Search

Animal welfare is an important field of study due to animal sentience, yet there is to date no consensus on the definition of animal welfare. There have been four key developments in the field of animal welfare science since its birth: the theoretical and empirical study of affective states, and hence our understanding thereof, has increased; there has been a shift from a primary focus on unpleasant experiences towards an inclusion of pleasant experiences; there has been an increasing mention and investigation of the notion of cumulation of experiences in time, and with this, the importance of the time component of both affective states and animal welfare has come forward. Following others, we define welfare as a balance or cumulation of pleasant and unpleasant experiences over time. The time period of welfare depends on when welfare considerations are necessary, and may range from the duration of single and relatively short-term experiences to the entire life of an animal. We further propose that animal welfare conceptualised in this way can be assessed at three levels: level 1 represents the assessment of the environment and 'internal factors' such as health and personality, which interact in their impact on the affective experiences of animals; level 2 represents the assessment of affective states; and level 3 represents the assessment of the balance or cumulation of these affective states in time. The advancement of research necessitates studies to be more or less comparable, and this would be facilitated by researchers mentioning which concept of animal welfare they are basing their work on, at which level of assessment they are working, which assumptions they might be drawing from to infer welfare and which time period of interest they are focusing on, even if this is not mirrored by the timing of the assessment in practice. Assessment at levels 2 and 3 still needs much study, at both the theoretical and empirical levels, including agreements on validation tools., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Eukaryotic initiation factor eIF5A is essential for cell viability and contains a characteristic post-translational modification of a specific lysine residue into a hypusine. cDNAs with similarity to eIF5A sequences were derived from Spodoptera exigua and S. frugiperda cDNA libraries. The deduced amino acid sequences are identical for both species and predict a protein with a molecular mass of 17.5 kDa. The Drosophila melanogaster eIF5A cDNA sequence was retrieved from the Drosophila EST Project. The predicted protein is 80% similar to Spodoptera eIF5A. A single eIF5A gene copy is present in the S. frugiperda genome, which is transcribed into four different transcripts. Infection of S. frugiperda cells with a baculovirus resulted in a strong decline of all four transcripts already at 12 h after infection. In contrast, the eIF5A protein was fairly stable up to 48 h post infection.

An oral testicular toxicity and male fertility study was carried out in CD-1 mice with 1,3-diphenylguanidine (99.9% purity). 1,3-Diphenylguanidine was administered to male mice by daily gavage at dose levels of 0, 0.06, 0.25, 1, 4 and 16 mg/kg body wt. per day during an 8-week premating period. Females were not dosed at any time during the study. Sperm abnormality evaluation was performed in approximately half the males, randomly selected from the control and 16-mg/kg dose group on completion of dosing. The remaining males in the control, 4- and 16-mg/kg body wt per day groups were mated with non-dosed females. Reproductive performance, necropsy findings and litter data were recorded. No differences were found between control and dosed groups in body weight gain during the dosing period, macroscopic observations and organ weights at necropsy. Microscopic examination of the testes and determination of the frequency of total sperm abnormalities in the 16-mg/kg body wt per day group, did not show any effect due to 1,3-diphenylguanidine dosing when compared to the control group, except for a slight increase in sperm with folded tails but normal heads. Male and female fertility as well as reproduction performance were comparable in the groups examined (0, 4 and 16 mg/kg body wt per day). Maternal necropsy findings and litter data did not reveal any dose-related effect. It was concluded that under the conditions of the present study, 1,3-diphenylguanidine did not exert any significant adverse effects on fertility, reproductive capacity or embryonic/fetal development in CD-1 mice when administered to males at levels up to 16 mg/kg body wt per day.

The embryotoxicity/teratogenicity of the sugar replacer isomalt was studied in Wistar rats and New Zealand White rabbits. Groups of 22-23 female rats were given diets containing isomalt at concentrations of 2.5, 5 or 10%, from day 0 to day 21 of pregnancy. The possible adverse effects of restricted feeding were studied in an additional group (food intake less than 80% of the control values). Groups of 36-37 female rabbits were given diets containing isomalt at concentrations of 2.5, 5 or 10%, from day 0 to day 29 of pregnancy. The female rats and rabbits were killed on days 21 and 29 of pregnancy, respectively. In both species no maternal toxicity occurred and no effects on reproductive performance nor on embryonic or foetal development were seen in any of the groups fed isomalt. The feeding of restricted amounts of stock diet to pregnant rats resulted in decreased maternal weight gain and lower uterus weights. Furthermore, this group had an increased number of resorptions and small foetuses, decreased foetus and placental weights and retarded bone development.