considered for better diagnostic and an improved management. Conclusion As the prevalence of hypertension will grow in the next years, more studies specifically directed to this subject are needed.

Purpose of Review : This review highlights the major changes reflected in the 2022 American Heart Association (AHA) Scientific Statement on Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) in Children and Adolescents with a specific focus on the newly defined phenotypes of hypertension and their epidemiology and associated outcomes. Recent Findings: The 2022 AHA guidelines' most notable changes include the following: (1) alignment of blood pressure (BP) thresholds with the 2017 American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) clinical practice guidelines, 2017 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/AHA hypertension guidelines, and 2016 European Society of Hypertension (ESH) pediatric recommendations; (2) expansion of the use of ABPM to diagnose and phenotype pediatric hypertension in all pediatric patients; (3) removal of BP loads from diagnostic criteria; and (4) simplified classification of new hypertension phenotypes to prognosticate risks and guide clinical management. Summary: Recent studies suggest that utilizing the 2022 AHA pediatric ABPM guidelines will increase the prevalence of pediatric ambulatory hypertension, especially for wake ambulatory hypertension in older, taller males and for nocturnal hypertension in both males and females ≥ 8 years of age. The new definitions simplify the ambulatory hypertension criteria to include only the elements most predictive of future health outcomes, increase the sensitivity of BP thresholds in alignment with recent data and other guidelines, and thus make hypertension diagnoses more clinically meaningful. This guideline will also aid in the transition of adolescents and young adults to adult medical care. Further studies will be necessary to study ambulatory BP norms in a more diverse pediatric population and evaluate the impact of these guidelines on prevalence and future outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Hypertension is common following successful renal transplantation and has adverse effects on cardio-vascular and graft health. Blood pressure (BP) readings obtained during clinical visits can be misleading and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is a more reliable and accurate non-invasive method of BP monitoring. Aims and Objectives: To compare office BP with ambulatory BP recordings in successful adult kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). Material and Methods: Office BP (OBP) was measured with mercury sphygmomanometer according to standardized procedure as the mean of two readings taken 1 minute apart; thereafter, 24 hour ABPM was done using automated oscillometric device (Meditech device) in 56 KTRs. Results: OBP missed hypertension in 68% of KTRs who had normal OBP (masked phenomenon) and OBP overestimated hypertension in 11% of KTRs with uncontrolled OBP (white coat phenomenon). Thirty-four percent of patients were normal dippers, 32% non-dippers, 25% reverse dippers and 9% were extreme dippers. Conclusions: ABPM is a valuable tool in detecting dipping status, white coat and masked phenomena which are frequent problems among KTRs and should be considered as part of routine management of hypertension in KTRs.

Background: Patients of diabetes mellitus (DM) with hypertension (HTN) have a fourfold increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) as compared to normotensive nondiabetic controls. However, many patients of DM who are normotensive or have controlled blood pressure on office BP measurement (OBPM) may assume that they do not have increased risk of CVD but may be having HTN or uncontrolled blood pressure on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). Study Design Objective: A cross-sectional observational study to compare OBPM with ABPM and thus predict various hypertensive phenotypes like masked hypertension (MH) and white coat hypertension and pattern of blood pressure in diabetic patients of our population. Materials and Methods: Two hundred patients of DM with or without HTN were included in this study. The cases were subjected to detailed history, clinical examination, OBPM, and ABPM. Results: Out of 200 patients of DM, 32 were normotensives, 46 were hypertensives controlled on antihypertensive treatment, 22 were hypertensives not on anti-hypertensive treatment, and 100 were hypertensives uncontrolled on anti-hypertensive treatment. Among 32 normotensive diabetics, 17 (53%) patients had MH on ABPM. Out of these 32 normotensive patients, 7 (21.8%) had isolated nocturnal hypertension, 3 (9.3%) had isolated day-time HTN (IDH) and 7 (21.8%) had day-time and nocturnal HTN (DNH). Patients with MH had higher BMI, an observation that was statistically significant. Non-dipping pattern was found in 53% of patients of masked HTN. Out of 46 hypertensive diabetics with controlled OBPM on antihypertensive treatment, 26 (56.5%) had masked effect or masked uncontrolled hypertension on ABPM. Out of 22 diabetics with treatment naïve HTN, 7 (32%) were found to have white coat hypertension on ABPM. Fifteen (15%) patients out of 100 hypertensive diabetics with uncontrolled OBPM despite on anti-hypertensive were found to have white coat effect on ABPM. Patients with white coat effect had higher body mass index an observation that was statistically significant (p = 0.039). Non-dipping pattern was significantly associated with longer duration of diabetes (≥ 120 months), retinopathy and neuropathy. Conclusion: To rely exclusively on OBPM to diagnose HTN and monitor blood pressure may underestimate the CVD risk especially in diabetics. ABPM is a tool that may not only help clinicians in starting anti-HTN treatment perspicuously, but also may help in avoiding unnecessary anti-hypertensive treatment and/or withdrawing anti-hypertensive treatment as indicated and thus avoiding credulity.

Currently, 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring (ABPM) is the gold standard for diagnosing hypertension (HTN) and evaluating the effectiveness of antihypertensive therapy. The method provides information about some BP parameters that cannot be obtained in any other way. ABPM is reasonable in any patient with a documented increase in BP, especially if specific BP phenotypes are suspected: white coat HTN and masked HTN. Antihypertensive therapy under the ABPM, on average, is more economical and is not associated with overprescribing of drugs and their combinations. Based on the ABPM data, calculating a number of additional indicators of the 24-hour BP profile is possible, but their scope is still limited to the research field. In the conclusion on ABPM data, the results of office BP measurement and antihypertensive therapy should be indicated.

Hypertension continues to be the leading modifiable risk factor for stroke, kidney disease and cardiovascular disease, and it also plays a key role in a significant proportion of preventable deaths globally. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is an underutilised tool that augments the accurate diagnosis of hypertension. Out-of-office blood pressure measurements such as ABPM, permits the diagnosis of white coat hypertension and masked hypertension as well as determining a patient's nocturnal dipping status. These common clinical phenotypes have relevance with regard to clinical outcomes and may impact management. Overall, the diagnosis and management of hypertension presents numerous challenges, requiring the complementary use of multimodal blood pressure monitoring. Familiarity with the use of ABPM is important in the optimal management of patients, particularly as it becomes more accessible with the recent introduction of a Medicare Benefits Schedule item number. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]