Search

Concerns exist regarding increased toxicities, including endocrine therapy toxicity, with concurrent radiation and endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (EBC). We present a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing concurrent versus sequential endocrine and radiotherapy in hormone-responsive EBC. In this multicenter trial, patients were randomized to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy concurrent with, or sequential to, radiotherapy. The primary outcome was change in endocrine therapy toxicity from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES) score. From September 2019 to January 2021, 133 patients were randomized to concurrent endocrine and radiotherapy, and 127 to sequential treatment. Most patients were post-menopausal (72.7%, 189/260) with stage 1 disease (65.8%, 171/260). Tamoxifen was the endocrine therapy of choice for 69.6% (181/260) of patients, and an aromatase inhibitor for the remainder. The median total radiation dose and fractions were 40.1 Gray (range 26–50) and 15 fractions (range 5–25), respectively. For the primary outcome of change in endocrine therapy toxicity per FACT-ES scores from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy, no significant difference was found between the groups (median [range] = −4.9 (−82, 38.8) for concurrent and −5.1 (−42, 40) for sequential, p = 0.87). This is the first trial to investigate the impact of concurrent versus sequential adjuvant endocrine and radiotherapy on endocrine therapy-related toxicities. The findings provide further support to allow the optimal timing of radiation and endocrine therapy to be tailored for the individual patient.

Concerns exist regarding increased toxicities, including endocrine therapy toxicity, with concurrent radiation and endocrine therapy in early breast cancer (EBC). We present a pragmatic, randomized trial comparing concurrent versus sequential endocrine and radiotherapy in hormone-responsive EBC. In this multicenter trial, patients were randomized to receive adjuvant endocrine therapy concurrent with, or sequential to, radiotherapy. The primary outcome was change in endocrine therapy toxicity from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Endocrine Symptom (FACT-ES) score. From September 2019 to January 2021, 133 patients were randomized to concurrent endocrine and radiotherapy, and 127 to sequential treatment. Most patients were post-menopausal (72.7%, 189/260) with stage 1 disease (65.8%, 171/260). Tamoxifen was the endocrine therapy of choice for 69.6% (181/260) of patients, and an aromatase inhibitor for the remainder. The median total radiation dose and fractions were 40.1 Gray (range 26–50) and 15 fractions (range 5–25), respectively. For the primary outcome of change in endocrine therapy toxicity per FACT-ES scores from baseline to 3 months post radiotherapy, no significant difference was found between the groups (median [range] = −4.9 (−82, 38.8) for concurrent and −5.1 (−42, 40) for sequential, p = 0.87). This is the first trial to investigate the impact of concurrent versus sequential adjuvant endocrine and radiotherapy on endocrine therapy-related toxicities. The findings provide further support to allow the optimal timing of radiation and endocrine therapy to be tailored for the individual patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uncertainty about disproportionate impact on health care budgets limits implementation of early highly effective treatment (EHT) in multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: To estimate cost-effectiveness of escalation versus EHT disease-modifying treatment (DMT) sequences. Methods: Using a health-economic approach, we analysed health benefits (relapse rate reduction, disability prevention), direct/indirect DMT and societal costs of escalation versus EHT DMT sequences. In scenario analyses, we allowed (1) earlier use of alemtuzumab (ALE) and (2) a single retreatment with cladribine (CLA). Results: In our model, we showed that the ratio between costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for the most cost-effective EHT and escalation sequence results into a similar net health benefit with higher costs and also higher QALYs associated with an EHT versus escalation strategy. Earlier use of ALE is more cost-effective than in later lines, even when aggravating the impact of its side-effects tenfold. Retreatment with CLA was more cost-effective in both escalation and EHT sequences. Conclusions: Certain EHT sequences are equally cost-effective to escalation sequences and are likely to result in more health at uncertain additional costs. The favourable cost–benefit ratio of CLA and ALE suggests that a wider application of affordable highly effective therapies could promote the cost-effectiveness both EHT and escalation approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radium‐223 and taxane chemotherapy each improve survival of patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Whether the radium‐223–taxane sequence could extend survival without cumulative toxicity was explored. Methods: The global, prospective, observational REASSURE study (NCT02141438) assessed real‐world safety and effectiveness of radium‐223 in patients with mCRPC. Using data from the prespecified second interim analysis (data cutoff, March 20, 2019), hematologic events and overall survival (OS) were evaluated in patients who were chemotherapy‐naive at radium‐223 initiation and subsequently received taxane chemotherapy starting ≤90 days ("immediate") or >90 days ("delayed") after the last radium‐223 dose. Results: Following radium‐223 therapy, 182 patients received docetaxel (172 [95%]) and/or cabazitaxel (44 [24%]); 34 patients (19%) received both. Seventy‐three patients (40%) received immediate chemotherapy and 109 patients (60%) received delayed chemotherapy. Median time from last radium‐223 dose to first taxane cycle was 3.6 months (range, 0.3–28.4). Median duration of first taxane was 3.7 months (range, 0–22.0). Fourteen patients (10 in the immediate and four in the delayed subgroup) had grade 3/4 hematologic events during taxane chemotherapy, including neutropenia in two patients in the delayed subgroup and thrombocytopenia in one patient in each subgroup. Median OS was 24.3 months from radium‐223 initiation and 11.8 months from start of taxane therapy. Conclusions: In real‐world clinical practice settings, a heterogeneous population of patients who received sequential radium‐223–taxane therapy had a low incidence of hematologic events, with a median survival of 1 year from taxane initiation. Thus, taxane chemotherapy is a feasible option for those who progress after radium‐223. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02141438. Plain Language Summary: Radium‐223 and chemotherapy are treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer, which increase survival but may affect production of blood cells as a side effect.We wanted to know what would happen if patients received chemotherapy after radium‐223.Among the 182 men treated with radium‐223 who went on to receive chemotherapy, only two men had severe side effects affecting white blood cell production (neutropenia) during chemotherapy.On average, the 182 men lived for 2 years after starting radium‐223 and 1 year after starting chemotherapy.In conclusion, patients may benefit from chemotherapy after radium‐223 treatment without increasing the risk of side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To retrospectively analyze real‐world treatment patterns in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who initiated third‐line treatment in Europe. Methods: German and Italian administrative claims data were sourced from the German AOK PLUS health insurance fund and Italian local health units (2016–2020). Data for the United Kingdom (UK), France, and Spain were sourced from medical chart reviews (MCRs) from 2016 to 2018 (historical) and 2019 to 2021 (new) using electronic case report forms. Results: Across all countries, immunomodulatory imide drug (IMiD)‐based regimens were prominent in the third‐line setting. From 2016 to 2020, lenalidomide‐dexamethasone was most common in Italy (18.0%) and Germany (12.7%). From 2019 to 2021, the most common regimen was ixazomib‐lenalidomide‐dexamethasone (67.5%) in the UK, pomalidomide‐dexamethasone (17.1%) in France, and daratumumab‐bortezomib‐dexamethasone (15.0%) in Spain. In the historical data (2016–2018), third‐line lenalidomide‐ and pomalidomide‐dexamethasone doublet use across the UK (>47%), France (>46%), and Spain (>33%) was high. From historical to new, triplet use increased in Spain (>19% to >60%) as did anti‐CD38 agent use in France (15.1% to 51.9%) and Spain (19.7% to 42.1%). Conclusions: From 2016 to 2021, third‐line regimens were mostly IMiD based. The MCR data demonstrated evolving treatment choices from 2016 to 2018 and 2019 to 2021, providing insights into uptake of novel agents and current RRMM European clinical practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal treatment sequencing for advanced, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) is unknown. We performed a multicenter, retrospective study to evaluate the best treatment sequence in terms of progression-free survival to first-line (PFS1) and to second-line (PFS2), and overall survival among patients with advanced, well-differentiated pNETs. Methods: This multicenter study retrospectively analyzed the prospectively collected data of patients with sporadic well-differentiated pNETs who received at least two consecutive therapeutic lines, with evidence of radiological disease progression before change of treatment lines. Results: Among 201 patients, 40 (19.9%) had a grade 1 and 149 (74.1%) a grade 2 pNET. Primary tumor resection was performed in 98 patients (48.8%). First-line therapy was performed in 128 patients with somatostatin analogs (SSA), 35 received SSA + radioligand therapy (RLT), 21 temozolomide-based chemotherapy, and 17 SSA + targeted therapy. PFS was significantly longer in patients with grade 1 pNETs compared to those with grade 2, in patients who received primary tumor surgery, and in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the use of upfront RLT was independently associated with improved PFS compared to SSA. Second-line therapy was performed in 94 patients with SSA + targeted therapy, 35 received chemotherapy, 45 SSA + RLT, and 27 nonconventional-dose SSA or SSA switch. PFS was significantly longer in patients treated with RLT compared to other treatments. At multivariate analysis, the type of second-line therapy was independently associated with the risk for progression. OS was significantly longer in patients who received primary tumor surgery, with Ki67 < 10%, without extrahepatic disease, and in patients who received SSA–RLT sequence compared to other sequences. Conclusions: In this large, multicenter study, RLT was associated with better PFS compared to other treatments, and the SSA–RLT sequence was associated with the best survival outcomes in patients with pNETs with Ki67 < 10%. Primary tumor surgery was also associated with improved survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: ALK–rearranged advanced NSCLC (aNSCLC) represents 4% of all NSCLCs, and multiple ALK-targeted therapies (ALK-inhibitors) are now available for use. Little is known about changes in treatment patterns, or how prognostic factors and sequence of therapy may impact overall survival in the real-world setting. We aim to describe initial and subsequent treatments used, survival outcomes, prognostic factors, and the impact of treatment on overall survival in the largest (N = 739) real-world cohort of patients with ALK+ aNSCLC reported in the literature. Methods: Retrospective observational cohort study with data drawn from a U.S.-based electronic health record–derived, deidentified database. Eligible patients were diagnosed with ALK+ aNSCLC between 2011-2020 and were treated in multiple different cancer clinics and across multiple geographic regions throughout the United States. Results: From a cohort of 63,667 patients with aNSCLC, 739 patients with ALK+ NSCLC were eligible for analysis, median age was 63 years, 54% patients were female, and 85% were managed in community setting. More than 168 different treatment sequences were observed, and treatment utilization changed over time. Cohort median overall survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval: 33–45). Positive prognostic factors were as follows: never-smoking history, younger age, treatment in an academic setting, and initial early stage at diagnosis. Initial treatment with a second-generation ALK-inhibitor was associated with improved survival compared with chemotherapy. Conclusions: For people with ALK+ aNSCLC, this study has identified several important clinical prognostic factors and is practice affirming; first-line treatment with a second-generation ALK-inhibitor improves survival compared with chemotherapy.

Opinion Statement: Multiple treatment options are now approved for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). An immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-containing regimen should be highly considered as the first-line treatment when there is no contraindication, especially in those with hepatitis virus-related HCC, due to proven superior overall survival (OS) compared to sorafenib. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and durvalumab plus tremelimumab remain the treatment of choice among all ICI-containing regimens, unless contraindications to either of the medications exist. Although sorafenib is still the only medication currently approved for select patients with Child-Pugh B (CP) HCC in the first-line setting, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is being studied in this patient population. Moreover, patients with post-liver transplantation recurrence may benefit from tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), while more studies are still needed to determine the safety of ICIs in this setting. Interestingly, multiple potential biomarkers, including tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI) status, and PD-L1 expression level, have inconsistently predicted response to ICIs in patients with HCC. Limited evidence is available to guide treatment choice in later-line settings after progressing on ICIs, and decisions should be based on the safety profile of the treatment regimen and patient preference. Multiple trials are ongoing to elucidate the optimal treatment sequence. Of note, we believe that TKIs (e.g., cabozantinib, regorafenib, lenvatinib, and sorafenib) could be more beneficial in later-line settings to broaden inhibition of other pathways apart from vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). When conventional treatment options are exhausted, tissue biopsy may be helpful to reveal rare targetable mutations, such as RET gene fusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Patients with breast cancer, that has spread and does not respond to hormone treatment, are usually treated with chemotherapy. If one kind of chemotherapy fails, another kind is started. There are various options and different chemotherapies to choose, but currently there is no standard, which kind to use first. Our aim was to find out, whether starting with one chemotherapy is better than with the other. We have investigated all patients with metastatic breast cancer who have been treated with the two most frequently used kinds of chemotherapy ("taxanes" and "PLD") at the University Hospital Basel, Switzerland. We found that patients who have received taxanes first survived longer than patients who received PLD first. These results are astonishing and highly relevant to patients with breast cancer and their treating physicians. Because our study was backward-looking, we cannot rule out that our results are confounded by any unknown factors other than the kind of chemotherapy. This important question should be investigated in a prospective clinical trial. Background: Patients with endocrine-resistant metastatic breast cancer (MBC) require cytostatic therapy. Single-agent taxanes and anthracyclines, including pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD), are standard treatment options. There are no prospective data regarding optimal treatment sequences, and real-world data regarding both treatment options are limited. Methods: We analyzed electronic records of all patients with Her2-negative MBC treated with either first-line PLD or first-line taxane and subsequent crossover at the University Hospital Basel between 2003 and 2021. The primary endpoint was time to next chemotherapy or death (TTNC). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). We used the Kaplan–Meyer method and logrank test to compare time-to-event endpoints and the Fisher exact test to compare discrete variables. Results: We retrospectively identified 42 patients with Her2-negative MBC who have received either single-agent PLD or single-agent taxane as first-line chemotherapy with subsequent crossover, including 23 patients who received first-line PLD and 19 patients who received first-line taxane. Baseline characteristics were similar between treatment groups. Treatment sequence PLD–taxane was significantly inferior to taxane–PLD regarding all endpoints: median TTNC 4.9 vs. 9.9 months (p = 0.006), median OS 17.8 vs. 24.6 months (p = 0.05), median PFS 4.4 vs. 9.0 months (p = 0.005), and ORR 13% vs. 53% (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Here, we report a first retrospective head-to-head comparison of the treatment sequence PLD–taxane versus taxane–PLD in patients with MBC, showing a substantial advantage of using taxanes first, followed by PLD. An inherent treatment bias in favor of first-line taxanes cannot be excluded, thus calling for prospective validation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To define the optimal threshold of perioperative chemotherapy completion and relative dose intensity (RDI) for patients with resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Background: Many patients who undergo pancreatectomy for PDAC fail to initiate or complete recommended perioperative chemotherapy. The association between the amount of perioperative chemotherapy received and overall survival (OS) is not well-defined. Methods: Single-institution analysis of 225 patients who underwent pancreatectomy for stage I/II PDAC (2010--2021). Associations between OS, chemotherapy cycles completed, and RDI were analyzed. Results: Regardless of treatment sequence, completion of ≥ 67% of recommended cycles was associated with improved OS compared with no chemotherapy [median OS: 34.5 vs 18.1 months; hazard ratio (HR): 0.43; 95% CI: 0.25--0.74] and <67% of cycles (median OS: 17.9 months; HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24--0.64). A near-linear relationship existed between cycles completed and the RDI received (β = 0.82). A median RDI of 56% corresponded to the completion of 67% of cycles. Receipt of ≥ 56% RDI was associated with improved OS compared with no chemotherapy (median OS: 35.5 vs 18.1 months; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.23--0.84) and <56% RDI (median OS: 27.2 months; HR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.20--0.96). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with increased odds of receiving ≥67% of recommended cycles (odds ratio: 2.94; 95% CI: 1.45--6.26) and ≥56% RDI (odds ratio: 4.47; 95% CI: 1.72--12.50). Conclusions: Patients with PDAC who received ≥ 67% of recommended chemotherapy cycles or ≥56% cumulative RDI had improved OS. Neoadjuvant therapy was associated with increased odds of receiving ≥ 67% of cycles and ≥56% cumulative RDI and should be considered in all patients with resectable PDAC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of our study was to determine whether data on the clinical effectiveness of second-line therapy collected in a real-world setting provide additional valuable information on the optimal sequence of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treatment. Methods: Patients diagnosed with mRCC who were treated with at least one dose of first-line vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted therapy with either sunitinib or pazopanib and with at least one dose of second-line everolimus, axitinib, nivolumab, or cabozantinib were included. The efficacy of different treatment sequences was analyzed based on the time to the second objective disease progression (PFS2) and the time to the first objective disease progression (PFS). Results: Data from 172 subjects were available for analysis. PFS2 was 23.29 months. The 1-year PFS2 rate was 85.3%, and the 3-year PFS2 rate was 25.9%. The 1-year overall survival rate was 97.0%, and the 3-year overall survival rate was 78.6%. Patients with a lower IMDC prognostic risk group had a significantly (p < 0.001) longer PFS2. Patients with metastases in the liver had a shorter PFS2 than patients with metastases in the other sites (p = 0.024). Patients with metastases in the lungs and lymph nodes (p = 0.045) and patients with metastases in the liver and bones (p = 0.030) had lower PFS2 rates than patients with metastases in other sites. Conclusions: Patients with a better IMDC prognosis have a longer PFS2. Metastases in the liver lead to a shorter PFS2 than metastases in other sites. One metastasis site means a longer PFS2 than 3 or more metastasis sites. Nephrectomy performed in an earlier stage of disease or metastatic setting means higher PFS and higher PFS2. No PFS2 difference was found between different treatment sequences of TKI–TKI or TKI-immune therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To describe real-world treatment sequences of ramucirumab relative to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Methods: Retrospective, observational study including adult patients treated with ramucirumab (April 2014–June 2020) from a nationwide health-record database. Results: In 1117 eligible patients, ramucirumab + paclitaxel was the most common ramucirumab-containing regimen (72.0%). A total of 217 patients also received an ICI. For ramucirumab then ICI (n = 148) and ICI then ramucirumab (n = 50), ramucirumab + taxane and ICI monotherapy were the most frequent approaches, most commonly observed as second- and third-line (2L and 3L). Median time on ramucirumab in 2L and 3L was similar regardless of sequence with ICI. Conclusion: Most patients with advanced gastroesophageal cancer received ramucirumab before ICI, with ramucirumab + paclitaxel as the most common ramucirumab-based regimen. What is the Order of New Treatments for Gastroesophageal Cancers in the Real World? Gastroesophageal cancers (cancers of the stomach or food pipe) which cannot be cured are first treated using traditional chemotherapy. Newer anti-cancer therapies with fewer side effects, such as ramucirumab (RAM) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), are now available either alone or in combination with chemotherapy. We designed this study to describe the order of use for RAM and ICI. The patients in this study were from Flatiron Health database, which includes electronic medical record data of US patients with gastroesophageal cancers. The included patients had been treated with RAM and were grouped based on the treatments received and in the order in which they received RAM and ICI. Of the patients who received both RAM and ICI, RAM then ICI was the most common order, followed by ICI then RAM and then RAM plus ICI at the same time. RAM in combination with paclitaxel (a chemotherapy) was the most common RAM-containing treatment. The duration of RAM therapy was the same whether patients received the treatment before or after ICI. These findings can be used by patients with gastroesophageal cancers and oncologists when making treatment decisions, specifically if RAM might be an option when it is time to change treatments. Real-world studies like this help answer questions that were not addressed in clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Despite the remarkable advances that have been made in the management of colorectal cancer over recent years, the optimal treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains a controversial matter. Undoubtedly, such a complex disease requires a multidisciplinary approach, in which close collaboration between all specialists involved in its management is of utmost importance. Methods: A literature search was conducted in PubMed. There was no limit set to the date of publication. The main focus of the literature review is to provide a comprehensive summary of the current multidisciplinary management of CRLM while highlighting the surgical approach. Results: Assessment of resectability, evaluation of the patient's fitness, and discussion of clinicopathological features all play a vital role in finding the most suitable treatment strategy for CRLM patients, who should all be timely discussed in the multidisciplinary tumor board, in order to decide upon the optimal therapy sequence, operative time window, and postoperative treatment. Conclusion: Although hepatic resection remains the only potentially curative treatment strategy for patients with CRLM, a multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal treatment. A clear definition of treatment goal (curative vs. palliative) at the time of disease diagnosis determines the further therapeutic course. Preoperative estimation of liver functional reserve is a key factor in the decision-making process for CRLM resectability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The combination of hyperthermia (HT) with radio(chemo)therapy or chemotherapy (CT) is an established treatment strategy for specific indications. Its application in routine clinical practice in Europe depends on regulatory and local conditions. We conducted a survey among European clinical centers to determine current practice of HT. Methods: A questionnaire with 22 questions was sent to 24 European HT centers. The questions were divided into two main categories. The first category assessed how many patients are treated with HT in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or CT for specific indications per year. The second category addressed which hyperthermia parameters are recorded. Analysis was performed using descriptive methods. Results: The response rate was 71% (17/24) and 16 centers were included in this evaluation. Annually, these 16 centers treat approximately 637 patients using HT in combination with radio(chemo)therapy or CT. On average, 34% (range: 3–100%) of patients are treated in clinical study protocols. Temperature readings and the time interval between HT and radio(chemo)therapy or CT are recorded in 13 (81%) and 9 (56%) centers, respectively. The thermal dose quality parameter "cumulative equivalent minutes at 43 °C" (CEM43°C) is only evaluated in five (31%) centers for each HT session. With regard to treatment sequence, 8 (50%) centers administer HT before radio(chemo)therapy and the other 8 in the reverse order. Conclusion: There is a significant heterogeneity among European HT centers as to the indications treated and the recording of thermometric parameters. More evidence from clinical studies is necessary to achieve standardization of HT practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The growing availability of clinical real-world data (RWD) represents a formidable opportunity to complement evidence from randomized clinical trials and observe how oncological treatments perform in real-life conditions. In particular, RWD can provide insights on questions for which no clinical trials exist, such as comparing outcomes from different sequences of treatments. To this end, process mining is a particularly suitable methodology for analyzing different treatment paths and their associated outcomes. Here, we describe an implementation of process mining algorithms directly within our hospital information system with an interactive application that allows oncologists to compare sequences of treatments in terms of overall survival, progression-free survival and best overall response. As an application example, we first performed a RWD descriptive analysis of 303 patients with advanced melanoma and reproduced findings observed in two notorious clinical trials: CheckMate-067 and DREAMseq. Then, we explored the outcomes of an immune-checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge after a first progression on immunotherapy versus switching to a BRAF targeted treatment. By using interactive process-oriented RWD analysis, we observed that patients still derive long-term survival benefits from immune-checkpoint inhibitors rechallenge, which could have direct implications on treatment guidelines for patients able to carry on immunecheckpoint therapy, if confirmed by external RWD and randomized clinical trials. Overall, our results highlight how an interactive implementation of process mining can lead to clinically relevant insights from RWD with a framework that can be ported to other centers or networks of centers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Multiple life‐prolonging therapies are available for metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the optimal treatment strategy following progression through standard treatment with docetaxel, androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) and cabazitaxel, remains unclear. We aimed to describe treatment patterns in men with mCRPC following progression on standard treatments and determine whether subsequent treatment choice impacts overall survival. Methods: Clinicopathologic and treatment data were extracted from the electronic CRPC Australian Database (ePAD) for patients who had received docetaxel, ARSIs and cabazitaxel in any order. Data were analyzed to compare groups that did versus did not receive subsequent systemic therapy. Treatment sequences, median duration of treatment, and median overall survival (mOS) were reported for each treatment group. Results: Ninety‐eight eligible patients were identified, with 51 receiving subsequent systemic therapy. Those who received further treatment were younger (68 vs. 71 years, p <.01) but did not have any other differences in clinicopathologic features compared to those who received no further treatment. Patients who received upfront docetaxel were more likely to proceed to subsequent treatment (p =.02). Subsequent systemic therapies varied, the most common being carboplatin‐based regimens (n = 13, 25.5%) and many patients were rechallenged with ARSI (n = 10, 19.6%) or docetaxel (n = 6, 11.8%). There was no difference in mOS according to subsequent systemic therapy (p =.09). Conclusion: This retrospective multicenter analysis demonstrates the variation in treatment sequences used for mCRPC in the real‐world setting. In the absence of high quality, prospective evidence, our results suggest that subsequent treatment choice does not influence survival outcomes and the optimal choice is guided by individual patient and disease‐related factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundA total of 11 treatment sequences for advanced wild-type squamous non-small cell lung cancer are recommended by Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology Guidelines, consisting of seven first-line and three second-line treatments. Five of these treatments were newly approved in China between 2021 and 2022. We evaluated the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these strategies from the Chinese healthcare system perspective.MethodsNetwork meta-analysis with non-proportional hazards was used to calculate the relative efficacy between interventions. A sequential model was developed to estimate costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for treatment sequences with first-line platinum- and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy (SC) with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, camrelizumab, sintilimab, sugemalimab or pembrolizumab, followed by second-line docetaxel, tislelizumab or nivolumab. SC and docetaxel were used as comparators for first-line and second-line treatments, respectively. QALY and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were used to evaluate effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, respectively. Cost-effective threshold was set as USD 19,091. Subgroup analysis was conducted to determine the best first-line and second-line therapy.ResultsPembrolizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (PED) was the most effective treatment sequence. QALYs for patients received SC, nedaplatin + SC, tislelizumab + SC, sintilimab + SC, camrelizumab + SC, sugemalimab + SC, pembrolizumab + SC followed by docetaxel were 0.866, 0.906, 1.179, 1.266, 1.179, 1.266, 1.603, 1.721, 1.807; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by tislelizumab were 1.283, 1.301; QALYs for SC, nedaplatin + SC followed by nivolumab were 1.353, 1.389. Camrelizumab + SC, followed by docetaxel (CAD) was the most cost-effective. Compared to SC with or without nedaplatin, tislelizumab, or sintilimab followed by docetaxel, ICERs of CAD were USD 12,276, 13,210, 6,974, 9,421/QALY, respectively. Compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by tislelizumab, the ICERs of CAD were USD 4,183, 2,804/QALY; CAD was dominant compared with nedaplatin or SC followed by nivolumab; The ICER of sugemalimab + SC followed by docetaxel and PED were USD 522,023, 481,639/QALY compared with CAD. Pembrolizumab + SC and camrelizumab + SC were the most effective and cost-effective first-line options, respectively; tislelizumab was the most effective and cost-effective second-line therapy. Tislelizumab used in second-line was more effective than first-line, no significant differences between their cost-effectiveness. Sensitivity and scenario analysis confirmed robustness of the results.ConclusionsPED and CAD are the most effective and cost-effective treatment sequence, respectively; pembrolizumab + SC and camrelizumab + SC are the most effective and cost-effective first-line choice, respectively; tislelizumab is the most effective and cost-effective second-line choice.

New treatment modalities have been recently introduced in the management of ovarian cancer (OC). Herein, we sought to investigate their implementation in routine clinical practice and examine the real-world management of OC in Greece. EpOCa was a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective study in patients with advanced epithelial OC. The primary outcome was to estimate the proportions of the different treatment regimens used per line of therapy, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the key secondary endpoints. A total of 154 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom, 40% were tested for BRCA mutations and 30% were found to be positive. Nearly 90% of patients underwent debulking surgery at diagnosis, with few operations being also recorded upon relapse. Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) was predominantly used in the first line with half of patients also receiving angiogenesis inhibitor (AI), while non-platinum-based CT was preferred in later lines. The median PFS was 18.2 and 8.8 months in the first- and second-line setting, respectively, whereas the median OS was approximately 50 months. Our study adds to the available, but limited, real world data on the management of ovarian cancer providing evidence regarding the applied treatment strategies and outcomes of patients in Greece.

In patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM), a combination of radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is routinely used. However, the best sequence of radio-immunotherapy (RIT) remains unclear. In an exploratory phase 2 trial, MBM patients received RT (stereotactic or whole-brain radiotherapy depending on the number of MBM) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) ± nivolumab (nivo) in different sequencing (Rad-ICI or ICI-Rad). Comparators arms included patients treated with ipi-free systemic treatment or without RT (in MBM-free patients). The primary endpoints were radiological and immunological responses in the peripheral blood. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 106 screened, 92 patients were included in the study. Multivariate analysis revealed an advantage for patients starting with RT (Rad-ICI) for overall response rate (RR: p = .007; HR: 7.88 (95%CI: 1.76–35.27)) and disease control rate (DCR: p = .036; HR: 6.26 (95%CI: 1.13–34.71)) with a trend for a better PFS (p = .162; HR: 1.64 (95%CI: 0.8–3.3)). After RT plus two cycles of ipi-based ICI in both RIT sequences, increased frequencies of activated CD4, CD8 T cells and an increase in melanoma-specific T cell responses were observed in the peripheral blood. Lasso regression analysis revealed a significant clinical benefit for patients treated with Rad-ICI sequence and immunological features, including high frequencies of memory T cells and activated CD8 T cells in the blood. This study supports increasing evidence that sequencing RT followed by ICI treatment may have better effects on the immunological responses and clinical outcomes in MBM patients.

First-line palliative chemotherapy regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) have not been compared in head-to-head phase III randomised controlled trials (RCT). Data on optimum first-line treatment and subsequent sequencing is lacking. To compare overall survival (OS) between first-line treatment regimens in a real-world population to determine if an optimal therapeutic sequence is associated with survival benefit. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collated data from the Australasian PURPLE pancreatic cancer registry was undertaken. From 2016 to 2020, of 1551 pancreatic cancer patients, 615 received palliative-intent chemotherapy. Patients with early-stage resected disease without recurrence (n = 369), radiotherapy alone (n = 43), received supportive care alone (n = 458) or had less than 3 months follow-up (n = 66) were excluded. Median OS was comparable between patients receiving first-line Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 376) and those receiving FOLFIRINOX (n = 73) (11.3 versus 12.3 months, P = 0.37), with 38% proceeding to second-line chemotherapy which was associated with longer mOS compared to first-line treatment alone (17.4 versus 8.2 months, P < 0.001). With second-line treatment following prior FOLFIRINOX (n = 29) or Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel (n = 101), mOS did not differ significantly (17.3 versus 15.9 months, P = 0.92), respectively, whilst median progression-free survival was longer with prior FOLFIRINOX (5.2 versus 2.9 months, P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in overall survival between either first-line chemotherapy choice, despite patients receiving FOLFIRINOX being younger, fitter, and more likely to have localised disease. However, FOLFIRINOX was associated with delayed progression. In the absence of phase III RCT data, clinicians should be comfortable using either Gemcitabine/Nab-Paclitaxel or FOLFIRINOX as first-line therapy in advanced PDAC. • Analysis of optimal therapeutic sequencing in advanced pancreatic cancer (n = 615). • 1st-line FFX efficacy comparable to GEM-P (mOS 11.3 versus 12.3 months P = 0.37). • Longer mOS with 2nd-line chemotherapy versus 1st-line only (17.4 versus 8.2 months P < 0.001). • 2nd-line 5FU versus GEM-based treatment mOS similar (17.3 versus 15.9 months P = 0.92). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The most common site of involvement of leiomyosarcoma is the retroperitoneum, accounting for approximately 50% of all cases. The case study presented herein describes the journey of a man with a grade 2 retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma at the time of diagnosis. The patient received first-line doxorubicin (six cycles) and evofosfamide (11 cycles) during participation in the phase III, randomized, double-blind SARC021 trial and achieved stable disease. Upon progression, he received 24 cycles of second-line trabectedin with stable disease, then third-line pazopanib for 14 months with stable disease. Finally, he received fourth-line gemcitabine monotherapy for 5 months until disease progression, which was followed by death. Notably, trabectedin provided long-term disease control and maintained the patient's functional performance throughout treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prognosis of patients with advanced HCC can vary widely depending on factors such as the stage of the cancer, the patient's overall health, and treatment regimens. This study aimed to investigate survival outcomes and associated factors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this retrospective study, data from 23 medical oncology clinics were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) values were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors associated with survival which were identified in univariate analysis were subsequently evaluated in a multivariate Cox-regression survival analysis was conducted using the backward stepwise (Conditional LR) method to determine the independent predictors of PFS and OS. Of 280 patients, 131 received chemotherapy and 142 received sorafenib, 6 received atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and 1 received nivolumab for first-line setting. The median follow-up time was 30.4 (95%CI 27.1-33.6) months. For-first line, median PFS was 3.1 (95%CI2.7-3.5) months, and it was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab (PFS 5.8 (95%CI 4.2-7.5) than in those received chemotherapy (PFS 2.1 (95%CI 1.9-2.3) in the first-line setting (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that male gender (HR: 2.75, 95% CI: 1.53-4.94, p = 0.01), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.88, 95% CI: 1.10-3.21, p = 0.02), higher baseline AFP level (HR: 2.38, 95% CI: 1.54-3.67, p < 0.001) and upfront sorafenib treatment (HR,0.38; 95% CI: 0.23-0.62, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with shorter PFS. The median OS was 13.2 (95%CI 11.1-15.2) months. It was significantly longer in patients who received sorafenib or atezolizumab-bevacizumab or nivolumab in the first-line setting followed by TKIs (sorafenib or regorafenib, OS 18.6 (95%CI 13.8-23.5)) compared to those who received chemotherapy (OS 10.3 (95%CI 6.6-14.1)) in the first-line setting. The multivariate analysis revealed that upfront chemotherapy treatment approach, male gender (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.07-2.94, p = 0.02), poor ECOG performance score (HR: 1.96, 95% CI: 1.24-3.09, p = 0.004) and Child-Pugh score, presence of extrahepatic disease (HR: 1.54, 95% CI: 1.09-2.18, p = 0.01), and higher baseline AFP value (HR: 1.50, 95% CI: 1.03-2.19, p = 0.03) were significantly associated with poor prognosis. Additionally, regarding of treatment sequence, upfront sorafenib followed by regorafenib showed a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25-0.66, p < 0.001). Sorafenib followed by regorafenib treatment was associated with a significantly lower risk of mortality rather than upfront sorafenib followed by BSC group or upfront chemotherapy followed by TKIs. These findings underscore the importance of the optimal treatment sequences to improve survival in patients with advanced HCC.

Background: Patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) typically receive a targeted inflammatory bowel disease therapy after treatment with conventional therapies and after the development of significant morbidity. Evidence suggests that early biologic treatment after diagnosis could improve treatment response and prevent disease complications compared with delayed biologic treatment after conventional therapy., Methods: RALEE was a retrospective study using claims data from IBM® MarketScan® Research Databases between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019. Adults with UC and at least one claim for vedolizumab were categorized into Early or Delayed Vedolizumab groups according to whether they had received vedolizumab within 30 days of diagnosis or after conventional therapy (5-aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, and immunomodulators), respectively. Treatment response was assessed at 2, 6, and 12 months after vedolizumab treatment initiation and was analyzed with logistic regression (bivariate)., Results: At 2 months, Delayed Vedolizumab was associated with significantly higher odds of nonresponse than Early Vedolizumab (odds ratio [OR], 2.509; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.28-4.90). Delayed Vedolizumab was not significantly associated with odds of nonresponse at 6 months (OR, 1.173; 95% CI, 0.72-1.90) or at 12 months (OR, 0.872; 95% CI, 0.55-1.37). Mean total healthcare costs were similar in the Early Vedolizumab ($6492) and Delayed Vedolizumab ($5897) groups, although there were small differences in costs from different types of claims., Conclusions: Patients who received vedolizumab early after UC diagnosis were less likely to experience nonresponse at 2 months and incurred similar healthcare costs at 12 months compared with patients who received delayed vedolizumab., Competing Interests: N.K.C. serves as a consultant for NeuroLogica and Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and serves as a speaker for Bristol Myers Squibb. N.C. is an employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and has stock or stock options. J.A.C., J.Q., and Z.T. are employees of OPEN Health, a research consultancy that received fees from Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. to conduct these analyses. M.K. is an employee of the University of Illinois Chicago, College of Pharmacy, supported by a Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. fellowship at the time of the study. R.T. is a former employee of Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and has stock or stock options. D.T.R. has received grant support from Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and has served as a consultant for AbbVie, AltruBio, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Bristol Myers Squibb, Genentech/Roche, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Iterative Scopes, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Pfizer, Prometheus Biosciences, Takeda, and TechLab Inc., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Crohn's & Colitis Foundation.)

Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has been approved as a treatment for ALK-positive lung cancer. This review provides information regarding the pharmacology and clinical features of lorlatinib, including its efficacy and associated adverse events. Pivotal clinical trials are discussed along with the current status of lorlatinib as a treatment for ALK-positive lung cancer and future therapeutic challenges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To assess overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma by first-line (1L) targeted therapy (TT) or checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) use, second-line (2L) TT or CPI use, and treatment sequence. Patients & methods: Advanced BRAF-mutant melanoma patients treated with 1L CPI or TT were selected from a real-world, electronic health record-derived database. Results: CPI was associated with improved survival after adjustment for potential confounders (hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.66-0.87]). Median OS was similar between 2L therapies and among likely treatment sequences. Conclusion: This real-world study demonstrated a survival benefit with 1L CPI versus TT. Analyses of 2L and treatment sequences were unable to detect or rule out clinically relevant differences in OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The rapid expansion in treatment options for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) of the past decade requires clinical decision making on the sequential prescription of these treatments. Here, we compare 360 treatment escalation sequences for patients with RRMS in terms of health outcomes and societal costs in The Netherlands.Methods: We use a microsimulation model with a societal perspective, developed in collaboration with MS neurologists, to estimate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 360 treatment sequences starting with first-line therapies in RRMS. This model integrated data on disease progression, disease-modifying treatment efficacy, clinical decision rules, age-dependent relapse rates, quality of life, healthcare, and societal costs.Results: Costs and health outcomes were overlapping among different treatment escalation sequences. In our model for RRMS treatment, optimal lifetime health outcomes (20.24 ± 1.43 quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs], 6.11 ± 0.30 relapses) were achieved with the sequence peginterferon-dimethyl fumarate-ocrelizumab-natalizumab-alemtuzumab. The most cost-effective sequence (peginterferon-glatiramer acetate-ocrelizumab-cladribine-alemtuzumab) yielded numerically worse health outcomes per patient (19.59 ± 1.43 QALYs, 6.64 ± 0.43 relapses), but resulted in €98 127 ± €19 134 less costs than the most effective treatment sequence.Conclusions: Effectiveness estimates of treatments have overlapping confidence intervals but the treatment sequence that yields most QALYs is not the most cost-effective option, also when taking uncertainty into account. It is important that neurologists are aware of cost constraints and its relationship with prescription behavior, but treatment decisions should be individually tailored. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary : To evaluate whether treatment sequence affects romosozumab response, this analysis reviewed studies where romosozumab was administered before or following an antiresorptive (alendronate or denosumab). Initial treatment with romosozumab followed by an antiresorptive resulted in larger increases in bone mineral density of both hip and spine compared with the reverse sequence. Introduction : Teriparatide followed by an antiresorptive increases bone mineral density (BMD) more than using an antiresorptive first. To evaluate whether treatment sequence affects romosozumab response, we reviewed randomized clinical trials where romosozumab was administered before (ARCH, FRAME) or following (STRUCTURE, Phase 2 extension) an antiresorptive (alendronate or denosumab, respectively). Methods: We evaluated BMD percentage change for total hip (TH) and lumbar spine (LS) and response rates (BMD gains ≥ 3% and ≥ 6%) at years 1 and 2 (except STRUCTURE with only 1-year data available). Results: With 1-year romosozumab initial therapy in ARCH and FRAME, TH BMD increased 6.2% and 6.0%, and LS BMD increased 13.7% and 13.1%, respectively. When romosozumab was administered for 1 year after alendronate (STRUCTURE) or denosumab (Phase 2 extension), TH BMD increased 2.9% and 0.9%, respectively, and LS BMD increased 9.8% and 5.3%, respectively. Over 2 years, TH and LS BMD increased 7.1% and 15.2% with romosozumab/alendronate, 8.5% and 16.6% with romosozumab/denosumab, and 3.8% and 11.5% with denosumab/romosozumab, respectively. A greater proportion of patients achieved BMD gains ≥ 6% when romosozumab was used first, particularly for TH, versus the reverse sequence (69% after romosozumab/denosumab; 15% after denosumab/romosozumab). Conclusion: In this study, larger mean BMD increases and greater BMD responder rates were achieved when romosozumab was used before, versus after, an antiresorptive agent. Since BMD on treatment is a strong surrogate for bone strength and fracture risk, this analysis supports the thesis that initial treatment with romosozumab followed by an antiresorptive will result in greater efficacy versus the reverse sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• TKI have revolutionized the course of advanced NSCLC with EGFR common mutation. • Tumor heterogeneity and acquired resistance mechanisms are unavoidable limits. • Multiple novel treatment strategies based on various combinations have emerged. • Treatment strategy should be based on the clinical and biological profile. • Taking patients preferences into account is essential in the therapeutic strategy. Common EGFR gene mutations (exon 19 deletion and L858R in exon 21) are the most frequent cause of actionable genomic alterations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The introduction of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as 1st-line treatment of advanced stages of the disease has changed the natural history of the disease and extended survival rates, establishing third generation TKIs as a new standard of frontline treatment. Nonetheless, the prolongation of overall survival remains modest, as multiple escape pathways and tumor increasing heterogeneity inevitably develop over time. Several strategies are currently developed to improve these patients' outcome: prevent the emergence of resistance mechanisms by therapeutic combinations introduced from the first line, act on the residual disease at the time of maximum response to 1st line treatment, develop therapeutic strategies at the time of acquired resistance to TKIs, either dependent on the resistance mechanisms, or agnostic of the resistance pathways. Recent advancements in treatment combinations have shown promising results in prolonging progression-free survival, but often at the cost of more severe side effects in comparison with the current standard of care. These emerging new treatment options open up possibilities for diverse therapeutic sequences in the management of advanced NSCLC depending on common EGFR mutations. The impact on the disease natural history, the patients' survival and quality of life is not yet fully understood. In this review, we propose an overview of published and forthcoming advances, and a management algorithm considering the different first-line options, integrating the clinical and biological parameters that are critical to clinicians' decision-making process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The impact of dual sequential modifications using radio-frequency (RF) plasma and electron beam irradiation (EBI) on starch properties was investigated and compared with single treatments within an irradiation dose range of 5–20 kGy. Regardless of sequence, dual treatments synergistically affected starch properties, increasing acidity, solubility, and paste clarity, while decreasing rheological features with increasing irradiation dose. The molecular weight distribution was also synergistically influenced. Amylopectin distribution broadened particularly below 10 kGy. Amylose narrowed its distribution across all irradiation doses. This was due to dominating EBI-induced degradation and molecular rearrangements from RF plasma. With the highest average radiation-chemical yield (G) and degradation rate constant (k) of (2.12 ± 0.14) × 10−6 mol·J−1 and (3.43 ± 0.23) × 10−4 kGy−1, respectively, upon RF plasma pre-treatment, amylose underwent random chain scission. In comparison to single treatments, dual modification caused minor alterations in spectral characteristics and crystal short-range order structure, along with increased granule aggregation and surface irregularities. The synergistic effect was dose-dependent, significant up to 10 kGy, irrespective of treatment sequence. The highest synergistic ratio was observed when RF plasma preceded irradiation, demonstrating the superior efficiency of plasma pre-treatment in combination with EBI. This synergy has the potential to lower costs and extend starch's technological uses by enhancing radiation sensitivity and reducing the irradiation dose. • Dual sequential action of RF plasma and EBI decreased synergistically the viscosity. • Dual modification caused a synergistic decrease in molecular weights. • Dual modification led to slight variations in crystal short-range order structure. • Synergistic ratio had the highest values when RF plasma preceded irradiation. • Synergistic impact, irrespective of treatment sequence, was significant up to 10 kGy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: As the treatment advances, there were several novel agents developed for R/M HNSCC, including an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody, cetuximab, and an anti-programmed death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, pembrolizumab and nivolumab. To date, little was known regarding the optimal treatment sequences. Our observational study demonstrated that median overall survival was 23.7 months versus 22.8 months in Cet-IO and IO-Cet, respectively (p = 0.484). The overall response rate (ORR) were 73% in Cet-IO versus 37% in IO-Cet (p = 0.002). Both Cet-IO and IO-Cet are effective in R/M HNSCC patients with insignificant survival differences. The higher response rate of Cet-IO might render it to be considered in patients with large tumor burdens and urgent needs for treatment responses. Our conclusion can be real-world evidence for clinical decision-making. Background: The prognosis was poor when patients had recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). Herein, we conducted an observational study of cetuximab followed by immunotherapy (Cet-IO) versus immunotherapy followed by cetuximab (IO-Cet) in patients with R/M HNSCC. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with R/M HNSCC and treated with a sequential cetuximab-containing regimen and immunotherapy-containing regimen were enrolled in our study. Kaplan-Meier curves were estimated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 75 patients were enrolled in our study for oncologic outcomes evaluation, with 40 patients in Cet-IO and 35 patients in IO-Cet. The median PFS1 was 5.1 months in Cet-IO and 4.5 months in IO-Cet (p = 0.777) and the median PFS2 was 16.5 months in Cet-IO and 11.4 months in IO-Cet (p = 0.566). The median OS was 23.7 months versus 22.8 months in Cet-IO and IO-Cet, respectively (p = 0.484). The overall response rate (ORR) were 73% in Cet-IO versus 37% in IO-Cet (p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the treatment sequences, Cet-IO or IO-Cet, were insignificantly different with survival. Conclusion: Both Cet-IO and IO-Cet are effective in R/M HNSCC patients with insignificant survival differences. The higher ORR of Cet-IO might render it to be considered in patients with large tumor burdens and urgent needs for treatment responses. Further prospective studies are merited to validate our conclusions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The optimal treatment sequence for patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains uncertain. This study aimed to assess factors associated with the use of simultaneous resections and impact on hospital variation. This population-based study included all patients who underwent liver surgery for synchronous colorectal liver metastases between 2014 and 2019 in the Netherlands. Factors associated with simultaneous resection were identified. Short-term surgical outcomes of simultaneous resections and factors associated with 30-day major morbidity were evaluated. Of 2146 patients included, 589 (27%) underwent simultaneous resection in 28 hospitals. Simultaneous resection was associated with age, sex, BMI, number, size and bilobar distribution of CRLM, and administration of preoperative chemotherapy. More minimally invasive and minor resections were performed in the simultaneous group. Hospital variation was present (range 2.4%–83.3%) with several hospitals performing simultaneous procedures more and less frequently than expected. Simultaneous resection resulted in 13% 30-day major morbidity, and 1% mortality. ASA classification ≥3 was independently associated with higher 30-day major morbidity after simultaneous resection (aOR 1.97, CI 1.10–3.42, p = 0.018). Distinctive patient and tumour characteristics influence the choice for simultaneous resection. Remarkable hospital variation is present in the Netherlands. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In patients with melanoma brain metastases (MBM), a combination of radiotherapy (RT) with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is routinely used. However, the best sequence of radio-immunotherapy (RIT) remains unclear. In an exploratory phase 2 trial, MBM patients received RT (stereotactic or whole-brain radiotherapy depending on the number of MBM) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) ± nivolumab (nivo) in different sequencing (Rad-ICI or ICI-Rad). Comparators arms included patients treated with ipi-free systemic treatment or without RT (in MBM-free patients). The primary endpoints were radiological and immunological responses in the peripheral blood. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Of 106 screened, 92 patients were included in the study. Multivariate analysis revealed an advantage for patients starting with RT (Rad-ICI) for overall response rate (RR: p = .007; HR: 7.88 (95%CI: 1.76-35.27)) and disease control rate (DCR: p = .036; HR: 6.26 (95%CI: 1.13-34.71)) with a trend for a better PFS (p = .162; HR: 1.64 (95%CI: 0.8-3.3)). After RT plus two cycles of ipi-based ICI in both RIT sequences, increased frequencies of activated CD4, CD8 T cells and an increase in melanoma-specific T cell responses were observed in the peripheral blood. Lasso regression analysis revealed a significant clinical benefit for patients treated with Rad-ICI sequence and immunological features, including high frequencies of memory T cells and activated CD8 T cells in the blood. This study supports increasing evidence that sequencing RT followed by ICI treatment may have better effects on the immunological responses and clinical outcomes in MBM patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Clinical trials have proven the efficacy and safety of new therapies for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), but how those therapies are used in the real world is poorly described. Real-world treatment patterns of antitumor therapies and factors associated with overall therapy duration in patients with AGC in Japan were investigated. Methods: This retrospective cohort study used a Japanese administrative claims database (June 2014 to September 2019). Patients with AGC who started the guideline-recommended first-line combination regimens with platinum and fluoropyrimidine agents between June 2015 and July 2019 were included. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with overall therapy duration (first line to last administration of guideline-listed agent). Results: Of the 10,581 patients included, the most common first-line combination regimen without trastuzumab was S-1 plus oxaliplatin (4327/9069 patients; 47.7%) and with trastuzumab was capecitabine plus cisplatin (608/1512 patients; 40.2%). Most common second- and third-line regimens were ramucirumab plus taxane (3650/5358 patients; 68.1%) and nivolumab (1229/2390 patients; 51.4%), respectively. Factors positively associated with longer overall therapy duration were: oral fluoropyrimidine in first line (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 0.63 [0.57–0.69]); trastuzumab in any line (0.73 [0.68–0.78]); treatment at a designated cancer hospital (0.89 [0.84–0.94]); dietary consultation within 1 month before/after start of first line (0.92 [0.86–0.98]); and treatment at a surgical department (0.94 [0.89–0.99]). Negatively associated factors were: edema (1.21 [1.07–1.37]); physical therapy (1.21 [1.12–1.31]); nutritional intervention (1.21 [1.14–1.28]) within 1 month before/after start of first line; thrombosis (1.13 [1.04–1.23]); renal disease (1.11 [1.02–1.21]); age (1.07 [1.02–1.13]); and peritoneal metastasis/ascites (1.06 [1.01–1.13]). Conclusions: In real-world treatment practice for AGC in Japan, therapy choice after the recommended first-line chemotherapy was consistent with guidelines. Factors associated with overall therapy duration were identified, which may assist in optimizing treatment sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

New treatment modalities have been recently introduced in the management of ovarian cancer (OC). Herein, we sought to investigate their implementation in routine clinical practice and examine the real-world management of OC in Greece. EpOCa was a non-interventional, multicenter, retrospective study in patients with advanced epithelial OC. The primary outcome was to estimate the proportions of the different treatment regimens used per line of therapy, while progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the key secondary endpoints. A total of 154 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom, 40% were tested for BRCA mutations and 30% were found to be positive. Nearly 90% of patients underwent debulking surgery at diagnosis, with few operations being also recorded upon relapse. Platinum-based chemotherapy (CT) was predominantly used in the first line with half of patients also receiving angiogenesis inhibitor (AI), while non-platinum-based CT was preferred in later lines. The median PFS was 18.2 and 8.8 months in the first- and second-line setting, respectively, whereas the median OS was approximately 50 months. Our study adds to the available, but limited, real world data on the management of ovarian cancer providing evidence regarding the applied treatment strategies and outcomes of patients in Greece. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Clinical effects of ICI and AA therapy are evaluated in comparison with either monotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. • ICI and AA therapy showed a higher objective response rate than either monotherapy. • AA administered concomitantly or immediately after ICI can provide favorable survival benefits compared to either monotherapy. • ICI administered immediately after AA may show no survival benefits compared to ICI monotherapy. Several studies have demonstrated that anti-angiogenic agents (AAs) have the ability to regulate immune-related cells in the tumor microenvironment and may affect the clinical effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Therefore, we investigated the drug interaction between ICI and AA for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We systematically searched PubMed-MEDLINE, Embase-Scopus, and ISI Web of Science before August 23, 2021. ICI and AA therapy included the concomitant and sequential use of ICIs and AAs. The objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) of patients who received ICI and AA therapy were evaluated and compared to those of patients who received either monotherapy. Subgroup analyses were performed to clarify the cause of heterogeneity; the timing and sequence of ICI and AA administration were predefined as the subgroups. Thirteen studies involving 2414 patients were included in the meta-analysis. ICI and AA therapy had significantly higher ORR than either monotherapy (OR [95% CI]: 0.61 [0.50–0.74]; p < 0.001; I2 = 29%). PFS and OS were favorable benefits in ICI and AA therapy; however, significant heterogeneity was identified in these analyses (I2 = 80% and 59%, respectively). According to the administration timing and sequence, ICI immediately after AA showed no PFS and OS benefits compared to ICI monotherapy (HR [95 % CI]: 1.54 [1.14–2.08] and 1.50 [1.04–2.15], respectively), whereas favorable PFS and OS were demonstrated when AA was concomitantly administered with ICI (HR [95 % CI]: 0.57 [0.43–0.76] and 0.80 [0.61–1.05], respectively) or when AA was administered immediately after ICI (HR [95 % CI]: 0.58 [0.34–1.00] and 0.56 [0.40–0.80], respectively). ICI and AA therapy can provide favorable clinical effects compared to either monotherapy; however, ICI administered immediately after AA may not show survival benefits. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Several studies have previously demonstrated the survival benefit of both EGFR‐TKI treatment and chemotherapy in patients with non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. The aim of the present study was to clarify the factors influencing the treatment sequence after failure of EGFR‐TKI therapy, focusing on the number of organs with metastasis (hereafter, metastatic organs). Methods Between January 2010 and December 2016, consecutive patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC who were started on first‐line EGFR‐TKI were reviewed. The factors influencing withholding systemic chemotherapy and the post‐progression survival (PPS) after failure of EGFR‐TKI were investigated. Results A total of 393 patients were started on first‐line EGFR‐TKI during the study period. After excluding patients maintained on EGFR‐TKI or who received osimertinib targeting secondary EGFR T790M, 297 patients were included in the analysis. Among these, 180 (60.6%) received chemotherapy after failure of EGFR‐TKI (TKI‐Ct group), while the remaining 117 (39.4%) received no chemotherapy (TKI‐only group). Multivariate analysis identified older age (≥75 years: odds ratio [OR] = 0.25, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.11–0.43, P

Aim: To define the prognostic significance of first-line TKI in mRCC patients receiving nivolumab. Materials and methods: A total of 571 mRCC patients who received ≥second line nivolumab were included in this subanalysis. The correlation between prior TKI (sunitinib vs. pazopanib) and overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were investigated. Additionally, the impact of TKI choice according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score was examined. Results: There was no significant difference between sunitinib and pazopanib groups in terms of mPFS, mOS, overall response rate and disease control rate. Moreover, no difference between sunitinib and pazopanib was found according to the International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium prognostic score. Conclusion: There is no conclusive evidence favoring pazopanib or sunitinib treatment before initiating nivolumab therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.

Objectives: Most patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) switch between disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) during their lifetime. Our aim was to develop an MS cost-utility model that takes treatment switching into account to provide a more realistic estimate of treatment benefit than previous models that assume lifetime use of 1 DMT.Methods: A treatment sequence model using a microsimulation framework with a lifetime time horizon and a societal perspective was developed in R. Clinical plausibility and decision rules for switching were defined in consultation with Dutch MS neurologists. The ability of DMTs to prevent relapses and delay disease progression was modeled by applying DMT-specific estimates derived from a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to natural history data. A total of 2 treatment strategies were compared: a first-line DMT sequence (peginterferon-glatiramer-teriflunomide-interferon-beta-dimethyl fumarate) and an escalation DMT sequence (peginterferon-glatiramer-ocrelizumab-natalizumab-alemtuzumab). Scenario analyses explored impact of alternative sources of natural history data, societal versus healthcare perspective, and condition-specific versus generic utilities. Predicted short-term switches (<5 years) were externally validated with Dutch claims data on DMT use.Results: Short-term switches predicted by the model compared well with Dutch claims data. Transition from relapsing-remitting MS to secondary progressive MS was delayed by the escalation sequence (24.7 vs 20.3 years on first-line sequence). Model results were sensitive to utility values and medical resource consumption was a large driver of uncertainty.Conclusions: This microsimulation model overcomes the limitation of previous models by modeling treatment sequences. Because it better reflects clinical reality, it facilitates incorporating cost-utility information in clinical guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: The purpose of this manuscript was to illustrate the impact of the place in the treatment sequence on the cost and cost-effectiveness of different biologics for patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Materials and methods: We developed a treatment sequence model and focused on seven different biological treatment options and 840 combinations of treatment sequences. The model converted cost of treatment to a cost per responder by dividing treatment cost by expected number of patients achieving PASI100 after 52 weeks of treatment. We used Spanish ex-factory price levels, dosing recommendations and real-world data on drug survival to calculate the treatment costs. Results: The most cost-effective treatment sequence was brodalumab-risankizumab-guselkumab-ixekizumab, with a cost per responder of e139,281 during the first five years of treatment. In comparison, if brodalumab was not recommended as first-line therapy, total costs would increase by 7.4% to e149,616. If brodalumab was not recommended as any of the first four lines of treatment, total costs would increase by 13.1% to e157,527 relative to the most cost-effective treatment sequence. Conclusions: A sequential therapy model may improve efficiency in the treatment of psoriasis. According to our results, brodalumab as the first-line therapy in Spain leads to the most cost-effective treatment sequence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Romosozumab, a monoclonal anti‐sclerostin antibody that has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, reduces fracture risk within 12 months. In a post hoc, exploratory analysis, we evaluated the effects of romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who had not received previous osteoporosis therapy. This phase 2 trial (NCT00896532) enrolled postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck T‐score ≤ −2.0 and ≥ −3.5. Individuals were randomized to placebo or various romosozumab dosing regimens from baseline to month 24, were re‐randomized to 12 months of denosumab or placebo (months 24–36), and then all received romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 12 months (months 36–48). Results for the overall population have been previously published. Here, we present results for changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and levels of procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide (P1NP) and β‐isomer of the C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β‐CTX) from a subset of women who were randomized to placebo for 24 months, were re‐randomized to receive denosumab (n = 16) or placebo (n = 12) for 12 months, and then received romosozumab for 12 months. In women who were randomized to placebo followed by denosumab, romosozumab treatment for 12 months maintained BMD gained during denosumab treatment at the total hip (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 0.9%) and further increased BMD gains at the lumbar spine (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 5.3%). Upon transition to romosozumab (months 36–48), P1NP and β‐CTX levels gradually returned to baseline from their reduced values during denosumab administration. Transitioning to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab appears to improve lumbar spine BMD and maintain total hip BMD while possibly preventing the rapid increase in levels of bone turnover markers above baseline expected upon denosumab discontinuation. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Purpose: This retrospective analysis focuses on treatment stage migration in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to identify successful treatment sequences in a large cohort of real-world patients. Methods: 1369 HCC patients referred from January 1993 to January 2020 to the tertiary center of the Heidelberg University Hospital, Germany were analyzed for initial and subsequent treatment patterns, and overall survival. Results: The most common initial treatment was transarterial chemoembolization (TACE, n = 455, 39.3%) followed by hepatic resection (n = 303, 26.1%) and systemic therapy (n = 200, 17.3%), whereas the most common 2nd treatment modality was liver transplantation (n = 215, 33.2%) followed by systemic therapy (n = 177, 27.3%) and TACE (n = 85, 13.1%). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed by far the best prognosis for liver transplantation recipients (median overall survival not reached), followed by patients with hepatic resection (11.1 years). Patients receiving systemic therapy as their first treatment had the shortest median overall survival (1.7 years; P < 0.0001). When three or more treatment sequences preceded liver transplantation, patients had a significant shorter median overall survival (1st seq.: not reached; 2nd seq.: 12.4 years; 3rd seq.: 11.1 years; beyond 3 sequences: 5.5 years; P = 0.01). Conclusion: TACE was the most common initial intervention, whereas liver transplantation was the most frequent 2nd treatment. While liver transplantation and hepatic resection were associated with the best median overall survival, the timing of liver transplantation within the treatment sequence strongly affected median survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Primary orbital melanoma (POM) is a rare disease with limited data on survival and best treatment practices. Here we utilize the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to determine the overall survival (OS) and covariates that influence mortality. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: All patients diagnosed with POM from 2004 to 2016 were identified in the NCDB. Patient and oncologic data were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method and multivariate models for the primary outcome of OS. Results: A total of 129 patients were identified. Median OS was 36.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.1–78.7 months) with mean 5‐year survival of 42.0% (CI 33.2%–53.2%). Treatments received included surgery alone (43.4%), radiation alone (23.3%), and surgery followed by radiation (20.2%). The multivariate model demonstrated an increased risk of death associated with age over 80 years (hazard ratio [HR] 3.41, CI 1.31–8.86, P =.012), a Charlson‐Deyo comorbidity score of 2 or greater (HR 5.30, CI 1.87–15.03, P =.002), and no treatment (HR 2.28, CI 1.03–5.06, P =.042). For every 1 cm increase in tumor size, there was an increased risk of death (HR 1.06, CI 1.00–1.13, P =.039). When compared to surgery alone, no other treatment modality had an effect on OS. Conclusions: This study leveraged multiyear data from the NCDB to provide prognostic and demographic information on the largest known cohort of POM cases. Increased age, increased comorbidities, not receiving treatment, and larger tumor size were associated with increased mortality. There was no clear survival advantage for specific treatments. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1790–1797, 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Romosozumab, a monoclonal anti‐sclerostin antibody that has the dual effect of increasing bone formation and decreasing bone resorption, reduces fracture risk within 12 months. In a post hoc, exploratory analysis, we evaluated the effects of romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mass who had not received previous osteoporosis therapy. This phase 2 trial (NCT00896532) enrolled postmenopausal women with a lumbar spine, total hip, or femoral neck T‐score ≤ −2.0 and ≥ −3.5. Individuals were randomized to placebo or various romosozumab dosing regimens from baseline to month 24, were re‐randomized to 12 months of denosumab or placebo (months 24–36), and then all received romosozumab 210 mg monthly for 12 months (months 36–48). Results for the overall population have been previously published. Here, we present results for changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and levels of procollagen type I N‐terminal propeptide (P1NP) and β‐isomer of the C‐terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (β‐CTX) from a subset of women who were randomized to placebo for 24 months, were re‐randomized to receive denosumab (n = 16) or placebo (n = 12) for 12 months, and then received romosozumab for 12 months. In women who were randomized to placebo followed by denosumab, romosozumab treatment for 12 months maintained BMD gained during denosumab treatment at the total hip (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 0.9%) and further increased BMD gains at the lumbar spine (mean change from end of denosumab treatment of 5.3%). Upon transition to romosozumab (months 36–48), P1NP and β‐CTX levels gradually returned to baseline from their reduced values during denosumab administration. Transitioning to romosozumab after 12 months of denosumab appears to improve lumbar spine BMD and maintain total hip BMD while possibly preventing the rapid increase in levels of bone turnover markers above baseline expected upon denosumab discontinuation. © 2021 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To summarize and indirectly compare the efficacy and safety of different second-line systematic therapies after first-line androgen-receptor targeting therapies (ARTs) for biomarker-unselected metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Studies published in English up to May 2023 were identified in PubMed, Web of Science and ASCO-GU 2023. Studies accessing the efficacy and safety of second-line systematic therapies after first-line ARTs for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients were eligible for current systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA). Thirty-two studies with 5388 patients and 10 unique treatment modalities met our inclusion criteria. Current evidence suggested that docetaxel (DOC) combined with the same ART as first-line (ART1) (ART1 + DOC) were associated with significantly improved PSA response, PSA progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical or radiographic PFS (rPFS) compared with other reported second-line systematic therapies, including DOC. An increase in toxicity was observed with ART1 + DOC. Our NMA indicated that DOC monotherapy was only inferior to ART1 + DOC in improvement disease outcomes. The incidence of toxicity between patients received second-line DOC and an alternative ART (ART2) was similar. The available evidence reviewed in our work suggested a clinical benefit of DOC nomotherapy and DOC plus ART1 as the second-line systematic therapy for biomarker-unselected mCRPC patients progressed on a first-line ART. More studies and RCTs are needed to evaluate the optimal second-line treatments for mCRPC patients with one prior first-line ART. [Display omitted] • DOC and DOC + ART1 seems to be most beneficial for clinical benefit. • More studies and RCTs are needed to evaluate the optimal second-line treatments patients received DOC+ART1 had an increased incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Datian Chen,1 Kaikai Gu,2 Huiyu Wang3 1Department of Oncology, Haimen People’s Hospital, Haimen, People’s Republic of China; 2Haimen Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Haimen, People’s Republic of China; 3Wuxi People’s Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Wuxi, People’s Republic of China Abstract: Anti-EGFR mAb (cetuximab or panitumumab) and anti-VEGF mAb (bevacizumab) are the two main targeted agents available for RAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment. Nonetheless, three head-to-head clinical trials evaluating anti-EGFR mAb vs -VEGF mAb in first-line treatment failed to conclude a uniform result. Recently, a few small clinical studies revealed that prior use of bevacizumab may impair the effect of cetuximab or panitumumab. Preclinical studies have also suggested that pretreatment with bevacizumab may lead to simultaneous resistance to anti-EGFR mAb. Therefore, we performed this review to summarize the available data regarding the optimal sequential treatment of anti-EGFR and -VEGF mAb for RAS or KRAS WT mCRC and discuss the potential mechanisms that may explain this phenomenon. Primary tumor location and early tumor shrinkage have emerged as new potential prognostic and predictive factors in mCRC. We also collected information to explore whether these factors affect the optimal sequencing of targeted therapy in mCRC. However, definite conclusions cannot be made, and we can only speculate on optimal treatment recommendations based on the contradictory results. Keywords: anti-EGFR mAb, bevacizumab, treatment sequence, metastatic colorectal cancer