Search

Lumbosacral interbody fusion is a mainstay of surgical treatment for degenerative spinal pathologies causing chronic pain and functional impairment. However, the optimal technique for this procedure remains controversial. Well-established open approaches, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), have historically been the standard of practice. A recent paradigm shift in spinal surgery has led to the investigation of minimally invasive approaches to mitigate tissue damage without compromising outcomes. This extensive review aims to examine current clinical and biomechanical evidence on the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to an axial lumbosacral interbody fusion. Since this technique was first described in 2004, accumulating evidence suggests it results in high fusion rates, consistent improvements in pain and function, reduced perioperative morbidity, and low rates of complication. Although early clinical outcomes have been promising, there is a paucity of comparative data investigating outcomes of the paracoccygeal transsacral approach to traditional alternatives and other minimally invasive techniques. Here, we summarize current evidence and discuss pertinent topics for the spinal surgeon considering this novel approach, including indications, advantages, relevant anatomy, contraindications, and technical considerations.

Background: Although the second (S2) and third (S3) sacral segments have been established as potential osseous fixation pathways for screw fixation, the S2 body has been demonstrated to have inferior bone density when compared to the body of the first (S1) sacral segment. Caution regarding the use of iliosacral screws at this level has been advised as a result. As transiliac–transsacral screws traverse the lateral cortices of the posterior pelvis, they may be relying on bone with superior density for purchase, which could obviate this concern. The objective of this study was to compare the bone density of the posterior ilium and sacroiliac joint to that of the sacral body at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral levels. Materials and methods: A retrospective case series was performed, reviewing the CT scans of 100 patients without prior pelvic trauma. Each CT was confirmed to have available osseous fixation pathways at the first (S1), second (S2), and third (S3) sacral segments. The bone density of the posterior ilium/sacroiliac joint (PISJ) and sacral body (SB) was measured using the embedded standardized Hounsfield units (HU) tool at each sacral level. Results: The average S2 PISJ bone density (320.1) was significantly higher than the S1 (286.5) and S3 (278.9) PISJ (p < 0.0001) and S1 and S3 PISJ was not statistically different. The S1 sacral body bone density (231.1) was significantly higher than the S2 (182.1) and S3 (126.8) bone density (p < 0.0001). The PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at every sacral level (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: The S2 PISJ bone density is significantly greater than S1. The S1, S2, and S3 PISJ bone density is greater than the sacral body at all sacral levels, and the S1 body has higher bone density than the S2 and S3 bodies. These differences in bone density may have implications for the stability of posterior pelvic ring fixation constructs with regard to screw purchase. Level of evidence: Level III—Case cohort series. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: Retrospective radioanatomic single-center cohort study.Objective: To investigate sex-specific differences in transsacral corridor dimensions, determine feasibility rates of transsacral screw placement without extended safety zones around planned screw positions, and develop an index defining sacral dysmorphism (SD) irrespective of transsacral corridor diameters.Summary Of Background Data: Previously reported SD definitions used radiologically identifiable pelvic characteristics or predefined minimum diameter thresholds of transsacral corridors in the upper sacral segment including safety zones for screw placement. Technical progress of surgical 3D image guidance improved sacral screw insertion accuracy questioning established minimum diameter threshold-based SD definitions.Methods: Datasets from cross-sectional pelvic imaging of 100 women and 100 men presenting to a general hospital from July 2018 through August 2018 were included in a database to evaluate transsacral trajectory rates, and dimensions of transsacral corridor lengths, widths (TSCWs), and heights (TSCHs) in sacral segments I to III (S1-3). SD was assumed, if no transsacral trajectory was found in S1 with a corridor diameter of at least 7.5 mm.Results: Women presented significantly higher rates of transsacral trajectories in the inferior sector of S1 (P = 0.03), and larger transsacral corridor lengths in S2 (superior sector, P = 0.045), and S3 (central position, P = 0.02). In men, significantly higher feasibility rates were found for the placement of two transsacral screws in S2 (P = 0.0002), and singular screws in S3 (P = 0.006), with larger S1- (P = 0.0002), and central S2-TSCWs (P = 0.006). SD was prevalent in 17% of women, and 16% of men (P = 0.85). Calculating TSCW ratios of S1 and S2 was significantly indicative for SD at values below a threshold of 0.8 in women (P < 0.00001), and men (P = 0.0004).Conclusion: SD is independent of sex despite significant differences in sacral morphology. An index defining SD irrespective of absolute transsacral corridor dimensions is presented to reliably differentiate dysmorphic from nondysmorphic sacra in women and men.Level Of Evidence: 2. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous screw fixation of the posterior pelvic ring is technically demanding and can result in cortical breach. The purpose of this study was to examine risk factors for screw breach and iatrogenic nerve injury. A retrospective review at a single level-one trauma center identified 245 patients treated with 249 screws for pelvic ring injuries with postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans. Cortical screw breach, iatrogenic nerve injury, and associated risk factors were evaluated. There were 86 (35%) breached screws. The breach rate was similar between screw types (33% S1-iliosacral (S1-IS), 44% S1-transsacral (S1-TS), 31% S2-IS, and 30% S2-TS) and was not associated with patient characteristics, Tile C injuries, or corridor size or angle. The overall rate of screw revision for screw malpositioning was 1.2% (3/249). Iatrogenic nerve injuries occurred in 8 (3.2%) of the 249 screws. Screws that caused iatrogenic nerve injuries had greater screw breach distances (5.4 vs. 0 mm, MD 5, CI 2.3 to 8.7, p < 0.0001), were more likely to be S1-IS screws (88% vs. 47%, PD 40%, CI 7 to 58%, p = 0.006), more likely to be placed in Tile C injuries (75% vs. 44%, PD 31%, CI -3 to 55%, p = 0.04), and there was a trend for having a screw corridor size <10 mm (75% vs. 47%, PD 28, CI -6 to 52%, p = 0.06). Of the 7 iatrogenic nerve injuries adjacent to screw breaches, two nerve injuries recovered after screw removal, three recovered with screw retention, and two did not recover with screw retention. Screw breaches were common and iatrogenic nerve injuries were more likely with S1-IS screws. Surgeons should maintain a high degree of caution when placing these screws and consider removal of any breached screw associated with nerve injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to present a technique of abdominosacral resection and its results in patients with locally advanced primary or locally recurrent rectal cancer with dorsolateral fixation. METHODS: Between 1994 and 1999, 13 patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer and 37 patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer underwent abdominosacral resection as part of a multimodality treatment, i.e., preoperative irradiation, surgery, and intraoperative irradiation. After the abdominal phase, the patient was turned from supine to prone position to perform the transsacral phase of the resection. RESULTS: Margins were microscopically negative in 26 patients (52 percent), microscopically positive in 18 (36 percent), and positive with gross residual disease in 6 patients. Operation time ranged from 210 to 590 (median, 390) minutes, and blood loss ranged from 400 to 10,000 (median, 3,500) ml. No operative or hospital deaths occurred. Postoperative complications occurred in 41 patients (82 percent); most notable were perineal wound infections or dehiscence (n = 24, 48 percent). Other complications were postoperative urinary retention or incontinence (n = 9, 18 percent), peritonitis (n = 4), grade II neuropathy (n = 1), and fistula formation (n = 3). Kaplan-Meier 3-year overall survival, disease-free survival, and local control rates were, respectively, 41 percent, 31 percent, and 61 percent. Completeness of the resection (negative vs. positive margins) was a significant factor influencing survival (P = 0.04), disease-free survival (P = 0.0006), and local control (P = 0.0002). CONCLUSION: The abdominosacral resection provides wide access and may be the therapeutic solution for the accomplishment of a radical resection for distally situated, dorsally or dorsolaterally fixed primary or locally recurrent rectal cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The management of rectal cancer has been changing to include more sphincter-sparing procedures. We report our initial experience with a new technique incorporating laparoscopy and a transsacral approach for low or midlevel rectal cancer. Here, we tried to determine whether this sphincter-sparing method could produce acceptable morbidity and recurrence rates.Methods: Patients with rectal cancer 4 to 8 cm from the dentate line underwent laparoscopically-assisted transsacral resection (LTR) with primary anastomosis. With this technique, the rectosigmoid is mobilized via laparoscopy while the patient is in the supine position. Next, the patient is placed in the prone jackknife position, and a segment of rectum is resected by a transsacral approach. Age, estimated blood loss, length of time in the operating room, length of stay, and postoperative complications were noted. Aspects of the tumor pathology regarding stage, lymph nodes, tumor size, and presence of tumor at resection margins also were recorded.Results: A total of 13 patients, ages 26 to 70 years (mean, 52.5 years), underwent the procedure. No perioperative deaths occurred. The mean hospital stay was 9.6 days. The average size of the rectal lesion was 4.3 cm in the largest dimension. The average specimen contained 11.5 total, and 2.0 metastatic lymph nodes. Postoperative complications included two anastomotic breakdowns and two other wound complications. Late follow-up evaluation ranged from 10 to 30 months, with 11 of 13 patients alive (85% survival). Two local recurrences and three distant recurrences were noted at long-term follow-up assessment.Conclusions: In selected patients with low or midlevel rectal cancer, LTR may be a viable option. Further experience is necessary to define its oncologic efficacy and whether routine temporary diverting colostomy is indicated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine the frequency of fixation failure after transsacral-transiliac (TS) screw fixation of vertical shear (VS) pelvic ring injuries (OTA/AO 61C1) and to describe the mechanism of failure of TS screws., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Setting: Level 1 academic trauma center., Patients/participants: Twenty skeletally mature patients with unilateral, displaced, unequivocal VS injuries were identified between May 1, 2009 and April 31, 2016. Mean age was 31 years and mean follow-up was 14 months. Twelve had sacroiliac dislocations (61C1.2) and eight had vertical sacral fractures (61C1.3)., Intervention: Operative treatment with at least one TS screw., Main Outcome Measurements: Radiographic failure, defined as a change of >1 cm of combined displacement of the posterior pelvis compared with the intraoperative position on inlet and outlet radiographs., Results: Radiographic failure occurred in 4 of 8 (50%) vertical sacral fractures. Posterior fixation was comprised of a single TS screw in 3 of these 4 failures. The dominant mechanism of screw failure was bending. All of these failures occurred early in the postoperative period. No fixation failures occurred among the sacroiliac dislocations. There were no deep infections or nonunions., Conclusions: This is the first study to describe the mechanism of failure of TS screws in a clinical setting after VS pelvic injuries. We caution surgeons from relying on single TS screw fixation for vertically unstable sacral fractures. Close radiographic monitoring in the first few weeks after surgery is advised., Level of Evidence: Level IV., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the Orthopaedic Trauma Association.)

Background High-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis is challenging to treat, and there is no standard recommended operative technique. The authors performed a systematic review of the literature evaluating the efficacy and safety of modern transsacral instrumentation techniques for high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis. Methods A systematic PubMed search adherent to PRISMA guidelines included relevant clinical studies reporting transsacral instrumentation for high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis in adult humans from 1980 onward. Available data regarding clinical and radiographic outcomes for individual patients were abstracted. Results Nine of 311 studies were eligible for detailed review. They reported on 38 patients (mean 33.1 years; range 18–66 years) treated with transsacral instrumentation. Transsacral cages (6 articles, n = 23), screws (2 articles, n = 12) and rods (1 article, n = 3) were used. Posterior (86.8%) and combined anteroposterior approaches were used, both with (55.2%) and without decompression, partial reduction (23.7%), posterior pedicle screw fixation (94.7%), and adjacent level inter-body fusion (42.1%). Four patients had 6 perioperative complications (15.8%). Mean follow-up time was 30.1 months (range 2–58 months; n = 37). All patients had adequate fusion on follow-up imaging (n = 34) and no progression of slip (n = 32). All patients had improvement in pain (n = 32) and at least average function postoperatively (94.7%; n = 33/35). Conclusion Operative techniques for managing high-grade L5-S1 spondylolisthesis are evolving. In our systematic review, modern transsacral instrumentation resulted in good clinical outcome and fusion rates, and acceptable complication rates. Risks and benefits should be individualized for each patient. Transsacral instrumentation is a viable and effective treatment option for this pathology. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background context: Bowel perforation is an uncommon complication of posterior spinal surgery. The AxiaLIF transsacral instrumentation system has been used for the treatment of L5–S1 spondylolisthesis and degenerative disc disease since its introduction in 2005 as a potentially less invasive alternative to traditional anterior or posterior interbody fusion. Purpose: In this article, we report a case of a rectal perforation as a complication of placement of the AxiaLIF instrumentation system that was successfully treated without the removal of the device. Study design: Case report. Methods: The patient presented with progressive back pain and sepsis 3 weeks after an L5–S1 fusion done with the AxiaLIF technique at an outside facility. The patient was managed with antibiotic therapy and a diverting ileostomy, without the removal of the AxiaLIF device. Results: Over the next year, she had symptoms indicative of nonunion of the operated level and breakdown at the adjacent level, which were confirmed with imaging. She underwent revision posterior spinal fusion without the removal of the AxiaLIF device. Eighteen months after the AxiaLIF device was placed, the patient continued to demonstrate no signs of infection recurrence. Conclusions: Delayed presentation of rectal perforation with a subsequent anaerobic sepsis is a potential complication of the presacral approach to the L5–S1 disc space. Recognition and treatment with fecal diversion and long-term intravenous antibiotics is an alternative to device removal and sacral reconstruction. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]