Search

Your search keyword '"van Noorloos, Marloes"' showing total 48 results
Start Over Author "van Noorloos, Marloes"
48 results on '"van Noorloos, Marloes"'

1. Hate Speech Criteria: A Modular Approach to Task-Specific Hate Speech Definitions

Author

Khurana, Urja, Vermeulen, Ivar, Nalisnick, Eric, van Noorloos, Marloes, and Fokkens, Antske

Subjects
Computer Science - Computation and Language
Abstract

\textbf{Offensive Content Warning}: This paper contains offensive language only for providing examples that clarify this research and do not reflect the authors' opinions. Please be aware that these examples are offensive and may cause you distress. The subjectivity of recognizing \textit{hate speech} makes it a complex task. This is also reflected by different and incomplete definitions in NLP. We present \textit{hate speech} criteria, developed with perspectives from law and social science, with the aim of helping researchers create more precise definitions and annotation guidelines on five aspects: (1) target groups, (2) dominance, (3) perpetrator characteristics, (4) type of negative group reference, and the (5) type of potential consequences/effects. Definitions can be structured so that they cover a more broad or more narrow phenomenon. As such, conscious choices can be made on specifying criteria or leaving them open. We argue that the goal and exact task developers have in mind should determine how the scope of \textit{hate speech} is defined. We provide an overview of the properties of English datasets from \url{hatespeechdata.com} that may help select the most suitable dataset for a specific scenario., Comment: Accepted at WOAH 2022, co-located at NAACL 2022. Cite ACL version

Published
2022

5. Kroniek van het Europees strafrecht

Author

Van Noorloos, Marloes, Ouwerkerk, Jannemieke, Verrest, Pieter, Van Noorloos, Marloes, Ouwerkerk, Jannemieke, and Verrest, Pieter

Abstract

Waar de vorige kroniek van het Europees strafrecht (voorjaar 2020) nog kon aanvangen met de constatering dat er in de jaren daarvoor niet veel nieuwe Europese wetgeving tot stand was gekomen, zijn de kaarten heel anders geschud voor de periode waarop deze kroniek ziet. In deze periode is niet alleen behoorlijk veel nieuwe wetgeving tot stand gekomen, er is ook een fors aantal wetsvoorstellen ingediend. De ontwikkelingen betreffen voornamelijk het materiële strafrecht (milieucriminaliteit, corruptie), waarbij ook sprake is van een uitbreiding van bevoegdheden (deze omvat nu ook de overtreding van EU-sancties). Daarnaast is er nieuwe wetgeving (in de maak) voor de samenwerking in strafzaken (e-evidence, overdracht van strafvervolging). Het belangrijkste verschil met het moment waarop de vorige kroniek verscheen is misschien wel dat inmiddels goed zichtbaar is dat de ontwikkeling van het Nederlandse strafrecht en strafprocesrecht voor een steeds belangrijker deel plaatsvindt op EU-niveau.

Published
2023

7. Haatmisdrijven in Nederland

Author

van der Aa, Suzan, van Noorloos, Marloes, van Doorn, J., Brands, J., Kunst, M.J.J., Muller, E.R., Pemberton, A., van Reemst, L., Criminal Law and Criminology, RS: FdR Institute MICS, and Department of Criminal Law

Published
2023

11. Vrijheid de uitzondering, beperking de regel: De strafbaarstelling van het verblijven in een door een terroristische organisatie gecontroleerd gebied

Author

Faber, Tom, van Noorloos, Marloes, Faber, Tom, and van Noorloos, Marloes

Abstract

This article deals with the legislative proposal in the Netherlands to criminalise staying (without permission) in an area controlled by a terrorist organisation. The discussion surrounding the proposal is focused, amongst other things, on possible exemptions for journalists and providers of humanitarian assistance. This article analyses the newest version of the proposal in light of the rights to freedom of movement and freedom of expression.

Published
2022

20. Strafvordering buiten het rechtsgebied van een rechtbank

Author

van Noorloos, Marloes, Hamers, Laura, Spapens, Antonius, Kooijmans, Tijs, Ceulen, Rik, van der Ham, Janneke, van Noorloos, Marloes, Hamers, Laura, Spapens, Antonius, Kooijmans, Tijs, Ceulen, Rik, and van der Ham, Janneke

Published
2020

36. Aanbevelingen met betrekking tot de strafbaarstelling van belediging van gezagdragers, met name politieagenten, openbare instellingen en staatshoofden (plus bijlagen)

Author

Studiecommissie Uitingsdelicten van de Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC) en het Nederlands Juristen Comité voor de Mensenrechten (NJCM), van Noorloos, Marloes, Hins, W., Janssen, E., Jebbink, W., Kesar, N., Korthals Altes, W., Nieuwenhuis, A., Schumacher, N., Vis, T., Volgenant, O., van Woudenberg, J., Studiecommissie Uitingsdelicten van de Vereniging voor Media- en Communicatierecht (VMC) en het Nederlands Juristen Comité voor de Mensenrechten (NJCM), van Noorloos, Marloes, Hins, W., Janssen, E., Jebbink, W., Kesar, N., Korthals Altes, W., Nieuwenhuis, A., Schumacher, N., Vis, T., Volgenant, O., and van Woudenberg, J.

Published
2017

45. The Politicisation of Hate Speech Bans in the Twenty-first-century Netherlands: Law in a Changing Context.

Author

van Noorloos, Marloes

Subjects
*HATE speech laws, *MULTICULTURALISM, *EMIGRATION & immigration, *FREEDOM of expression, *DEBATE
Abstract

In the past decade, the intense debate about multiculturalism and immigration has led to a questioning of the limits of criminal law on hate speech in the Netherlands. The freedom of expression/hate speech dilemma, with its delicate relationship between freedom of expression, non-discrimination and freedom of religion, has itself become a battle ground in public discourse about multiculturalism. This paper seeks to analyse how legal developments around hate speech bans in the Netherlands (in legislation, case law and prosecution policy) have interacted with sociopolitical changes in a multicultural society in the twenty-first century, and how hate speech bans have become politicised. It will show how developments in the Dutch ‘free speech v. hate speech’ debate have led to contestation over fundamental rights and the role of the judiciary versus the legislature, now that the judiciary is being called in to regulate a sensitive sociopolitical conflict. The paper also shows how since 9/11 there has been an ‘asymmetrical’ use of hate speech bans, to protect the majority against radical minorities, and examines what this implies in terms of the ‘militant democracy’ idea. Asymmetry is also apparent in the way freedom of speech functions in public debate, where many use the free speech argument rhetorically as the right to ‘say what they think’, but do not necessarily grant the same right to their adversaries. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results