Search

The native European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) is an ecosystem engineer providing important ecosystem services, but became nearly extinct from the North Sea due to diseases and overfishing. There's a growing interest to restore these oyster reefs for their valuable contribution in re-establishing a rich ecosystem in the North Sea. In order to reintroduce the flat oyster population, the availability of hard substrate is crucial for initial settlement and reef development. Such substrate is offered by the infrastructure in offshore wind farms, by means of quarried rock placed at the base of the wind turbine foundations and on top of cable crossings to prevent scouring of the seabed. Further anthropogenic disturbances of the seabed are largely restricted, making wind farm areas promising sites for oyster reef restoration. For successful oyster reef initiation, offering a suitable type of substrate for larvae settlement is important. Here, we assess the settlement preference of flat oysters on 9 different types of substrate, by comparing total settlement, spat densities and spat survival. Oyster larvae settlement preference based on the total number of spat per surface area of the substrate was the highest for granite, a rock type conventionally used as scour protection in offshore wind farms. The lowest settlement preference was observed for steel and the biodegradable polymer BESE. The experiments were performed in a spatting pond and in a natural bay to be able to compare spat collection under controlled and natural conditions. Settlement rates in the spatting pond were much higher than in the natural environment, though survival rates were lower. Our results provide insight in the settlement preference of the European flat oyster for different types of substrate under controlled and natural conditions. Knowing these favorable substrates and conditions for oyster larvae settlement allows for the selection of pro-active measures that contribute to flat oyster reef, Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Acropora palmata is one of the major reef-building coral species in the Caribbean. The species has suffered drastic declines in abundance and sexual recruitment over the past decades. One method for active rehabilitation of A. palmata reefs is by assisting the production of sexual recruits under controlled lab conditions. Within this study, the effect of different aquaculture regimes and culturing periods on the survival rates of these recruits was investigated. In August 2016, coral spawn was collected on a reef nearshore New Providence, Bahamas, cross-fertilized, and reared in mobile laboratory facilities from Van Oord Dredging and Marine Contractors. Larvae were settled on pre-conditioned aragonite plugs. Sexual recruits were cultured under four different aquaculture conditions: ambient vs. high Total Alkalinity (TA) (∼2.8 mEq L−1 vs. 4.8 mEq L−1) and with vs. without feeding Artemia nauplii. Recruit size was monitored by tracking living tissue area and the number of polyps of a subset of recruits. Plates with recruits were outplanted to a nursery on the reef after 4, 9 and 14 weeks of aquaculture. Survival was determined during the aquaculture phase (at 4, 9 and 14 weeks after settlement), and after outplanting (at 27 and 44 weeks after settlement). During the aquaculture phase, survival was significantly lower in seawater with increased TA compared to ambient seawater conditions. The average number of polyps per recruit was significantly higher in the treatments with feeding. After outplanting to the reef, both survival and recruit size were highest in the feeding treatments. The most successful aquaculture treatment in this study was a combination of increased TA and feeding during 9 weeks of aquaculture, which resulted in a doubling of survival and recruit size at 10 months after settlement compared to ambient conditions. Ambient conditions did not enhance survivorship nor recruit size at 10 months after settlement, as compared to the, Green Open Access added to TU Delft Institutional Repository ‘You share, we take care!’ – Taverne project https://www.openaccess.nl/en/you-share-we-take-care Otherwise as indicated in the copyright section: the publisher is the copyright holder of this work and the author uses the Dutch legislation to make this work public., Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering, Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk

Marine reef ecosystems have degraded massively worldwide, and restoration efforts have as yet not managed to realize the scale required to reverse continued degradation. To achieve effective scales, scientific insights in restoration methods should be paired with industry-based approaches used for infrastructural development. We illustrate by five principles how long-standing experience of marine contractors with executing large-scale projects, can support reef restoration: i) utilizing industrial techniques to achieve positive impact at scale, ii) landscaping infrastructure to optimize habitat for targeted species, iii) inducing life to overcome connectivity bottle-necks and steer community composition, iv) designing nature development efforts to be self-sustainable, and v) ensuring continuity beyond project boundaries by early stakeholder engagement. Consciously connecting scientific knowledge to industry-based activities increases the likelihood that marine infrastructure development and ecosystem rehabilitation can be aligned. We plead that synergizing practices by science and industry is needed to upscale restoration efforts and truly improve marine reef ecosystems., Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Incorporation of ecology and ecosystem services into marine infrastructural developments has gained interest over the last decades. Growing attention is given to combine the massive roll-out of offshore wind farms in the North Sea with reinstating the once rich but nowadays nearly extinct European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis). However, the practical upscaling of these pilots is hindered by the absence of clear management objectives and the lack of quantitative knowledge on the effect of technical interventions that could stimulate oyster reef development. Consequently, it is unclear what scale of intervention would actually be required to achieve overall management objectives. This paper presents a stepwise procedure designed in particular to guide the selection of appropriate measures and their required scale for pro-actively facilitating flat oyster reef development in offshore wind farms, in order to reach a desired state for oyster reef inclusive wind farms. The stepwise procedure addresses the historical and current situation of the physical system and social environment, provides options for intervention that stimulate oyster reef development at a range of scales, from micro-scale (materials used) to mega-scale (connectivity between wind farms), and quantitatively assesses the potential effect of applying these interventions. Assumptions have been made in quantifying the effort required for developing oyster reefs in offshore wind farms, and refinement is obviously needed. However, this is a first attempt to make such estimates. The outcomes provide direction in identifying research needs to fill knowledge gaps, as well as in decision-making during the design process for inducing oyster reef development in offshore wind farms. Herewith, application of the stepwise procedure supports authorities in restoration management for the successful reinstatement of flat oyster reefs in the southern North Sea., Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

The North Sea was once abundantly covered with hard substrates such as oyster beds, coarse peat banks and glacial erratics, providing habitat to a rich community of marine species. Most of these habitats were destroyed by bottom-trawl fisheries over the past century, and today, the seabed hosts a relatively poor species community. Emerging offshore windfarms include the re-introduction of hard substrate by means of scour protection around the foundation of wind turbines. It is assumed that the new habitat will contribute to marine biodiversity, and this study aims to demonstrate that. Video data were collected using a Remotely Operated Vehicle in four wind farms in the southern North Sea. A quantitative assessment was made to determine the effect of scour protection on community structure. The assessment revealed distinct community clusters for geographic location and seabed type. Windfarms closely located to each other had a more similar epibenthic community compared to those further away. The epibenthic community at the rocky armour layer of the scour protection had a different species composition and a higher species abundance than the one at the sandy seabed surrounding it. Species diversity by means of richness, evenness and the Shannon diversity index was not consistently higher or lower for the communities at the different seabed types. This study shows that marine life inhabits scour protection in offshore wind farms and that it is different from the community living at the surrounding seabed. Knowing the potential epibenthic community structure at and around a scour protection supports the development of new wind farms that include components to enhance their ecological value. Herewith, our study contributes to efforts to restore biodiversity in the North Sea., Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

The North Sea was once abundantly covered with hard substrates such as oyster beds, coarse peat banks and glacial erratics, providing habitat to a rich community of marine species. Most of these habitats were destroyed by bottom-trawl fisheries over the past century, and today, the seabed hosts a relatively poor species community. Emerging offshore windfarms include the re-introduction of hard substrate by means of scour protection around the foundation of wind turbines. It is assumed that the new habitat will contribute to marine biodiversity, and this study aims to demonstrate that. Video data were collected using a Remotely Operated Vehicle in four wind farms in the southern North Sea. A quantitative assessment was made to determine the effect of scour protection on community structure. The assessment revealed distinct community clusters for geographic location and seabed type. Windfarms closely located to each other had a more similar epibenthic community compared to those further away. The epibenthic community at the rocky armour layer of the scour protection had a different species composition and a higher species abundance than the one at the sandy seabed surrounding it. Species diversity by means of richness, evenness and the Shannon diversity index was not consistently higher or lower for the communities at the different seabed types. This study shows that marine life inhabits scour protection in offshore wind farms and that it is different from the community living at the surrounding seabed. Knowing the potential epibenthic community structure at and around a scour protection supports the development of new wind farms that include components to enhance their ecological value. Herewith, our study contributes to efforts to restore biodiversity in the North Sea., Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Rivers, Ports, Waterways and Dredging Engineering

Traditionally, marine infrastructure development is regarded to have a negative impact on the ecosystem in or near which it occurs. As a consequence, a whole industry has been treated as a threat and the ingenuity of companies in this industry was forced to focus on minimizing potential negative impacts. Recent trends are to also consider potential positive spin-offs, by including nature-based components in the designs. In this context, Dutch dredging and marine contractor, Van Oord, launched its Coral Rehabilitation Initiative in 2010. A mobile laboratory, named ReefGuard, was developed, to be operated anywhere in the world for sexual reproduction and rearing corals at a large scale (Van Koningsveld et ah, 2017). ReefGuard is used to initiate 'Coral Engines': large scale nurseries with corals obtained through sexual reproduction as well as from fragmentation. These Coral Engines guarantee the long term and large-scale supply of genetically diverse corals for reef creation and rehabilitation. Having coral 'in stock' furthermore allows reefs to be repaired quickly following harmful events such as hurricanes. The involvement of local stakeholders in its setup and operation foresees in sustainable opportunities for research, education and awareness, and local employment. Since 2010 ReefGuard has been applied in five large scale field applications (Australia 2014, 2015, The Bahamas 2015, 2016, 2017) (Van Koningsveld et al, 2017; Robijns et al, 2018; Schutter et al, 2018) producing thousands of sexual recruits consistently. In 2017 a first Coral Engine was delivered with several tens of thousands newly settled coral recruits, and hundreds of one year old recruits and fragments. This paper explains the concept of the Coral Engine in more detail and shares perspectives for future implementation along marine construction projects across the world. Marine infrastructure projects thus become opportunities for coral reef rehabilitation with essential financial and logistica, Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk

Traditionally, marine infrastructure development is regarded to have a negative impact on the ecosystem in or near which it occurs. As a consequence, a whole industry has been treated as a threat and the ingenuity of companies in this industry was forced to focus on minimizing potential negative impacts. Recent trends are to also consider potential positive spin-offs, by including nature-based components in the designs. In this context, Dutch dredging and marine contractor, Van Oord, launched its Coral Rehabilitation Initiative in 2010. A mobile laboratory, named ReefGuard, was developed, to be operated anywhere in the world for sexual reproduction and rearing corals at a large scale (Van Koningsveld et ah, 2017). ReefGuard is used to initiate 'Coral Engines': large scale nurseries with corals obtained through sexual reproduction as well as from fragmentation. These Coral Engines guarantee the long term and large-scale supply of genetically diverse corals for reef creation and rehabilitation. Having coral 'in stock' furthermore allows reefs to be repaired quickly following harmful events such as hurricanes. The involvement of local stakeholders in its setup and operation foresees in sustainable opportunities for research, education and awareness, and local employment. Since 2010 ReefGuard has been applied in five large scale field applications (Australia 2014, 2015, The Bahamas 2015, 2016, 2017) (Van Koningsveld et al, 2017; Robijns et al, 2018; Schutter et al, 2018) producing thousands of sexual recruits consistently. In 2017 a first Coral Engine was delivered with several tens of thousands newly settled coral recruits, and hundreds of one year old recruits and fragments. This paper explains the concept of the Coral Engine in more detail and shares perspectives for future implementation along marine construction projects across the world. Marine infrastructure projects thus become opportunities for coral reef rehabilitation with essential financial and logistica, Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk