Search

Background Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is an alternative to a caesarean section (CS) in the absence of repeat or new indications for primary CS. There is a knowledge gap regarding the trend and successful VBAC in Ethiopia. Therefore this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the trend, pooled prevalence of successful VBAC and its predictors in Ethiopia. Methods Electronic databases (SCOPUS, CINAHL, Embase, PubMed and Web of Science), Google Scholar and lists of references were used to search works of literature in Ethiopia. Stata version 14 was used for analysis and the odds ratios of the outcome variable were determined using the random effects model. Heterogeneity among the studies was assessed by computing values for I2 and p-values. Also, sensitivity analyses and funnel plots were done to assess the stability of pooled values to outliers and publication bias, respectively. Results A total of 12 studies with a sample size of 2080 were included in this study. The overall success rate of VBAC was 52% (95% confidence interval 42 to 65). Cervical dilatation ≥4 cm at admission, having a prior successful vaginal delivery and VBAC were the predictors of successful VBAC. Conclusions Meta-analyses and sensitivity analyses showed the stability of the pooled odds ratios and the funnel plots did not show publication bias. The pooled prevalence of successful VBAC was relatively low compared with existing evidence. However, the rate was increasing over the last 3 decades, which implies it needs more strengthening and focus to decrease maternal morbidity and mortality by CS complications. Promoting VBAC by emphasizing factors favourable for its success during counselling mothers who previously delivered by CS to enhance the prevalence of VBAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Determining how women make sense of their birth preferences with metaphor analysis will be an important step in determining perceptions about birth options. Objective The aim of this study is to examine the perceptions of women who had cesarean section regarding the concept of "cesarean birth" and "Vaginal birth after cesarean section" with metaphor analysis. Materials and Methods: This study is a qualitative research based on the philosophy of Husserl's phenomenology, which was carried out between June and November 2022. Within the scope of the research, 50 women who had a cesarean section were interviewed face to face. The metaphor form prepared in line with the international literature was used to determine women's perceptions of the concept of "Cesarean section" and "Vaginal birth after cesarean section". Results 25 metaphors for cesarean birth and 28 metaphors for vaginal birth after caesarean section were identified. Considering the common features and analogy aspects of the metaphors obtained, three themes were determined within the scope of cesarean section and vaginal birth after caesarean section. Conclusions This study took a unique approach to revealing women's birth experiences and perceptions. Vaginal birth after caesarean section is a very valuable birth method for women who have had a cesarean section and are curious about the feeling of vaginal birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• All three models (Grobman 2007, Grobman 2021 and Zhang model 2020) were observed to have a fair discriminative capacity. • Poor agreement between observed and predicted probability of successful TOLAC limits its usefulness in the study setting. • A population-specific model, including intrapartum factors, may aid in predicting the outcome among women undergoing TOLAC. To externally validate three predictive models (the Grobman model (2007), the Zhang model (2020), and the Grobman model (2021)) for identifying women with increased chances of a successful trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC). This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary teaching hospital from 2018 to 2021. Individual probabilities were calculated for women with previous one caesarean section who underwent TOLAC at term, using the predicted probabilities from the logistic regression models. The primary outcome of this study was vaginal delivery following attempted TOLAC. The predictive ability of the models was assessed using the area under the receiver operative characteristics curves (AUC) and a calibration graph. Of 1515 eligible women who underwent TOLAC, we found an overall rate of successful TOLAC of 60.3 %. No significant difference was noticed in adverse scar outcome and neonatal morbidity while comparing successful and failed TOLAC. The discriminative ability of Grobman-2007 and Grobman-2021 and the Zhang model were fair to poor with the AUC of 0.54(95 % CI 0.51–0.57), 0.62(95 % CI 0.59–0.65) and 0.66(95 % CI 0.63–0.69) respectively. The agreement between the observed rates of TOLAC success and the predicted probabilities for all three models was poor. The performance of all three models predicting success after TOLAC was poor in the study population. A population-specific model may be needed, with the addition of factors influencing the labour, such as the methods of induction, which may aid in predicting the outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There is emerging evidence that vaginal birth after open and laparoscopic myomectomy may be safe in many pregnancies, however, there are no studies examining the perspectives of women who have given birth post myomectomy and their preferences regarding mode of birth. We performed a retrospective questionnaire survey of women who had an open or laparoscopic myomectomy followed by a pregnancy within 3 maternity units in a single NHS trust in the UK over a 5-year period. Our results revealed only 53% felt actively involved in the decision making for their birth plan and 90% had not been offered a specific birth options counselling clinic. Of those who had either a successful trial of labour after myomectomy (TOLAM) or elective caesarean section (ELCS) in the index pregnancy, 95% indicated satisfaction with their mode of birth however, 80% would prefer vaginal birth in a future pregnancy. Whilst long term prospective data is required to fully establish the safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic and open myomectomy, this study is the first to explore the subjective experiences of women who had given birth post laparoscopic or open myomectomy and has highlighted the inadequate involvement of these women in the decision-making process. What is already known on this subject? Fibroids are the commonest female solid tumours in women of childbearing age with surgical management including open and laparoscopic excision techniques. However, the management of a subsequent pregnancy and birth remains controversial with no robust guidance on which women may be suitable for vaginal birth. What do the results of this study add? We present the first study to our knowledge which explores women's experiences of birth and birth options counselling after open and laparoscopic myomectomy. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? We provide a rationale for using birth options clinics to facilitate an informed decision-making process and highlight the current inadequate guidance for clinicians on how to advise women having a pregnancy following a myomectomy. Whilst long term prospective data is required to fully establish the safety of vaginal birth after laparoscopic and open myomectomy, this needs to be carried out in a way which promotes the preferences of the women affected by this research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Part of the caseload of an Advanced Midwife Practitioner (AMP) service in a Northwest of Ireland maternity unit includes vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) women. Despite evidence about VBAC being a safe option for women, the numbers attempting a VBAC remain small. This research was undertaken to give an insight into how VBAC eligible women opt for an elective repeat CS (ERCS) or VBAC birth. Forty-four postnatal women with one previous CS who birthed between August 2021 and March 2022 were invited to participate in a qualitative study. Thirteen semi-structured interviews were undertaken in 2022. Thematic Analysis guided the analysis of the data and the findings are framed using the domains of the Socio-Ecological Model. Decision making in relation to ERCS and VBAC is complex. Women want accurate VBAC information and time for discussions. Decisions are influenced by the woman's own confidence to birth naturally, family size, rite of passage to motherhood, control, previous birth experience, postnatal recovery and friends and family. Previous experience can influence but not predict the next mode of birth. However, there is no one script that healthcare professionals (HCP) can use for this decision making given the various factors that influence this. To meet women's individual needs, HCPs should discuss VBAC suitability postnatally, offer VBAC antenatal clinics and specific VBAC classes. Discussions about suitability for VBAC should occur following the primary CS. Continuity of care (COC), time for discussions and VBAC supportive HCP should be an option for all of this cohort. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the paper is to determine the prevalence of levator ani muscle injuries and identify risk factors among women undergoing vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC) compared to those with elective repeat Caesarean section (ERCS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective observational comparative study was conducted at the 2nd Clinic of Gynaecology and Obstetrics of FM CU and UN Bratislava. Women with a history of one Caesarean section were included in the study. They were divided into those who had a successful VBAC and those who delivered by ERCS. The mothers underwent a 3D/4D ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor muscles 3-5 days after childbirth. The study evaluates the frequency and risk factors of avulsion injury of the levator ani muscle (LAM) in a group of 46 women after a successful vaginal delivery after a previous Caesarean section and 32 women after ERCS using 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound examination of the pelvic floor. RESULTS: A total of 78 women were included in the study, 46 after VBAC and 32 after ERCS. In the first group, we recorded LAM avulsion injury in 13 cases (28.3%); in the post-ERCS group, we did not record this injury (p < 0.0001). We also found an overdistended hiatal area (21.0 vs 19.4 cm²) and a more frequent occurrence of the area exceeding 25 cm² (21.3% vs 6.2%, p = 0.0340) which was approaching the statistical significance. In the first group, we identified an increase in weight during pregnancy to 15 kg and a neonatal birthweight of 4,000 g or higher as risk factors for LAM injury. CONCLUSION: In the group of women with VBAC, there is a statistically significant risk of LAM avulsion and a higher occurrence of the overdistended area of the hiatus urogenitalis, especially in women with larger foetuses and in those who experienced greater weight gain during pregnancy (Tab. 3, Ref. 50). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is associated with reduced blood loss and transfusions, fewer infections, and fewer thromboembolic events as compared to caesarean delivery. The current rate of repeat caesarean after one previous caesarean is above the WHO standard of 15%. We aimed to determine the occurrence of VBAC and to determine the occurrence of feto-maternal outcomes in successful VBAC cases so that trials of VBAC can be given to carefully selected patients to reduce the rate of repeat caesarean section. Methods: The Combined Military Hospital (CMH) Rawalpindi's Obstetrics and Gynaecology department conducted this cross-sectional study from March 20 to September 19, 2021. After obtaining ethical committee approval, data was collected using a non-probability, consecutive sampling technique from 150 patients on a self-developed structured proforma. Patients between the age range of 20-35 years with a history of previous lower segment caesarean section, having gestational age between 37-41 weeks and who presented in spontaneous labour were included in this study. After taking informed consent, all women were given a trial of labour and the outcome of the trial was noted. Women were followed for the feto-maternal outcomes. The gathered information was analysed using SPSS version 25.0. Post-stratification, a p-value of 0.05 or lower on the chi-square test was deemed statistically significant. Results: Following a C-section, 28.67% of patients experienced successful vaginal births. PPH was found in 2.32%, scar dehiscence in 0.0%, low birth weight babies in 16.28%, APGAR score <7 at 1 minute was 23.26% and NICU admission as 9.30% in women undergoing vaginal birth after caesarean section. Conclusion: Appropriate selection of patients for the trial of VBAC can help reduce the higher rate of repeat caesarean section after a previous caesarean section and increase the chances of successful vaginal birth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The Grobman antenatal nomogram to predict likelihood of successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) has been validated in multiple institutions. However, due to concerns regarding inclusion of ethnicity, a new nomogram has been developed. Aim: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of the updated Grobman nomogram without ethnicity in a regional hospital in Australia. Materials and methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of women electing to have a VBAC at a regional hospital over a nine‐year period. Maternal demographics and obstetric outcomes were collected. Women were assigned a predicted likelihood of successful VBAC using the updated Grobman nomogram, with variables such as age, pre‐pregnancy weight, height and arrest disorder as indications for previous caesarean birth, previous vaginal birth, previous VBAC and treated chronic hypertension. The predicted likelihood of successful VBAC was compared with actual successful VBAC rates. Results: A total of 541 women attempted VBAC with a VBAC success rate of 74.3% (402/541). The nomogram demonstrated good fit, with a receiver operating curve area under the curve of 0.707 (95% confidence interval 0.659–0.755). Using a cut‐off value of 0.5, the success rate of classification with this model was 74.3%. On comparing each predicted decile, the nomogram performed poorly in those predicted to have a <40% chance of successful VBAC. Conclusions: This study confirms the use of the updated Grobman nomogram without ethnicity, alongside usual counselling, to provide individualised advice for informed decision‐making. However, clinicians should be mindful of the limitation of poor accuracy in women with a low predicted probability of VBAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To validate Grobman’s nomogram for prediction of trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC) success in the Indian population. Methods: A prospective observational study of women with previous lower segment caesarean sections (LSCS) who were admitted for TOLAC between January 2019 and June 2020 at a tertiary care hospital We compared the Grobman’s predicted VBAC success probability to the observed VBAC rate in the study population and devised a receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve for the nomogram. Results: Among the 124 women with prior LSCS who chose TOLAC and were included in the study, 68 (54.8%) had a successful VBAC and 56 (45.2%) had a failed TOLAC. The mean Grobman’s predicted success probability for the cohort was 76.7%, significantly higher in VBAC women versus CS women (80.6% vs. 72.1%; p 0.001). The VBAC rate was 69.1% with a predicted probability of > 75% and only 42.9% with a probability of 50%. Women in the > 75% probability group had a nearly similar observed and predicted VBAC rate (69.1% vs. 86.3%; p = 0.002), and a greater number of women in the 50% probability group had successful VBAC than predicted (42.9% vs. 39.5%; p = 0.018). The area under the ROC curve for the study was 0.703 (95% CI 0.609–0.797; p 0.001). Grobman’s nomogram had a sensitivity of 57.35%, a specificity of 82.14%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 79.59%, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 61.33% at a predicted probability cut-off of 82.5%. Conclusions: Women who had a higher Grobman’s predicted probability had greater VBAC success rates than those with low predicted probability scores. The prediction ability of the nomogram was highly accurate at higher predicted probabilities, and even at lower predicted probabilities, women did have good odds of delivering vaginally.

Copyright of African Journal of Reproductive Health is the property of Women's Health & Action Research Centre and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Objective: To investigate the impact of uterine contractile activity on the outcome of trial of labour after caesarean section (TOLAC). Design: Secondary, blinded analyses of a prospective TOLAC cohort. Setting: Two labour wards, one in a university tertiary hospital and the other in a central hospital. Population: A total of 194 TOLAC parturients with intrauterine tocodynamometry during labour. Methods: Analysis of intrauterine pressure, frequency of contractions and baseline tonus of uterine muscle in 30‐minute periods for 4 hours before birth. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: uterine contractile activity during TOLAC. Secondary aims: contributors associated with failed TOLAC and uterine rupture. Results: TOLAC succeeded in 74% of cases. Uterine contractile activity, expressed as intrauterine pressure, was significantly higher in successful TOLAC compared with failed TOLAC (210 versus 170 Montevideo units). The statistically significant risk factors of failed TOLAC, after multivariate regression analysis, were prolonged gestational age, reduced cervical dilatation at admission and lower mean intrauterine pressure. In cases of uterine rupture, contractile activity did not differ from that in failed TOLAC. Cervical ripening with a Foley catheter appeared to be a risk factor for uterine rupture, as well as cervical dilatation <3 cm at admission. The incidence of total uterine rupture was 2.6% (n = 5). Conclusions: Women with successful vaginal birth had higher uterine contractile activity than those experiencing failed TOLAC or uterine rupture despite similar use of oxytocin. Induction of labour with a Foley catheter turned out to be a risk factor for uterine rupture during TOLAC among parturients with no previous vaginal delivery. During VBAC the response to oxytocin, assessed as intrauterine pressure, is greater and adequate, in contrast to failed TOLAC. During VBAC the response to oxytocin, assessed as intrauterine pressure, is greater and adequate, in contrast to failed TOLAC. Linked article This article is commented on by PJ Steer, pp. 985 in this issue. To view this minicommentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17035. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The indication for Caesarean delivery is one of the most important information required in the antenatal care and delivery mode for women with previous Caesarean section(s). Objective: To assess the level of agreement/disparity between mothers’ report and the actual medical indication for Caesarean delivery and to explore factors associated with it. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out among 248 women who were delivered by Caesarean section. A comparison was done between the patient's report of the indication for the Caesarean section and the physician's record and the level of similarity was recorded. Results: More than half (126; 50.7%) of the respondents reported indications that were classified as complete similarity [Group A] while Groups B to E had 54 (21.8%), 21 (8.5%), 26 (10.5%) and 21 (8.5%) responses respectively. Of the group with “non-similar” responses, foetal indication accounted for 36.1% of them. Parity was the only predictor of “similarity”. Compared to para 0, para 1-4 were more likely to report “similarity” in the indications for the Caesarean section (AOR = 3.370; 95% CI = 1.277-8.888). Conclusion: While the past obstetric history is an important aspect of the evaluation of the pregnant woman, it is important to attempt greater verification of facts at history taking for the indications for previous Caesarean section, especially when it has to do with foetal health as the indication, and in the nulliparae.

The aim of this study was to determine the main contributors to caesarean section (CS) rates at an Australian tertiary hospital. We conducted a retrospective review of women who delivered in an Australian tertiary hospital between 2014 and 2017. Women were allocated according to a modified Robson Ten-Group Classification System and CS indications were collected in nulliparous women and women with previous CS. The largest contributor to the 35.7% overall CS rate was women with a term cephalic infant and a previous CS (31.5% relative CS rate) and the most common indication was repeat CS. The group CS rate in nulliparous women with a cephalic term infant was higher when labour was induced compared to occurring spontaneously (36.6% and 18.1% respectively). The primary CS indication for these women was labour dystocia and maternal request was the most common CS indication for nulliparous women with a pre-labour CS. What is already known on this subject? Significantly increasing caesarean section (CS) rates continue to prompt concern due to the associated neonatal and maternal risks. The World Health Organisation have endorsed the Robson Ten-Group Classification System to identify and analyse CS rate contributors. What do the results of this study add? We have used the modified Robson Ten-Group Classification System to identify that women with cephalic term infants who are nulliparous or who have had a previous CS are the largest contributors to overall CS rates. CS rates were higher in these nulliparous women if labour was induced compared to occurring spontaneously and the primary CS indication was labour dystocia. In nulliparous women with a CS prior to labour the most common CS indication was maternal request. Majority of women with a previous CS elected for a repeat CS. What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice? Future efforts should focus on minimising repeat CS in multiparous women and primary CS in nulliparous women. This may be achieved by redefining the definition of labour dystocia, exploring maternal request CS reasoning and critically evaluating induction timing and indication. Appropriately promoting a trial of labour in women with a previous CS in suitable candidates may reduce repeat CS incidence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Uterine closure technique in caesarean section (CS) influences the rate of late complications in subsequent pregnancies. As no common recommendation on suture techniques exists, we developed a questionnaire to determine the techniques currently used and the frequencies of late complications. The online questionnaire consisted of 13 questions and was sent to 648 obstetric hospitals (level I–IV) in Germany. Number of CS, rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), the type of uterus suturing technique and the frequency of uterine dehiscences, ruptures and placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) were queried. The answers were anonymous, and results were evaluated descriptively. The response rate was 24.7%. The mean CS rate was 27.3% (±6.2), the repeat CS rate 33.2% (±18.1). After CS, 46.2% (±20.2) women delivered vaginally. To close the uterotomy, 74.4% of hospitals used single layer continuous sutures, 16.3% single layer locked sutures, 3.8% interrupted sutures, 3.1% double layer continuous sutures and 2.5% used other suture techniques. The percentages of observed uterine dehiscences did not differ significantly between the different levels of care nor did the uterotomy suture techniques. There is no uniform suturing technique in Germany. A detailed description of suture technique in surgery reports is required to evaluate complications in subsequent pregnancies. National online surveys on obstetric topics are feasible and facilitate the discussion on the need to define a standardized uterine closure technique for CS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The World Health Organization recommends a caesarean section (CS) rate at health facilities from 10 to 15%, but the rate is higher at most of the institutions in different countries, including Ethiopia resulting in negative health-related and economic consequences. Vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is a safe and appropriate choice to decrease the rate of CS. Though the success rate is 60– 80%, the number of mothers who experience the trial of labor is decreasing and the overall CS rate is rising. There is also limited information on determinants of successful VBAC in Ethiopia. Therefore, the study aimed to identify determinants of successful VBAC at public hospitals in Ambo town. Methods: A Facility-based retrospective unmatched case-control study was employed at public hospitals in Ambo town, Ethiopia, from June 1 to July 1, 2020. A systematic random sampling technique was used to select cases (n=74) and controls (n=221). The data were collected using a structured questionnaire and it was filled IN by reviewing the client's medical record. The data were entered into Epi Info and exported to SPSS for analysis. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analysis was carried out for data analysis. Finally, statistical significance was determined based on the odds ratio with its 95% confidence interval and a p-value of < 0.05. Results: Mothers whose age was less than 25 years and 25– 29 years (AOR: 8.88; 95% CI 3.03, 26.03) and (AOR: 5.37; 95% CI 2.28, 12.66), respectively, mothers who had a history of previous successful VBAC (AOR: 3.01; 95% CI 1.47, 6.13), had a history of previous spontaneous vaginal delivery (AOR: 3.85; 95% CI 1.84, 8.05) and cervical dilation ≥ 4cm at admission (AOR: 2.05: 95% CI 1.14, 3.67) were independent determinants of successful VBAC. Conclusion: The study identified that past and present obstetric conditions played a significant role in the success of VBAC. Therefore, health workers have to consider those predictors while counselling and choosing mothers for trial of labor after caesarean section (TOLAC). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background The delivery mode for pregnant women with uteruses scarred by prior caesarean section (CS) is a controversial issue, even though the CS rate has risen in the past 20 years. We performed this retrospective study to identify the factors associated with preference for CS or vaginal birth after CS (VBAC). Methods Pregnant women (n = 679) with scarred uteruses from Moulay Ali Cherif Provincial Hospital, Rashidiya, Morocco, were enrolled. Gestational age, comorbidity, fetal position, gravidity and parity, abnormal amniotic fluid, macrosomia, placenta previa or abruptio, abnormal fetal presentation, premature rupture of fetal membrane with labor failure, poor progression in delivery, and fetal outcomes were recorded. Results Out of 679 pregnant women ≥28 gestational weeks, 351 (51.69%) had a preference for CS. Pregnant women showed preference for CS if they were older (95% CI 1.010–1.097), had higher gestational age (95% CI 1.024–1.286), and a shorter period had passed since the last CS (95% CI 0.842–0.992). Prior gravidity (95% CI 0.638–1.166), parity (95% CI 0.453–1.235), vaginal delivery history (95% CI 0.717–1.818), and birth weight (95% CI 1.000–1.001) did not influence CS preference. In comparison with fetal preference, maternal preference was the prior indicator for CS. Correlation analysis showed that pregnant women with longer intervals since the last CS and history of gravidity, parity, and vaginal delivery showed good progress in the first and second stages of vaginal delivery. Conclusions We concluded that maternal and gestational age and interval since the last CS promoted CS preference among pregnant women with scarred uteruses.

Introduction: The rate of primary cesarean section is on the rising trend. Vaginal birth after cesarean section can be an alternative to reduce cesarean section worldwide. Antenatal examination and intrapartum monitoring are the most important factors for a vaginal birth after a cesarean section. This study aims to determine the acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section trial in a tertiary care hospital in Nepal. Methods: This is a descriptive cross-sectional study carried out in Shree Birendra Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal, from March 2019 to March 2020. All pregnant women with a previous history of cesarean section meeting Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynecology criteria were included. A trial of labor was conducted on the patients who accepted vaginal birth after cesarean section. Results: A total of 85 cases with previous lower section cesarean section were included in the study. Out of which, 75 (88.2%) refused vaginal birth after cesarean section, and only 10 cases (11.8%) accepted to undergo a trial of labor. Five women (50%) had a successful vaginal birth. Complications were less among the vaginal birth after cesarean section group than the repeat cesarean section group. There was no maternal and neonatal mortality. Conclusions: The acceptance of vaginal birth after cesarean section is very low in this study. No complications were observed among vaginal birth after cesarean section in our study.

Introduction: Vaginal birth after caesarean delivery is associated with better outcomes compared to repeat caesarean section. Accurate antenatal risk stratification of women undergoing a trial of labor after caesarean section is crucial in order to maximize perinatal and maternal outcomes. The primary aim of this study was to explore the role of antepartum ultrasound in predicting the probability of vaginal birth in women attempting trial of labor; the secondary aim was to build a multiparametric prediction model including pregnancy and ultrasound characteristics able to predict vaginal birth and compare its diagnostic performance with previously developed models based exclusively upon clinical and pregnancy characteristics.Methods: Prospective study of consecutive singleton pregnancies scheduled for trial of labor undergoing a dedicated antepartum ultrasound assessment at 36-38 weeks of gestation. Head circumference, estimated fetal weight cervical length, sub-pubic angle were recorded before the onset of labour. The obstetricians and midwives attending the delivery suite were blinded to the ultrasound findings. Multivariate logistic regression and area under the curve analyses were used to explore the strength of association and test the diagnostic accuracy of different maternal and ultrasound characteristics in predicting vaginal birth. Comparison with previously reported clinical models developed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Unit Network (Grobman's models) was performed using De Long analysis.Results: A total of 161women who underwent trial of labor were included in the study. Among them 114 (70.8 %) women had successful vaginal birth. At multivariable logistic regression analysis maternal height (adjusted odds ratio (aOR):1.24;9 5% Confidence Interval (CI)1.17-1.33), previous C-section for arrest labor (aOR:0.77; 95 %CI0.66-0.93), cervical dilation at admission (aOR:1.35 ; 95 %CI1.12-1.74), fetal head circumference (aOR:0.77 ; 5%CI0.43-0.89), subpubic angle (aOR:1.39 95 %CI1.11-1.99) and cervical length (aOR:0.82 95 % CI0.54-0.98) were independently associated with VBAC. A model integrating these variables had an area under curve of 0.839(95 % CI 0.710-0.727) for the prediction of vaginal birth, significantly higher than those achieved with intake (0.694; 95 %CI0.549-0.815; p = 0.01) and admission (0.732: 95 % CI 0.590-0.84; p = 0.04) models reported by Grobman.Conclusion: Antepartum prediction of vaginal birth after a caesarean section is feasible. Fetal head circumference, subpubic angle and cervical length are independently associated and predictive of vaginal birth. Adding these variables to a multiparametric model including maternal parameters improves the diagnostic accuracy of vaginal birth compared to those based only on maternal characteristic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether the use of intrauterine tocodynamometry versus external tocodynamometry (IT versus ET) during labour reduces operative deliveries and improves newborn outcome. As IT provides more accurate information on labour contractions, the hypothesis was that it may more appropriately guide oxytocin use than ET. Design: Randomised controlled trial. Setting: Two labour wards, in a university tertiary hospital and a central hospital. Population: A total of 1504 parturients with singleton pregnancies, gestational age ≥37 weeks and fetus in cephalic position: 269 women with uterine scars, 889 nulliparas and 346 parous women with oxytocin augmentation. Methods: Participants underwent IT (n = 736) or ET (n = 768) during the active first stage of labour. Main outcome measures: Primary outcome: rate of operative deliveries. Secondary outcomes: duration of labour, amount of oxytocin given, adverse neonatal outcomes. Results: Operative delivery rates were 26.9% (IT) and 25.9% (ET) (odds ratio 1.05, 95% CI 0.84–1.32, P = 0.663). The ET to IT conversion rate was 31%. We found no differences in secondary outcomes (IT versus ET). IT reduced oxytocin use during labours with signs of fetal distress, and trial of labour after caesarean section. Conclusions: IT did not reduce the rate of operative deliveries, use of oxytocin, or adverse neonatal outcomes, and it did not shorten labour duration. IT (versus ET) reduced oxytocin use in high‐risk labours but did not influence operative delivery rate or adverse neonatal outcomes. IT (versus ET) reduced oxytocin use in high‐risk labours but did not influence operative delivery rate or adverse neonatal outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Offering a trial of labor (ToL) after previous caesarean section (CS) is an important strategy to reduce short- and long-term morbidity associated with repeated CS. We compared maternal and perinatal outcomes between ToL and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) at a district hospital in rural Rwanda. Methods Audit of women’s records with one prior CS who delivered at Ruhengeri district hospital in Rwanda between June 2013 and December 2014. Results Out of 4131 women who came for delivery, 435 (11%) had scarred uteri. ToL, which often started at home or at health centers without appropriate counseling, occurred in 297/435 women (68.3%), while 138 women (31.7%) delivered by ERCS. ToL was successful in 134/297 (45.1%) women. There were no maternal deaths. Twenty-eight out of all 435 women with a scarred uterus (6.4%) sustained severe acute maternal morbidity (puerperal sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture), which was higher in women with ToL (n = 23, 7.7%) compared with women who had an ERCS (n = 5, 3.6%): adjusted odds ration (aOR) 1.4 (95% CI 1.2–5.4). There was no difference in neonatal admissions between women who underwent ToL (n = 64/297; 21.5%) and those who delivered by ERCS (n = 35/138; 25.4%: aOR 0.8; CI 0.5–1.6). The majority of admissions were due to perinatal asphyxia that occurred more often in infants whose mothers underwent ToL (n = 40, 13.4%) compared to those who delivered by ERCS (n = 15, 10.9%: aOR 1.9; CI 1.6–3.6). Perinatal mortality was similar among infants whose mothers had ToL (n = 8; 27/1000 ToLs) and infants whose mothers underwent ERCS (n = 4; 29/1000 ERCSs). Conclusions A considerable proportion of women delivering at a rural Rwandan hospital had scarred uteri. Severe acute maternal morbidity was higher in the ToL group, perinatal mortality did not differ. ToL took place under suboptimal conditions: access for women with scarred uteri into a facility with 24-h surgery should be guaranteed to increase the safety of ToL.

Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) is an increasingly common choice offered to women in the UK. March 2019 saw the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence (NICE) publish new guidelines surrounding this area of intrapartum care. NICE's recommendations could be used in conjunction with existing guidelines, for example those published by the Royal College of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (RCOG) in 2015, to improve the experiences for women choosing VBAC and support healthcare professionals caring for women choosing trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) and VBAC. This article explores the history of VBAC and discusses how the new guidelines may inform future practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) delivery remains a controversial topic, and one for which there is a lack of robust data to guide clinicians and parturients regarding their best option for mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. In many developed countries the trend observed in recent years is that of progressively reduced VBAC rates, and hence increased use of elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS). This factor has contributed, more than any other, to the disproportionately high caesarean section (CS) rates in many countries. With current CS rates varying between 30 and 50% in the developed world, a previous CS is the cited primary indication in approximately 30%. To compound matters, there are huge variations in the reported VBAC rates between different countries, regions and even institutions. This review has focused on the recent trends in VBAC attempt, success and overall rates internationally, with inclusion of figures for a period of 25 years from a single Irish institution. An analysis of the reported factors that influence VBAC success, or failure, is presented. The complex task of estimating risk, both perinatal and maternal, for women who pursue VBAC or ERCS, is included in this review. Finally, the current evidence base for clinical practice pertaining to VBAC is outlined, with inclusion of commentary regarding the future for this difficult area of obstetric practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prospective observational study was conducted to find out the success of VBAC and the common predictive factors leading to successful VBAC. A total of 136 pregnant women with full term pregnancy, having history of previous one lower segment caesarean section and without any other medical and obstetrical complication were enrolled in the study. The success of VBAC was 75 percent, of which 92.16% had normal vaginal delivery and 5.88% had vacuum and 1.96% had outlet forceps delivery. Twenty five percent women required caesarean section for various indications. There was significantly higher number of women who had history of previous successful VBAC, had vaginal delivery (91.67%; p=0.038).It was observed that the rate of vaginal delivery was significantly high in women with Bishop's score between 10 to 13 (94.64%) compared to 6 to 9 (61.25%) (p<0.001).The baby weight determined by ultrasound scan was significantly associated with mode of delivery (p=0.049). The common predictors of successful VBAC were history of previous successful VBAC, normal body mass index, favorable Bishop's score, spontaneous onset of labor and average baby weight. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Offering a trial of labor (ToL) after previous caesarean section (CS) is an important strategy to reduce short- and long-term morbidity associated with repeated CS. We compared maternal and perinatal outcomes between ToL and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) at a district hospital in rural Rwanda.Methods: Audit of women's records with one prior CS who delivered at Ruhengeri district hospital in Rwanda between June 2013 and December 2014.Results: Out of 4131 women who came for delivery, 435 (11%) had scarred uteri. ToL, which often started at home or at health centers without appropriate counseling, occurred in 297/435 women (68.3%), while 138 women (31.7%) delivered by ERCS. ToL was successful in 134/297 (45.1%) women. There were no maternal deaths. Twenty-eight out of all 435 women with a scarred uterus (6.4%) sustained severe acute maternal morbidity (puerperal sepsis, postpartum hemorrhage, uterine rupture), which was higher in women with ToL (n = 23, 7.7%) compared with women who had an ERCS (n = 5, 3.6%): adjusted odds ration (aOR) 1.4 (95% CI 1.2-5.4). There was no difference in neonatal admissions between women who underwent ToL (n = 64/297; 21.5%) and those who delivered by ERCS (n = 35/138; 25.4%: aOR 0.8; CI 0.5-1.6). The majority of admissions were due to perinatal asphyxia that occurred more often in infants whose mothers underwent ToL (n = 40, 13.4%) compared to those who delivered by ERCS (n = 15, 10.9%: aOR 1.9; CI 1.6-3.6). Perinatal mortality was similar among infants whose mothers had ToL (n = 8; 27/1000 ToLs) and infants whose mothers underwent ERCS (n = 4; 29/1000 ERCSs).Conclusions: A considerable proportion of women delivering at a rural Rwandan hospital had scarred uteri. Severe acute maternal morbidity was higher in the ToL group, perinatal mortality did not differ. ToL took place under suboptimal conditions: access for women with scarred uteri into a facility with 24-h surgery should be guaranteed to increase the safety of ToL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:  Uterine rupture is associated with clinically significant uterine bleeding, fetal distress, expulsion or protrusion of the fetus, placenta or both into the abdominal cavity requiring prompt cesarean delivery and uterine repair or hysterectomy. Previous cesarean section is the most common risk factor. The most consistent early indicator of it is the onset of prolonged and profound fetal bradycardia., Objective: In this study, we present six cases of uterine rupture highlighting risk factors, and challenges in diagnosis and management, along with a review of the literature., Method: A retrospective case series identified eight cases during the five-year study period. All cases from January 1, 2018 to December 31, 2022 were reviewed. Cases with multiple previous cesarean sections were excluded., Result: Six cases meeting the study criteria were included in our case series. Uterine rupture was a rare occurrence with a prevalence of nine in 31,315 births representing 0.03% of deliveries. No maternal mortality or need for hysterectomy occurred in our study. Fifty percent of uterine ruptures were associated with stillbirths. The most common risk factor was a previous cesarean section in 83.3%. The most common presenting sign was non-reassuring fetal status patterns in 66.6%. A single case had a silent rupture., Conclusion: Signs and symptoms of uterine rupture are nonspecific making diagnosis challenging. Delay in definitive management causes significant fetal morbidity and mortality. For best outcomes, vaginal birth after a previous cesarean section needs close monitoring in appropriately prepared units with the ability to perform immediate cesarean delivery and provide advanced neonatal support., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Abdulmane et al.)

Objective: To assess the risks of uterine rupture, maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labour (TOL) after one previous caesarean were compared with having an elective repeated caesarean section (ERCS) without labour in low-resource settings.Design: A prospective 4-year observational study.Setting: Senegal and Mali.Sample: A cohort of 9712 women with one previous caesarean delivery.Methods: Maternal and perinatal outcomes were compared between 8083 women who underwent a TOL and 1629 women who had an ERCS. Perinatal and maternal outcomes were then stratified according to the presence or absence of risk factors associated with vaginal birth after caesarean section. These outcomes were adjusted on maternal, perinatal and institutional characteristics.Main Outcome Measures: The risks of uterine rupture, maternal complication and perinatal mortality associated with TOL after one previous caesarean as compared with ERCS, RESULTS: The risks of hospital-based maternal complication [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.52; 95% CI 1.09-2.13; P = 0.013] and perinatal mortality (adjusted OR 4.53; 95% CI 2.30-9.92; P < 0.001) were significantly higher in women with a TOL compared with women who had an ERCS. However, when restricted to low-risk women, these differences were not significant (adjusted OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.55-1.46, P = 0.68, and adjusted OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.75-1.86; P = 0.53, for each outcome, respectively). Uterine rupture occurred in 25 (0.64%) of 3885 low-risk women compared with 70 (1.66%) of 4198 women with unfavourable risk factors.Conclusion: Low-risk women have no increased risk of maternal complications or perinatal mortality compared with women with one or more unfavourable factors.Tweetable Abstract: Low-risk women have a lower risk of maternal complications or perinatal mortality compared with high-risk women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Caesarean sections (CS) have significantly increased worldwide and a previous CS is nowadays an important and increasingly reported indication to perform a repeat CS. There is a paucity of information in Switzerland on the incidence of repeat CS after previous CS and relationship between the rates of vaginal birth after CS (VBAC). The aim of this study was to analyse the actual trend in VBAC in Switzerland.Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study to analyse the proportion of VBAC among all pregnant women with previous sections which give birth during two time periods (group 1:1998/1999 vs. group 2:2004/2005) in our tertiary care referral hospital and in the annual statistics of Swiss Women's Hospitals (ASF-Statistics). In addition, the proportion of induction of labour after a previous caesarean and its success was analysed.Results: In both cohorts studied, we found a significant decrease of vaginal births (p < 0.05) and a significant increase of primary elective repeat caesarean section (p < 0.05) from the first to the second time period, while there was a decrease of secondary repeat caesarean sections. The prevalence of labour induction did not decrease.Conclusion: Our study shows that vaginal birth after a prior caesarean section has decreased over time in Switzerland. There was no significant change in labour induction during the study period. While this trend might reflect an increasing demand for safety in pregnancy and childbirth, it concomitantly increases maternal risks of further pregnancies, and women need to be appropriately informed about long-term risks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare single- with double-layer closure of the uterus for the risk of uterine rupture in women attempting vaginal birth after one prior caesarean delivery.Design: Cohort study.Setting: Sweden.Population: From a total of 19 604 nulliparous women delivered by caesarean section in the years 2001-2007, 7683 women attempting vaginal birth in their second delivery were analysed.Methods: Data from population-based registers were linked to hospital-based registers that held data from maternity and delivery records. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of uterine rupture after single- or double-layer closure of the uterus. Results are presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).Main Outcome Measure: Uterine rupture.Results: Uterine rupture during labour occurred in 103 (1.3%) women. There was no increased risk of uterine rupture when single- was compared with double-layer closure of the uterus (OR 1.17; 95% CI 0.78-1.76). Maternal factors associated with uterine rupture were: age ≥35 years and height ≤160 cm. Factors from the first delivery associated with uterine rupture in a subsequent delivery were: infection and giving birth to an infant large for gestational age. Risk factors from the second delivery were induction of labour, use of epidural analgesia, and a birthweight of ≥4500 g.Conclusions: There was no significant difference in the rate of uterine rupture when single-layer closure was compared with double -layer closure of the uterus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Regional and interinstitutional variations have been recognized in the increasing incidence of caesarean section. Modes of birth after previous caesarean section vary widely, ranging from elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) and unplanned repeat caesarean section (URCS) after trial of labour to vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC). This study describes interinstitutional variations in mode of birth after previous caesarean section in relation to regional indicators in Germany. Material and methods: A cross-sectional study using the birth registers of six maternity units (n=12,060) in five different German states (n=370,209). Indicators were tested by χ² and relative deviations from regional values were expressed as relative risks and 95% confidence intervals. Results: The percentages of women in the six units with previous caesarean section ranged from 11.9% to 15.9% (P=0.002). VBAC was planned for 36.0% to 49.8% (P=0.003) of these women, but actually completed in only 26.2% to 32.8% (P=0.66). Depending on the indicator, the units studied deviated from the regional data by up to 32% [relative risk 0.68 (0.47-0.97)] in respect of completed VBAC among all initiated VBAC. Conclusions: There is substantial interinstitutional variation in mode of birth following previous caesarean section. This variation is in addition to regional patterns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To analyse the mode of delivery in trial of labour (TOL), incidence of successful vaginal deliveries and indications of repeat caesarean section (CS). Materials and Methods: Prospective selective study. Study population consisted of 367 pregnant women with previous one lower segment caesarean section (LSCS) in reproductive age group. These were grouped in to three groups, Group 1 (n = 239): Women, who were elected for repeat CS without a TOL. Group 2 (n = 76): Women, who were given TOL and delivered vaginally. Group 3 (n = 52): Women, who were given a TOL but due to failed trial, had to be taken for emergency repeat section. The maternal and foetal outcome was studied in all the groups. Statistical Method Used: The data was entered in the Microsoft excel worksheet, values expressed as mean ± SD. Chi-square test was done to compare the categorical variables among the groups. ANOVA (one-way analysis of variance) was done to compare the baseline characteristics of patients and time to delivery among the groups. Results: Out of 128 women who were given TOL, 76 (59.37%) vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) occurred, out of which 40 (52.63%) had spontaneous vaginal deliveries without augmentation of labour and 36 (47.36%) subjects had augmentation of labour with artificial rupture of membranes (ARMs) and oxytocin. A total of 52 women (40.62%) underwent emergency LSCS. Conclusion: Proper selection and counselling about clinically significant risks, women can be given TOL with careful monitoring and taken for emergency LSCS on minimal indication is the best answer to management of previous one CS in labour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: to describe the outcomes related to birth after a caesarean section (CS) in one Australian state, New South Wales (NSW), over a nine-year period. The objectives were to determine whether changes had occurred in the rates of attempted and successful vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), induction of labour, place of birth, admission to special care or neonatal intensive care nursery and perinatal mortality. Design and setting: cross-sectional analytic study of hospital births in New South Wales using population-based data from 1998–2006. Participants: women experiencing the next birth after a CS where: the total number of previous CS was 1; the presentation at birth was vertex; it was a singleton pregnancy; and, the estimated gestational age was greater than or equal to 37 weeks. A total of 53,455 women met these criteria. Measurements: data were obtained from NSW Health Department''s Midwives Data Collection (MDC). The MDC includes all live births and stillbirths of at least 20 weeks gestation or 400g birth weight in the state. Findings: over the nine-year period, the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section declined significantly (31–19%). The proportion of women who ‘attempted a vaginal birth’ also declined (49–35%). Of those women who laboured, the vaginal birth rate declined from 64% to 53%. Babies whose mothers ‘attempted’ a VBAC were significantly less likely to require admission to a special care nursery (SCN) or neonatal intensive care (NICU). The perinatal mortality rate in babies whose mothers ‘attempted’ a VBAC was higher than those babies born after an elective caesarean section although the absolute numbers are very small. Key conclusions: rates of VBAC have declined over this nine-year period. Rates of neonatal mortality and proxy measures of morbidity (admission to a nursery) are generally in the low range for similar settings. Implications for practice: decisions around the next birth after CS are complex. Efforts to keep the first birth normal and support women who have had a CS to have a normal birth need to be made. More research to predict which women are likely to achieve a successful VBAC and the most effective ways to facilitate a VBAC is essential. Midwives have a critical role to play in these endeavours. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Objective: To study risk factors for uterine rupture (UR) in women with one previous caesarean section (CS) undergoing a vaginal birth after CS (VBAC). Study design: A nested case–control study was conducted. Baseline characteristics, general obstetric history, details of the previous CS, current delivery and maternal and neonatal outcome were analysed for 41 cases with a UR and 157 controls (no rupture). Data were extracted from 21 Dutch hospitals. Results: Labour induction was more common in cases than in controls (51% vs. 25% respectively, P =0.001), and in case of induction therapy especially the use of prostaglandins (PGE2) was more frequent in the case group (86% vs. 46%, P =0.014 for cases and controls respectively). Patients with UR had a significantly lower Bishop score (median: 2.0 vs. 4.0, P =0.005) and received more augmentation of labour compared to controls (36% vs. 18%, P =0.010). In the multivariate analysis induction with PGE2 and oxytocin, induction with PGE2 alone, and augmentation of labour were independent variables affecting the occurrence of UR (respectively OR 13.0, CI 2.3–74.2; OR 4.6, CI 1.9–11.3 and OR 2.7, CI 1.2–6.3). Forty-four percent of the ruptures can be explained by induction of labour with prostaglandins±oxytocin. Conclusion: Having studied baseline characteristics, general obstetric history, details of the previous CS and of the current delivery, we show that no factors other than the use of PGE2 (±oxytocin) in response to a low Bishop score, and augmentation of labour with oxytocin are associated with an increased risk for UR in women undergoing VBAC after one previous CS. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Women with a previous caesarean section should be counselled antenatally about delivery options. The success rate of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC) is 72–76%. The risk of uterine rupture is 22–74/10 000. Continuous foetal monitoring, intravenous access and accessibility to theatre are required in all VBAC cases. Pregnant women with HIV infection should be cared for by a multidisciplinary team. Mother to child transmission of HIV can be reduced to less than 1% with interventions. Antiretroviral therapy is commenced in the second trimester. Mode of delivery is dependent on viral load. Breast feeding should be avoided and babies require postnatal antiretroviral therapy. Cardiotocograph tracings are categorized as normal, suspicious or pathological. Foetal blood sampling is warranted with a pathological tracing, and can be done from early stages of cervical dilatation. At full dilatation, foetal blood sampling can allow more time for head descent to avoid performing a difficult instrumental delivery. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: Although fetal and perinatal death remains a common event in obstetric practice, only a minority of these deaths occur during, or as a consequence of, events during labour or delivery. Unfortunately, many of these deaths are associated with substandard care. In some cases, avoidance of labour altogether, with delivery by Caesarean section, will prevent such adverse events and these risk factors can be determined antenatally. For most women, ostensibly ‘low-risk’ for such problems at the onset of labour, good midwifery and obstetric care, with the judicious use of fetal monitoring and intervention when concerns arise, are the cornerstone of avoiding delivery-related perinatal death. In this review we examine risk factors for delivery-related perinatal death and consider how such tragedies could hopefully be avoided. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Abstract: In developed countries obstetrics has dramatically changed over the past decades. Whilst maternal morbidity and mortality were the key issues during the first half of the 20th century, the second half increasingly concentrated on the fetus and the reduction of fetal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. This is especially relevant in the context of preterm labour and the subsequent consequences for the neonate, with prematurity accounting for 85% of infant mortality and 50% of infant neurological morbidity. With labour induction on the rise without clearly identifiable indications, the consequences for the mother in terms of failed induction, leading to caesarean delivery, as well as iatrogenic prematurity in the fetus are two very relevant issues to be considered. This review includes an update on cervical ripening, pre-induction cervical assessment and failed labour induction, and reviews the most widely used methods of cervical ripening and labour induction, including oxytocin infusion, and vaginal and oral prostaglandin administration. Particular attention has been directed to the specific subsets of women needing induction, including those with pre-labour rupture of membranes and those with previous caesarean deliveries. The National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline on induction of labour (2001; due for an update in 2008) forms the basis for this review, together with the Cochrane database and a literature search to identify and synthesize relevant evidence to answer specific clinical questions. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Posterior wall rupture of the uterus in presence of previous caesarean scar is an extremely rare and unpredictable event. A 26-year old lady in her second pregnancy went into spontaneous labour at 41 weeks gestation. She had emergency caesarean section in her previous pregnancy. She made slow progress in labour to full dilatation without augmentation, but was noted to have fresh vaginal bleeding and breakthrough pain despite an epidural. Uterine scar rupture was suspected and an emergency lower segment caesarean section was carried out. Fresh intraperitoneal bleeding was noted but with an intact previous scar. The baby was delivered in good condition. A vertical posterior uterine wall rupture of the lower segment, 5 cm in length, was found to be bleeding profusely and was successfully repaired. Uterine rupture is a rare but serious complication. Usually the rupture occurs through the previous uterine scar. There are only four reported cases in the literature of posterior uterine rupture in labour through “healthy” uterine tissue in women with previous caesarean section. This is the first instance of fetal survival. The exact mechanism is unknown but likely to be a combination of factors including prostaglandin use, element of obstruction and strong inelastic scar. Strict vigilance is required during labour in women with previous scar. Early recognition of imminent scar rupture should speed delivery and improve the outcome for mother and baby. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim. This study explored the childbirth expectations and knowledge of women who had experienced a caesarean and would prefer a vaginal birth in a subsequent pregnancy. Background. Vaginal birth after caesarean is considered best practice. However, in most western world countries, despite the inherent risks of caesarean for both mother and baby, the number of women labouring after a previous caesarean is declining. Methods. Newspaper advertisements were used to recruit Western Australian women who had experienced a caesarean. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the interview data collected from women who attempted a vaginal birth ( n = 24), or stated they would choose this option, in a subsequent pregnancy ( n = 11). Findings. For this cohort of women, their caesarean experience reinforced their previously held expectations about birthing naturally. The women held strong views about the importance of working with their bodies to achieve a vaginal birth, which was considered an integral part of being a woman and mother. Positive support from family and friends and a reluctance to undergo another caesarean was also influential. Women articulated the risks of caesarean and considered vaginal birth enhanced the health and well-being of the mother and baby, promoted maternal infant connection and the eased the transition to motherhood. Conclusion. This study documents how the importance of birth, as a significant life event, remained the focus of these women's childbirth expectations influencing future decisions on birth mode and mediating against the ‘pressure’ of medical discourse promoting caesarean. Relevance to clinical practice. Knowledge and appreciation of the multiple dimensions that contribute to women's decisions after a caesarean provides valuable information on which service providers and researchers can draw as they investigate interventions that enhance the uptake and success of women birthing vaginally after a caesarean. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Obstetricians frequently need to decide whether to induce a woman who has previously been delivered by Caesarean section (LSCS). There is very little evidence from randomised controlled trials to aid their decision making. Observational studies, with their inherent flaws, suggest a 3.6% maternal complication rate in women undergoing repeat elective LSCS, and approximately 66% vaginal delivery rate and 1% uterine rupture rate in women who were induced. There is little evidence to guide the choice of induction agent. Various factors have been suggested to predict a successful vaginal delivery, but a previous vaginal delivery appears to be strongly predictive of a good outcome. Alternative strategies, such as stretching and sweeping the membranes or awaiting spontaneous labour, may reduce the need for induction. If labour is induced in a woman with a scarred uterus we should ensure that the high risk situation is not compounded by poor care in labour. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Summary: Obstetrics is a specialty that is widely perceived to be associated with a high risk of litigation. In the UK, it accounts for about 60–70% of the total (malpractice) sum paid by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) each year. Professionals involved in malpractice claims can become demoralized and the fear of litigation might be deterring young medical graduates from entering the specialty, leading to a recruitment crisis. Patients, and their families, who are involved in a litigation process often experience physical and emotional trauma, which might not be alleviated by financial compensation. During the antenatal period, missing structural abnormalities during obstetric ultrasound and failure to inform the patients of such abnormalities can result malpractice claims. Intrapartum fetal distress, shoulder dystocia and complications of vaginal birth after caesarean section account for the majority of obstetric litigation. Effective communication, team working, documentation, training and education as well as robust risk management strategies can help improve patient care and reduce medico-legal claims. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

To assess the benefits and harms of planned elective repeat Caesarean section with planned vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC).The Cochrane controlled trials register and MEDLINE (1966–current) were searched using the following terms: vaginal birth after C(a)esare(i)an; trial of labo(u)r; elective C(a)esare(i)an; C(a)esare(i)an section, repeat; randomis(z)ed controlled trial; randomis(z)ed trial; clinical trial; and prospective cohort study, to identify all published randomised controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Primary outcomes related to success of trial of labour, need for Caesarean section, maternal and neonatal mortality, and morbidity.There were no randomised controlled trials identified that compared planned elective repeat Caesarean birth with planned vaginal birth. Two prospective cohort studies were identified where all 449 women compared had a single prior Caesarean section in their immediately preceding pregnancy and were suitable for an attempted VBAC in their next pregnancy. For all outcomes, data were available from a single study only. Reported outcome data were available for maternal deaths (0/137 women),in uterofetal deaths (2/312 fetuses), neonatal deaths (0/137 infants), uterine scar dehiscence (2/137 women), uterine scar rupture (1/312 women), and infant Apgar score of less than seven at 5 min of age (9/312 infants). There were no statistically significant differences between planned elective repeat Caesarean section and planned VBAC.There is a paucity of quality information available to assist women and their caregivers regarding optimal mode of birth for women with a single prior Caesarean section in their next pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]