Search

BACKGROUND: Fetal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) is an emerging technique for assessing fetal cardiac function by measuring global longitudinal strain. Alterations in global longitudinal strain may serve as early indicator of pregnancy complications, making 2D-STE a potentially valuable tool for early detection. Early detection can facilitate timely interventions to reduce fetal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of performing 2D-STE at 16 weeks gestational age.METHODS: This pilot study utilized 50 ultrasound clips of the fetal four-chamber view recorded between 15+5 and 16+2 weeks gestational age from a prospective cohort study. A strict protocol assessed three parameters essential for 2D-STE analysis: fetal four-chamber view ultrasound clip quality, region of interest, and frame rates. Two independent researchers measured global longitudinal strain in all adequate fetal four-chamber view ultrasound clips to determine inter- and intra-operator reliability.RESULTS: Out of the 50 ultrasound clips, 37 (74%) were feasible for 2D-STE analysis. The inter-operator reliability for global longitudinal strain measurements of the left and right ventricles was moderate (ICC of 0.64 and 0.74, respectively), while the intra-operator reliability was good (ICC of 0.76 and 0.79, respectively).CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that fetal 2D-STE analysis at 16 weeks gestational age is feasible when adhering to a strict protocol. However, further improvements are necessary to enhance the inter- and intra-operator reliability of 2D-STE at this gestational age.

OBJECTIVES: Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography has been considered an angle-independent modality. However, current literature is limited and inconclusive on the actual impact of angle of insonation on strain values. Therefore, the primary objective of this study was to assess the impact of angles of insonation on the estimation of fetal left ventricular and right ventricular global longitudinal strain. Secondarily, the impact of different definitions for angles of insonation was investigated in a sensitivity analysis.METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospective longitudinal cohort study with 124 healthy subjects. The analyses were based on the four-chamber view ultrasound clips taken between 18+0 and 21+6 weeks of gestation. Angles of insonation were categorized into three groups: up/down, oblique and perpendicular. The mean fetal left and right ventricular and global longitudinal strain values corresponding to these three groups were compared by an ANOVA test corrected for heteroscedasticity.RESULTS: Fetal left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain values were not statistically different between the three angles of insonation (p-value >0.062 and >0.149, respectively). When applying another definition for angles of insonation in the sensitivity analysis, the mean left ventricular global longitudinal strain value was significantly decreased for the oblique compared to the up/down angle of insonation (p-value 0.041).CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of a difference in fetal left and right ventricular global longitudinal strain between the different angles of insonation in fetal two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Researchers have long suspected a mutual interaction between maternal and fetal heart rhythms, referred to as maternal-fetal cardiac coupling (MFCC). While several studies have been published on this phenomenon, they vary in terms of methodologies, populations assessed, and definitions of coupling. Moreover, a clear discussion of the potential clinical implications is often lacking. Subsequently, we perform a scoping review to map the current state of the research in this field and, by doing so, form a foundation for future clinically oriented research on this topic.METHODS: A literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane. Filters were only set for language (English, Dutch, and German literature were included) and not for year of publication. After screening for the title and the abstract, a full-text evaluation of eligibility followed. All studies on MFCC were included which described coupling between heart rate measurements in both the mother and fetus, regardless of the coupling method used, gestational age, or the maternal or fetal health condition.RESULTS: 23 studies remained after a systematic evaluation of 6,672 studies. Of these, 21 studies found at least occasional instances of MFCC. Methods used to capture MFCC are synchrograms and corresponding phase coherence indices, cross-correlation, joint symbolic dynamics, transfer entropy, bivariate phase rectified signal averaging, and deep coherence. Physiological pathways regulating MFCC are suggested to exist either via the autonomic nervous system or due to the vibroacoustic effect, though neither of these suggested pathways has been verified. The strength and direction of MFCC are found to change with gestational age and with the rate of maternal breathing, while also being further altered in fetuses with cardiac abnormalities and during labor.CONCLUSION: From the synthesis of the available literature on MFCC presented in this scoping review, it seems evid

INTRODUCTION: Fetal electrocardiography (NI-fECG) and electrohysterography (EHG) have been proven more accurate and reliable than conventional non-invasive methods (doppler ultrasound and tocodynamometry) and are less affected by maternal obesity. It is still unknown whether NI-fECG and EHG will eliminate the need for invasive methods, such as the intrauterine pressure catheter and fetal scalp electrode. We studied whether NI-fECG and EHG can be successfully used during labor.MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective clinical pilot study was performed in a tertiary care teaching hospital. A total of 50 women were included with a singleton pregnancy with a gestational age between 36 +0 and 42 +0 weeks and had an indication for continuous intrapartum monitoring. The primary study outcome was the percentage of women with NI-fECG and EHG monitoring throughout the whole delivery. Secondary study outcomes were reason and timing of a switch to conventional monitoring methods (i.e., tocodynamometry and fetal scalp electrode or doppler ultrasound), repositioning of the abdominal electrode patch, success rates (i.e., the percentage of time with signal output), and obstetric and neonatal outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch trial register (NL8024).RESULTS: In 45 women (90%), NI-fECG and EHG monitoring was used throughout the whole delivery. In the other five women (10%), there was a switch to conventional methods: in two women because of insufficient registration quality of uterine contractions and in three women because of insufficient registration quality of the fetal heart rate. In three out of five cases, the switch was after full dilation was reached. Repositioning of the abdominal electrode patch occurred in two women. The overall success rate was 94.5%. In 16% (n = 8) of women, a cesarean delivery was performed due to non-progressing dilation (n = 7) and due to suspicion of fetal distress (n = 1). Neonatal metabolic acidosis did not occur. Two

BACKGROUND: The value of ST analysis of the fetal electrocardiogram during labor to lower asphyxia and cesarean section rates is uncertain. Physiological variation of the electrical heart axis between fetuses may explain false alarms in conventional ST analysis (absolute ST analysis). ST events (alarms) based on relative T/QRS rises (relative ST analysis) correct for this variation and may improve diagnostic accuracy of ST analysis.AIMS: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of absolute and relative ST analysis with regard to fetal acidemia.STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study.SUBJECTS: 20 healthy women with an uncomplicated pregnancy monitored with ST analysis during labor: 10 cases (umbilical cord artery pH < 7.05) and 10 controls (pH > 7.20).OUTCOME MEASURES: Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratio.RESULTS: In 16 of the 20 patients a total of 54 absolute ST events were reported. Two reviewers classified the cardiotocograms; in cases 29% of the absolute ST events were significant, in the controls it was 19%. Relative ST analysis versus absolute ST analysis showed a sensitivity of 90% (55-100%) vs. 70% (35-93%), a specificity of 100% (69-100%) vs. 70% (35-93%), a positive likelihood ratio of infinity vs. 2.3 (0.8-6.5), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.1 (0.0-0.6) vs. 0.4 (0.2-1.2), and diagnostic odds ratio of infinity vs. 5.4 (0.8-36.9). McNemar showed no statistical significant difference between the sensitivity and specificity of the methods.CONCLUSIONS: We observed higher positive and lower negative likelihood ratios for relative ST analysis in comparison to absolute ST analysis. In this small study we found no statistical difference. Relative ST analysis should be studied in a larger study.