Search

BACKGROUND Vancomycin is standard therapy in pediatric oncology patients with neutropenic fever. In a previous study we showed that with a starting dose of 60 mg/kg/day in four doses 58% of patients had inadequate trough levels. As a result the starting dose was increased to 90 mg/kg/day. OBJECTIVE To determine whether a starting dose of 90 mg/kg/day in four doses leads to a higher percentage therapeutic trough levels compared to 60 mg/kg/day in four doses. Furthermore, population pharmacokinetics were described in pediatric oncology patients. DESIGN AND METHODS Prospective data from the VANCOPOP study were combined with retrospective data from the Academisch Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam. The percentage therapeutic trough levels (10-15 mg/L) in the first three days of therapy was the primary endpoint. As a secondary endpoint, renal toxicity was evaluated. Population pharmacokinetics were described using nonlinear mixed-effects modelling. RESULTS Data was available from 53 and 22 patients receiving 60 and 90 mg/kg/day, respectively. The percentages therapeutic trough concentrations were comparable in both groups (21% and 23%, respectively). The percentages sub- (68% and 41%, respectively) and supratherapeutic concentrations (12% and 36%, respectively) were different between dosing groups (p < 0.05). The population pharmacokinetics of vancomycin were described by a two-compartment model with creatinine clearance significantly affecting clearance. Based on Monte Carlo simulations the following doses were proposed: younger than two years 90 mg/kg/day, two till six years 80 mg/kg/day, six till twelve years 70 mg/kg/day and twelve till eighteen years 60 mg/kg/day, all in four doses. CONCLUSION Vancomycin clearance is age-dependent and highly variable in pediatric oncology patients. A prospective study is necessary to evaluate the proposed dosing guidelines for different age groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Outcomes for children with relapsed and refractory high-risk neuroblastoma (RR-HRNB) remain dismal. The BEACON Neuroblastoma trial (EudraCT 2012-000072-42) evaluated three backbone chemotherapy regimens and the addition of the antiangiogenic agent bevacizumab (B)., Materials and Methods: Patients age 1-21 years with RR-HRNB with adequate organ function and performance status were randomly assigned in a 3 × 2 factorial design to temozolomide (T), irinotecan-temozolomide (IT), or topotecan-temozolomide (TTo) with or without B. The primary end point was best overall response (complete or partial) rate (ORR) during the first six courses, by RECIST or International Neuroblastoma Response Criteria for patients with measurable or evaluable disease, respectively. Safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) time were secondary end points., Results: One hundred sixty patients with RR-HRNB were included. For B random assignment (n = 160), the ORR was 26% (95% CI, 17 to 37) with B and 18% (95% CI, 10 to 28) without B (risk ratio [RR], 1.52 [95% CI, 0.83 to 2.77]; P = .17). Adjusted hazard ratio for PFS and OS were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.63 to 1.27) and 1.01 (95% CI, 0.70 to 1.45), respectively. For irinotecan ([I]; n = 121) and topotecan (n = 60) random assignments, RRs for ORR were 0.94 and 1.22, respectively. A potential interaction between I and B was identified. For patients in the bevacizumab-irinotecan-temozolomide (BIT) arm, the ORR was 23% (95% CI, 10 to 42), and the 1-year PFS estimate was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.47 to 0.80)., Conclusion: The addition of B met protocol-defined success criteria for ORR and appeared to improve PFS. Within this phase II trial, BIT showed signals of antitumor activity with acceptable tolerability. Future trials will confirm these results in the chemoimmunotherapy era.

Background: The survival for many children with relapsed/refractory cancers remains poor despite advances in therapies. Arginine metabolism plays a key role in the pathophysiology of a number of pediatric cancers. We report the first in child study of a recombinant human arginase, BCT-100, in children with relapsed/refractory hematological, solid or CNS cancers., Procedure: PARC was a single arm, Phase I/II, international, open label study. BCT-100 was given intravenously over one hour at weekly intervals. The Phase I section utilized a modified 3 + 3 design where escalation/de-escalation was based on both the safety profile and the complete depletion of arginine (defined as adequate arginine depletion; AAD <8μM arginine in the blood after 4 doses of BCT-100). The Phase II section was designed to further evaluate the clinical activity of BCT-100 at the pediatric RP2D determined in the Phase I section, by recruitment of patients with pediatric cancers into 4 individual groups. A primary evaluation of response was conducted at eight weeks with patients continuing to receive treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity., Results: 49 children were recruited globally. The Phase I cohort of the trial established the Recommended Phase II Dose of 1600U/kg iv weekly in children, matching that of adults. BCT-100 was very well tolerated. No responses defined as a CR, CRi or PR were seen in any cohort within the defined 8 week primary evaluation period. However a number of these relapsed/refractory patients experienced prolonged radiological SD., Conclusion: Arginine depletion is a clinically safe and achievable strategy in children with cancer. The RP2D of BCT-100 in children with relapsed/refractory cancers is established at 1600U/kg intravenously weekly and can lead to sustained disease stability in this hard to treat population., Clinical Trial Registration: EudraCT, 2017-002762-44; ISRCTN, 21727048; and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03455140., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Fenwick, Weston, Wheatley, Hodgson, Marshall, Elliott, Makin, Ng, Brennan, Lowis, Adamski, Kilday, Cox, Gattens, Moore, Trahair, Ronghe, Campbell, Campbell, Williams, Kirby, Van Eijkelenburg, Keely, Scarpa, Stavrou, Fultang, Booth, Cheng, De Santo and Mussai.)

Background/objective: To analyze changes in recurrent/refractory osteosarcoma phase II trials over time to inform future trials in this population with poor prognosis., Methods: A systematic review of trials registered on trial registries between 01/01/2017-14/02/2022. Comparison of 98 trials identified between 2003 and 2016. Publication search/analysis for both periods, last update on 01/12/2022., Results: Between 2017 and 2022, 71 phase-II trials met our selection criteria (19 osteosarcoma-specific trials, 14 solid tumor trials with and 38 trials without an osteosarcoma-specific stratum). The trial number increased over time: 13.9 versus 7 trials/year (p = 0.06). Monotherapy remained the predominant treatment (62% vs. 62%, p = 1). Targeted therapies were increasingly evaluated (66% vs. 41%, P = 0.001). Heterogeneity persisted in the trial characteristics. The inclusion criteria were measurable disease (75%), evaluable disease (14%), and surgical remission (11%). 82% of the trials included pediatric or adolescent patients. Biomarker-driven trials accounted for 25% of the total trials. The survival endpoint use (rather than response) slightly increased (40% versus 31%), but the study H 1 /H 0 hypotheses remained heterogeneous. Single-arm designs predominated over multiarm trials (n = 7). Available efficacy data on 1361 osteosarcoma patients in 58 trials remained disappointing, even though 21% of these trials were considered positive, predominantly those evaluating multi-targeted kinase inhibitors., Conclusion: Despite observed changes in trial design and an increased number of trials investigating new therapies, high heterogeneity remained with respect to patient selection, study design, primary endpoints, and statistical hypotheses in recently registered phase II trials for osteosarcoma. Continued optimization of trial design informed by a deeper biological understanding should strengthen the development of new therapies., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: [RE declares funding by the Princess Maxima foundation. KB declares honoraria for educational events for Novartis and has received honoraria for participation on advisory boards for glaxosmithkline, Bayer, NEC Oncoimmunity and Incyte. NE declares honoraria for educational events by Merck/MSD. NH declares a grant by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund. EP declares honoraria for participation on advisory boards for Deciphera Pharmaceutical, Eusa Pharma, SynOx Therapeutics and Daiichy Sankyo. SS declares consulting fees by Ceridwen Oncology, support for travel by Adaptimmune and has received honoraria for participation of an advisory board for glaxosmithkline. All remaining authors have declared no conflicts of interest.]., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

This study assessed sleep, distress and quality of life (QoL) in parents of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) from diagnosis to three years after, and the impact of sleep and distress on QoL. Additionally, this study explored determinants of sleep and distress. Parents completed the MOS Sleep, Distress Thermometer for Parents and SF-12 at four-five months (T0), one year (T1), two years (T2), and three years (T3) after diagnosis. The course of outcomes and longitudinal impact of clinically relevant sleep problems (>1SD above reference’s mean) and clinical distress (score ≥ 4) on QoL Z-scores were assessed with linear mixed-models. Determinants of sleep and distress were assessed with multinomial mixed-models. Parents (81% mothers) of 139 patients (60% males; 76% medium-risk (MR)) participated. Distress and QoL gradually restored from T0 to T3. Sleep problems improved, but were still elevated at T3: 33% reported clinically relevant sleep problems, of which 48% in concurrence with distress. Over time, presence of sleep problems or distress led to lower mental QoL Z-scores (SD-score −0.2 and −0.5, respectively). Presence of both led to a cumulatively lower Z-score (SD-score −1.3). Parents in the latter group were more likely to report insufficient social support, parenting problems, a chronic illness, pain for their child, having a child with MR-ALL, and being closer to diagnosis. In conclusion, parental well-being improves over time, yet sleep problems persist. In combination with ongoing distress, they cumulatively affect QoL. Special attention should be given to parents who are vulnerable to worse outcomes.

Purpose: AcSé-ESMART is a proof-of-concept, phase I or II, platform trial, designed to explore targeted agents in a molecularly enriched cancer population. Arms A and B aimed to define the recommended phase II dose and activity of the CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib with topotecan and temozolomide (TOTEM) or everolimus, respectively, in children with recurrent or refractory malignancies., Patients and Methods: Ribociclib was administered orally once daily for 16 days after TOTEM for 5 days (arm A) or for 21 days with everolimus orally once daily continuously in a 28-day cycle (arm B). Dose escalation followed the continuous reassessment method, and activity assessment the Ensign design. Arms were enriched on the basis of molecular alterations in the cell cycle or PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways., Results: Thirty-two patients were included, 14 in arm A and 18 in arm B, and 31 were treated. Fourteen patients had sarcomas (43.8%), and 13 brain tumors (40.6%). Main toxicities were leukopenia, neutropenia, and lymphopenia. The recommended phase II dose was ribociclib 260 mg/m 2 once a day, temozolomide 100 mg/m 2 once a day, and topotecan 0.5 mg/m 2 once a day (arm A) and ribociclib 175 mg/m 2 once a day and everolimus 2.5 mg/m 2 once a day (arm B). Pharmacokinetic analyses confirmed the drug-drug interaction of ribociclib on everolimus exposure. Two patients (14.3%) had stable disease as best response in arm A, and seven (41.2%) in arm B, including one patient with T-acute lymphoblastic leukemia with significant blast count reduction. Alterations considered for enrichment were present in 25 patients (81%) and in eight of nine patients with stable disease; the leukemia exhibited CDKN2A/B and PTEN deficiency., Conclusion: Ribociclib in combination with TOTEM or everolimus was well-tolerated. The observed activity signals initiated a follow-up study of the ribociclib-everolimus combination in a population enriched with molecular alterations within both pathways., Competing Interests: Xavier PaolettiConsulting or Advisory Role: MSD Oncology, Daiichii Sankyo Jonathan RubinoResearch Funding: Roche/Genentech (Inst), Novartis (Inst), Bristol Myers Squibb/Celgene (Inst), Cyclacel (Inst), AstraZeneca (Inst), Taiho Oncology (Inst) Nicolas AndreResearch Funding: BMS (Inst)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS Isabelle AertsConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Jazz Pharmaceuticals Gilles VassalConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer, Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Lilly, Ipsen, NovartisTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol Myers Squibb, Roche Birgit GeoergerConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, AZD, NovartisNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

The introduction of immunotherapy using an anti-GD2 antibody (dinutuximab, ch14.18) has significantly improved survival rates for high-risk neuroblastoma patients. However, this improvement in survival is accompanied by a substantial immunotherapy-related toxicity burden. The primary objective of this study was to describe treatment-related toxicities during immunotherapy with dinutuximab, IL-2, GM-CSF, and isotretinoin. A retrospective, single center analysis of immunotherapy-related toxicities was performed in twenty-six consecutive high-risk neuroblastoma patients who received immunotherapy as maintenance therapy in the Princess Máxima Center (Utrecht, Netherlands). Toxicities were recorded and graded according to the CTCAE. Particular attention was drawn to pain and fever management and toxicities leading to dose modifications of dinutuximab and IL-2. Twenty-three patients (88%) completed all six courses of immunotherapy. Disease progression, isotretinoin-associated liver toxicity, and catheter-related infection in combination with peripheral neuropathy were reasons for immunotherapy discontinuation. The most common grade ≥3 toxicities for courses 1-5, respectively, were pain, catheter-related infections, and fever. In total, 310 grade ≥3 toxicities were recorded in 124 courses. Thirty-three grade 4 toxicities in 19/26 patients and no grade 5 toxicities (death) were seen. Fifty-nine percent of grade ≥3 toxicities were recorded in the two courses with IL-2. Catheter-related bloodstream infections were identified in 81% of patients. Four of these episodes led to intensive care admission followed by full recovery (grade 4)., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Blom, Lurvink, Aleven, Mensink, Wolfs, Dierselhuis, van Eijkelenburg, Kraal, van Noesel, van Grotel and Tytgat.)

Introduction: Data regarding real-world impact on cancer clinical research during COVID-19 are scarce. We analysed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the conduct of paediatric cancer phase I-II trials in Europe through the experience of the Innovative Therapies for Children with Cancer (ITCC)., Methods: A survey was sent to all ITCC-accredited early-phase clinical trial hospitals including questions about impact on staff activities, recruitment, patient care, supply of investigational products and legal aspects, between 1st March and 30th April 2020., Results: Thirty-one of 53 hospitals from 12 countries participated. Challenges reported included staff constraints (30% drop), reduction in planned monitoring activity (67% drop of site initiation visits and 64% of monitoring visits) and patient recruitment (61% drop compared with that in 2019). The percentage of phase I, phase II trials and molecular platforms closing to recruitment in at least one site was 48.5%, 61.3% and 64.3%, respectively. In addition, 26% of sites had restrictions on performing trial assessments because of local contingency plans. Almost half of the units suffered impact upon pending contracts. Most hospitals (65%) are planning on improving organisational and structural changes., Conclusion: The study reveals a profound disruption of paediatric cancer early-phase clinical research due to the COVID-19 pandemic across Europe. Reported difficulties affected both patient care and monitoring activity. Efforts should be made to reallocate resources to avoid lost opportunities for patients and to allow the continued advancement of oncology research. Identified adaptations to clinical trial procedures may be integrated to increase preparedness of clinical research to futures crises., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement N. André reports a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, BMS and Akina. He received funding for trial from BMS and molecules for trials from BMS and Pierre Fabre. He received travel support from BMS. K. Nysom reports a consulting or advisory role for YmAbs and Bayer and receiving honoraria from YmAbs and Bayer. L. Marshall reports a consulting or advisory role for Bayer, BMS, Eisai and Tesaro and receiving honoraria from Bayer for speaking in symposia/educational events. M. Gambart reports a consulting or advisory role for Bayer and receiving grants for travel expenses from Jazz pharmaceutical and Eusapharma. C. Rossig reports receiving honoraria for educational presentations and advice by Amgen, Pfizer, Celgene, Roche, BMS, Novartis and Genentech. F. Fagioli reports a consultant or advisory role for Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme and Takeda. I. Øra reports a consulting or advisory role for and receiving honoraria from Bayer. B. De Wilde reports a consultant or advisory role for Bayer, Roche and Novartis. C. Rizzari reports receiving personal and/or institutional grants, travel support and consultation fees from Amgen, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, SOBI and Servier. S. Palmu reports a consulting or advisory role for Boehringer Ingelheim and receiving honoraria for educational events and travel expenses from Octapharma and Sobi. L. Moreno reports being a member of a data monitoring committees for clinical trials sponsored by Novartis, Actuate Therapeutics, Shionogi, Incyte, the University of Southampton and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust; a consulting role for Novartis and Shionogi. He also reports being a member of the Executive Committee of SIOPEN (European neuroblastoma research cooperative group), organisation which receives royalties for the sales of dinutuximab beta. He reports that his institution receives funding from sponsors for DMC participation, advisory role or conducting industry-sponsored clinical trials. F. Bautista reports a consultant or advisory role for Bayer, Amgen, Sanofi and EusaPharma and receiving honoraria for speaking at symposia from Amgen and Jazz Pharmaceuticals and support for attending symposia from Takeda, EusaPharma, Shire and Jazz Pharmaceuticals. The rest of the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Long-term trends in neuroblastoma incidence and survival in unscreened populations are unknown. We explored trends in incidence, stage at diagnosis, treatment and survival of neuroblastoma in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2014., Methods: The Netherlands Cancer Registry provided data on all patients aged <18 years diagnosed with a neuroblastoma. Trends in incidence and stage were evaluated by calculating the average annual percentage change (AAPC). Univariate and multivariable survival analyses were performed for stage 4 disease to test whether changes in treatment are associated with survival., Results: Of the 593 newly diagnosed neuroblastoma cases, 45% was <18 months of age at diagnosis and 52% had stage 4 disease. The age-standardized incidence rate for stage 4 disease increased at all ages from 3.2 to 5.3 per million children per year (AAPC + 2.9%, p < .01). This increase was solely for patients ≥18 months old (3.0-5.4; AAPC +3.3%, p = .01). Five-year OS of all patients increased from 44 ± 5% to 61 ± 4% from 1990 to 2014 (p < .01) and from 19 ± 6% to 44 ± 6% (p < .01) for patients with stage 4 disease. Multivariable analysis revealed that high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell rescue and anti-GD2-based immunotherapy were associated with this survival increase (HR 0.46, p < .01 and HR 0.37, p < .01, respectively)., Conclusion: Incidence of stage 4 neuroblastoma increased exclusively in patients aged ≥18 months since 1990, whereas the incidence of other stages remained stable. The 5-year OS of stage 4 patients improved, mostly due to the introduction of high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell rescue and immunotherapy., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Aim of the Study: Radiolabelled meta-iodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is an effective option in treatment of neuroblastoma (NBL) tumours. We studied feasibility, toxicity and efficacy of upfront 131 I-MIBG and induction treatment in stage 4 NBL patients., Patients and Methods: Retrospective, multi-centre (AMC and EMC) pilot regimen (1/1/2005-2011). Newly diagnosed stage 4 NBL patients, were treated with 2 courses of 131 I-MIBG, GPOH 2004 NBL protocol, myeloablative therapy (MAT) and autologous stem cell rescue (ASCT). 131 I-MIBG was administered in a fixed dose. Response rate (RR) was defined as complete remission, very good partial response and partial response., Results: Thirty-two patients, (median age [range] 2.9 [0-11.4] years), 21 received 131 I-MIBG therapy, 11 did not because of: MIBG non-avid (N = 5) and poor clinical condition (N = 6). In 95% of eligible patients 131 I-MIBG treatment was feasible within 2 weeks from diagnosis. Interval between chemotherapy courses was 25 days ( 131 I-MIBG group) versus 22 days (chemotherapy group). No stem cell support was needed after 131 I-MIBG therapy. Stem cell harvest in both groups was feasible, neutrophil recovery was comparable, but platelet recovery post MAT, ASCT was slower for 131 I-MIBG-treated patients. RR post 131 I-MIBG was 38%, post MAT + ASCT was 71% ( 131 I-MIBG group), 36% (chemotherapy group) and overall 59%., Conclusions: Induction therapy with 131 I-MIBG before the HR GPOH NB 2004 protocol is feasible, tolerable and effective in newly diagnosed stage 4 NBL patients. 131 I-MIBG upfront therapy induces early responses., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A 5-year-old boy presented with a swelling on the glans penis resulting from a parameatal, urethral cyst.