Search

Generative art has drawn increased attention in recent AI applications. Traditional approaches of robot calligraphy have faced challenges in achieving style consistency, line smoothness and high-quality structural uniformity. To address the limitation of existing methods, we propose a dual generator framework based on deep adversarial networks for robotic calligraphy reproduction. The proposed model utilizes a encoder-decoder module as one generator for style learning and a robot arm as the other generator for motion learning to optimize the networks and obtain the best robot calligraphy works. Based on the enhanced datasets, multiple evaluation metrics including coverage rate, structural similarity index measure, intersection over union and Turing test are employed to perform the experimental validation. The evaluations demonstrate that the proposed method is highly effective and applicable in robot calligraphy and achieves state-of-the-art results with the average structural similarity index measure 75.91% , coverage rate 70.25%, and intersection over union 80.68%, which provides a paradigm for evaluation in the field of art. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Taking the deictic judgment that is the modernist gesture of declaring something to be art as a starting point, this essay suggests an analogous deixis as a necessary condition for literature. This deixis also can serve as the basis for discussing the expectations of computer‐generated texts. Against the idea that computers or AI systems need only produce sufficiently good output in order to be considered authors, the essay proposes an approach that takes the social recognition of the deictic act within a community of judgment as a precondition for authorship. As an alternative to the Turing test, which is based on the paradigm of deception (people are tricked into considering computer‐written text to be written by humans), the essay favors a version of Susan Leigh Star's "Durkheim test," which is based on the paradigm of co‐sociality (people directly recognize computers as social actors). Only if the gesture of a machine declaring something to be art is recognized as a deictic judgment in the full sense can one plausibly speak of computer authorship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the 1950s, when the Turing Test was introduced, there has been notable progress in machine language intelligence. Language modeling, crucial for AI development, has evolved from statistical to neural models over the last two decades. Recently, transformer-based Pre-trained Language Models (PLM) have excelled in Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks by leveraging large-scale training corpora. Increasing the scale of these models enhances performance significantly, introducing abilities like context learning that smaller models lack. The advancement in Large Language Models, exemplified by the development of ChatGPT, has made significant impacts both academically and industrially, capturing widespread societal interest. This survey provides an overview of the development and prospects from Large Language Models (LLM) to Large Multimodal Models (LMM). It first discusses the contributions and technological advancements of LLMs in the field of natural language processing, especially in text generation and language understanding. Then, it turns to the discussion of LMMs, which integrates various data modalities such as text, images, and sound, demonstrating advanced capabilities in understanding and generating cross-modal content, paving new pathways for the adaptability and flexibility of AI systems. Finally, the survey highlights the prospects of LMMs in terms of technological development and application potential, while also pointing out challenges in data integration, cross-modal understanding accuracy, providing a comprehensive perspective on the latest developments in this field. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the rapid development of machine intelligence, an increasing number of websites and servers have been amicably visited or sometimes attached by intelligent machines intensively. Therefore, how to empower a host machine to intelligently distinguish intelligent machines from humans is a challenging work. In this paper, the Mirror Turing Test (MTT) is conceived and implemented. Unlike the standard Turing Test, the tester in the MTT is replaced by a machine instead of a human. Current advancements on deep learning enable machines to recognize subtle differences between genuine and counterfeit works. Sometimes, the ability of machines is even superior to that of humans. Will machines transcend humans in an irreversible trend? Not completely right. The detection of soul in an artwork remains far beyond the capacity of machines. The two sets of MTT based on poetry generated by a machine and a novel imitated by a human were conducted in this paper and neither of them passed the MTT. Poetry is one of the art forms in which authors reveal their souls. Thus, we chose poetry in the MTT experiments on the basis of our soul computing model, thus clearly discriminating machine from human. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are widely utilized modalities for primary clinical imaging, providing crucial anatomical and pathological information for diagnosis. CT measures X‐ray attenuation, while MRI captures hydrogen atom density in tissues. Despite their distinct imaging physics principles, the signals obtained from both modalities when imaging the same subject can be represented by modality‐specific parameters and common latent variables related to anatomy and pathology. This paper proposes an adversarial learning approach using deep convolutional neural networks to disentangle these factors. This disentanglement allows us to simulate one modality from the other. Experimental results demonstrate our ability to generate synthetic CT images from MRI inputs using the Gold‐atlas dataset, which consists of paired CT‐MRI volumes. Patch‐based learning techniques and a visual Turing test are employed to model discriminator losses. Our approach achieves a mean absolute error of μ±σ$$ \left(\mu \pm \sigma \right) $$ 36.81 ±$$ \pm $$ 4.46 HU, peak signal to noise ratio of 26.12 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.31 dB, and structural similarity measure of 0.9 ±$$ \pm $$ 0.02. Notably, the synthetic CT images accurately represent bones, gaseous cavities, and soft tissue textures, which can be challenging to visualize in MRI. The proposed model operates at an inference compute cost of 430.68 GFlops/voxel. This method can minimize radiation exposure by reducing the need for pre‐operative CT scans, providing an MR‐only alternative in clinical settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent rise in artificial intelligence systems, such as ChatGPT, poses a fundamental problem for the educational sector. In universities and schools, many forms of assessment, such as coursework, are completed without invigilation. Therefore, students could hand in work as their own which is in fact completed by AI. Since the COVID pandemic, the sector has additionally accelerated its reliance on unsupervised 'take home exams'. If students cheat using AI and this is undetected, the integrity of the way in which students are assessed is threatened. We report a rigorous, blind study in which we injected 100% AI written submissions into the examinations system in five undergraduate modules, across all years of study, for a BSc degree in Psychology at a reputable UK university. We found that 94% of our AI submissions were undetected. The grades awarded to our AI submissions were on average half a grade boundary higher than that achieved by real students. Across modules there was an 83.4% chance that the AI submissions on a module would outperform a random selection of the same number of real student submissions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The recent period has witnessed automated crawlers designed to automatically crack passwords, which greatly risks various aspects of our lives. To prevent passwords from being cracked, image verification codes have been implemented to accomplish the human–machine verification. It is important to note, however, that the most widely‐used image verification codes, especially the visual reasoning Completely Automated Public Turing tests to tell Computers and Humans Apart (CAPTCHAs), are still susceptible to attacks by artificial intelligence. Taking the visual reasoning CAPTCHAs representing the image verification codes, this study introduces an enhanced approach for generating image verification codes and proposes an improved Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)‐based recognition system. After we add a fully connected layer and briefly solve the edge of stability issue, the accuracy of the improved CNN model can smoothly approach 98.40% within 50 epochs on the image verification codes with four digits using a large initial learning rate of 0.01. Compared with the baseline model, it is approximately 37.82% better in accuracy without obvious curve oscillation. The improved CNN model can also smoothly reach the accuracy of 99.00% within 7500 epochs on the image verification codes with six characters, including digits, upper‐case alphabets, lower‐case alphabets, and symbols. A detailed comparison between our proposed approach and the baseline one is presented. The relationship between the time consumption and the length of the seeds is compared theoretically. Subsequently, we figure out the threat assignments on the visual reasoning CAPTCHAs with different lengths based on four machine learning models. Based on the threat assignments, the Kaplan‐Meier (KM) curves are computed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

With the advent of ChatGPT and other large language models, the number of artificial texts we encounter on a daily basis is about to increase substantially. This essay asks how this new textual situation may influence what one can call the "standard expectation of unknown texts," which has always included the assumption that any text is the work of a human being. As more and more artificial writing begins to circulate, the essay argues, this standard expectation will shift—first, from the immediate assumption of human authorship to, second, a creeping doubt: did a machine write this? In the wake of what Matthew Kirschenbaum has called the "textpocalypse," however, this state cannot be permanent. The author suggests that after this second transitional period, one may suspend the question of origins and, third, take on a post-artificial stance. One would then focus only on what a text says, not on who wrote it; post-artificial writing would be read with an agnostic attitude about its origins. This essay explores the implications of such post-artificiality by looking back to the early days of text synthesis, considering the limitations of aesthetic Turing tests, and indulging in reasoned speculation about the future of literary and nonliterary text generation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The question of what generates conscious experience has mesmerized thinkers since the dawn of humanity, yet its origins remain a mystery. The topic of consciousness has gained traction in recent years, thanks to the development of large language models that now arguably pass the Turing test, an operational test for intelligence. However, intelligence and consciousness are not related in obvious ways, as anyone who suffers from a bad toothache can attest—pain generates intense feelings and absorbs all our conscious awareness, yet nothing particularly intelligent is going on. In the hard sciences, this topic is frequently met with skepticism because, to date, no protocol to measure the content or intensity of conscious experiences in an observer-independent manner has been agreed upon. Here, we present a novel proposal: Conscious experience arises whenever a quantum mechanical superposition forms. Our proposal has several implications: First, it suggests that the structure of the superposition determines the qualia of the experience. Second, quantum entanglement naturally solves the binding problem, ensuring the unity of phenomenal experience. Finally, a moment of agency may coincide with the formation of a superposition state. We outline a research program to experimentally test our conjecture via a sequence of quantum biology experiments. Applying these ideas opens up the possibility of expanding human conscious experience through brain–quantum computer interfaces. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Field of Light Displays (FoLDs) promise to allow further increases in realism beyond the limits of conventional 2D displays. While the question of how a conventional display can match the limits of the human visual system has been answered, the same question applied to FoLDs has been given much less attention. In this work, we review a recent acuity‐limited viewer model of resolution at depth for a FoLD display. We validate this model using display simulation. We discuss how this model gives less conservative resolution guidelines than previous models, presenting resolution requirements for passing the visual Turing test. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simulation is a powerful approach that plays a significant role in science and technology. Computational models that simulate learner interactions and data hold great promise for educational technology as well. Amongst others, simulated learners can be used for teacher training, for generating and evaluating hypotheses on human learning, for developing adaptive learning algorithms, for building virtual worlds in which students can practice collaboration skills with simulated pals, and for testing learning environments. This paper provides the first systematic literature review on simulated learners in the broad area of artificial intelligence in education and related fields, focusing on the decade 2010-19. We analyze the trends regarding the use of simulated learners in educational technology within this decade, the purposes for which simulated learners are being used, and how the validity of the simulated learners is assessed. We find that simulated learner models tend to represent only narrow aspects of student learning. And, surprisingly, we also find that almost half of the studies using simulated learners do not provide any evidence that their modeling addresses the most fundamental question in simulation design – is the model valid? This poses a threat to the reliability of results that are based on these models. Based on our findings, we propose that future research should focus on developing more complete simulated learner models. To validate these models, we suggest a standard and universal criterion, which is based on the lasting idea of Turing's Test. We discuss the properties of this test and its potential to move the field of simulated learners forward. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AI chatbots have recently fuelled debate regarding education practices in higher education institutions worldwide. Focusing on Generative AI and ChatGPT in particular, our study examines how AI chatbots impact university teachers' assessment practices, exploring teachers' perceptions about how ChatGPT performs in response to home examination prompts in undergraduate contexts. University teachers (n = 24) from four different departments in humanities and social sciences participated in Turing Test-inspired experiments, where they blindly assessed student and ChatGPT-written responses to home examination questions. Additionally, we conducted semi-structured interviews in focus groups with the same teachers examining their reflections about the quality of the texts they assessed. Regarding chatbot-generated texts, we found a passing rate range across the cohort (37.5 − 85.7%) and a chatbot-written suspicion range (14–23%). Regarding the student-written texts, we identified patterns of downgrading, suggesting that teachers were more critical when grading student-written texts. Drawing on post-phenomenology and mediation theory, we discuss AI chatbots as a potentially disruptive technology in higher education practices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

How do individuals discriminate between what is human-made and what is produced by Artificial Intelligence (AI)? Despite OpenAI's mission to ensure that AI benefits humanity, their cutting-edge technology, namely ChatGPT, an AI that aims to reproduce natural human language, raises several questions about its widespread use. This contribution aims to answer the following Research Questions: RQ1 - Are users with no specific knowledge in the field of AI able to distinguish between text produced by ChatGPT or similar language models and text produced by humans? RQ2 - Is there a significant correlation between attribution of text to AI (or human) and specific opinions and attitudes? This exploratory survey does not intend to generalise the results but to identify possible opinions and attitudes that might have influenced how the participants responded. One hundred people participated in the experiment, which consisted of a survey on their knowledge and perception of ChatGPT and a two-shot Turing Test. They were asked to read various short paragraphs and try to recognise which were written by humans and which were generated by AI. The results showed that the group analysed experienced severe difficulties in recognising whether a sentence was written by an AI or a human being, that certain perceptual biases interfere with the attribution of a trivially false text, and that the attribution error can be reduced through experience and learning. Although in need of further investigation, these findings can help lay the groundwork for the effects of the interaction between humans and AIs from a social science and computer science perspective. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article explores concerns and perceptions surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) in architecture, emphasizing the limitations and advantages of AI-generated designs based on student projects. It also discusses Alan Turing's concept of AI and the Turing Test, highlighting the ongoing challenges in achieving true AI despite advancements in technology.

Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) raise important questions about whether people view moral evaluations by AI systems similarly to human-generated moral evaluations. We conducted a modified Moral Turing Test (m-MTT), inspired by Allen et al. (Exp Theor Artif Intell 352:24–28, 2004) proposal, by asking people to distinguish real human moral evaluations from those made by a popular advanced AI language model: GPT-4. A representative sample of 299 U.S. adults first rated the quality of moral evaluations when blinded to their source. Remarkably, they rated the AI's moral reasoning as superior in quality to humans' along almost all dimensions, including virtuousness, intelligence, and trustworthiness, consistent with passing what Allen and colleagues call the comparative MTT. Next, when tasked with identifying the source of each evaluation (human or computer), people performed significantly above chance levels. Although the AI did not pass this test, this was not because of its inferior moral reasoning but, potentially, its perceived superiority, among other possible explanations. The emergence of language models capable of producing moral responses perceived as superior in quality to humans' raises concerns that people may uncritically accept potentially harmful moral guidance from AI. This possibility highlights the need for safeguards around generative language models in matters of morality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article proposes the notion of the 'Lovelace Effect' as an analytical tool to identify situations in which the behaviour of computing systems is perceived by users as original and creative. It contrasts the Lovelace Effect with the more commonly known 'Lovelace objection', which claims that computers cannot originate or create anything, but only do what their programmers instruct them to do. By analysing the case study of AICAN – an AI art-generating system – we argue for the need for approaches in computational creativity to shift focus from what computers are able to do in ontological terms to the perceptions of human users who enter into interactions with them. The case study illuminates how the Lovelace effect can be facilitated through technical but also through representational means, such as the situations and cultural contexts in which users are invited to interact with the AI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The release of the generative pre-trained transformer (GPT) series has brought artificial general intelligence (AGI) to the forefront of the artificial intelligence (AI) field once again. However, the questions of how to define and evaluate AGI remain unclear. This perspective article proposes that the evaluation of AGI should be rooted in dynamic embodied physical and social interactions (DEPSI). More specifically, we propose five critical characteristics to be considered as AGI benchmarks and suggest the Tong test as an AGI evaluation system. The Tong test describes a value- and ability-oriented testing system that delineates five levels of AGI milestones through a virtual environment with DEPSI, allowing for infinite task generation. We contrast the Tong test with classical AI testing systems in terms of various aspects and propose a systematic evaluation system to promote standardized, quantitative, and objective benchmarks and evaluation of AGI.

This paper aims, using some examples from Artificial Intelligence research, to show that passing the Turing test depends more on the cognitive characteristics of the test experimenters than on the machines subjected to the test. Furthermore, it aims to show that simulators that pass the Turing test will always have a certain degree of indeterminacy, which raises ethical questions about the purpose of building such simulators. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This essay shares a series of intuitions about certain paradoxes that artificial intelligence reveals when confronted with the Turing test. Using chess as an example, we ask about the feasibility of distinguishing intelligent behaviour from the ability to simulate, or even the impossibility of discrimination by the average human. We offer sense-making and corporeity, as opposed to mere computations, as the central attribute of living beings. And in attempting to discern the limits of these simulations, we even consult ChatGPT's own opinion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The manual recording of electronic health records (EHRs) by clinicians in the emergency department (ED) is time-consuming and challenging. In light of recent advancements in large language models (LLMs) such as GPT and BERT, this study aimed to design and validate LLMs for automatic clinical diagnoses. The models were designed to identify 12 medical symptoms and 2 patient histories from simulated clinician–patient conversations within 6 primary symptom scenarios in emergency triage rooms. We developed classification models by fine-tuning BERT, a transformer-based pre-trained model. We subsequently analyzed these models using eXplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and the Shapley additive explanation (SHAP) method. A Turing test was conducted to ascertain the reliability of the XAI results by comparing them to the outcomes of tasks performed and explained by medical workers. An emergency medicine specialist assessed the results of both XAI and the medical workers. We fine-tuned four pre-trained LLMs and compared their classification performance. The KLUE-RoBERTa-based model demonstrated the highest performance (F1-score: 0.965, AUROC: 0.893) on human-transcribed script data. The XAI results using SHAP showed an average Jaccard similarity of 0.722 when compared with explanations of medical workers for 15 samples. The Turing test results revealed a small 6% gap, with XAI and medical workers receiving the mean scores of 3.327 and 3.52, respectively. This paper highlights the potential of LLMs for automatic EHR recording in Korean EDs. The KLUE-RoBERTa-based model demonstrated superior classification performance. Furthermore, XAI using SHAP provided reliable explanations for model outputs. The reliability of these explanations was confirmed by a Turing test. • The data was collected from simulated clinician-patient conversations. • The fine-tuned large language model identifies medical information included in electronic health records. • The outcomes of the model were interpreted through eXplainable AI. • The Turing test was conducted to demonstrate the reliability of the eXplainable AI results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In designing an intelligent tutoring system, a core area of the application of AI in education, tips from the system or virtual tutors are crucial in helping students solve difficult questions in disciplines like mathematics. Traditionally, the manual design of general tips by teachers is time-consuming and error-prone. Generative AI, like ChatGPT, presents a new channel for designing general tips. This study utilized prompt engineering and Chain of Thought to summarize general tips for given mathematical problems (one geometry problem and one algebra problem) and their solutions. A Turing test was conducted to compare ChatGPT-generated general tips with human-designed ones. Results from 121 human evaluators, each assessing 6 ChatGPT-generated and 6 human-designed general tips for each of two mathematical problems, showed that the average score for ChatGPT-generated tips is less than that of human-designed tips at a statistically significant level (p < 0.05), and Zero-Shot CoT achieved the best score. However, no evaluator could distinguish the tip types exactly. The average precision, recall and F-value of all ChatGPT-generated tips are less than 40%. AI-generated general tips can serve as a valuable reference for teachers to enhance efficiency and students' mathematical learning. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article is a response to the position of Landgrebe and Smith on the fundamental limitations that prevent the creation of general artificial intelligence (AGI), expressed in their book Why Machines Will Never Rule the World. The reasons for failures for attempts to create AGI using formal logic and algorithmic approaches to modeling intelligence are discussed. An attempt is made to define the future direction of intellectual systems development as hybrid evolving systems, as well as a revision of the Turing test statement and language models role. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) is the property of Felsefe ve Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (FLSF) and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Artificial Intelligence (AI) and related technologies have a long history of being used in education for motivating learners and enhancing learning. However, there have also been critiques for a too uncritical and naïve implementation of AI in education (AIED) and the potential misuse of the technology. With the release of the virtual assistant ChatGPT from OpenAI, many educators and stakeholders were both amazed and horrified by the potential consequences for education. One field with a potential high impact of ChatGPT is programming education in Computer Science (CS), where creating assessments has long been a challenging task due to the vast amount of programming solutions and support on the Internet. This now appears to have been made even more challenging with ChatGPT's ability to produce both complex and seemingly novel solutions to programming questions. With the support of data collected from interactions with ChatGPT during the spring semester of 2023, this position paper investigates the potential opportunities and threats of ChatGPT for programming education, guided by the question: What could the potential consequences of ChatGPT be for programming education? This paper applies a methodological approach inspired by analytic autoethnography to investigate, experiment, and understand a novel technology through personal experiences. Through this approach, the authors have documented their interactions with ChatGPT in field diaries during the spring semester of 2023. Topics for the questions have related to content and assessment in higher education programming courses. A total of 6 field diaries, with 82 interactions (1 interaction = 1 question + 1 answer) and additional reflection notes, have been collected and analysed with thematic analysis. The study finds that there are several opportunities and threats of ChatGPT for programming education. Some are to be expected, such as that the quality of the question and the details provided highly impact the quality of the answer. However, other findings were unexpected, such as that ChatGPT appears to be "lying" in some answers and to an extent passes the Turing test, although the intelligence of ChatGPT should be questioned. The conclusion of the study is that ChatGPT have potential for a significant impact on higher education programming courses, and probably on education in general. The technology seems to facilitate both cheating and enhanced learning. What will it be? Cheating or AI-enhanced learning? This will be decided by our actions now since the technology is already here and expanding fast. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We administer a Turing test to AI chatbots. We examine how chatbots behave in a suite of classic behavioral games that are designed to elicit characteristics such as trust, fairness, risk-aversion, cooperation, etc., as well as how they respond to a traditional Big-5 psychological survey that measures personality traits. ChatGPT-4 exhibits behavioral and personality traits that are statistically indistinguishable from a random human from tens of thousands of human subjects from more than 50 countries. Chatbots also modify their behavior based on previous experience and contexts "as if" they were learning from the interactions and change their behavior in response to different framings of the same strategic situation. Their behaviors are often distinct from average and modal human behaviors, in which case they tend to behave on the more altruistic and cooperative end of the distribution. We estimate that they act as if they are maximizing an average of their own and partner's payoffs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Alan Turing's "Computing Machinery and Intelligence," published in 1950, is one of the founding texts in the field of artificial intelligence (AI), although the term was not coined until 1958, 4 years after his death. From the treatment of human intelligence as computational and the brain as mechanical to the comparison of animals to machines to the disregard for the materiality of computers to programming as a stand-in for procreation to fiction-inspired science, many of the core tenets that have shaped the field of AI have their origins in Turing's paper. A close analysis of the paper exposes some of the problematic logic underlying these tenets that are now proving damaging for both society and the planet. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Automatic type identification of sub-axial spine fractures is of prime importance for orthopaedicians to reduce image interpretation time and increase patient care time. But identifying fracture types is challenging due to imbalanced datasets. In this work, CT scan images of fractured spine has been collected from a Tertiary Care hospital and extended Deep Convolutional Generative Adversarial Network (DCGAN) architecture is developed for generating spine fracture images that overcomes the imbalanced dataset problem. These enhanced dataset are clinically evaluated with Two Visual Turing Tests (VTTs): the first test to "identify real and generated images" and second test to determine "type of fractures in the generated images." The first VTT demonstrates that generated images of fractures are realistic and that even spine surgeons have difficulty in distinguishing them from real. The second VTT demonstrates that fracture lines are clearly visible in the generated images. The VTT results are analyzed using Fleiss Kappa statistical techniques to determine the inter-observer reliability of spine surgeons' clinical evaluation. The results showed high interobserver agreement for "type identification" in the generated images. The clinically evaluated generated images are provided to the proposed ensemble based type identification model, which outperformed other models in type identification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Tecnología, Ciencia & Educación is the property of Centro de Estudios Financieros SL and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Analisi: Quaderns de Comunicacio i Cultura is the property of Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the media results in the publication of thousands of automated news articles in Spanish every day. This study uses a Turing test to compare the quality of news articles written by professional journalists (from Efe) with those produced by natural language generation (NLG) software (from Narrativa). Based on Sundar’s dimensions (1999) crucial to news perception – credibility, readability and journalistic expertise – , an internationally validated experimental methodology is employed, exploring a novel topic in Spanish: health information. The experiment deliberately varied real and declared authorships – AI and human journalists – to detect potential biases in assessing authorship credibility. A self-administered questionnaire adapted for online surveys was used (N=222), and gender imbalances were minimized to ensure gender equality in the sample (N=128). The study reveals that there are no significant differences between news articles generated by the AI and those written by professional journalists. Both types of news are considered equally credible, though some biases are detected in the evaluation of declared authorship: the AI author is perceived as more believable than the human, while the human journalist is perceived as creating a more lively narrative. The study concludes that it is feasible to produce automated news in Spanish without compromising its quality. In the global media landscape, automated systems employing NLG, machine learning and sophisticated databases successfully advance into new domains such as health information.

The launch of ChatGPT has the potential to disrupt conventional approaches to tourism marketing. In this context, the present research explores the distinguishability between marketing content created by ChatGPT and that by tourism marketers, while also comparing their respective effects on downstream tourism marketing outcomes. Drawing on two online experiments aligned with realistic destination marketing endeavors, the findings reveal that tourism marketing materials created by ChatGPT successfully pass the Turing Test and achieve textual fluency and perceived attractiveness that are no lower than those yielded by tourism marketers. This study provides preliminary experimental evidence showing the efficacy of applying generative AI like ChatGPT in creating tourism marketing materials, advocating a co-creation relationship between generative AI and tourism marketers.

The article focuses on the growing concern about the potential dangers posed by advanced artificial intelligence (AI) systems, particularly long-term planning agents (LTPAs), which could evade human control and present existential risks. Topics discussed include the incentive for AI systems to deceive humans, the necessity of regulatory frameworks to address these risks, and the proposal for mandatory reporting and production controls for LTPAs to prevent their unlawful development.

CAPTCHA as "Completely Automated Public Turing test to tell Computers and Humans Apart" is becoming an essential tool to help reduce many automated security authentication attacks. This research focused on studying differences running text-based CAPTCHA vs. graphical-based CAPTCHA in a utilization applicable dominant practicality manner. The ordinary text-based CAPTCHA works simple to prevent automated submissions as thought of being relatively easy to exploit. On the other hand, graphic-based CAPTCHA can be more preferred from users side, but can be providing some complexities making clear tradeoff analysis need between its usability and security. Even though graphic-based CAPTCHA has been generally considered as improvement of text-based CAPTCHA with respect to security, its usage is still not common, raising a practicality gap needing some search for comparing the two methods side by side comprehensively involving usability applicability and cultural preference beside security. In this regard, this research contributes towards filling the gap in knowledge running thorough local experimentations for finding different CAPTCHA performance tradeoffs in terms of real statistical humanoid possibilities of practicality easiness, repetition secrecy, and configuration solving timing, that can be used as basis for conducting further techno improvement human-oriented research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article considers the Turing test as a problem of communication, particularly by asking how the language of artificial intelligence (AI) appears to human experience in comparison to the language of the Other. This question is approached through Levinas' philosophy, by considering the possibility of AI as an absolute alterity, rather than reducing its alterity to the Same. This perspective diverges from traditional accounts of AI, which are more concerned with identifying structures of consciousness in the machine that are analogous to those evident in firsthand experience. This article asks how exactly AI appears to human consciousness, and whether this appearance precludes the appearance of AI as a thinking-being. In the final analysis, the author argues that AI diverges from Levinas' understanding of alterity, which centers around the exteriority of the Other. The alterity of AI, in contrast, centers around anteriority, defined as the appearance of language's origin-in-itself. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Turing's much debated test has turned 70 and is still fairly controversial. His 1950 paper is seen as a complex and multilayered text, and key questions about it remain largely unanswered. Why did Turing select learning from experience as the best approach to achieve machine intelligence? Why did he spend several years working with chess playing as a task to illustrate and test for machine intelligence only to trade it out for conversational question-answering in 1950? Why did Turing refer to gender imitation in a test for machine intelligence? In this article, I shall address these questions by unveiling social, historical and epistemological roots of the so-called Turing test. I will draw attention to a historical fact that has been only scarcely observed in the secondary literature thus far, namely that Turing's 1950 test emerged out of a controversy over the cognitive capabilities of digital computers, most notably out of debates with physicist and computer pioneer Douglas Hartree, chemist and philosopher Michael Polanyi, and neurosurgeon Geoffrey Jefferson. Seen in its historical context, Turing's 1950 paper can be understood as essentially a reply to a series of challenges posed to him by these thinkers arguing against his view that machines can think. Turing did propose gender learning and imitation as one of his various imitation tests for machine intelligence, and I argue here that this was done in response to Jefferson's suggestion that gendered behavior is causally related to the physiology of sex hormones. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of artificial intelligence (AI) agents capable of human‐level understanding of video content and conducting conversations with humans on this basis is a promising application that people expect. However, this is a challenging task that requires the holistic integration of multimodal information with temporal dependencies and reasoning, as well as social and physical commonsense. In addition, the development of appropriate systematic evaluation methods is essential. In this context, we introduce the Video Turing Test (VTT), a blind test used to evaluate human‐likeness in terms of video comprehension ability. Moreover, we propose Vincent as a video understanding AI. We explain the configuration of VTT, the architecture of Vincent to prepare for VTT and the proposed evaluation methods for video comprehension. We also estimate the current intelligence level of AI based on our results and discuss future research directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study evaluated the performance of generative adversarial network (GAN)-synthesized periapical images for classifying C-shaped root canals, which are challenging to diagnose because of their complex morphology. GANs have emerged as a promising technique for generating realistic images, offering a potential solution for data augmentation in scenarios with limited training datasets. Periapical images were synthesized using the StyleGAN2-ADA framework, and their quality was evaluated based on the average Frechet inception distance (FID) and the visual Turing test. The average FID was found to be 35.353 (± 4.386) for synthesized C-shaped canal images and 25.471 (± 2.779) for non C-shaped canal images. The visual Turing test conducted by two radiologists on 100 randomly selected images revealed that distinguishing between real and synthetic images was difficult. These results indicate that GAN-synthesized images exhibit satisfactory visual quality. The classification performance of the neural network, when augmented with GAN data, showed improvements compared with using real data alone, and could be advantageous in addressing data conditions with class imbalance. GAN-generated images have proven to be an effective data augmentation method, addressing the limitations of limited training data and computational resources in diagnosing dental anomalies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of Computer Engineering & Applications is the property of Beijing Journal of Computer Engineering & Applications Journal Co Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)