Search

Aims: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour (IMT) is a rare mesenchymal neoplasm of intermediate malignant potential, occurring at any age and at multiple sites. Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma (EIMS) is an aggressive subtype of IMT, typically involving the abdomen. Most IMTs harbour kinase gene fusions, especially involving ALK and ROS1, but 20–30% of IMTs show no detectable translocations. The aim of this study is to further delineate clinicopathological and molecular characteristics of abdominal IMT and discover potential new therapeutic targets. Methods and results: In 20 IMTs, including four EIMS, RNA fusion analysis was performed, followed by multiplex DNA analysis if no ALK or ROS1 fusion was detected. Fourteen IMTs (70.0%) had an ALK translocation and the fusion partner was identified in 11, including a RRBP1::ALK fusion, not previously described in classical (non‐EIMS) IMT. RANBP2::ALK fusion was demonstrated in all EIMS. One IMT had a ROS1 fusion. In all ALK/ROS1 translocation‐negative IMTs mutations or fusions – as yet unreported in primary IMT – were found in genes related to the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)/PI3K/AKT pathway. Three of four patients with EIMS died of disease [mean survival 8 months (4–15 months)], whereas only one of 14 classical IMT patients succumbed to disease [mean follow‐up time 52 months (2–204 months); P < 0.01]. Conclusion: This study shows the wide clinical spectrum of abdominal IMTs and affirms the poor prognosis of EIMS, raising discussion about its status as IMT subtype. Furthermore, the newly detected alterations of the RTK/PI3K/AKT pathway expand the molecular landscape of IMTs and provide potential therapeutic targets. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Diagnosis and subsequent treatment of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma are frequently based on punch biopsies. Regarding the current TNM classification and stage grouping for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, it is important to identify the high-risk features (infiltration depth > 4 mm, perineural and/or lymphovascular invasion and poor differentiation). This study investigates the agreement of histological high-risk features and TNM grouping stage on 3 mm punch biopsies and subsequent surgical excision in 105 patients diagnosed with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. On punch biopsy, infiltration depth > 4 mm is not identified in 83.3% (30/36), perineural invasion in 90.9% (10/11) and poor differentiation in 85.7% (6/7) of cases. The TNM stage was underestimated on punch biopsy in 15.4% (16/104). This study shows that on a 3-mm punch biopsy, high- risk features in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma can remain undetected and that the actual TNM stage is not identified in 1 out of 6 tumours. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas (cSCC) can recur locally and can metastasize. The objective of this study was to identify clinical and histopathological prognostic factors for local recurrence and metastasis in cSCCs at any body site. Clinical and histopathological data were collected from 224 patients with cSCC. During the median follow-up period of 43 months (range 0-73 months) the cumulative probabilities of recurrence-free survival at 1, 2 and 4 years post-treatment were 98.0%, 96.9% and 94.7%, respectively, and for metastasis-free survival 98.1%, 97.0% and 95.9%, respectively. In univariate survival analyses, significant predictors for local recurrence were tumour diameter and tumour thickness. For metastasis this was invasion of deeper structures, location on the ear, poor differentiation, tumour diameter and tumour thickness. In multivariate survival analysis, every millimetre increase in both tumour diameter and tumour thickness were independent predictors for local recurrence as well as for metastasis and, therefore, it is important to report these in patients' files. Defining prognostic variables is important for diagnostic work-up, treatment and follow-up for an individual patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early phases of polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) can be difficult to distinguish by morphologic studies alone because they share many morphologic characteristics. Histologic criteria according to the 2008 World Health Organization (WHO) classification are part of the myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN) diagnosis. Our aim was to assess the reproducibility of morphologic characteristics and determine their relative importance for histologic diagnoses on selected trephine biopsy sections. For the study, 56 prefibrotic MPN trephine specimens were blindly reviewed by 4 hematopathologists using a scoring list of 16 histologic characteristics mentioned in the WHO classification. Consensus was defined as agreement by 3 of 4 hematopathologists. High degrees of consensus were reached for individual major morphologic features used in the WHO classification, especially for the nuclear features of megakaryocytes (83%). Some of the features correlated positively or negatively with the histologic diagnosis of PMF. Consensus for the histologic classification of MPN was reached in 39 (70%) of 56 cases without knowledge of clinical data. This finding indicates a difference in the relative importance assigned to individual histologic characteristics by different hematopathologists. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article presents case studies showing the development of a periorbital sebaceous carcinoma (SC) in situ. It tackles the case of an 82-year-old woman with a four-year history of an asymptomatic papule on the left eyebrow and an 82-year-old woman who was suspected with clinical recurrence of a reported nodular basal cell carcinoma (BCC) on the right lower lid. The article discusses the clinical presentation and management of SC in situ which include surgical excision.

Background: Noninvasive treatments are frequently used in treatment of superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) because of better cosmetic results, lower costs, and less burden on health care services when compared with surgical excision. However, probability of treatment failure is higher after noninvasive therapies and may depend on histologic tumor characteristics., Objective: We sought to investigate whether tumor thickness and adnexal extension are determinants of treatment failure in sBCC treated with topical methylaminolevulinate-photodynamic therapy, imiquimod, or 5-fluorouracil., Methods: Data were derived from a randomized controlled trial on the effectiveness of methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy, imiquimod, and 5-fluorouracil for treatment of sBCC (ISRCTN79701845). For tumors with treatment failure (n = 112) and a randomly selected control group of tumors without treatment failure (n = 224) data on tumor thickness and adnexal extension were retrospectively collected. Treatment failure was defined as a clinically and histologically persistent or recurrent tumor within 1-year posttreatment., Results: Tumor thickness of included patients ranged from 0.2 to 1.0 mm. Tumor thickness and adnexal extension of sBCC were not significantly associated with treatment failure of methylaminolevulinate photodynamic therapy, imiquimod, or 5-fluorouracil., Limitations: Follow-up period of 1 year is a limitation., Conclusion: There seems to be no need to determine tumor thickness or adnexal extension in sBCC before treatment., (Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Proliferative activity contributes to bone marrow cellularity in myeloproliferative neoplasia (MPN). Megakaryocytes are the most important cells in MPN bone marrow pathology. JAK2(V617F) mutation constitutively activates JAK2, pErk (phosphorylating extracellular signal-regulated kinase) and PI3K (phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase)-Akt signaling. Erk is involved in megakaryocyte differentiation, PI3K-Akt inhibits megakaryocyte apoptosis via Bcl-xL and two downstream effectors (p70S6k and Bnip3). Immunohistochemic expression of phosphorylated Erk, Akt, p70S6k and Bnip3 was studied along with microvessel density (MVD) in MPN bone marrow and megakaryocytes., Methods: 36 essential thrombocythemia (ET), 25 polycythemia vera and 45 primary myelofibrosis patients were analyzed for pErk, pAkt, Bnip3, p70S6k and MVD expression by immunostaining bone marrow biopsy sections followed by automated image analysis. JAK2(V617F) was analyzed through real-time PCR in blood samples., Results: pErk and pAkt were significantly higher expressed in MPN megakaryocytes, mainly in ET patients, compared to controls. Bnip3 was higher expressed in bone marrow of control patients and in MPN megakaryocytes. Mainly in ET patients, MPN megakaryocytes showed higher p70S6k expression compared to controls., Conclusion: Increased bone marrow cellularity in MPN patients might be influenced by increased pErk, pAkt and decreased Bnip3 expression. A dominant role for megakaryocytes in ET patients was shown. Increased amounts of megakaryocytes in MPN patients can be due to increased pAkt and p70S6k., (© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Clinical and histopathological differentiation between basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and trichoepithelioma (TE) is a frequent problem. Attempts have been made to identify immunohistochemical markers helpful in differentiating them. A correct diagnosis is important because the tumours are treated differently. Recent studies showed the absence of androgen receptor (AR) expression in benign hair follicle tumours like TE. This study examines whether AR immunostaining is a useful diagnostic test to differentiate between BCC and TE. We randomly selected 75 cases with histological diagnoses of either BCC (subtypes: superficial, nodular or infiltrative) or TE (subtypes: classic or desmoplastic) from the database of the pathology department of Maastricht University Medical Centre. The available haematoxylin &#38; eosin (H&#38;E) slides were reviewed by three independent investigators using predetermined characteristics. Fifty-six slides (38 BCC and 18 TE) with unequivocal histological characteristics of either tumour were used for immunohistochemistry with AR antibodies. Any nuclear expression within the tumour was considered positive. AR expression was present in 5/8 classic TE, 0/10 desmoplastic TE, 22/23 superficial or nodular BCC and in 10/15 infiltrative BCC. Immunohistochemical stain for AR is useful to differentiate between TE and BCC; particularly in desmoplastic TE versus infiltrative BCC (specificity and positive predictive value of 100%).

Background: The type of treatment for a basal cell carcinoma (BCC) depends on the histologic subtype. Histologic examination is usually performed on incisional biopsy specimens. In primary BCC, the histologic subtype is correctly identified with a punch biopsy in 80.7% of cases. In recurrent BCC, correct identification is more difficult because of discontinuous growth caused by scar formation. Because an aggressive histologic subtype has a significantly higher risk for recurrence in these tumors, the histologic subtype is at least as important in recurrent BCC as it is in primary BCC., Objective: To investigate the correlation between histologic findings on punch biopsy specimens and subsequent excision specimens in recurrent BCC. Furthermore, we sought to clarify how often an aggressive histologic subtype was missed, based on the punch biopsy specimen., Methods: We compared the histologic subtype in a punch biopsy specimen with the subsequent excision specimen in recurrent BCC. All BCCs were coded and judged randomly by the same dermatopathologist., Results: In 24 of 73 investigated BCCs (32.9%), the histologic subtype of the initial biopsy did not match with the histologic subtype of the subsequent excision. Of the 37 excised BCCs with an aggressive histologic subtype, 7 (19%) were missed by the initial punch biopsy., Limitations: Intraobserver variation may have affected the results of this study., Conclusions: Discriminating tumors with any aggressive growth is relevant for treatment. However, in recurrent BCC, the histology of the biopsy specimen does not always correlate with the histology of the definitive excision. This may have important therapeutic implications., (Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)