Search

Purpose: Detection of 11 pathogenic variants in the POLE gene in endometrial cancer (EC) is critically important to identify women with a good prognosis and reduce overtreatment. Currently, POLE status is determined by DNA sequencing, which can be expensive, relatively time-consuming, and unavailable in hospitals without specialized equipment and personnel. This may hamper the implementation of POLE -testing in clinical practice. To overcome this, we developed and validated a rapid, low-cost POLE hotspot test by a quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assay, QPOLE ., Materials and Methods: Primer and fluorescence-labeled 5'-nuclease probe sequences of the 11 established pathogenic POLE mutations were designed. Three assays, QPOLE -frequent for the most common mutations and QPOLE -rare-1 and QPOLE-rare-2 for the rare variants, were developed and optimized using DNA extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues. The simplicity of the design enables POLE status assessment within 4-6 hours after DNA isolation. An interlaboratory external validation study was performed to determine the practical feasibility of this assay., Results: Cutoffs for POLE wild-type, POLE -mutant, equivocal, and failed results were predefined on the basis of a subset of POLE mutants and POLE wild-types for the internal and external validation. For equivocal cases, additional DNA sequencing is recommended. Performance in 282 EC cases, of which 99 were POLE -mutated, demonstrated an overall accuracy of 98.6% (95% CI, 97.2 to 99.9), a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI, 90.7 to 99.8), and a specificity of 100%. After DNA sequencing of 8.8% equivocal cases, the final sensitivity and specificity were 96.0% (95% CI, 92.1 to 99.8) and 100%. External validation confirmed feasibility and accuracy., Conclusion: QPOLE is a qPCR assay that is a quick, simple, and reliable alternative for DNA sequencing. QPOLE detects all pathogenic variants in the exonuclease domain of the POLE gene. QPOLE will make low-cost POLE -testing available for all women with EC around the globe.

Objective: Microcystic, elongated fragmented (MELF) pattern of myometrial invasion is a distinct histologic feature occasionally seen in low-grade endometrial carcinomas (EC). The prognostic relevance of MELF invasion was uncertain due to conflicting data, and it had not yet appropriately been studied in the context of the molecular EC classification. We aimed to determine the relation of MELF invasion with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, and define its prognostic relevance in early-stage low/intermediate risk EC., Methods: Single whole tumor slides of 979 (85.8%) out of 1141 (high)intermediate-risk EC of women who participated in the PORTEC-1/-2 trials were available for review. Clinicopathological and molecular features were compared between MELF invasion positive and negative cases. Time-to-event analyses were done by Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank tests and Cox' proportional hazards models., Results: MELF invasion was found in 128 (13.1%) cases, and associated with grade 1-2 histology, deep myometrial invasion and substantial lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI). 85.6% of MELF invasion positive tumors were no-specific-molecular-profile (NSMP) EC. NSMP EC with MELF invasion were CTNNB1 wild type in 92.2% and KRAS mutated in 24.4% of cases. Risk of recurrence was lower for MELF invasion positive as compared to MELF invasion negative cases (4.9% vs. 12.7%, p = 0.026). However, MELF invasion had no independent impact on risk of recurrence (HR 0.65, p = 0.30) after correction for clinicopathological and molecular factors., Conclusions: MELF invasion has no independent impact on risk of recurrence in early-stage EC, and is frequently observed in low-grade NSMP tumors. Routine assessment of MELF invasion has no clinical implications and is not recommended., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest ASVMvdH, NH and CLC report a grant from the Dutch Cancer Society (unrelated). NH reports grant from Varian (unrelated), CLC reports grants from Varian (unrelated) and Elekta (non-financial, unrelated), IDMC membership Merck (unrelated) and chair Endometrial committee CGIG., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Adjuvant radiotherapy is an important component of post-operative therapy for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer. In the past decades, many trials have been conducted to determine the optimal adjuvant treatment strategy, pelvic external beam radiotherapy or vaginal brachytherapy. As a result, vaginal brachytherapy became the treatment of choice for patients with early-stage endometrial cancer at high-intermediate risk, based on clinicopathological risk factors. Vaginal brachytherapy maximizes local control and has only mild side effects with limited impact on quality of life, in comparison with pelvic external beam radiotherapy. The most frequently used treatment schedule is the one which was used in the PORTEC-2 trial (21 Gy in three fractions specified at 5 mm depth) and, whenever available, image-guided brachytherapy should be used. However, the most convenient and effective treatment schedule remains to be established. More recently, the discovery and integration of four molecular classes in the risk assessment of endometrial cancer patients has created new opportunities to prevent over- and undertreatment. The 2021 endometrial cancer guideline of the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO), and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) now proposes an integrated risk stratification, in which both clinicopathologic and molecular factors are combined, to direct adjuvant therapy. This rationale is now investigated in multiple prospective trials. This review provides an overview of the rationale and currently recommended and new strategies for vaginal brachytherapy in patients with stage I and II endometrial cancer., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ASVMH reports a research grant from the Dutch Cancer Society, during the conduct of the PORTEC-4a study, outside the submitted work. NH reports grants from Dutch Cancer Society and Varian outside the submitted work. CLC report grants from Varian, non-financial support from Elekta, other from Merck, outside the submitted work; and Dutch Cancer Society clinical trial grants. RAN reports grants from Dutch Cancer Society, Dutch Research Council, Elekta, Varian, Accuray, outside the submitted work., (© IGCS and ESGO 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Endometrial cancer is primarily treated with surgery. Adjuvant treatment strategies for endometrial cancer, such as external beam pelvic radiotherapy, vaginal brachytherapy, chemotherapy, and combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy, have been studied in several randomized trials. Adjuvant treatment is currently based on the presence of clinico-pathological risk factors. Low-risk disease is adequately managed with surgery alone. In high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy is recommended to maximize local control, with only mild side effects and without impact on quality of life. For high-risk endometrial cancer, recent large randomized trials support the use of pelvic radiotherapy, especially in stage I-II endometrial cancer with risk factors. For women with serous cancers and those with stage III disease, chemoradiation increased both recurrence-free and overall survival, while GOG-258 showed similar recurrence-free survival compared with six cycles of chemotherapy alone, but with better pelvic and para-aortic nodal control with combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Recent molecular studies, most notably the work from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) project, have shown that four endometrial cancer molecular classes can be distinguished; POLE ultra-mutated, microsatellite instable hypermutated, copy-number-low, and copy-number-high. Subsequent studies, using surrogate markers to identify groups analogous to TCGA sub-classes, showed that all four endometrial cancer sub-types are found across all stages, histological types, and grades. Moreover, the molecular sub-groups have proved to have a stronger prognostic impact than histo-pathological tumor characteristics. This introduces an new era of molecular classification based diagnostics and treatment approaches. Integration of the molecular factors and new therapeutic targets will lead to molecular-integrated adjuvant treatment including targeted treatments, which are the rationale of new and ongoing trials. This review presents an overview of current adjuvant treatment strategies in endometrial cancer, highlights the development and evaluation of a molecular-integrated risk profile, and briefly discusses ongoing developments in targeted treatment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: AH reports a research grant from the Dutch Cancer Society, during the conduct of the PORTEC-4a study., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Vaginal brachytherapy is currently recommended as adjuvant treatment in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer to maximize local control and has only mild side effects and no or limited impact on quality of life. However, there is still considerable overtreatment and also some undertreatment, which may be reduced by tailoring adjuvant treatment to the patients' risk of recurrence based on molecular tumor characteristics., Primary Objectives: To compare the rates of vaginal recurrence in women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, treated after surgery with molecular-integrated risk profile-based recommendations for either observation, vaginal brachytherapy or external pelvic beam radiotherapy or with standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Adjuvant treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile provides similar local control and recurrence-free survival as current standard adjuvant brachytherapy in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, while sparing many patients the morbidity of adjuvant treatment and reducing healthcare costs., Trial Design: A multicenter, international phase III randomized trial (2:1) of molecular-integrated risk profile-based adjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (standard arm)., Major Inclusion/exclusion Criteria: Women aged 18 years and over with a histological diagnosis of high-intermediate risk endometrioid endometrial cancer after total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. High-intermediate risk factors are defined as: (i) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (with invasion) and grade 3; (ii) stage IB grade 1 or 2 with age ≥60 and/or lymph-vascular space invasion; (iii) stage IB, grade 3 without lymph-vascular space invasion; or (iv) stage II (microscopic and grade 1)., Endpoints: The primary endpoint is vaginal recurrence. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free and overall survival; pelvic and distant recurrence; 5-year vaginal control (including treatment for relapse); adverse events and patient-reported symptoms and quality of life; and endometrial cancer-related healthcare costs., Sample Size: 500 eligible and evaluable patients., Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting Results: Estimated date for completing accrual will be late 2021. Estimated date for presentation of (first) results is expected in 2023., Trial Registration: The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03469674) and ISRCTN (11659025)., Competing Interests: Competing interests: ASVMvdH and NH report a research grant from the Dutch Cancer Society, during the conduct of the PORTEC-4a study. HWN reports non-financial support from Merck, grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, grants from AIMM, outside the submitted work. RAN reports grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, grants from the Dutch Research Council, grants from Elekta, grants from Varian, grants from Accuray, outside the submitted work. CC reports non-financial support from Roche, non-financial support from TherAguix, personal fees from Elekta, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from GSK, outside the submitted work. CLC reports grants from the Dutch Cancer Society, non-financial support from Elekta-Nucletron, during the conduct of the PORTEC-4a study. SK reports personal fees from GSK, personal fees from Roche, personal fees from MSD, personal fees from AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work., (© IGCS and ESGO 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)