Search

Introduction: Esophageal injury is one of the most serious complications of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with thermic energy sources. Better tissue selectivity of primarily non‐thermic pulsed field ablation (PFA) may eliminate collateral injury, particularly the risk of atrio‐esophageal fistula (AEF). Objective: To compare the incidence of any (peri)‐esophageal injury following PVI using PFA to thermic energy sources. Methods: Using endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound, and electrogastrography before and after PVI, esophageal and periesophageal injury (mucosal lesions, food retention, periesophageal edema, or vagal nerve injury) were assessed following PFA and radiofrequency (RF)‐ or cryoballoon (CB)‐PVI. Results: Between December 2022 and February 2023, 20 patients (67 ± 10 years, 53% male) undergoing PFA (Farapulse, Boston Scientific) for atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied and compared with a previous cohort of 57 patients who underwent thermic PVI (CB: n = 33; RF: n = 24). Following PFA‐PVI, none of the patients had mucosal lesions, food retention, or ablation‐induced vagal nerve injury; four patients showed periesophageal edema. Following thermic ablation, 33/57 patients (58%) showed esophageal and/or periesophageal injury (CB: 21/33 [64%], RF: 12/24 [50%]), in detail 4/57 mucosal lesions, 18/57 food retention, 17/57 vagal nerve injury, and 20/52 edema. Midterm success rates were similar for all energy sources. Conclusion: In contrast to thermic ablation tools, PFA is not associated with relevant esophageal and periesophageal injury, and might, therefore, reduce or eliminate the risk of potentially lethal AEF in interventional treatment of AF. The etiology of ablation‐induced periesophageal edema is unknown but has not been shown to be related to lesion progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundSymptomatic gastric hypomotility (SGH) is a rare but major complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, but data on this are scarce.ObjectiveWe compared the clinical course of SGH occurring with different energy sources.MethodsThis multicenter study retrospectively collected the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with SGH after AF ablation.ResultsThe data of 93 patients (67.0 ± 11.2 years, 68 men, 52 paroxysmal AF) with SGH after AF ablation were collected from 23 cardiovascular centers. Left atrial (LA) ablation sets included pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone, a PVI plus a roof-line, and an LA posterior wall isolation in 42 (45.2%), 11 (11.8%), and 40 (43.0%) patients, respectively. LA ablation was performed by radiofrequency ablation, cryoballoon ablation, or both in 38 (40.8%), 38 (40.8%), and 17 (18.3%) patients, respectively. SGH diagnoses were confirmed at 2 (1–4) days post-procedure, and 28 (30.1%) patients required re-hospitalizations. Fasting was required in 81 (92.0%) patients for 4 (2.5–5) days; the total hospitalization duration was 11 [7–19.8] days. After conservative treatment, symptoms disappeared in 22.3% of patients at 1 month, 48.9% at 2 months, 57.6% at 3 months, 84.6% at 6 months, and 89.7% at 12 months, however, one patient required surgery after radiofrequency ablation. Symptoms persisted for >1-year post-procedure in 7 patients. The outcomes were similar regardless of the energy source and LA lesion set.ConclusionsThe clinical course of SGH was similar regardless of the energy source. The diagnosis was often delayed, and most recovered within 6 months, yet could persist for over 1 year in 10%.

Introduction: Safety of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been established in clinical studies. However, despite prevention efforts the incidence of damage to (peri)‐esophageal tissue has not decreased, and the pathophysiology is incompletely understood. Damage to vagal nerve branches may be involved in lesion progression to atrio‐esophageal fistula. Using electrogastrography, we assessed the incidence of periesophageal vagal nerve injury (VNI) following atrial fibrillation ablation and its association with procedural parameters and endoscopic results. Methods: Patients were studied using electrogastrography, endoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasound before and after cryoballoon (CB) or radiofrequency (RF) PVI. The incidence of ablation‐induced neuropathic pattern (indicating VNI) in pre‐ and postprocedural electrogastrography was assessed and correlated with endoscopic results and ablation data. Results: Between February 2021 und January 2022, 85 patients (67 ± 10 years, 53% male) were included, 33 were treated with CB and 52 with RF (38 with moderate power moderate duration [25–30 W] and 14 with high power short duration [50 W]). Ablation‐induced VNI was detected in 27/85 patients independent of the energy form. Patients with VNI more frequently had postprocedural endoscopically detected pathology (8% mucosal esophageal lesions, 36% periesophageal edema, 33% food retention) but there was incomplete overlap. Pre‐existing esophagitis increased the likelihood of VNI. Ablation data and esophageal temperature data did not predict VNI. Conclusion: PVI‐induced VNI is quite common and independent of ablation energy source. VNI is part of (peri)‐esophageal damage and only partially overlaps with endoscopic findings. VNI‐associated acidic reflux may be involved in the complex pathophysiology of esophageal lesion progression to fistula. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is an effective treatment; however, periesophageal vagal nerve injury is not rare and sometimes results in acute gastroparesis (AGP) after atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA). We sought to investigate the incidence and risk factors of AGP via preprocedural computed tomography (CT) analysis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 422 patients who underwent index AFA at our center. Using contrast‐enhanced CT performed before ablation, the anatomical characteristics of the esophagus were compared between patients with and without post‐ablation AGP. AGP was diagnosed by the presence of symptoms, fasting abdominal X‐ray radiography as a screening test, and additional abdominal imaging. Results Of the 422 patients (age, 67 ± 11 years; male, 68.5%; cryoballoon, 63.7%), AGP developed in 14 (3.3%) patients, and six of 14 patients were asymptomatic. AGP resolved in all patients within 4 weeks without invasive treatment. In the AGP group, the esophagus was frequently located on the vertebra (middle‐positioned esophagus) (AGP vs non‐AGP, 42.9% vs 11.5%; P = .01), and additional posterior wall ablation was frequently performed (50.0% vs 14.5%; P = .02). In the multivariate analysis, middle‐positioned esophagus (P = .02; odds ratio, 9.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐53.3) and additional posterior wall ablation (P = .01; odds ratio, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.5‐42.1) were independent predictors of AGP. Conclusions Anatomical evaluation of the esophagus using CT may be simple and useful for predicting AGP after AFA. High‐risk patients who have middle‐positioned esophagus or who underwent excessive posterior wall ablation should be followed up closely.

Background  Perioesophageal vagal nerve (VN) injury after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains an important complication. The VN provides parasympathetic innervation to the majority of the abdominal organs—including the stomach and the sphincter of Oddi (SO)—and regulates smooth muscle contraction. We present an unusual case of SO spasm induced by VN injury after cryoballoon ablation (CBA). Case summary  A 71-year-old woman presented to our institution with paroxysmal AF. The patient had a history of cholecystectomy and SO dysfunction. She had undergone CBA for AF. Immediately after the procedure, the patient developed epigastric pain. Computed tomography showed dilation of the intra- and extrahepatic bile ducts, with the diameter of the common bile duct measuring ∼15.6 mm. Blood tests on postoperative Day 1 revealed severely elevated aminotransferase levels (aspartate aminotransferase, 3156 U/L; alanine aminotransferase, 2084 U/L; lactate dehydrogenase, 2279 U/L; total bilirubin 1.7 mg/dL). Discussion  It is known that VN denervation induces SO spasms. The right and left vagal trunks descend alongside the oesophagus, forming a perioesophageal plexus and innervating most of the gastrointestinal organs. In our case, SO spasm was induced as a result of the perioesophageal plexus injury caused by CBA. Underlying SO dysfunction and post-cholecystectomy also played an important role. Coupled with the absence of the gallbladder, which is the reservoir of bile juice and coordinator of SO, SO spasm caused severe elevation of the bile duct pressure. Care should be taken when performing AF ablation with regards to the stomach and the SO. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation is an effective treatment; however, periesophageal vagal nerve injury is not rare and sometimes results in acute gastroparesis (AGP) after atrial fibrillation ablation (AFA). We sought to investigate the incidence and risk factors of AGP via preprocedural computed tomography (CT) analysis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 422 patients who underwent index AFA at our center. Using contrast‐enhanced CT performed before ablation, the anatomical characteristics of the esophagus were compared between patients with and without post‐ablation AGP. AGP was diagnosed by the presence of symptoms, fasting abdominal X‐ray radiography as a screening test, and additional abdominal imaging. Results: Of the 422 patients (age, 67 ± 11 years; male, 68.5%; cryoballoon, 63.7%), AGP developed in 14 (3.3%) patients, and six of 14 patients were asymptomatic. AGP resolved in all patients within 4 weeks without invasive treatment. In the AGP group, the esophagus was frequently located on the vertebra (middle‐positioned esophagus) (AGP vs non‐AGP, 42.9% vs 11.5%; P =.01), and additional posterior wall ablation was frequently performed (50.0% vs 14.5%; P =.02). In the multivariate analysis, middle‐positioned esophagus (P =.02; odds ratio, 9.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5‐53.3) and additional posterior wall ablation (P =.01; odds ratio, 7.6; 95% CI, 1.5‐42.1) were independent predictors of AGP. Conclusions: Anatomical evaluation of the esophagus using CT may be simple and useful for predicting AGP after AFA. High‐risk patients who have middle‐positioned esophagus or who underwent excessive posterior wall ablation should be followed up closely. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]