Search

The rights of children need to be protected in spite of any conditions of state existence, and the legal regime of martial law is no exception. One of the types of support for the existence of the child is the payment of alimony for its maintenance. In connection with the introduction of a special legal regime - the legal regime of martial law and the revision of the existing norms of legislation, enshrined for the normal existence of the state, the question arose about the relevance of norms that regulate alimony payments for normal times to circumstances associated with a special legal regime (loss of employment by the alimony payer, including those associated with armed aggression against the state; appearance of territories with a special status (temporarily occupied areas, territories, Also, the issue of termination of recoveries for the period of legal regime of martial law; the possibility of charging a fine for recovery of alimony within the framework of enforcement proceedings; the possibility of commencing enforcement proceedings to recover alimony from a person who is/resides in the territory with a special status - temporarily occupied or the territory where active hostilities are taking place. The issue of recovery of alimony from a person who has the status of a military man is considered, as well as problems with the functioning of state registries. &nbsp

The rights of children need to be protected in spite of any conditions of state existence, and the legal regime of martial law is no exception. One of the types of support for the existence of the child is the payment of alimony for its maintenance. In connection with the introduction of a special legal regime - the legal regime of martial law and the revision of the existing norms of legislation, enshrined for the normal existence of the state, the question arose about the relevance of norms that regulate alimony payments for normal times to circumstances associated with a special legal regime (loss of employment by the alimony payer, including those associated with armed aggression against the state; appearance of territories with a special status (temporarily occupied areas, territories, Also, the issue of termination of recoveries for the period of legal regime of martial law; the possibility of charging a fine for recovery of alimony within the framework of enforcement proceedings; the possibility of commencing enforcement proceedings to recover alimony from a person who is/resides in the territory with a special status - temporarily occupied or the territory where active hostilities are taking place. The issue of recovery of alimony from a person who has the status of a military man is considered, as well as problems with the functioning of state registries., {"references":["1. Сімейний кодекс України : Закон України від 10.01.2002 № 2947-III // Верховна Рада України. Link: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2947-14#Text","2.\tЦивільний процесуальний кодекс України (зі змінами та доповненнями) № 1618-IV від 18.03.2004 року. B: Відомості Верховної Ради України. Link: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1618-15#Text","3.\tСИБІРЦЕВА, О. Заборгованість зі сплати аліментів фізичної особи -підприємця на спрощеній системі оподаткування: проблематика виконання судових рішень. Link: https://jurliga.ligazakon.net/analitycs/214049_zaborgov anst-z-splati-almentv-fzichno-osobi---pdprimtsya-na-sproshcheny-sistem-opodatkuvannya-problematika-vikonannya-sudovikh-rshen","4.\tКРАВЧЕНКО, Т. Чи можна не сплачувати аліменти під час війни? Link: https://vn.20minut.ua/blogs/chi-mozhna-ne-splachuvati-alimenti-pid-chas-vijni.html","5. Перелік видів доходів, які враховуються при визначенні розміру аліментів на одного з подружжя, дітей, батьків, інших осіб : Постанова Кабінету Миністрів України від 26 лютого 1993 г. № 146. Link: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/146-93-%D0%BF#Text"]}

The right of the child to education is considered as one of the types of relative rights of the person. The relative nature is conditioned by the imperative of conditions that affect the degree and nature of realization of the right of the child, complicating or, on the contrary, facilitating such realization. The legal basis for the realization of the right of the child to education is enshrined in numerous normative legal acts of varying legal force, dominated by subordinate acts, which implies the inclusion of a variety of conditions for the realization of such a right. It is noted that Ukraine has for a long time developed a detailed, transparent, public, maximally informative normative model for implementing the right of the child to education, which is effective for "standard", "basic" ("peaceful") relations, but which turned out not to be fully relevant to those relations that arose in connection with the military aggression against Ukraine. As a consequence, the need arose to update the model of relations for the implementation of the right of the child in conditions of war and, above all, in the conditions of the child's stay in the temporarily occupied territory, in the conditions of the emergence of "external factors" complicating such implementation. The article identifies "basic" problematic issues that require an operative regulation, and highlights the experience of Ukrainian lawmaking in the search for an optimal model for their regulation. It substantiates the objective necessity of fixing an alternative model of relations connected with the realization of the child's right to education in conditions of war, as temporary, forced, exclusive and significantly limited in its subjective distribution, but at the same time relevant to the challenges of the state in conditions of military external aggression against it. &nbsp

The right of the child to education is considered as one of the types of relative rights of the person. The relative nature is conditioned by the imperative of conditions that affect the degree and nature of realization of the right of the child, complicating or, on the contrary, facilitating such realization. The legal basis for the realization of the right of the child to education is enshrined in numerous normative legal acts of varying legal force, dominated by subordinate acts, which implies the inclusion of a variety of conditions for the realization of such a right. It is noted that Ukraine has for a long time developed a detailed, transparent, public, maximally informative normative model for implementing the right of the child to education, which is effective for "standard", "basic" ("peaceful") relations, but which turned out not to be fully relevant to those relations that arose in connection with the military aggression against Ukraine. As a consequence, the need arose to update the model of relations for the implementation of the right of the child in conditions of war and, above all, in the conditions of the child's stay in the temporarily occupied territory, in the conditions of the emergence of "external factors" complicating such implementation. The article identifies "basic" problematic issues that require an operative regulation, and highlights the experience of Ukrainian lawmaking in the search for an optimal model for their regulation. It substantiates the objective necessity of fixing an alternative model of relations connected with the realization of the child's right to education in conditions of war, as temporary, forced, exclusive and significantly limited in its subjective distribution, but at the same time relevant to the challenges of the state in conditions of military external aggression against it.

Російська інтервенція на Сході України, що супроводжувалася появою невизнаних державних утворень, таких як самопроголошені "Донецька Народна Республіка" і "Луганська Народна Республіка", значним чином трансформувала місцеві релігійні ландшафти, зробивши політику у сфері релігії дуже чутливим питанням. Політика окупаційної влади, спрямована на переслідування окремих релігійних громад та віруючих, перетворила тимчасово окуповані території України на простір релігійної несвободи, де порушуються релігійні права. Останні законодавчі ініціативи в Донецьку та Луганську викликали серйозне занепокоєння у широкої громадськості. Враховуючи незадовільний стан релігійної свободи на тимчасово окупованих територіях Східної України, а також необхідність належного реагування на чисельні випадки переслідування багатьох конфесій, у дослідженні надається не лише аналіз релігійної політики на цих територіях, але й всебічне пояснення конкретних наслідків у випадку Донбасу. The Russian interference in Eastern Ukraine followed by the appearance of unrecognized states such as the so-called “Donetsk People’s Republic” and “Luhansk People’s Republic” has distinctly shaped local religious landscapes, thus making policy on religion a very sensitive issue. Policies by the occupation authorities aimed to persecute certain religious communities and believers have transformed the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine into a space of religious non-freedom where religious rights are violated. The latest legislative initiatives in Donetsk and Luhansk cities raised serious concerns in the general public. Given the unsatisfactory state of religious freedom in the temporarily occupied territories of Eastern Ukraine and the need to respond appropriately to flagrant cases of persecution of many denominations, this study provides not only an analysis of religious policy in those territories, but also a comprehensive explanation of the specific outcome in the case of Donbas.

The article is dedicated to the sociological analysis of social cohesion construction as a category of state policy. Analyzing the content of Ukraine’s sustainable development goals until 2030 and the State Strategy for Regional Development for 2021–2027, the author summarizes the need to determine at the level of legal norms the social capital measurement as a component of social cohesion at the societal level.

The authors researched in the article the normative grounds of activities, competence and functions of the Mission of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea that determines its statute and jurisdiction. Special attention was paid to the influence of the Russian aggression to the legal statute of the Mission of the President of Ukraine in the Autonomous Republic of Crimea., У статті досліджено нормативні передумови діяльності, повноваження та функції Представництва Президента України в Автономній Республіці Крим, які визначають його статус та юрисдикцію. Особливу увагу приділено впливу російської агресії на правовий статус Представництва Президента України в Автономній Республіці Крим.