Search

The survey includes a study of destination planning and development at a local level through micro-regionalization. The subject of this work is the study, analysis and definition of opportunities for sustainable tourism development at a local level as a model that can be multiplied to be used in other developing tourist destinations. The objective of the study is the sustainable development of tourism in the municipality of Botevgrad and its positioning as an attractive tourist destination. To achieve the research goal, a set of general and private methods corresponding to the interdisciplinary and heterogeneous nature of the study are used: methods of analysis and synthesis, cameral method, cartographic method, geographic methods of research: spatial analysis of the resource potential, localization of the surveyed sites. An approach of studies and systematization of information on literary sources and planning documents has also been used; collecting, processing, systematizing and interpreting statistical data and documents; critical analysis method and expert assessment; comparative analysis method; scientific analysis and synthesis; field observation. The main conclusions point the opportunities for destination management at a local level through micro-regionalisation as a successful model for sustainable tourism.

On the examples of the islands of Šolta, Ugljan, Brač and Mljet, this paper seeks to show that the planned capacities of tourist zones in spatial designation plans of municipalities/towns and detailed urban designation plans of several tourist zones are not entirely coherent with their maintenance possibilities (executed by the current inhabitants), nor the housing zones for new inhabitants (who would enable the maintenance of said tourist zones) have been planned. The method of work is based on the research of documentation sources and on the parallel analyses of urban parameters: - spatial planning documents, - construction sites of the settlements of the island and its population, - tourist zones on the islands and the number of employees, and detailed allocations of areas and program abstracts of the examples of tourist zones. Conclusions: The CSS residential density on the islands is lower than 20 pph. The unbuilt sections of the CSS with low residential density (lower than 100 pph) can accomodate twice as many residents than the existing number of the islands’ inhabitants. The number of TZ bedding capacity is bigger than the existing number of the islands’ inhabitants. The number of necessary employees for the planned TZ makes up at least 20% (Mljet), and up to 70% (Ugljan) of the existing number of the islands’ inhabitants. The necessary area of the CSS allocated as the TZ employees’ accomodation can be located on the unbuilt sections of the islands’ CSS, but they weren’t allocated as such although they encompass the area of up to 40% (Brač) of the unbuilt section of the islands’ CSS. The facilities and areas for the employees’ accomodation weren’t specifically planned in the UDPs and DDPs of TZ/TL. There is enough additional space for the accomodation of a larger number of the necessary employees in the built sections of the settlements. It is important to regulate the planning of a section within the TZ as an accomodation area for the temporary (seasonal) employees. Cilj rada je pokazati na primjerima otoka Šolte, Ugljana, Brača i Mljeta, da u prostornim planovima uređenja općina / gradova i detaljnijim urbanističkim planovima uređenja za pojedine turističke zone, nisu u potpunosti usklađeni planirani kapaciteti turističkih zona sa mogućnostima njihovog servisiranja od strane postojećih stanovnika, te da također, nisu planirane niti stambene zone za nove stanovnike koji omogućuju servisiranje tih turističkih zona. Metoda rada se zasniva na istraživanju dokumentacijskih izvora i usporednim analizama urbanističkih parametara: prostorno planskih dokumenata, -građevinskog područja naselja otoka i broja njihovih stanovnika, turističkih zona na otocima i broja njihovih djelatnika, i detaljne namjene površina i programa sadržaja primjera turističkih zona. Zaključci: Gustoća stanovanja u GPN na otocima je niža od 20 st/ha. U neizgrađenim dijelovima GPN sa niskom gustoćom stanovanja (do 100 st/ha) može se smjestiti dvostruko veći broj stanovnika od postojećeg broja stanovnika na otocima. Broj planiranih ležaja u TZ veći je od postojećeg broja stanovnika otoka. Broj potrebnih djelatnika za planirane TZ čini najmanje 20% (Mljet), a najviše 70% (Ugljan) postojećeg broja stanovnika otoka. Potrebnu površinu GPN namijenjenu smještaju djelatnika TZ moguće je smjestiti u neizgrađenim dijelovima GPN otoka, ali ona nisu planirana za tu namjenu iako zauzimaju površinu do 40% (Brač) neizgrađenog dijela GPN otoka. U Upu-ovima i Dpu- ovima TZ/TL nisu posebno planirani sadržaji i površine za smještaj djelatnika. U izgrađenim građevinskim područjima naselja ima rezerve za smještaj većeg broja potrebnih djelatnika. Unutar obuhvata TZ potrebno je omogućiti regulativom da se dio iste planira za smještaj privremenih (sezonskih) zaposlenika.