Search

Background: An economic evaluation was performed alongside an RCT investigating flap fixation in reducing seroma formation after mastectomy. The evaluation focused on the first year following mastectomy and assessed cost-effectiveness from a health care and societal perspective., Methods: The economic evaluation was conducted between 2014 and 2018 in four Dutch breast clinics. Patients with an indication for mastectomy or modified radical mastectomy were randomly assigned to: conventional closure (CON), flap fixation with sutures (FFS) or flap fixation with tissue glue (FFG). Health care costs, patient and family costs and costs due to productivity losses were assessed. Outcomes were expressed in incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs): the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Bootstrapping techniques, sensitivity and secondary analyses were employed to address uncertainty., Results: The FFS-group yielded most QALYs (0.810; 95%-CI 0.755-0.856), but also incurred the highest mean costs at twelve months (€10.416; 95%-CI 8.231-12.930). CON was the next best alternative with 0.794 QALYs (95%-CI 0.733-0.841) and mean annual costs of €10.051 (95%-CI 8.255-12.044). FFG incurred fewer QALYs and higher costs, when compared to the CON group. The ICER of FFS compared to CON was €22.813/QALY. Applying a willingness to pay threshold in the Netherlands of €20.000/QALY, the probability that FFS was cost-effective was 42%, compared to 37% and 21% for CON and FFG, respectively., Conclusion: The cost-effectiveness of FFS following mastectomy, versus CON and FFG, is uncertain from a societal perspective. Yet, from a health care and hospital perspective FFS is likely to be the most cost-effective intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (© 2023 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose: OSNA is a molecular technique for sentinel lymph node (SN) analysis in breast cancer. Compared to histology, OSNA may yield more (micro)metastases and thereby result in more axillary lymph node dissections or radiotherapy. We investigated whether axillary treatments increase when using OSNA, applying current guidelines for de-escalating axillary management., Methods: All patients treated for cT1-3N0 breast cancer in our hospital between December 2013 and February 2016 were included. In 148 prospectively included patients (January 2015-February 2016), SN's were examined with OSNA. In a retrospective cohort of 123 patients (December 2013-December 2014), SN's were examined with conventional histology. Outcomes were: number of macro and micrometastases, amount of patients receiving axillary dissection or irradiation, number of patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy. Data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Pearson Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: 230 SN's from 123 patients were examined with conventional histology. 229 SN's from 148 patients were evaluated with OSNA. Amount of macrometastases was equal between groups (histology 17.9% versus OSNA 16.2%, p = 0.715). We found significantly more micrometastases when using OSNA (histology 11.4% versus OSNA 25.0%, p = 0.004). Total number of axillary lymph node dissections was comparable in both groups (histology 12.2%, OSNA 12.2%, p = 0.993), as well as number of axillary radiations (histology 8.9%, OSNA 11.5%, p = 0.493). Also, the number of patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy was similar between conventional histology and OSNA (histology 53.7% versus OSNA 58.1%, p = 0.462)., Conclusion: OSNA analysis for SN in breast cancer is a highly sensitive technique, detecting more micrometastases than standard histology. When applying current guidelines, OSNA analysis does not lead to overtreatment with more axillary dissections or irradiation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)