Search

Background Trauma-focused treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are commonly delivered either once or twice a week. Initial evidence suggests that session frequency affects treatment response, but very few trials have investigated the effect of session frequency. The present study’s aim is to compare treatment outcomes of twice-weekly versus once-weekly sessions of two treatments for PTSD related to childhood trauma, imagery rescripting (ImRs) and eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR). We hypothesize that both treatments will be more effective when delivered twice than once a week. How session frequency impacts treatment response, whether treatment type moderates the frequency effect, and which treatment type and frequency works best for whom will also be investigated. Methods The IREM-Freq trial is an international multicenter randomized clinical trial conducted in mental healthcare centers across Australia, Germany, and the Netherlands. We aim to recruit 220 participants, who will be randomized to one of four conditions: (1) EMDR once a week, (2) EMDR twice a week, (3) ImRs once a week, or (4) ImRs twice a week. Treatment consists of 12 sessions. Data are collected at baseline until one-year follow-up. The primary outcome measure is clinician-rated PTSD symptom severity. Secondary outcome measures include self-reported PTSD symptom severity, complex PTSD symptoms, trauma-related cognitions and emotions, depressive symptoms, dissociation, quality of life, and functioning. Process measures include memory, learning, therapeutic alliance, motivation, reluctance, and avoidance. Additional investigations will focus on predictors of treatment outcome and PTSD severity, change mechanisms of EMDR and ImRs, the role of emotions, cognitions, and memory, the optimization of treatment selection, learned helplessness, perspectives of patients and therapists, the network structure of PTSD symptoms, and sudden treatment gains. Discussion This study wi

Background Early identification of patients with mental health problems in need of highly specialised care could enhance the timely provision of appropriate care and improve the clinical and costeffectiveness of treatment strategies. Recent research on the development and psychometric evaluation of diagnosis-specific decision-support algorithms suggested that the treatment allocation of patients to highly specialised mental healthcare settings may be guided by a core set of transdiagnostic patient factors. Aims To develop and psychometrically evaluate a transdiagnostic decision tool to facilitate the uniform assessment of highly specialised mental healthcare need in heterogeneous patient groups. Method The Transdiagnostic Decision Tool was developed based on an analysis of transdiagnostic items of earlier developed diagnosisspecific decision tools. The Transdiagnostic Decision Tool was psychometrically evaluated in 505 patients with a somatic symptom disorder or post-traumatic stress disorder. Feasibility, interrater reliability, convergent validity and criterion validity were assessed. In order to evaluate convergent validity, the fivelevel EuroQol five-dimensional questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) and the ICEpop CAPability measure for Adults (ICECAP-A) were administered. Results The six-item clinician-administered Transdiagnostic Decision Tool demonstrated excellent feasibility and acceptable interrater reliability. Spearman’s rank correlations between the Transdiagnostic Decision Tool and ICECAP-A (−0.335), EQ-5D-5L index (−0.386) and EQ-5D-visual analogue scale (−0.348) supported convergent validity. The area under the curve was 0.81 and a cut-off value of ≥3 was found to represent the optimal cut-off value. Conclusions The Transdiagnostic Decision Tool demonstrated solid psychometric properties and showed promise as a measure for the early detection of patients in need of highly specialised mental healthcare.

Background: ImRs and EMDR, two promising techniques in treatment for childhood trauma-based PTSD, were compared in a randomized controlled study (Boterhoven de Haan et al., 2017), the IREM. For ImRs; the predominant explanation is that it works by changing the meaning of trauma events (Arntz, 2012). In the case of EMDR, the most recent theory is the working memory theory (Van den Hout & Engelhard, 2012). A qualitative study was done on patients’ perspectives on the working mechanisms in these two techniques. Objective: The study addressed the following questions: What are the most effective elements in the followed treatment according to patients? Is there a difference between the two treatments in this respect? Method: Opinions of 40 patients participating in the IREM study in Australia, Germany and the Netherlands were collected with semi-structured in-depth interviews. Thematic analysis was used for analysing the interviews. Results: At this symposium the results of the interviews in Australia, Germany and the Netherlands will be presented. Conclusions: The perspective of patients will help us to improve treatments, and to instruct therapists and patients helping them to get the best results possible.

An explanatory framework, referred to as the attitude/social influence/self-efficacy-model (ASE-model), was utilised to explain future self-reported adherence of adolescents to daily inhaled prophylactic asthma medication. The objective was to investigate the long-term influence of these earlier reported cognitive variables and other psychological and medical determinants on self-reported adherence 1 year later. Data were collected, via a questionnaire, from 86 adolescents with asthma (aged 11 through 18 years) recruited from outpatient clinics. Adherence was assessed by asking the patients to give themselves a report mark for adherence. The results of the multiple regression analyses showed that the three major ASE-variables were predictors of self-reported adherence to a moderate degree (R

A randomised controlled trial, involving 112 adolescents with asthma, and a 2-year follow-up was conducted to assess the impact of an intervention programme aimed at enhancing adherence to asthma medication. This programme had a duration of 1 year and consisted of an experimental group which received usual care from a paediatrician, but additionally attended individual and group sessions with an asthma nurse, and a control group which received usual care only. The programme aimed at enhancing adherence by stimulating a positive attitude, increasing feelings of social support, and enhancing self-efficacy. At baseline, and after 12-month (T1) and 24-month (T2) follow-up, the participants filled in questionnaires which were based on the concepts of the ASE-model. Adherence was assessed by self-report (range: 1-10) at the same points in time. After 12 months, 97 adolescents (87%) were available for follow-up, decreasing to 86 adolescents (77%) after 24 months. No statistically significant differences were found between the control and the experimental group, except for one. At T2, self-reported adherence appeared to be statistically significantly higher in the experimental group. In conclusion, there seems to have been no substantial effect of the intervention programme. Copyright © 2001 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd.