Search

Although warmth is a key sign of inflammatory skin lesions, an objective assessment and follow‐up of the temperature changes are rarely done in dermatology. The recent availability of accurate, sensitive and cost‐effective thermography devices has made the implementation of thermography in clinical settings feasible. The aim of this scoping review is to summarize the evidence around the value and pitfalls of infrared thermography (IRT) when used in the dermatology clinic. A systematic literature search was done for original articles using IRT in skin disorders. The results concerning the potential of IRT for diagnosis, severity staging and monitoring of skin diseases were collected. The data on the sensitivity and specificity of IRT were extracted. Numerous studies have investigated IRT in various skin diseases, revealing its significant value in wound management, skin infections (e.g. cellulitis), vascular abnormalities and deep skin inflammation (e.g. hidradenitis suppurativa). For other dermatological applications such as the interpretation of intradermal and patch allergy testing, hyper−/anhidrosis, erythromelalgia, cold urticaria and lymph node metastases more complex calculations, provocation tests or active cooling procedures are required. Dermatologists should be aware of a learning curve of IRT and recognize factors contributing to false positive and false negative results. Nonetheless, enough evidence is available to recommend IRT as a supplement to the clinical evaluation for the diagnosis, severity and follow‐up of several skin diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The progression of vitiligo is unpredictable, emphasizing the need to identify periods of activity early for tailored treatment. Confetti‐like depigmentation, hypochromic areas/borders and Koebner's phenomenon are clinical visible signs associated with disease activity in vitiligo. However, their true clinical significance requires further investigation using standardized scoring systems. In the present study, the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) and the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS) were applied to assess disease activity signs and disease progression over time, respectively. Individuals with at least one disease activity sign had a 76.9% likelihood of having active vitiligo. The simultaneous presence of multiple signs or their appearance across body locations increased the likelihood to 94% and 87.1%, respectively. Patients with no disease activity signs had a 60.3% likelihood of having stable disease. This research provides an important nuance about the disease activity signs in vitiligo, which may help guide disease management. The risk of active disease increases when at least two types of vitiligo activity signs are present, or when they are present on different body locations. However, the absence of vitiligo activity signs does not rule out active vitiligo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses the multifaceted aspects of oxidative stress in various tissues, particularly focusing on the skin. The skin is vulnerable to external triggers that increase the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), leading to inflammatory and apoptotic pathways that can cause skin disorders. Impaired skin barriers, such as in atopic dermatitis, result in increased penetration of pathogens and allergens, activating the immune system. The article also explores the role of oxidative stress in wound healing, vitiligo, melasma, lupus nephritis, and liver diseases, highlighting the potential therapeutic use of antioxidants in these conditions. [Extracted from the article]

Background/Objectives: There is currently no guidance on how to interpret the global degrees of activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) in vitiligo. Stratification into global degrees can be completed for static evaluations (e.g., visible disease activity signs) and dynamic assessments (e.g., evolution over time). For the latter, the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS15&60) and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score (VDIS15&60) were recently validated. Methods: In the current study, a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) for disease activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) was evaluated for validity (construct) and reliability (inter- and intrarater) based on a photo set of 66 patients. Subsequently, the PGA activity (worsening) and repigmentation (improvement) were used to stratify the Vitiligo Extent Score plus (VESplus), VDAS15&60 or VDIS15&60 into three global categories (slightly, moderately and much worse/improved), based on ROC analysis. Results: For the VESplus, cut-off values for the categories 'slightly, moderately and much worse' were >0.3%, >27.71% and >128.75% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. For the categories 'slightly, moderately and much improved', they were >0%, >4.87% and >36.88% BSA (relative changes in the affected total BSA), respectively. The optimal cut-off values of the number of active (VDAS15) body areas were >0 areas for slightly worse, >2 areas for moderately worse and >7 for much worse. For VDIS15, the cut-off values for slightly improved and moderately improved were >0 and >1. For VDAS60 and VDIS60, the cut-off points were >0.5, >3, >9.5 and >0.5 and >1.5, respectively. The results should be interpreted with caution in patients with extensive vitiligo due to the rather limited disease extent of the included patient population (VESplus (median: 3.2%)). Conclusions: This research will aid in the development of more detailed international definitions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current understanding of the placebo response in vitiligo is limited. Nonetheless, it is difficult to compare the outcomes of vitiligo trials if the repigmentation rates in placebo patients vary significantly. We conducted a meta‐analysis of the placebo response in vitiligo trials. Overall, repigmentation rates in patients receiving placebo were 22%, ranging substantially from 0 to 60%. Repigmentation (>25%) was still relatively common for placebo (9.35%), but fell to 5% when >50% improvement was analyzed. Higher frequencies of placebo responses correlated with more repigmentation in the intervention groups. Facial vitiligo and sunlight exposure was linked to higher placebo responses. Roughly estimating the amount of improvement using quartiles (0–25, 25%–50%, 50%–75%, 75%–100% repigmentation) resulted in higher placebo rates compared to other assessment methods. In clinical studies with older patients, the ratio of placebo reactions to treatment responses was higher. This is likely because clinical trials with older patients reported less repigmentation after treatment than studies with younger patients. The percentual difference in affected body surface area during the study period ranged from 6.2% worsening to 17.6% improvement in the placebo groups. This high variability in placebo responses illustrates the need for standardized outcome measures and more head‐to‐head trials in vitiligo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is evidence of a link between disease activity in vitiligo and clinical visible signs such as confetti‐like depigmentation, Koebner phenomenon and hypochromic areas/borders. Despite its established value, dermatologists and researchers continue to have a limited understanding of the vitiligo disease activity signs. The primary goal of this study was to identify 'hot spots' of disease activity signs in vitiligo patients in order to improve detection in clinical practice. Furthermore, the prevalence, clinical profiles of predisposed patients, interrelationship between the disease activity signs and potential pitfalls in the recognition of the signs were evaluated. The Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS) was used to score the presence of the disease activity signs in 441 non‐segmental and 57 segmental vitiligo patients. More detailed predilection areas were scored in a subset of patients, using 65 predefined body locations. At least one disease activity sign was observed in 51.0% and 8.8% of the non‐segmental and segmental vitiligo patients, respectively. Confetti‐like depigmentation was most observed on the elbows, Koebner phenomenon on the back of the hands, and hypochromic areas/borders in the armpits. The three signs were significantly more observed in patients with more involved body locations. Moreover, hypochromic areas/borders were more common in younger patients. Confetti‐like depigmentation had the highest interrelationship with the other signs and was the easiest to recognise. Knowledge around hot spots of the disease activity signs will enhance and simplify their detection in clinical practice. Based on the results, confetti‐like depigmentation appears to be the most straightforward sign to evaluate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: With the current trend in healthcare moving towards a more value‐based approach, it is essential to understand what value encompasses. Objectives: To develop an actionable value‐based outcome set (VOS) for daily practice. Methods: A mixed method approach was used consisting of four phases. Formerly, a systematic review was conducted, providing an overview of all patient‐relevant outcomes defined in current literature. These 23 outcomes were then presented to a group of patients, using a modified nominal group technique (NGT), to establish whether these results represented all of their relevant outcomes. Subsequently, these outcomes were ranked according to importance by patients attending our academic specialized psoriasis clinic. A review of the literature was performed to assess which instruments were available and suitable to evaluate the outcomes in this VOS. Finally, a pilot feasibility test was performed amongst patients. Results: Of the 23 outcomes, two were omitted from the ranking exercise after the NGT. In the ranking exercise, 120 patients participated. The median age was 50.0 (IQR 25.0) years and 36.7% were female. Median PASI score was 2.4 (IQR 5.2), and treatments varied from topicals to biologicals. The outcomes scored as most important were symptom control, treatment efficacy, confidence in care and control of disease. The least important outcomes were comorbidity control, productivity and cost of care. A significant difference was shown between the ranking of the outcomes (p < 0.001). In total, 12 instruments were selected, which are reported by both patient and provider, to measure the outcomes in this VOS. Median completion time for the patient part was 30 min (IQR 2.8). Conclusions: This VOS is a first proposal to evaluate psoriasis care in a value‐based manner. Measuring these outcomes can enable us to critically appraise and improve current care processes, within the reality of available resources, thereby increasing value for patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]