Search

Item does not contain fulltext CONTEXT: Previously we showed that pubertal children born small for gestational age (SGA) with a poor adult height (AH) expectation can benefit from treatment with GH 1 mg/m(2) per day ( approximately 0.033 mg/kg/d) in combination with 2 years of GnRH analog (GnRHa) and even more so with a double GH dose. GnRHa treatment is thought to have negative effects on body composition and blood pressure. Long-term effects and GH-dose effects on metabolic health in children treated with combined GH/GnRHa are unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate body composition, blood pressure, and lipid profile during GH treatment, either with or without 2 years of additional GnRHa. To assess whether GH 2 mg/m(2) per day ( approximately 0.067 mg/kg/d) results in a similar or even more favorable metabolic health at AH than GH 1 mg/m(2) per day. METHODS: This was a longitudinal, randomized, dose-response GH trial involving 107 short SGA children (58 girls) treated with GH until AH (GH randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2)/d during puberty). Sixty-four children received additional GnRHa. At AH, metabolic parameters were compared between children treated with combined GH/GnRHa and those with only GH. The GH dose effect on metabolic health was evaluated in a subgroup of 47 children who started GH treatment in early puberty (randomized 1 or 2 mg/m(2)/d) with 2 years of GnRHa. RESULTS: At AH, fat mass percentage (FM%) SD score (SDS), lean body mass (LBM) SDS, blood pressure SDS, and lipid profile were similar between children treated with combined GH/GnRHa and those with only GH. In the pubertal subgroup, FM% SDS was lower during treatment with GH 2 mg/m(2) per day. There was no GH dose-dependent effect on LBM SDS, blood pressure, and lipid profile. CONCLUSIONS: Combined GH/GnRHa treatment has no long-term negative effects on metabolic health compared with only GH. Started in early puberty, a GH dose of 2 mg/m(2) per day results in a similar metabolic health at AH and a more favorable FM% than GH 1 mg/m(2) per day.

Objective: We investigated whether the presence of concomitant coronary heart disease (CHD) in patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD) can be explained by intra-abdominal fat accumulation and compared different measures of adiposity as predictors of CHD in patients with PAD.Research Methods and Procedures: Data were collected from patients enrolled in the Second Manifestations of ARTerial disease (SMART) study, an ongoing prospective cohort study of patients with manifest vascular disease or vascular risk factors at the University Medical Centre Utrecht. The current analysis includes 315 patients, mean age 59 +/- 10 years, who had PAD with (n = 79) or without (n = 236) CHD. Parameters of adiposity were measured, and intra-abdominal fat and subcutaneous fat were measured ultrasonographically. Metabolic syndrome was defined according to Adult Treatment Panel III.Results: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome was higher among patients with CHD (63%) than among patients without CHD (48%). All parameters of adiposity indicated more fat in patients with CHD, except for subcutaneous fat. Waist circumference was associated with 64% higher prevalence of CHD (confidence interval, 20% to 123%) per 1 standard deviation increase in waist circumference after adjustment for age and sex. The odds ratio for waist circumference remained virtually the same after additional adjustment for the components of the metabolic syndrome and smoking.Discussion: An increased waist circumference, a crude measure of intra-abdominal fat, is associated with an increased risk of concomitant CHD in patients with PAD.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Familial dysbetalipoproteinemia (FD), also known as type III hyperlipoproteinemia, is a genetic dyslipidemia characterized by elevated very low density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicron remnant particles that confers increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of vascular risk factors, CVD, lipid values, treatment and lipid targets in patients with FD across Europe. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was performed in 305 patients with FD from seven academic hospitals in four European countries. Information was collected from clinical records. RESULTS: Patients mean (+/-standard deviation) age was 60.9+/-14.4 years, 201 (66%) were male, 69 (23%) had diabetes mellitus (DM) and 87 (29%) had a prior history of CVD. Mean body mass index was 28.5+/-5.0 kg/m2. Lipid-lowering medication was used by 227 (74%) patients (27% usual dose (theoretical low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) reduction40%)). Non high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels below treatment target (

The metabolic syndrome has been identified as an increasingly important precursor to cardiovascular diseases in many Asian populations. Our objective was to compare the contribution of component risk factors to the diagnosis of the metabolic syndrome, as defined by the Third report of the National Cholesterol Education Program Expert Panel Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATPIII), in the US and selected Asian populations. Nationally representative survey data from Hong Kong, Taiwan, Thailand and the US were used. Analyses were restricted to men and women aged >= 35 years. The age-standardized prevalence of the NCEP-ATPIII defined metabolic syndrome was highest in the US (31% in men, 35% in women), and lowest in Taiwan (11% in men, 12% in women). The component risk factors that defined the presence of the metabolic syndrome varied between countries. As expected, abnormal waist circumference was considerably more prevalent among individuals with the metabolic syndrome in the US (72% in men, 94% in women) compared with their Asian counterparts, but substantial variation was also observed between the Asian populations (13-22% in men, 38-63% in women). Furthermore, the relative contribution of other risk factors to the metabolic syndrome was also substantially different between countries. The NCEP-ATPIII definition identifies a heterogeneous group of individuals with the metabolic syndrome in different populations. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

The increased cardiovascular risk has been implicated in both HIV infection and antirretroviral therapy. The endothelial dysfunction triggered by the infection and the metabolic abnormalities associated with therapy predispose to premature atherosclerosis. The recognition of the increased cardiovascular risk in these patients will allow more appropriate prevention strategies, as well as therapy optimization with lipid-lowering agents and antirretroviral therapy modification. publishersversion published

Much controversy has surrounded both the pathological basis and the clinical utility of the metabolic syndrome. Key questions still revolve around the definition of this syndrome, its utility as a predictor of cardiovascular risk, and the treatment implications of diagnosis. The metabolic syndrome is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. However, the metabolic syndrome clearly underperforms compared with other, established prediction equations, such as the Framingham Risk Score and SCORE (Systemic COronary Risk Evaluation). Differences arise because the components are highly correlated (whereas other tools specifically include independent predictors) and because diagnosis is based on dichotomized variables. These facts, together with uncertain pathophysiology, mean that the metabolic syndrome in its current manifestation has limited utility for the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease. The syndrome has, however, served and continues to serve a useful purpose in raising awareness of the metabolic consequences of obesity, and as a spur for research into metabolic risk factor interactions.

Risk reduction in patients with clinically manifest vascular disease focuses on preventing new vascular events and not on prevention of type 2 diabetes. However, given the common pathophysiological pathways involved in the development of atherosclerosis and type 2 diabetes, it is probable that people with atherosclerotic vascular disease have an elevated risk of type 2 diabetes. The present prospective cohort study investigated the incidence of type 2 diabetes and the effect of the presence of metabolic syndrome on the incidence of type 2 diabetes in 4,022 patients with clinically manifest atherosclerosis, included in the study from September 1996 to June 2006. Patients who died (n=456), who were lost to follow-up (n=84) and those with diabetes at baseline (n=558) were excluded, leaving 2,924 patients for analysis. The incidence of diabetes was assessed by questionnaire (self-reported diabetes). During 13,726 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up 4.3 years, range 2.4–7.0 years), there were 152 type 2 diabetes cases (5.2%), corresponding to an incidence rate of 11.1 (95% CI 9.4–13.0) per 1,000 person-years. Patients with metabolic syndrome were at increased risk of incident type 2 diabetes compared to those without metabolic syndrome, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 5.7 (95% CI 3.7–8.9) for Revised National Cholesterol Education Program, 6.0 (4.1–9.0) for National Cholesterol Education Program and 4.0 (2.7–6.1) for International Diabetes Federation definitions of metabolic syndrome. Of all metabolic syndrome components, abdominal obesity was most strongly associated with incident type 2 diabetes (94% higher risk of type 2 diabetes for 1 standard deviation (11.3 cm) increase in waist circumference). In conclusion, patients with manifest atherosclerosis are at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. Metabolic syndrome identifies those at the highest risk and is an easy to use clinical tool. Abdominal obesity is a strong individual predictor of type 2 diabetes. Patients with manifest atherosclerosis and metabolic syndrome may derive particular benefit from lifestyle interventions focusing on weight reduction.