Search

Background: Team-based palliative care interventions have shown positive results for patients at the end of life in both hospital and community settings. However, evidence on the effectiveness of transmural, that is, spanning hospital and home, team-based palliative care collaborations is limited. Aim: To systematically review whether transmural team-based palliative care interventions can prevent hospital admissions and increase death at home. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Data sources: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), CINAHL (Ebsco), PsychINFO (Ovid), and Cochrane Library (Wiley) were systematically searched until January 2021. Studies incorporating teams in which hospital and community professionals co-managed patients, hospital-based teams with community follow-up, and case-management interventions led by palliative care teams were included. Data was extracted by two researchers independently. Results: About 19 studies were included involving 6614 patients, of whom 2202 received an intervention. The overall pooled odds ratio of at least one hospital (re)admissions was 0.46 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34–0.68) in favor of the intervention group. The highest reduction in admission was in the hospital-based teams with community follow-up: OR 0.21 (95% CI 0.07–0.66). The pooled effect on home deaths was 2.19 (95% CI 1.26–3.79), favoring the intervention, with also the highest in the hospital-based teams: OR 4.77 (95% CI 1.23–18.47). However, studies had high heterogeneity regarding intervention, study population, and follow-up time. Conclusion: Transmural team-based palliative care interventions, especially hospital-based teams that follow-up patients at home, show an overall effect on lowering hospital admissions and increasing the number of patients dying at home. However, broad clinical and statistical heterogeneity of included studies results in uncertainty about the effect size. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: delivering medical care of appropriate quality to older people with complex multimorbidity will be challenging in the next few decades and is already under pressure in the long term care setting. Interprofessional collaboration between elderly care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants can contribute to the sustainability of this care., Objective: to describe the experience with interprofessional collaboration of physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants in long term care and get insight in facilitators and challenges for it., Methods: focus group interviews were conducted with elderly care physicians, nurse practitioners and physician assistants from several long term care organisations were conducted, who collaborated as professionals for some time., Results: interprofessional collaboration was valued positively. Themes emerging from the interviews were: 'scarcity of physicians as reason employing nurse practitioners and physician assistants'; 'unfamiliarity with competencies of nurse practitioners and physician assistant among physicians'; 'trust'; 'added value'; 'absence of protocols/formats' and 'legal and regulation barriers'., Discussion/conclusion: the emerging themes fit within an existing theoretical model about development of interprofessional collaboration. The development of interprofessional collaboration in long term care fits in the first phases of this model. Important steps for realizing further interprofessional collaboration in daily practice is being aware of and valuing each other's competencies. Also formats that describe competencies and collaboration procedures are considered helpful. Positive for further development is the recent formal support of the three professional organisations together, offering perspective for sustainability of medical care for older people with complex multimorbidity in the coming decades.].