Search

SPM is a statistical method of analysis of time-varying human movement gait signal, depending on the random field theory (RFT). MovementRx is our inhouse-developed decision-support system that depends on SPM1D Python implementation of the SPM (spm1d.org). We present the potential application of MovementRx in the prediction of increased joint forces with the possibility to predispose to osteoarthritis in a sample of post-surgical Transtibial Amputation (TTA) patients who were ambulant in the community. We captured the three-dimensional movement profile of 12 males with TTA and studied them using MovementRx, employing the SPM1D Python library to quantify the deviation(s) they have from our corresponding reference data, using "Hotelling 2" and "T test 2" statistics for the 3D movement vectors of the 3 main lower limb joints (hip, knee, and ankle) and their nine respective components (3 joints × 3 dimensions), respectively. MovementRx results visually demonstrated a clear distinction in the biomechanical recordings between TTA patients and a reference set of normal people (ABILITY data project), and variability within the TTA patients' group enabled identification of those with an increased risk of developing osteoarthritis in the future. We conclude that MovementRx is a potential tool to detect increased specific joint forces with the ability to identify TTA survivors who may be at risk for osteoarthritis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the limits of stability (LOS) in persons with transtibial amputation (TTA), and to determine the effects of prosthetic alignment alterations on motor control strategies. Design: Before-and-after trial. Setting: A kinesiology laboratory at a university hospital. Participants: Male patients with TTA (n=10) and controls (n=17). Interventions: Prosthetic alignment. Main Outcome Measures: For the LOS test, the maximum excursion, endpoint excursion, direction control, movement velocity, and reaction time with inclination in the forward direction, toward the amputated leg/right leg, and in the backward direction, and toward the nonamputated leg/left leg. Measurements were performed using the following 5 prosthetic alignments: the optimal alignment, with the prosthesis shorter by 1cm, with the prosthesis longer by 1cm, and with the prosthetic foot in 5° of extra plantar flexion and 5° of extra dorsiflexion. Results: Compared with the control group, maximum excursion and direction control were lower (P<.05) in patients with TTA with backward body inclination for all tested prosthetic alignments. Direction control in backward inclination was reduced (P<.05) compared with other tested directions for all assessed prosthetic alignments. Differences between the tested alignments were not significant in any of the tested directions. Conclusions: Patients with TTA have decreased voluntary body inclination backward within the LOS for all tested prosthetic alignments. Compared with controls, changes in prosthetic foot settings by means of rotation in the sagittal plane had a larger impact on movement strategy in patients with TTA than did changes to the length of the prosthesis. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]