12 results on '"van Duyn EB"'
Search Results
2. Second and third look laparoscopy in pT4 colon cancer patients for early detection of peritoneal metastases; the COLOPEC 2 randomized multicentre trial
- Author
-
Bastiaenen, VP, Klaver, CEL, Kok, NFM, Wilt, JHW, de Hingh, I, Aalbers, AGJ, Boerma, D, Bremers, AJA, Burger, JWA, van Duyn, EB, Evers, P, van Grevenstein, WMU, Hemmer, PHJ, Madsen, Eva, Snaebjornsson, P, Tuynman, JB, Wiezer, MJ, Dijkgraaf, MGW, van der Bilt, JDW, Tanis, PJ, Bastiaenen, VP, Klaver, CEL, Kok, NFM, Wilt, JHW, de Hingh, I, Aalbers, AGJ, Boerma, D, Bremers, AJA, Burger, JWA, van Duyn, EB, Evers, P, van Grevenstein, WMU, Hemmer, PHJ, Madsen, Eva, Snaebjornsson, P, Tuynman, JB, Wiezer, MJ, Dijkgraaf, MGW, van der Bilt, JDW, and Tanis, PJ
- Published
- 2019
3. Laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or sigmoidectomy for perforated diverticulitis with purulent peritonitis: a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label trial
- Author
-
Vennix, S, Musters, Gd, Mulder, Im, Swank, Ha, Consten, Ec, Belgers, Eh, van Geloven AA, Gerhards, Mf, Govaert, Mj, van Grevenstein WM, Hoofwijk, Ag, Kruyt, Pm, Nienhuijs, Sw, Boermeester, Ma, Vermeulen, J, van Dieren, S, Lange, Jf, Bemelman, Wa, Collaborators (138) Hop WC, Ladies trial colloborators., Opmeer, Bc, Reitsma, Jb, Scholte, Ra, Waltmann, Ew, Legemate, Da, Bartelsman, Jf, Meijer, Dw, de Brouwer, M, van Dalen, J, Durbridge, M, Geerdink, M, Ilbrink, Gj, Mehmedovic, S, Middelhoek, P, Boom, Mj, van der Bilt JD, van Olden GD, Stam, Ma, Verweij, Ms, Busch, Or, Buskens, Cj, El-Massoudi, Y, Kluit, Ab, van Rossem CC, Schijven, Mp, Tanis, Pj, Unlu, C, Karsten, Tm, de Nes LC, Rijna, H, van Wagensveld BA, Koffeman, Gi, Steller, Ep, Tuynman, Jb, Bruin, Sc, van der Peet DL, Blanken-Peeters, Cf, Cense, Ha, Jutte, E, Crolla, Rm, van der Schelling GP, van Zeeland, M, de Graaf EJ, Groenendijk, Rp, Vermaas, M, Schouten, O, de Vries MR, Prins, Ha, Lips, Dj, Bosker, Rj, van der Hoeven JA, Diks, J, Plaisier, Pw, Sietses, C, Stommel, Mw, de Hingh IH, Luyer, Md, van Montfort, G, Ponten, Eh, Smulders, Jf, van Duyn EB, Klaase, Jm, Swank, Dj, Ottow, Rt, Stockmann, Hb, Vuylsteke, Jc, Belgers, Hj, Fransen, S, von Meijenfeldt EM, Sosef, Mn, Hendriks, Er, ter Horst, B, Leeuwenburgh, Mm, van Ruler, O, Vogten, Jm, Vriens, Ej, Westerterp, M, Eijsbouts, Qa, Bentohami, A, Bijlsma, Ts, de Korte, N, Nio, D, Joosten, Jj, Tollenaar, Ra, Stassen, Lp, Wiezer, Mj, Hazebroek, Ej, Smits, Ab, van Westreenen HL, Brandt, A, Nijboer, Wn, Toorenvliet, Br, Weidema, Wf, Coene, Pp, Mannaerts, Gh, den Hartog, D, de Vos RJ, Zengerink, Jf, Hulsewé, Kw, Melenhorst, J, Stoot, Jh, Steup, Wh, Huijstee, Pj, Merkus, Jw, Wever, Jj, Maring, Jk, Heisterkamp, J, Vriens, Mr, Besselink, Mg, Borel Rinkes IH, Witkamp, Aj, Slooter, Gd, Konsten, Jl, Engel, Af, Pierik, Eg, Frakking, Tg, van Geldere, D, Patijn, Ga, D'Hoore, Aj, de Buck van Overstraeten, A, Miserez, M, Terrasson, I, Wolthuis, A, Di Saverio, S, De Blasiis, Mg., Surgery, Immunology, Other departments, AII - Amsterdam institute for Infection and Immunity, AGEM - Amsterdam Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism, APH - Amsterdam Public Health, Clinical Research Unit, ACS - Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, 02 Surgical specialisms, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School, and CCA -Cancer Center Amsterdam
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Colon ,Sigmoid ,Peritonitis ,Research Support ,law.invention ,Diverticulitis, Colonic ,Stoma ,Colonic ,Sigmoidectomy ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Colon, Sigmoid ,Journal Article ,medicine ,Clinical endpoint ,Humans ,Comparative Study ,Peritoneal Lavage ,Non-U.S. Gov't ,Laparoscopy ,Diverticulitis ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ,Sigmoidoscopy ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Surgery ,Multicenter Study ,Treatment Outcome ,Reconstructive and regenerative medicine Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences [Radboudumc 10] ,Intestinal Perforation ,Randomized Controlled Trial ,Female ,business - Abstract
Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Case series suggest that laparoscopic peritoneal lavage might be a promising alternative to sigmoidectomy in patients with perforated diverticulitis. We aimed to assess the superiority of laparoscopic lavage compared with sigmoidectomy in patients with purulent perforated diverticulitis, with respect to overall long-term morbidity and mortality. METHODS: We did a multicentre, parallel-group, randomised, open-label trial in 34 teaching hospitals and eight academic hospitals in Belgium, Italy, and the Netherlands (the Ladies trial). The Ladies trial is split into two groups: the LOLA group comparing laparoscopic lavage with sigmoidectomy and the DIVA group comparing Hartmann's procedure with sigmoidectomy plus primary anastomosis. The DIVA section of this trial is still underway but here we report the results of the LOLA section. Patients with purulent perforated diverticulitis were enrolled for LOLA, excluding patients with faecal peritonitis, aged older than 85 years, with high-dose steroid use (>/=20 mg daily), and haemodynamic instability. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1:1; stratified by age [/=60 years]) using secure online computer randomisation to laparoscopic lavage, Hartmann's procedure, or primary anastomosis in a parallel design after diagnostic laparoscopy. Patients were analysed according to a modified intention-to-treat principle and were followed up after the index operation at least once in the outpatient setting and after sigmoidoscopy and stoma reversal, according to local protocols. The primary endpoint was a composite endpoint of major morbidity and mortality within 12 months. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01317485. FINDINGS: Between July 1, 2010, and Feb 22, 2013, 90 patients were randomly assigned in the LOLA section of the Ladies trial when the study was terminated by the data and safety monitoring board because of an increased event rate in the lavage group. Two patients were excluded for protocol violations. The primary endpoint occurred in 30 (67%) of 45 patients in the lavage group and 25 (60%) of 42 patients in the sigmoidectomy group (odds ratio 1.28, 95% CI 0.54-3.03, p=0.58). By 12 months, four patients had died after lavage and six patients had died after sigmoidectomy (p=0.43). INTERPRETATION: Laparoscopic lavage is not superior to sigmoidectomy for the treatment of purulent perforated diverticulitis. FUNDING: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.
- Published
- 2015
4. The Ladies trial: laparoscopic peritoneal lavage or resection for purulent peritonitis and Hartmann's procedure or resection with primary anastomosis for purulent or faecal peritonitis in perforated diverticulitis (NTR2037)
- Author
-
Swank, HA, Vermeulen, Stijn, Lange, Johan, Mulder, Ingrid, van der Hoeven, JAB, Stassen, LPS (Laurents), Crolla, RMPH, Sosef, MN, Nienhuijs, SW, Bosker, RJI, Boom, MJ, Kruyt, PM, Swank, DJ, Steup, WH, Graaf, EJR, Weidema, WF, Pierik, EGJM, Prins, HA (Hubert), Stockmann, HB, Tollenaar, RAEM, van Wagensveld, BA, Coene, PPLO, Slooter, GD (Gerrit), Consten, EC, van Duyn, EB, Gerhards, MF, Hoofwijk, AGM, Karsten, TM, Neijenhuis, PA, Blanken-Peeters, CFJM, Cense, HA (Huib), Mannaerts, GHH, Bruin, SC, Eijsbouts, QAJ, Wiezer, MJ, Hazebroek, EJ, van Geloven, A, Maring, JK, D'Hoore, A, Kartheuser, A, Remue, C, Grevenstein, WMU, Konsten, JL, van der Peet, DL, Govaert, MJPM, Engel, AF, Reitsma, JB, Bemelman, WA, Swank, HA, Vermeulen, Stijn, Lange, Johan, Mulder, Ingrid, van der Hoeven, JAB, Stassen, LPS (Laurents), Crolla, RMPH, Sosef, MN, Nienhuijs, SW, Bosker, RJI, Boom, MJ, Kruyt, PM, Swank, DJ, Steup, WH, Graaf, EJR, Weidema, WF, Pierik, EGJM, Prins, HA (Hubert), Stockmann, HB, Tollenaar, RAEM, van Wagensveld, BA, Coene, PPLO, Slooter, GD (Gerrit), Consten, EC, van Duyn, EB, Gerhards, MF, Hoofwijk, AGM, Karsten, TM, Neijenhuis, PA, Blanken-Peeters, CFJM, Cense, HA (Huib), Mannaerts, GHH, Bruin, SC, Eijsbouts, QAJ, Wiezer, MJ, Hazebroek, EJ, van Geloven, A, Maring, JK, D'Hoore, A, Kartheuser, A, Remue, C, Grevenstein, WMU, Konsten, JL, van der Peet, DL, Govaert, MJPM, Engel, AF, Reitsma, JB, and Bemelman, WA
- Published
- 2010
5. An observational cohort of patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases or pseudomyxoma peritonei treated with CRS-HIPEC: Development and first results of the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry.
- Author
-
van Erning FN, van den Heuvel TBM, Sijtsma FPC, Boerma D, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Bremers AJ, van Duyn EB, van Grevenstein HMU, Hemmer PHJ, Kok NFM, Madsen E, de Reuver PR, Wiezer RJ, Witkamp AJ, Nienhuijs SW, Poelmann FB, Tuynman JB, Been LB, Rovers KP, and de Hingh IHJT
- Subjects
- Humans, Netherlands, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Mitomycin administration & dosage, Mitomycin therapeutic use, Peritoneal Neoplasms therapy, Peritoneal Neoplasms secondary, Pseudomyxoma Peritonei therapy, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Colorectal Neoplasms therapy, Registries, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures, Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
- Abstract
Introduction: To improve care for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) or pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry was initiated in 2019. The aims are to describe the development and content of this registry and to give insight into the data collected during the first years., Materials and Methods: The registry is an observational cohort in the Netherlands. All patients with CRC-PM or PMP who intend to undergo cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) from 6 hospitals are included. Clinical data and outcomes (including hospital variation) were analyzed., Results: In 2019-2022, 889 patients were included in the CRS-HIPEC quality registry: 749 (84 %) with CRC-PM and 140 (16 %) with PMP. Peritoneal metastases were diagnosed synchronously in 51 % of CRC-PM patients and in 94 % of PMP patients. In patients undergoing complete CRS, the median peritoneal cancer index was 8 (IQR 4-13) for CRC-PM and 15 (IQR 6-26) for PMP. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 639 CRC-PM patients (97 %) and 108 PMP patients (82 %). HIPEC was mainly performed with mitomycin C (CRC-PM: 94 %, PMP: 92 %). Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 148 CRC-PM patients (22 %) and 30 PMP patients (23 %) with 90-day mortality rates of 2 %. In CRC-PM, differences between hospitals were observed regarding proportions of diagnostic laparoscopies/laparotomies, (neo)adjuvant treatment, ostomy formations and re-admissions., Conclusion: The CRS-HIPEC quality registry provides insight into the outcomes of CRS-HIPEC and enables clinical auditing and observational cohort studies aiming to improve treatment outcomes for patients with CRC-PM and PMP., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd, BASO ~ The Association for Cancer Surgery, and the European Society of Surgical Oncology. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Better stoma care using the Stoma App: does it help? A first randomized double-blind clinical trial on the effect of mobile healthcare on quality of life in stoma patients.
- Author
-
van der Storm SL, Consten ECJ, Govaert MJPM, Tuynman JB, Oosterling SJ, Grotenhuis BA, Smits AB, Marsman HA, van Rossem CC, van Duyn EB, de Nes LCF, Verdaasdonk E, de Vries Reilingh TS, Vening W, Bemelman WA, and Schijven MP
- Subjects
- Humans, Colostomy, Ileostomy, Quality of Life, Adult, Mobile Applications, Surgical Stomas
- Abstract
Background: Receiving a stoma significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Coping with this new situation can be difficult, which may result in a variety of physical and psychosocial problems. It is essential to provide adequate guidance to help patients cope with their stoma, as this positively influences self-efficacy in return. Higher self-efficacy reduces psychosocial problems increasing patient's quality of life. This study investigates whether a new mobile application, the Stoma App, improves quality of life. And if personalized guidance, timed support, and peer contact offered as an in-app surplus makes a difference., Methods: A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted between March 2021 and April 2023. Patients aged > 18 years undergoing ileostomy or colostomy surgery, in possession of a compatible smartphone were included. The intervention group received the full version of the app containing personalized and time guidance, peer support, and generic (non-personalized) stoma-related information. The control group received a restricted version with only generic information. Primary outcome was stoma quality of life. Secondary outcomes included psychological adaption, complications, re-admittance, reoperations, and length of hospital stay., Results: The intervention version of the app was used by 96 patients and the control version by 112 patients. After correction for confounding, the intervention group reported a significant 3.1-point improvement in stoma-related quality of life one month postoperatively (p = 0.038). On secondary outcomes, no significant improvements could be retrieved of the intervention group., Conclusion: The Stoma App improves the quality of life of stoma patients. Peer support and personalized guidance are of significant importance in building self-efficacy. It is to be recommended to implement Stoma app-freely available software qualifying as a medical device-in standard stoma care pathways for the benefits of both patients and healthcare providers., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Perioperative systemic therapy and cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC versus upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases: protocol of a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study (CAIRO6)
- Author
-
Rovers KP, Bakkers C, Simkens GAAM, Burger JWA, Nienhuijs SW, Creemers GM, Thijs AMJ, Brandt-Kerkhof ARM, Madsen EVE, Ayez N, de Boer NL, van Meerten E, Tuynman JB, Kusters M, Sluiter NR, Verheul HMW, van der Vliet HJ, Wiezer MJ, Boerma D, Wassenaar ECE, Los M, Hunting CB, Aalbers AGJ, Kok NFM, Kuhlmann KFD, Boot H, Chalabi M, Kruijff S, Been LB, van Ginkel RJ, de Groot DJA, Fehrmann RSN, de Wilt JHW, Bremers AJA, de Reuver PR, Radema SA, Herbschleb KH, van Grevenstein WMU, Witkamp AJ, Koopman M, Haj Mohammad N, van Duyn EB, Mastboom WJB, Mekenkamp LJM, Nederend J, Lahaye MJ, Snaebjornsson P, Verhoef C, van Laarhoven HWM, Zwinderman AH, Bouma JM, Kranenburg O, van 't Erve I, Fijneman RJA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hemmer PHJ, Punt CJA, Tanis PJ, and de Hingh IHJT
- Subjects
- Adult, Bevacizumab administration & dosage, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant adverse effects, Colorectal Neoplasms pathology, Combined Modality Therapy, Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures adverse effects, Disease-Free Survival, Female, Fluorouracil administration & dosage, Fluorouracil adverse effects, Humans, Leucovorin administration & dosage, Leucovorin adverse effects, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Metastasis, Oxaliplatin administration & dosage, Oxaliplatin adverse effects, Perioperative Period, Peritoneal Neoplasms pathology, Peritoneal Neoplasms secondary, Peritoneal Neoplasms surgery, Peritoneum drug effects, Peritoneum pathology, Progression-Free Survival, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms drug therapy, Colorectal Neoplasms surgery, Peritoneal Neoplasms drug therapy, Peritoneum surgery
- Abstract
Background: Upfront cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC (CRS-HIPEC) is the standard treatment for isolated resectable colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) in the Netherlands. This study investigates whether addition of perioperative systemic therapy to CRS-HIPEC improves oncological outcomes., Methods: This open-label, parallel-group, phase II-III, randomised, superiority study is performed in nine Dutch tertiary referral centres. Eligible patients are adults who have a good performance status, histologically or cytologically proven resectable PM of a colorectal adenocarcinoma, no systemic colorectal metastases, no systemic therapy for colorectal cancer within six months prior to enrolment, and no previous CRS-HIPEC. Eligible patients are randomised (1:1) to perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC (experimental arm) or upfront CRS-HIPEC alone (control arm) by using central randomisation software with minimisation stratified by a peritoneal cancer index of 0-10 or 11-20, metachronous or synchronous PM, previous systemic therapy for colorectal cancer, and HIPEC with oxaliplatin or mitomycin C. At the treating physician's discretion, perioperative systemic therapy consists of either four 3-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX), six 2-weekly neoadjuvant and adjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX), or six 2-weekly neoadjuvant cycles of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin with irinotecan (FOLFIRI) followed by four 3-weekly (capecitabine) or six 2-weekly (5-fluorouracil/leucovorin) adjuvant cycles of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy. Bevacizumab is added to the first three (CAPOX) or four (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) neoadjuvant cycles. The first 80 patients are enrolled in a phase II study to explore the feasibility of accrual and the feasibility, safety, and tolerance of perioperative systemic therapy. If predefined criteria of feasibility and safety are met, the study continues as a phase III study with 3-year overall survival as primary endpoint. A total of 358 patients is needed to detect the hypothesised 15% increase in 3-year overall survival (control arm 50%; experimental arm 65%). Secondary endpoints are surgical characteristics, major postoperative morbidity, progression-free survival, disease-free survival, health-related quality of life, costs, major systemic therapy related toxicity, and objective radiological and histopathological response rates., Discussion: This is the first randomised study that prospectively compares oncological outcomes of perioperative systemic therapy and CRS-HIPEC with upfront CRS-HIPEC alone for isolated resectable colorectal PM., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov/ NCT02758951 , NTR/ NTR6301 , ISRCTN/ ISRCTN15977568 , EudraCT/ 2016-001865-99 .
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Second and third look laparoscopy in pT4 colon cancer patients for early detection of peritoneal metastases; the COLOPEC 2 randomized multicentre trial.
- Author
-
Bastiaenen VP, Klaver CEL, Kok NFM, de Wilt JHW, de Hingh IHJT, Aalbers AGJ, Boerma D, Bremers AJA, Burger JWA, van Duyn EB, Evers P, van Grevenstein WMU, Hemmer PHJ, Madsen EVE, Snaebjornsson P, Tuynman JB, Wiezer MJ, Dijkgraaf MGW, van der Bilt JDW, and Tanis PJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aftercare methods, Aftercare statistics & numerical data, Aged, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic, Colonic Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Early Detection of Cancer statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Laparoscopy statistics & numerical data, Male, Middle Aged, Peritoneal Neoplasms secondary, Peritoneum diagnostic imaging, Peritoneum pathology, Prospective Studies, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Young Adult, Colonic Neoplasms pathology, Early Detection of Cancer methods, Laparoscopy methods, Peritoneal Neoplasms diagnosis, Second-Look Surgery methods
- Abstract
Background: Approximately 20-30% of patients with pT4 colon cancer develop metachronous peritoneal metastases (PM). Due to restricted accuracy of imaging modalities and absence of early symptoms, PM are often detected at a stage in which only a quarter of patients are eligible for curative intent treatment. Preliminary findings of the COLOPEC trial (NCT02231086) revealed that PM were already detected during surgical re-exploration within two months after primary resection in 9% of patients with pT4 colon cancer. Therefore, second look diagnostic laparoscopy (DLS) to detect PM at a subclinical stage may be considered an essential component of early follow-up in these patients, although this needs confirmation in a larger patient cohort. Furthermore, a third look DLS after a negative second look DLS might be beneficial for detection of PM occurring at a later stage., Methods: The aim of this study is to determine the yield of second look DLS and added value of third look DLS after negative second look DLS in detecting occult PM in pT4N0-2 M0 colon cancer patients after completion of primary treatment. Patients will undergo an abdominal CT at 6 months postoperative, followed by a second look DLS within 1 month if no PM or other metastases not amenable for local treatment are detected. Patients without PM will subsequently be randomized between routine follow-up including 18 months abdominal CT, or an experimental arm with a third look DLS provided that PM or incurable metastases are absent at the 18 months abdominal CT. Primary endpoint is the proportion of PM detected after a negative second look DLS and will be determined at 20 months postoperative., Discussion: Second look DLS is supposed to result in 10% occult PM, and third look DLS after negative second look DLS is expected to detect an additional 10% of PM compared to routine follow-up alone in patients with pT4 colon cancer. Detection of PM at an early stage will likely increase the proportion of patients eligible for curative intent treatment and subsequently improve survival, given the uniformly reported direct association between the extent of peritoneal disease and survival., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03413254 , January 2018.
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. An International Collaborative Standardizing a Comprehensive Patient-Centered Outcomes Measurement Set for Colorectal Cancer.
- Author
-
Zerillo JA, Schouwenburg MG, van Bommel ACM, Stowell C, Lippa J, Bauer D, Berger AM, Boland G, Borras JM, Buss MK, Cima R, Van Cutsem E, van Duyn EB, Finlayson SRG, Hung-Chun Cheng S, Langelotz C, Lloyd J, Lynch AC, Mamon HJ, McAllister PK, Minsky BD, Ngeow J, Abu Hassan MR, Ryan K, Shankaran V, Upton MP, Zalcberg J, van de Velde CJ, and Tollenaar R
- Subjects
- Delphi Technique, Focus Groups, Humans, International Cooperation, Quality of Health Care, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms therapy, Patient Reported Outcome Measures
- Abstract
Importance: Global health systems are shifting toward value-based care in an effort to drive better outcomes in the setting of rising health care costs. This shift requires a common definition of value, starting with the outcomes that matter most to patients., Objective: The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM), a nonprofit initiative, was formed to define standard sets of outcomes by medical condition. In this article, we report the efforts of ICHOM's working group in colorectal cancer., Evidence Review: The working group was composed of multidisciplinary oncology specialists in medicine, surgery, radiation therapy, palliative care, nursing, and pathology, along with patient representatives. Through a modified Delphi process during 8 months (July 8, 2015 to February 29, 2016), ICHOM led the working group to a consensus on a final recommended standard set. The process was supported by a systematic PubMed literature review (1042 randomized clinical trials and guidelines from June 3, 2005, to June 3, 2015), a patient focus group (11 patients with early and metastatic colorectal cancer convened during a teleconference in August 2015), and a patient validation survey (among 276 patients with and survivors of colorectal cancer between October 15, 2015, and November 4, 2015)., Findings: After consolidating findings of the literature review and focus group meeting, a list of 40 outcomes was presented to the WG and underwent voting. The final recommendation includes outcomes in the following categories: survival and disease control, disutility of care, degree of health, and quality of death. Selected case-mix factors were recommended to be collected at baseline to facilitate comparison of results across treatments and health care professionals., Conclusions: A standardized set of patient-centered outcome measures to inform value-based health care in colorectal cancer was developed. Pilot efforts are under way to measure the standard set among members of the working group.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Targeted lymph node biopsy in mediastinoscopy using 3D FDG-PET/CT movies: a feasibility study.
- Author
-
Siepel FJ, de Bruin WI, van Duyn EB, Steenvoorde P, Wagenaar NR, Slump CH, and van Dalen JA
- Subjects
- Aged, Biopsy methods, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung pathology, Feasibility Studies, Female, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Humans, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Lung Neoplasms pathology, Lymph Nodes pathology, Male, Mediastinum, Middle Aged, Radiopharmaceuticals, Sensitivity and Specificity, Surgery, Computer-Assisted methods, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung diagnostic imaging, Lung Neoplasms diagnostic imaging, Lymph Nodes diagnostic imaging, Mediastinoscopy methods, Multimodal Imaging methods, Positron-Emission Tomography, Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Abstract
In non-small-cell lung cancer, positive lymph nodes with increased fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake may be missed by mediastinoscopy. Lack of pathological confirmation may lead to radical, but unnecessary lung surgery. To minimize these false-negative results, the feasibility and potential value of three-dimensional (3D) FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) movies were investigated to improve targeted lymph node biopsy during mediastinoscopies. PET/CT images were rendered in 3D volumes with multiplanar reconstructions and maximum intensity projections and reviewed in 3D 'fly-through' and 'fly-around' movies. These movies were developed and optimized by the Departments of Surgery and Nuclear Medicine. Twenty-two consecutive patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were included, of whom eight were FDG-PET positive for mediastinal lymph nodes. 3D FDG-PET/CT movies were presented to surgeons before mediastinoscopy. Surgical consequences were investigated, including sensitivity and the negative predictive value of mediastinoscopy. Results were compared with those of a retrospective study in which 3D techniques were not used. During mediastinoscopies, the 3D-PET/CT movies were found to be helpful in the surgical localization of FDG-positive lymph nodes. It led to more confidence in the surgical approach. The sensitivity and negative predictive value were 86 and 94%, respectively. Although not statistically significant, these results were higher compared with those of the retrospective study (75 and 92%, respectively). 3D FDG-PET/CT guidance during mediastinoscopy is feasible. The movies seem to lead to targeted biopsy of lymph nodes. They may reduce false-negative mediastinoscopies and improve staging of lung cancer. 3D FDG-PET/CT can be seen as a promising tool for further implementation of image-guided surgery.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison.
- Author
-
Liem MS, van Duyn EB, van der Graaf Y, and van Vroonhoven TJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Age Distribution, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Confidence Intervals, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hernia, Inguinal diagnosis, Humans, Incidence, Laparoscopy adverse effects, Laparotomy adverse effects, Male, Middle Aged, Odds Ratio, Pain Measurement, Pain, Postoperative epidemiology, Pain, Postoperative physiopathology, Probability, Recurrence, Risk Factors, Sex Distribution, Treatment Outcome, Hernia, Inguinal surgery, Laparoscopy methods, Laparotomy methods
- Abstract
Objective: To study the long-term recurrence rate and other complications after conventional and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair., Summary Background Data: Reliable long-term follow-up of patients with inguinal hernias treated by laparoscopic repair techniques is lacking., Methods: The authors performed a randomized, multicenter trial in which 487 patients with inguinal hernia were treated by totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair and 507 patients were treated by conventional anterior hernia repair. Patients were followed and examined for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain 2, 3, and 5 years after surgery. Risk factors for recurrence and chronic inguinal pain were assessed., Results: Patients who underwent conventional repair had a high risk for recurrence compared to patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. Risk factors for recurrence were operative time and type of conventional repair. Predictive independent risk factors for chronic inguinal pain were conventional repair (Bassini repairs and non-bassini repairs), inguinal pain before surgery, and perioperative lesion of the ilioinguinal nerve., Conclusions: Patients with inguinal hernia who undergo laparoscopic repair have fewer recurrences and less chronic inguinal pain than those who undergo conventional open repair. The Bassini repair produces unacceptably high recurrence rates.
- Published
- 2003
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Free vascularised fibula transplantation for treatment of a fractured femur after radiation therapy.
- Author
-
van Duyn EB, Werker PM, and van der Werken C
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Femoral Fractures diagnostic imaging, Fibrosarcoma radiotherapy, Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary methods, Fracture Healing radiation effects, Humans, Radiography, Treatment Outcome, Femoral Fractures surgery, Femur radiation effects, Fibula transplantation, Radiation Injuries complications
- Published
- 2001
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.