Search

Background and aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of compliance to institutional guidelines on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) among the surgical wards of our facility and to evaluate the impact of our antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the adherence rate. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including all 14 surgical wards of our hospital. Eight of these wards participate in a non-restrictive ASP. All patients admitted to one of the wards who had been prescribed SAP were included; the appropriateness of prophylaxis was defined according to the institutional protocols. Results: During the study period, we evaluated 169 patients undergoing a surgical procedure, of whom 105 (62.1%) received SAP. Overall, 10 (10.5%) patients were prescribed unnecessary prophylaxis; among the remaining 95, 30 (31.6%) received appropriate prophylaxis, while 65 (68.4%) were prescribed SAP deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons (38.5% received a drug with a larger spectrum of activity, 9.2% a molecule with a narrower spectrum, 36.9% an incorrect dose and 76.9% a longer duration of prophylaxis). A higher number of patients in the inappropriate prophylaxis group received abdominal surgery (P = 0.001) and were admitted to a ward not participating in the ASP (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, being admitted to an ASP unit was the only factor independently related to having received appropriate prophylaxis. Conclusions: A low rate of adherence to local guidelines on SAP was observed, but a non-restrictive ASP can significantly impact the appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis.

Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the common complications following spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, several studies had shown conflicting results regarding optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Due to limitations in population homogeneity and sample size, these studies have not provided significant statistical correlations or clear practical recommendations. The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of timing of cefuroxime SAP on the risk of SSI in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, and to determine the optimal timing of administration. Retrospective nested case-control study. We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021. In the current study, the primary outcome measure was SSI. This was a retrospective nested case-control study. All consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021 formed a retrospective cohort. For each SSI case, 2 controls free of SSI at the time of the index date of their corresponding case were selected, matched by age, sex, and calendar year. Electronic record and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively in electronic database. SAP related data included timing of administration, preoperative dose, intraoperative second dose, and postoperative use. To examine the effects of mismatched variables, we further adjusted for possible confounding factors using conditional logistic regression models. Subsequently, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the statistical associations. According to the preplanned statistical scheme and matching factors, we matched 236 controls for these SSI cases, and the subsequent statistical analysis was performed on these 354 patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, the results indicated that the risk of SSI was 70% higher in the group receiving SAP 31 to 60 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=1.732, 95%CI 1.031–2.910, p=.038). Additionally, the risk of SSI was 150% higher in the group receiving SAP 61 to 120 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=2.532, 95%CI 1.250–5.128, p=.010). In subgroup analysis, this statistical trend persisted for both deformity surgeries and different SSI classifications. Administering cefuroxime SAP within 30 minutes before skin incision significantly reduces the risk of SSI, whether they are deep or superficial, in spinal fusion surgery. This pattern remains consistent among spinal deformity patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is the peri-operative administration of antimicrobial agents. Compliance rates vary worldwide from 15% to 84.3%, with studies in Turkey not exceeding 35%. The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the rate of appropriate antibiotic class, timing, and duration as well as discharge prescriptions in Turkey. Thus, we aimed to determine the rate of full compliance with SAP procedures in our country Patients and Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted in 47 hospitals from 28 provinces in seven different regions of Turkey. Patients over 18 years of age in all surgical units between June 6, 2022, and June 10, 2022, were included in the study. Results: Of the 7,978 patients included in the study, 332 were excluded from further analyses because of pre-existing infection, and SAP compliance analyses were performed on the remaining 7,646 cases. The antibiotic most commonly used for SAP was cefazolin (n = 4,701; 61.5%), followed by third-generation cephalosporins (n = 596; 7.8%). The most common time to start SAP was within 30 minutes before surgery (n = 2,252; 32.5%), followed by 30 to 60 minutes before surgery (n = 1,638; 23.6%). Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis duration was <24 hours in 3,516 (50.7%) patients and prolonged until discharge in 1,505 (21.7%) patients. Finally, the actual proportion of patients compliant with SAP was 19% (n = 1,452) after omitting 4,458 (58.3%) patients who were prescribed oral antibiotic agents at discharge as part of a prolonged SAP. Conclusions: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis compliance rates are still very low in Turkey. Prolonged duration of SAP and especially high rate of antibiotic prescription at discharge are the main reasons for non-compliance with SAP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Guidelines advocate for the use of single‐dose prophylaxis in open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) procedures. The presence of local (institutional) guidelines may assist in the uptake of evidence‐based recommendations. Aim: To determine the impact of local guideline introduction on prescribing practice for ORIF procedures at a metropolitan hospital in relation to our previous audit investigating adherence to national guidelines, which found that only 20.4% of ORIF patients received single‐dose prophylaxis. Method: Antibiotic prescribing was audited for patients undergoing ORIF of closed fractures from July–December 2021 at a metropolitan, tertiary hospital following guideline introduction in April 2021. Data on perioperative prescribing regimens were collected, with results compared to recommendations in local guidelines. Descriptive statistics, chi‐squared test, and Fisher's exact test were used to report categorical variables. Ethics approval was granted by Northern Health Office of Research, Ethics, and Governance (Reference no: NLR 72459) and registered with the RMIT University College Human Ethics Advisory Network (Reference no: RM 24642). Results: Data were collected for 165 patients. Almost all patients (93.5%) received cefazolin preoperatively as per guidelines. Only 22.6% of patients received single‐dose prophylaxis as per local guideline recommendations, with overall adherence to guidelines only 16.4%. Conclusion: Little change was observed in the proportion of patients who received single‐dose prophylaxis as compared to our previous audit. There is a need to understand why guidelines are not adhered to despite the availability of national and local guidelines. An evaluation of local barriers may assist with informing future implementation strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background An appropriately administered surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis decreases the rate of surgical site infections. Although evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been published on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, the rate of adherence to the protocol and the impact of extending antimicrobial prophylaxis postoperatively is yet to be well elucidated. Method A total of general surgery and vascular surgery patients with clean and clean contaminated wound undergoing elective surgical procedures were included in the study. The rate of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization, the proportion of patients whom had their antimicrobial prophylaxis extended beyond 24 h and the rate of surgical site infections across groups were evaluated. Results The surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization rate was 90.5%. Of these patients, 12.6% were unnecessarily administered with antibiotics. An “extended” antibiotics administration beyond 24 h after the surgery was found in 40.2%. Gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery patients had 7.9-fold rate of “extended” surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis beyond 24 h, AOR 7.89 (95% CI 3.88–20.715.62, p value

Objective: To evaluate whether redosing antibiotics within an hour of incision is associated with a reduction in incisional surgical site infection (iSSI) in children with appendicitis. Background: Existing data remain conflicting as to whether children with appendicitis receiving antibiotics at diagnosis benefit from antibiotic redosing before incision. Methods: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study using data from the Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program augmented with antibiotic utilization and operative report data obtained though supplemental chart review. Children undergoing appendectomy at 14 hospitals participating in the Eastern Pediatric Surgery Network from July 2016 to June 2020 who received antibiotics upon diagnosis of appendicitis between 1 and 6 hours before incision were included. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare odds of iSSI in those who were and were not redosed with antibiotics within 1 hour of incision, adjusting for patient demographics, disease severity, antibiotic agents, and hospital-level clustering of events. Results: A total of 3533 children from 14 hospitals were included. Overall, 46.5% were redosed (hospital range: 1.8%--94.4%, P<0.001) and iSSI rates were similar between groups [redosed: 1.2% vs non-redosed: 1.3%; odds ratio (OR) 0.84, (95%,CI, 0.39--1.83)]. In subgroup analyses, redosing was associated with lower iSSI rates when cefoxitin was used as the initial antibiotic (redosed: 1.0% vs nonredosed: 2.5%; OR: 0.38, (95% CI, 0.17--0.84)], but no benefit was found with other antibiotic regimens, longer periods between initial antibiotic administration and incision, or with increased disease severity. Conclusions: Redosing of antibiotics within 1 hour of incision in children who received their initial dose within 6 hours of incision was not associated with reduction in risk of incisional site infection unless cefoxitin was used as the initial antibiotic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Jian Zou,&ast; Jia-Yun Zhong,&ast; Yan-Xin Liu, Yu Liu, Dan Huang, Bian-Tiao Xu, Xi-Wen Li, Wen-Jun Gong, Jia Tao Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jian Zou, The People’s Hospital of Pengzhou, No. 255 Second Section of South Third Ring Road, Chengdu, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 28 86239898, Email 70336641@qq.comPurpose: Quality control circle (QCC) has acquired success in many fields in healthcare industry as a process management tool, whereas its efficacy in surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) remains unknown. This study aimed to implement QCC interventions to improve the appropriateness of SAP.Methods: A QCC activity team was established to grasp the current situation of SAP in clean surgery procedure, set target, formulate corresponding countermeasures and implement and review them in stages. The plan-do-check-act (PDCA) method was cyclically applied.Results: The appropriateness of antibiotic prophylaxis before (January to December 2020) and after (January to December 2021) the implementation of QCC activities were evaluated based on relevant international and Chinese SAP guidelines. The overall SAP appropriateness was significantly improved from 68.72% before QCC to 93.7% post QCC implementation (P< 0.01). A significant improvement (P< 0.05) was also determined for each category: selection (from 78.82% to 96.06%), duration (from 90.15% to 96.46%), indication (from 94.09% to 97.64%), timing of first dose (from 96.55% to 99.21%), antimicrobial usage (from 96.8% to 99.41%), re-dosing of antimicrobial (from 96.55% to 99.21%).Conclusion: Implementation of a QCC program can optimize the use of antibiotics and improve the appropriateness of SAP and is of practical importance to their standardization.Keywords: surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, quality control circle, appropriateness

Background: An appropriately administered surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis decreases the rate of surgical site infections. Although evidence-based clinical practice guidelines have been published on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, the rate of adherence to the protocol and the impact of extending antimicrobial prophylaxis postoperatively is yet to be well elucidated. Method: A total of general surgery and vascular surgery patients with clean and clean contaminated wound undergoing elective surgical procedures were included in the study. The rate of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization, the proportion of patients whom had their antimicrobial prophylaxis extended beyond 24 h and the rate of surgical site infections across groups were evaluated. Results: The surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis utilization rate was 90.5%. Of these patients, 12.6% were unnecessarily administered with antibiotics. An "extended" antibiotics administration beyond 24 h after the surgery was found in 40.2%. Gastrointestinal and hepato-pancreatico-biliary surgery patients had 7.9-fold rate of "extended" surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis beyond 24 h, AOR 7.89 (95% CI 3.88–20.715.62, p value < 0.0001). The overall rate of surgical site infection was 15(6.8%). The "extended" regimen of prophylactic antibiotics had no effect on the rate of surgical site infections. Conclusion: Less than half of the patients included here had surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis regimen in accordance with the existing guidelines. The most common protocol violation was noted as extension of antimicrobial prophylaxis for more than 24 h after surgery. The extension of antimicrobial prophylaxis did not decrease the rate of surgical site infections, reaffirming the evidence that prophylactic extension of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis is unnecessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a leading indication for antibiotic use in Australian hospitals with established high rates of inappropriate prescribing. Optimal administration of SAP for patients at high risk of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections presents additional complexities. A greater understanding of barriers to optimal SAP in this cohort is required to inform targeted antimicrobial stewardship strategies, optimize SAP, and reduce the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs). Methods: A multiple-choice questionnaire appraising knowledge and barriers to optimal SAP was electronically distributed to key stakeholders. Data from the questionnaire were collated and analyzed using Survey Monkey® (Momentive Inc., San Mateo, CA) data analysis tools. Results: Eighty-three persons provided full or partial responses to the questionnaire. There were 19% of respondents who considered MRSA colonization status of patients to be only "somewhat important" when selecting appropriate SAP. Additionally, 62% of responses did not correctly identify the appropriate SAP regimen for patients who are colonized with MRSA. Several barriers to optimal SAP were identified including poor understanding of SAP guidelines, lack of timely identification of patients confirmed to be colonized with MRSA, inaccurate documentation of antibiotic and surgical start times, and limitations of the current operating room management software program. Conclusions: The high level of engagement from most key stakeholders demonstrates accountability and an overall desire to improve SAP. Barriers identified in this audit should be considered by facilities wishing to optimize compliance with SAP guidelines and consequently reduce SSIs, in particular for patients who are at high risk of MRSA infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Wound infections are the commonest hospital-acquired infections in surgical patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis in general surgery in Jayanagar general hospital, Bangalore, India. Method: It is a prospective, observational study. The data were collected from 180 patients who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria in Jayanagar General Hospital. During the study, 180 prescriptions were studied and patient records were collected and analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft excel. Result: The patients were taken a crack at the investigation. More frequently used antibiotics are cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and amikacin. About 98% of patients who undergo minor or major surgery received antibiotics. Among them, 27.22% received amikacin and cefotaxime, 12.22% received ceftriaxone and metronidazole, 12.22% received cefotaxime and metronidazole, and 10.55% received amikacin and ceftriaxone. About 20.5% received the triple combination. Among 180 patients, 37 patients were treated with one antibiotic, 120 patients were treated with two antibiotics, and the rest of 23 patients with three antibiotics and more; among them patients treated with single antibiotics had a high incidence of SSI. Conclusion: The study finished up about the abuse and inappropriate selections of antibiotics. Henceforth, our study likewise proposes following the guidelines for judicious utilization of antibiotics, and limiting inappropriate antibiotic use is the most ideal approach to minimize the odds of SSI. The clinic ought to set up prophylactic antibiotics guidelines which ought to be open and open by each individual from the careful group. The medical checklist ought to be polished viably. Incessant review of prophylactic antibiotic use is expected to improve legitimate practices (prophylactic antibiotics employments). Surgeons should adhere to prophylactic antibiotics guidelines.

Animal models imply that the perinatal exposure to antibiotics has a substantial impact on microbiome establishment of the offspring. We aimed to evaluate the effect of timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis for cesarean section before versus after cord clamping on gut microbiome composition of term born infants. We performed an exploratory, single center randomized controlled clinical trial. We included forty pregnant women with elective cesarean section at term. The intervention group received single dose intravenous cefuroxime after cord clamping (n = 19), the control group single dose intravenous cefuroxime 30 minutes before skin incision (n = 21). The primary endpoint was microbiome signature of infants and metabolic prediction in the first days of life as determined in meconium samples by 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Secondary endpoints were microbiome composition at one month and 1 year of life. In meconium samples of the intervention group, the genus Staphylococcus pre-dominated. In the control group, the placental cross-over of cefuroxime was confirmed in cord blood. A higher amino acid and nitrogen metabolism as well as increased abundance of the genera Cutibacterium, Corynebacterium and Streptophyta were noted (indicator families: Cytophagaceae, Lactobacilaceae, Oxalobacteraceae). Predictive models of metabolic function revealed higher 2ʹfucosyllactose utilization in control group samples. In the follow-up visits, a higher abundance of the genus Clostridium was evident in the intervention group. Our exploratory randomized controlled trial suggests that timing of antimicrobial prophylaxis is critical for early microbiome engraftment but not antimicrobial resistance emergence in term born infants.

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the major purposes of antimicrobial use.Aim: To determine the adherence to the Japanese SAP guidelines in Japanese university hospitals.Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study including 15 general hospitals and one dental university hospital. Up to three cases of 18 designated surgeries were evaluated regarding adherence to Japanese SAP guidelines: selection of antibiotics, timing of administration, re-dosing intervals, and duration of SAP. When all items were appropriate, surgery was defined as 'appropriate'.Findings: In total, 688 cases (22-45 cases per surgery) were included. The overall appropriateness was 46.8% (322/688), and the appropriateness of each surgery ranged from 8.0% (2/25, cardiac implantable electronic device implantation) to 92.1% (35/38, distal gastrectomy). The appropriateness of each item was as follows: pre/intraoperative selections, 78.5% (540/688); timing of administrations, 96.0% (630/656); re-dosing intervals, 91.6% (601/656); postoperative selection, 78.9% (543/688); and duration of SAP, 61.4% (423/688). The overall appropriateness of hospitals ranged from 17.6% (9/51) to 73.3% (33/45). The common reasons for inappropriateness were the longer duration (38.5%, 265/688) and choice of antibiotics with a non-optimal antimicrobial spectrum before/during, and after surgery (19.0%, 131/688 and 16.9%, 116/688, respectively), compared to the guideline.Conclusions: Adherence to the guidelines differed greatly between the surgeries and hospitals. Large-scale multi-centre surveillance of SAP in Japanese hospitals is necessary to identify inappropriate surgeries, factors related to the appropriateness, and incidences of surgical site infections. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aim: The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of compliance to institutional guidelines on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) among the surgical wards of our facility and to evaluate the impact of our antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the adherence rate., Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including all 14 surgical wards of our hospital. Eight of these wards participate in a non-restrictive ASP. All patients admitted to one of the wards who had been prescribed SAP were included; the appropriateness of prophylaxis was defined according to the institutional protocols., Results: During the study period, we evaluated 169 patients undergoing a surgical procedure, of whom 105 (62.1%) received SAP. Overall, 10 (10.5%) patients were prescribed unnecessary prophylaxis; among the remaining 95, 30 (31.6%) received appropriate prophylaxis, while 65 (68.4%) were prescribed SAP deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons (38.5% received a drug with a larger spectrum of activity, 9.2% a molecule with a narrower spectrum, 36.9% an incorrect dose and 76.9% a longer duration of prophylaxis). A higher number of patients in the inappropriate prophylaxis group received abdominal surgery (P = 0.001) and were admitted to a ward not participating in the ASP (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, being admitted to an ASP unit was the only factor independently related to having received appropriate prophylaxis., Conclusions: A low rate of adherence to local guidelines on SAP was observed, but a non-restrictive ASP can significantly impact the appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Abstract Background Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of closed fractures is a required indication for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). Guidelines contain recommendations on how best to prescribe SAP, however, adherence to SAP guidelines remains suboptimal. The Australian Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 (updated April 2019) advocates for single dose prophylaxis for ORIF procedures. There is a paucity of information on how SAP is prescribed for ORIF of closed fractures in Australian hospitals. The aim of this study was to identify prescribing practice and to evaluate guideline adherence pre- and post-guideline update. Methods A retrospective audit was conducted for patients undergoing an ORIF of closed fractures at a metropolitan teaching hospital in a 6-month period during 2018 (pre-guideline update) and 2019 (post-guideline update). Data were collected on prescribing practice (perioperative antibiotics prescribed, dose, time and route of administration and duration of prophylaxis) and compared to SAP recommendations in Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v15 (2018) and v16 (2019). Descriptive statistics and Chi square tests were used to report categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with guideline adherence. A p-value

Abstract Objective The goal of this study was to monitor the compliance and impact on a protocol change of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac surgery favouring cefazolin instead cefuroxime, initiated by the hospital’s antimicrobial stewardship team. Methods This quality improvement study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in collaboration with the department of cardiothoracic surgery and the hospitals antimicrobial stewardship team following a revision of the standard for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis including 1029 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. 582 patients receiving cefuroxime and 447 patients receiving cefazolin respectively were compared without altering any other preventative perioperative measures including its postoperative duration of less than 24 h. Adherence and surgical site infections were compiled and analysed. Results A complete adherence was achieved. Overall surgical site infections occurred in 37 (3.6%) of the cases, 20 (3.4%) in cefuroxime patients and 17 (3.8%) in cefazolin patients (p value = 0.754). No statistically significant differences could be found in any of the primary endpoints, but there was a trend towards less deep sternal wound infections in the cefazolin group. Conclusions The study supports the role of antimicrobial stewardship in cardiac surgery and mirrors the success of a multidisciplinary team aiming to minimize adverse events by optimizing antibiotic use.

Background: Surgery site infections (SSIs) are infections that arise in surgery for an operative wound infection surveillance within 30 days of surgery or 90 days after implant installation. JNMC, Bhagalpur, India, intended to look at the pre-and postoperative use of antibiotics. Methods: Four hundred twelve patient charts were analyzed for four months in JNMC, Bhagalpur, India as part of a hospital-based cross-section study. The study covered all patients 13 years of age and older who had been admitted to the hospital and had undergone various surgeries. In addition, a P value was preserved for the further multivariate analysis, using multiple logistic regressions, to study the association between the resulting variable and the predictor. Results: The general surgery operation included 152 of the 412 patients, while the remainder was for different operations. A single operative antibiotic was administered to the majority of patients, followed by two surgical prophylactic medications. Before the hospital was discharged, 40 of the patients experienced surgical site infections. In almost half of these cases, ceftriaxone and metronidazole were combined with SSIs. Emergency surgery patients were 2.6 times more likely to have a SSI than optional surgery patients. The SSIs were 2.5 times more likely in patients who were not given antibiotic prophylaxis. In our investigation, the protection against SSI was found to include clean-contaminated and contaminated wound types. Conclusions: According to this study, the majority of patients received antimicrobial prophylaxis. In the hospital where the study was done, the total incidence of SSIs was 11.1%. The most frequently given antibiotic was ceftriaxone. The absence of prevention, wound type, and types of surgery has all been associated with SSI development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Surgical site infection (SSI) is the commonest preventable health care–associated infection among postoperative cases. Several guidelines are available for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) and other measures which prevent SSI. National Center for Disease Control (NCDC), India, has also provided a guideline for prevention of SSI in 2016. In this study we have compared the NCDC, India, guideline with WHO (World health organization) and American Society of Health System Pharmacists (ASHP) guidelines. The timing of antimicrobial agent administration is the only parameter which is included in all the three guidelines. As per NCDC and ASHP it should be within 60 minutes of incision while as per WHO it is within 120 minutes of incision. Materials and Methods This was a prospective observational study—104 patients undergoing surgery in general surgical ward between January 2016 and June 2017 were included in this study. The NCDC guideline was compared with WHO and ASHP guidelines. Real data comparison was done for those parameters which were included in all the three guidelines. Statistical Analysis Data were analyzed using descriptive methods and chi-square test. Results None of the patients in our study received SAP within 60 minutes of incision. In 70% cases it was administered within 2 hours of incision and in the remaining 30% it was administered after more than 2 hours. There was no significant difference in the incidence of SSI among these two groups. Conclusion NCDC SAP guideline helps in rational use of antimicrobials. Increasing the duration for SAP may be added in the NCDC guidelines. Inclusion of certain additional parameters like weight-based doses and consideration for other comorbidities will help in patient- and procedure-specific SAP. Antimicrobial stewardship should be encouraged in all the hospitals and should follow local antimicrobial resistance pattern. This will assist in therapy decision, policy making, and evidence-based treatment.

Ocular surgery encompasses a wide range of procedures, including surgery of the tear ducts, eyelid, cornea and conjunctiva, lens, ocular muscle, and vitreoretinal and iris surgery. Operations are also performed for the removal of tumors, repairs of ocular trauma and, finally, corneal transplantation. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in ocular surgery is a complex field in which shared lines of action are absent. In light of the scarcity of shared evidence in the use of ocular antimicrobial prophylaxis for the pediatric population, this consensus document aims to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients of neonatal and pediatric age undergoing eye surgery. The following scenarios are considered: (1) intraocular surgery; (2) extraocular surgery; (3) ocular trauma; (4) ocular neoplasm; (5) ocular surface transplantations; (6) corneal grafts. This work has been made possible by the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies and represents, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of recommendations regarding clinical actions in the peri-operative environment in eye surgery. The application of uniform and shared protocols aims to improve surgical practice, through the standardization of procedures, with a consequent reduction of SSIs, also limiting the phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Wound infections are the commonest hospital-acquired infections in surgical patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the pattern of antimicrobial prophylaxis in general surgery in Jayanagar general hospital, Bangalore, India. Method: It is a prospective, observational study. The data were collected from 180 patients who satisfied inclusion and exclusion criteria in Jayanagar General Hospital. During the study, 180 prescriptions were studied and patient records were collected and analyzed using SPSS and Microsoft excel. Result: The patients were taken a crack at the investigation. More frequently used antibiotics are cefotaxime, ceftriaxone, and amikacin. About 98% of patients who undergo minor or major surgery received antibiotics. Among them, 27.22% received amikacin and cefotaxime, 12.22% received ceftriaxone and metronidazole, 12.22% received cefotaxime and metronidazole, and 10.55% received amikacin and ceftriaxone. About 20.5% received the triple combination. Among 180 patients, 37 patients were treated with one antibiotic, 120 patients were treated with two antibiotics, and the rest of 23 patients with three antibiotics and more; among them patients treated with single antibiotics had a high incidence of SSI. Conclusion: The study finished up about the abuse and inappropriate selections of antibiotics. Henceforth, our study likewise proposes following the guidelines for judicious utilization of antibiotics, and limiting inappropriate antibiotic use is the most ideal approach to minimize the odds of SSI. The clinic ought to set up prophylactic antibiotics guidelines which ought to be open and open by each individual from the careful group. The medical checklist ought to be polished viably. Incessant review of prophylactic antibiotic use is expected to improve legitimate practices (prophylactic antibiotics employments). Surgeons should adhere to prophylactic antibiotics guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); however, non-adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis protocols can lead to several negative outcomes. We performed a before-and-after intervention study with the aim of improving the process outcome, including adherence to guidelines. Another objective of this study was to investigate improvement in patient outcomes as a result of adherence to a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis programme. The indicators of improved patient outcomes were a reduction in overall SSI rate and the decreased cost of antibiotics. SSI rate was calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of SSIs by the total number of surgeries and then multiplying the value obtained by 100%. The interventions implemented in the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis programme included establishment of a guideline, educational sessions, and a monthly revision of prescriptions. Our findings show that implementation of the interventions resulted in reduced antibiotic consumption, a considerable decrease in the cost of prophylaxis, and a decrease in the incidence of SSIs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Despite the extensive research that has been conducted to date, practice often differs from established guidelines and will vary between individuals and organisations. It has been noted that the global uptake of local and international surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines is poor with limited research investigating factors that affect guideline adherence. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reported barriers and enablers to the adherence of SAP guidelines. Methods A search of the literature was performed using four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS) for articles published in the English language from January 1998 to December 2018. Articles were included if they were solely related to SAP and discussed the barriers or enablers to SAP guideline adherence. Articles that assessed the adherence to a range of infection control measures or discussed adherence to antibiotic treatment guidelines rather than SAP guidelines were excluded from this review. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Results A total of 1489 papers were originally retrieved, with 48 papers meeting the eligibility criteria. Barriers and enablers were mapped to 11 out of 14 TDF domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion and behavioural regulation. Barriers were further categorised into personal or organisational barriers, while enablers were arranged under commonly trialled interventions. Conclusions There are numerous factors that can determine the uptake of SAP guidelines. An identification and understanding of these factors at a local level is required to develop tailored interventions to enhance guideline adherence. Interventions, when used in combination, can be considered as a means of improving guideline use.

Abstract Background The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in cesarean section prior to incision to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). This study aimed to determine whether SAP administration following cord clamping confers an increased SSI risk to the mother. Methods Study design: Cohort. Setting: 75 participating Swiss hospitals, from 2009 to 2018. Participants: A total of 55,901 patients were analyzed. Main outcome measures: We assessed the association between SAP administration relative to incision and clamping and the SSI rate, using generalized linear multilevel models, adjusted for patient characteristics, procedural variables, and health-care system factors. Results SAP was administered before incision in 26′405 patients (47.2%) and after clamping in 29,496 patients (52.8%). Overall 846 SSIs were documented, of which 379 (1.6% [95% CI, 1.4–1.8%]) occurred before incision and 449 (1.7% [1.5–1.9%]) after clamping (p = 0.759). The adjusted odds ratio for SAP administration after clamping was not significantly associated with an increased SSI rate (1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36; p = 0.144) when compared to before incision. Supplementary and subgroup analyses supported these main results. Conclusions This study did not confirm an increased SSI risk for the mother in cesarean section if SAP is given after umbilical cord clamping compared to before incision.

Background: This study was aimed to describe the choice of Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis at a tertiary-level care hospital in United Arab Emirates. It also associated the choice between two leading antimicrobials for the SAP to the site of surgery.Methods: A descriptive drug use evaluation was performed retrospectively to study choices of antimicrobials in surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. An analytical cross-sectional study design was used to develop a hypothesis regarding the choice of ceftriaxone. Data were collected from the medical records of Hospital from July 2020 to December 2020. Results were presented in numbers and percentages.Results: SAP data were collected from 199 patients, of which 159 were clean or clean-contaminated. Dirty surgeries (18) needed a higher level of antimicrobials as there were infections to be treated. For other surgeries with no infection, overuse of antimicrobials was found regarding the choice of antimicrobials. Surgical antibiotic Prophylaxis was administered within the recommended time prior to surgeries. Ceftriaxone was preferred over cefuroxime in all types of surgeries based on the timing of Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis, wound classification, and the surgical site. A statistically significant association for choice of ceftriaxone over cefuroxime was found regarding surgical sites (p-value

Background: Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of closed fractures is a required indication for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). Guidelines contain recommendations on how best to prescribe SAP, however, adherence to SAP guidelines remains suboptimal. The Australian Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v16 (updated April 2019) advocates for single dose prophylaxis for ORIF procedures. There is a paucity of information on how SAP is prescribed for ORIF of closed fractures in Australian hospitals. The aim of this study was to identify prescribing practice and to evaluate guideline adherence pre- and post-guideline update.Methods: A retrospective audit was conducted for patients undergoing an ORIF of closed fractures at a metropolitan teaching hospital in a 6-month period during 2018 (pre-guideline update) and 2019 (post-guideline update). Data were collected on prescribing practice (perioperative antibiotics prescribed, dose, time and route of administration and duration of prophylaxis) and compared to SAP recommendations in Therapeutic Guidelines: Antibiotic v15 (2018) and v16 (2019). Descriptive statistics and Chi square tests were used to report categorical variables. Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with guideline adherence. A p-value < 0.05 was deemed statistically significant.Results: Data were collected for a total of 390 patients (n = 185, 2018; n = 205, 2019). Cefazolin was the most commonly prescribed antibiotic as per guideline recommendations, with variable, yet appropriate doses observed across the two audit periods. While 78.3% of patients received SAP for the correct duration in 2018, only 20.4% of patients received single dose prophylaxis in 2019. Overall adherence to guidelines was 63.2% in the 2018, and 18.0% in the 2019 audit periods respectively. Patient age was significantly associated with an increase in overall guideline adherence, while lower limb fractures, an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of 3 and emergency admissions were associated with decreased overall adherence to SAP guidelines.Conclusion: Adherence to guidelines was greater with v15 (2018) compared with v16 (2019). Patient factors, including limb fracture site and ASA score, had little impact on guideline adherence. Further research is required to understand what influences guideline adherence in the orthopaedic setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The goal of this study was to monitor the compliance and impact on a protocol change of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in cardiac surgery favouring cefazolin instead cefuroxime, initiated by the hospital's antimicrobial stewardship team.Methods: This quality improvement study was performed in a tertiary care hospital in collaboration with the department of cardiothoracic surgery and the hospitals antimicrobial stewardship team following a revision of the standard for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis including 1029 patients who underwent cardiac surgery. 582 patients receiving cefuroxime and 447 patients receiving cefazolin respectively were compared without altering any other preventative perioperative measures including its postoperative duration of less than 24 h. Adherence and surgical site infections were compiled and analysed.Results: A complete adherence was achieved. Overall surgical site infections occurred in 37 (3.6%) of the cases, 20 (3.4%) in cefuroxime patients and 17 (3.8%) in cefazolin patients (p value = 0.754). No statistically significant differences could be found in any of the primary endpoints, but there was a trend towards less deep sternal wound infections in the cefazolin group.Conclusions: The study supports the role of antimicrobial stewardship in cardiac surgery and mirrors the success of a multidisciplinary team aiming to minimize adverse events by optimizing antibiotic use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Background: Periodic point prevalence surveys (PPSs) provide a method for assessing changes in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use over time. Following the introduction of an antimicrobial stewardship programme at Nagoya University Hospital (Aichi, Japan) a five-year PPS study was performed to highlight any epidemiological changes. Methods: One-day PPSs were performed annually in July at Nagoya University Hospital. Data on patient characteristics, medical devices, active HAIs and antimicrobial use were collected using a standard data-collection form. Results: A total of 4339 patients were included. Over the five-year study period the median patient age was 62 years, median duration of hospital admission was nine days, 9% of patients had an HAI and 35.2% received at least one antimicrobial. Overall there were 406 HAIs (95% confidence interval, 369–447) with surgical site infection, pneumonia and febrile neutropenia occurring most frequently. Enterobacterales were the most common pathogens (N = 78, 28.6%) and 32.1% were third-generation cephalosporin-resistant. Meropenem was the most frequently prescribed antimicrobial for HAIs. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis changed drastically, with shorter durations and a marked reduction in oral cephalosporin use. However, antimicrobials for medical prophylaxis gradually increased. Conclusions: This five-year PPS study shows consistent data for patient background, HAIs and causative pathogens and highlights changes in antimicrobial use during the era of the National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance. To describe the epidemiology of Japanese hospitals by PPS, multicentre PPSs including in community hospitals should be performed annually.

Background: Antibiotic-resistant infections have elevated rates of morbidity and mortality, and antibiotic exposure is a significant trigger factor for drug resistance growth. If surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) increases risk for antibiotic-resistant infections, it may cause significant harm even if it decreases overall infection rates. The present study is planned to study the effect of antimicrobial surgical prophylaxis in the department of general surgery. Materials and Methods: This prospective study included young age people to old age people who underwent elective surgical procedures. The study was carried for 5 successive years from 2016 to 2020. Surgeries from multiple disciplines were included if SAP was considered discretionary by current guidelines. Results: According to the observations, the antibiotics were administered in all the surgical interventions and most of the pre-operatively antibiotics were administered by IV route. Graph showcases a gradual increase in antibiotic misuse both before and during the surgery. In the year 2016, the antibiotic usage in surgical prophylaxis was observed to be an average of 65.89%. This value was found to be progressively increasing in the successive years. By the year of 2020, the average hiked to the value of 97.11%. This is conclusive of the decreasing misuse of antibiotics with years. Especially the recent times reaching the maximum peak, as appreciated in the graph. This could be attributed as one of the major factors in development of resistance towards various microorganisms that has been managed. Conclusion: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis is an important treatment technique for preventing postoperative infections, if the right antibiotics are administered at the right moment, for the right length of time, and for the right surgical procedures. It is crucial to use a narrow-spectrum antibiotic that is safe for the surgical venue. The expense of specific antibiotics and the endemicity of multi-resistant bacteria in specific units or clinics are also subject to periodic modification, so hospital surgical antibiotic prophylaxis procedures should be checked on a regular basis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Surgical site infections are frequently observed despite the availability of national guideline on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). These infections increase patient morbidity, mortality, and direct and indirect health-care costs. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is a common orthopedic surgery for fracture. There is a paucity of Indian data on SAP in ORIF surgery. Aims: The present study was taken up aiming at the evaluation of appropriateness and pharmacoeconomics of SAP in ORIF based on the national guidelines. Subjects and Methods: One-year observational prospective cohort study was conducted among 412 participants, who underwent ORIF in the Department of Orthopedics in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Name, dose, route, timing, frequency, and duration of administration of prophylactic antimicrobials used were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics were used wherever required. Results: The mean age of participants was 39.24 years, majority (60.92%) were male, and 49.52% had fracture of lower-limb bones. The appropriateness of preoperative SAP in terms of indication in ORIF, timing, and route of administration was 100%. Selection and dose of preoperative and postoperative antimicrobials were appropriate in only 13% of cases. Omission of intraoperative dose was appropriate in all participants. Duration of postoperative Antimicrobial agent administration was inappropriately long in all participants. None of the cases received completely appropriate regimen. Cost analysis showed the mean cost of SAP practiced in our hospital was eleven times higher than that with recommended SAP. Conclusions: Considering the inappropriateness of SAP practiced, monitoring of guideline implementation and awareness among health-care professionals are necessary to prevent SSI and to decrease economic burden on the patients.

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) refers to the utilization of antibiotic agents for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI), to prevent SSI-associated morbidity and mortality, reduce duration and cost of healthcare, and cause minimal adverse drug effects. The adherence rate among surgeons for the available international and national guidelines and optimal practice remains considerably low in many hospitals, especially in developing countries. The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among various surgical specialties and those involved in providing SAP. Methods: An institution-based exploratory, multi-specialty, collective, mixed method approach (qualitative and quantitative) was used to assess the knowledge and compliance rate for SAP guidelines among the consultants and residents of surgical specialties. Quantitative analysis was performed using a pre-tested questionnaire. For qualitative analysis, focus group discussions were conducted. Thematic analysis was conducted by the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and the Capabilities, Opportunities, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model. Results: Twenty-eight focus groups and 16 paired interviews were undertaken. On thematic analysis six significant themes were noted and mapped to the COM-B model, and subthemes mapped to the relevant TDF domains in a combined framework. Key themes recognized were: (1) solitary focus on surgical skills; (2) following the hierarchy is more important than guideline compliance; (3) doubts and overcautious attitude of surgeons hinders appropriate SAP prescribing; (4) non-availability in-hospital supply of antimicrobial agents; (5) patient characteristics and type of surgery play a role in prescribing SAP; and (6) lack of national and local guidelines. Conclusions: The knowledge and attitudes of surgeons toward appropriate SAP prescribing are crucial factors for execution of guidelines. Including them in policy making decisions can help in strong execution of the same. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ocular surgery encompasses a wide range of procedures, including surgery of the tear ducts, eyelid, cornea and conjunctiva, lens, ocular muscle, and vitreoretinal and iris surgery. Operations are also performed for the removal of tumors, repairs of ocular trauma and, finally, corneal transplantation. Antibiotic prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSIs) in ocular surgery is a complex field in which shared lines of action are absent. In light of the scarcity of shared evidence in the use of ocular antimicrobial prophylaxis for the pediatric population, this consensus document aims to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on antimicrobial prophylaxis for patients of neonatal and pediatric age undergoing eye surgery. The following scenarios are considered: (1) intraocular surgery; (2) extraocular surgery; (3) ocular trauma; (4) ocular neoplasm; (5) ocular surface transplantations; (6) corneal grafts. This work has been made possible by the multidisciplinary contribution of experts belonging to the most important Italian scientific societies and represents, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of recommendations regarding clinical actions in the peri-operative environment in eye surgery. The application of uniform and shared protocols aims to improve surgical practice, through the standardization of procedures, with a consequent reduction of SSIs, also limiting the phenomenon of antimicrobial resistance.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a potential complication in surgical procedures, mainly because clean/contaminated surgery involves organs that are normally colonized by bacteria. Dental, maxillo-facial and ear-nose-throat (ENT) surgeries are among those that carry a risk of SSIs because the mouth and the first respiratory tracts are normally colonized by a bacterial flora. The aim of this consensus document was to provide clinicians with recommendations on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in neonates (

Background: Despite the extensive research that has been conducted to date, practice often differs from established guidelines and will vary between individuals and organisations. It has been noted that the global uptake of local and international surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines is poor with limited research investigating factors that affect guideline adherence. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the reported barriers and enablers to the adherence of SAP guidelines. Methods: A search of the literature was performed using four electronic databases (CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed and SCOPUS) for articles published in the English language from January 1998 to December 2018. Articles were included if they were solely related to SAP and discussed the barriers or enablers to SAP guideline adherence. Articles that assessed the adherence to a range of infection control measures or discussed adherence to antibiotic treatment guidelines rather than SAP guidelines were excluded from this review. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used to assess the quality of included studies. Results: A total of 1489 papers were originally retrieved, with 48 papers meeting the eligibility criteria. Barriers and enablers were mapped to 11 out of 14 TDF domains: knowledge, skills, social/professional role and identity, beliefs about capabilities, beliefs about consequences, reinforcement, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and resources, social influences, emotion and behavioural regulation. Barriers were further categorised into personal or organisational barriers, while enablers were arranged under commonly trialled interventions. Conclusions: There are numerous factors that can determine the uptake of SAP guidelines. An identification and understanding of these factors at a local level is required to develop tailored interventions to enhance guideline adherence. Interventions, when used in combination, can be considered as a means of improving guideline use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends administration of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in cesarean section prior to incision to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). This study aimed to determine whether SAP administration following cord clamping confers an increased SSI risk to the mother. Methods: Study design: Cohort. Setting: 75 participating Swiss hospitals, from 2009 to 2018. Participants: A total of 55,901 patients were analyzed. Main outcome measures: We assessed the association between SAP administration relative to incision and clamping and the SSI rate, using generalized linear multilevel models, adjusted for patient characteristics, procedural variables, and health-care system factors. Results: SAP was administered before incision in 26′405 patients (47.2%) and after clamping in 29,496 patients (52.8%). Overall 846 SSIs were documented, of which 379 (1.6% [95% CI, 1.4–1.8%]) occurred before incision and 449 (1.7% [1.5–1.9%]) after clamping (p = 0.759). The adjusted odds ratio for SAP administration after clamping was not significantly associated with an increased SSI rate (1.14, 95% CI 0.96–1.36; p = 0.144) when compared to before incision. Supplementary and subgroup analyses supported these main results. Conclusions: This study did not confirm an increased SSI risk for the mother in cesarean section if SAP is given after umbilical cord clamping compared to before incision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main aim of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in urologic procedures is to prevent bacteraemia, surgical site infections (SSIs), and postoperative urinary tract infections (ppUTIs). Guidelines for SAP in paediatric urology are lacking. Only some aspects of this complex topic have been studied, and the use of antibiotic prophylaxis prior to surgical procedures seems to be more often linked to institutional schools of thought or experts’ opinions than to rules dictated by studies demonstrating the most correct and preferred management. Therefore, the aim of this Consensus document realized using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method is to provide clinicians with a series of recommendations on SAP for the prevention of bacteraemia, SSIs, and ppUTIs after urologic imaging and surgical procedures in paediatric patients. Despite the few available studies, experts agree on some basilar concepts related to SAP for urologic procedures in paediatric patients. Before any urological procedure is conducted, UTI must be excluded. Clean procedures do not require SAP, with the exception of prosthetic device implantation and groin and perineal incisions where the SSI risk may be increased. In contrast, SAP is needed in clean-contaminated procedures. Studies have also suggested the safety of eliminating SAP in paediatric hernia repair and orchiopexy. To limit the emergence of resistance, every effort to reduce and rationalize antibiotic consumption for SAP must be made. Increased use of antibiotic stewardship can be greatly effective in this regard.

Abstract Background The optimal timing of preoperative surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of changing the timing of SAP on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) in laparoscopic surgery. Methods We performed a before-after study from August 2014 through June 2017 to assess the impact of changes in the timing of SAP on the incidence of SSI at a 790-bed tertiary care center in Japan. The intervention was the administration of SAP immediately after the study patients entered the operating room for laparoscopic surgery. Results In total, 1397 patients who met the inclusion criteria were analyzed. After the intervention, the median time between the time of SAP completion and the time of surgical incision changed from 8 min to 26 min (p

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) includes all postoperative infections occurring at surgical sites. It is one of the most common causes of the morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a brief course of an anti-microbial agent for the prevention of SSI. Judicious use of antibiotics can decrease the morbidity associated with SSI, but inappropriate antibiotic use leads to antibiotic resistance. Aims and Objectives: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is still rampant, and the present study was planned to assess the prophylactic antibiotic usage in the surgery department. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 200 patients in the Department of General Surgery, MMIMSR, Mullana, Haryana, with prior approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: Out of 200 patients, 193 received intravenous preoperative antimicrobial dose on the day of surgery. Most commonly prescribed group was the third-generation cephalosporin (61%). Fixed-dose combinations were also frequently used, among them piperacillin-tazobactam (20.5%) was the most common combination used. Average duration of postoperative prophylactic antimicrobial administration was 8.23 days. Conclusion: This study showed antibiotics were used as prophylactic in almost every patient. Still, many patients do suffer from SSI as average duration of antibiotic usage is around 8 days. To combat inappropriate antibiotic usage, there is need to make the SAP guidelines and to adhere to these guidelines.

Background: Prolonged surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) to prevent surgical site infection (SSI) is generally discouraged after completion of surgery. However, little is known about the pattern of peri-operative antibiotic use in resource-limited settings. We aimed to describe its use at a typical government hospital in Uganda. Methods: A study was originally conducted in a rural Ugandan regional referral and teaching hospital in 2014 and 2015 to improve hand hygiene practice and measure its impact on health-care-associated infections including SSI (WardGel study). This is a secondary analysis of the data from the WardGel study to assess the frequency of peri-operative antibiotic use among surgical patients. Results: Of 3,627 patients enrolled into the original study, 960 (26.5%) underwent surgery at the hospital and 907 patients (94.5%) received antibiotic agents during hospitalization. Of these, 880 patients (97.0%, of 907 patients) received antibiotic agents on the day of surgery. A combination of ceftriaxone and metronidazole was the most common regimen (609/907 patients, 67.1%). Thirty-six of 907 patients (4.0%) started and completed their antibiotic agents on the day of surgery. The mean length of antibiotic use during hospitalization was 3.5 days (standard deviation, 3.3). After adjusting for covariates, linear regression analysis showed an extra 1.9 days of antibiotic use post-operatively (95% confidence interval = 1.7-2.3). During the total 4,960 inpatient-days for those having surgery, there were 6,503 days of therapy (DOTs) of antibiotic agents and 1,649 antibiotic-free days (AFDs). Conclusions: Most patients received prolonged antibiotic therapy after surgery. Antimicrobial stewardship for SAP can play a major role in combating antimicrobial resistance in resource-limited settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Open in new tab Download slide Open in new tab Download slide OBJECTIVES: Our goal was to determine the optimal timing and choice of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) in patients having cardiac surgery. METHODS: The setting was the Swiss surgical site infection (SSI) national surveillance system with a follow-up rate of >94%. Participants were patients from 14 hospitals who had cardiac surgery from 2009 to 2017 with clean wounds, SAP with cefuroxime, cefazolin or a vancomycin/cefuroxime combination and timing of SAP within 120 min before the incision. Exposures were SAP timing and agents; the main outcome was the incidence of SSI. We fitted generalized additive and mixed-effects generalized linear models to describe effects predicting SSIs. RESULTS: A total of 21 007 patients were enrolled with an SSI incidence of 5.5%. Administration of SAP within 30 min before the incision was significantly associated with decreased deep/organ space SSI [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54–0.98; P  = 0.035] compared to administration of SAP 60–120 min before the incision. Cefazolin (adjusted OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.49–0.84; P  = 0.001) but not vancomycin/cefuroxime combination (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.82–1.34; P  = 0.689) was significantly associated with a lower risk of overall SSI compared to cefuroxime alone. Nevertheless, there were no statistically significant differences between the SAP agents and the risk of deep/organ space SSI. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this large prospective study provide substantial arguments that administration of SAP close to the time of the incision is more effective than earlier administration before cardiac surgery, making compliance with SAP administration easier. The choice of SAP appears to play a significant role in the prevention of all SSIs, even after adjusting for confounding variables. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context: Surgical site infections are frequently observed despite the availability of national guideline on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP). These infections increase patient morbidity, mortality, and direct and indirect health-care costs. Open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) is a common orthopedic surgery for fracture. There is a paucity of Indian data on SAP in ORIF surgery. Aims: The present study was taken up aiming at the evaluation of appropriateness and pharmacoeconomics of SAP in ORIF based on the national guidelines. Subjects and Methods: One-year observational prospective cohort study was conducted among 412 participants, who underwent ORIF in the Department of Orthopedics in a Tertiary Care Hospital. Name, dose, route, timing, frequency, and duration of administration of prophylactic antimicrobials used were recorded. Statistical Analysis Used: Descriptive statistics were used wherever required. Results: The mean age of participants was 39.24 years, majority (60.92%) were male, and 49.52% had fracture of lower-limb bones. The appropriateness of preoperative SAP in terms of indication in ORIF, timing, and route of administration was 100%. Selection and dose of preoperative and postoperative antimicrobials were appropriate in only 13% of cases. Omission of intraoperative dose was appropriate in all participants. Duration of postoperative Antimicrobial agent administration was inappropriately long in all participants. None of the cases received completely appropriate regimen. Cost analysis showed the mean cost of SAP practiced in our hospital was eleven times higher than that with recommended SAP. Conclusions: Considering the inappropriateness of SAP practiced, monitoring of guideline implementation and awareness among health-care professionals are necessary to prevent SSI and to decrease economic burden on the patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is important for the prevention of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and must be effective against the microorganisms most likely to contaminate the surgical site. Our aim was to compare different SAP regimens (cefazolin, cefuroxime, or vancomycin, alone or combined with gentamicin) in patients undergoing total knee (TKA) and hip (THA) arthroplasty. In this preclinical exploratory analysis, we analyzed the results of intraoperative sample cultures, the ratio of plasma antibiotic levels to the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) for bacteria isolated at the surgical wound and ATCC strains, and serum bactericidal titers (SBT) against the same microorganisms. A total of 132 surgical procedures (68 TKA, 64 THA) in 128 patients were included. Cultures were positive in 57 (43.2%) procedures (mostly for coagulase-negative staphylococci and Cutibacterium spp.); the rate was lower in the group of patients receiving combination SAP (adjusted OR 0.475, CI95% 0.229–0.987). The SAP regimens evaluated achieved plasma levels above the MICs in almost all of intraoperative isolates (93/94, 98.9%) and showed bactericidal activity against all of them (SBT range 1:8–1:1024), although SBTs were higher in patients receiving cefazolin and gentamicin-containing regimens. The potential clinical relevance of these findings in the prevention of PJIs remains to be determined.

Objective: There is a need to assess the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals as a first step toward improving future prescribing to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This is in line with Ghana's National Action Plan., Methods: A point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use was undertaken at the adult medical, surgical, and pediatric wards of Tamale Teaching Hospital using the standardized Global Point Prevalence Survey (GPPS) tool. Key target areas include adherence to current guidelines, limiting the prescribing of 'Watch' antibiotics with their greater resistance potential, and limiting the prescribing of antibiotics post-operatively to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs)., Results: Out of 217 patients' medical records assessed, 155 (71.4%) patients were prescribed antimicrobials. The rates were similar among children (73.9%) and adults (70.3%). Most of the antibiotics prescribed were in the WHO 'Watch' group (71.0%) followed by those in the 'Access' group (29%). Out of the 23 cases indicated for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent SSIs, the majority (69.6%) were given doses for more than 1 day, with none receiving a single dose. This needs addressing to reduce AMR and costs. Guideline compliance with the current Ghanaian Standard Treatment Guidelines (GSTG) for managing infections was also low (28.7%). The type of indication was the only independent predictor of guideline compliance (aOR = 0.013 CI 0.001-0.127, p-value = 0.001)., Conclusion: Given current concerns with antimicrobial prescribing in this hospital, deliberate efforts must be made to improve the appropriateness of prescribing to reduce AMR via targeted antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) includes all postoperative infections occurring at surgical sites. It is one of the most common causes of the morbidity and mortality in postoperative patients. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is a brief course of an anti-microbial agent for the prevention of SSI. Judicious use of antibiotics can decrease the morbidity associated with SSI, but inappropriate antibiotic use leads to antibiotic resistance. Aims and Objectives: Inappropriate use of antibiotics is still rampant, and the present study was planned to assess the prophylactic antibiotic usage in the surgery department. Materials and Methods: A prospective study was conducted on 200 patients in the Department of General Surgery, MMIMSR, Mullana, Haryana, with prior approval from the Institutional Ethical Committee. Results: Out of 200 patients, 193 received intravenous preoperative antimicrobial dose on the day of surgery. Most commonly prescribed group was the third-generation cephalosporin (61%). Fixed-dose combinations were also frequently used, among them piperacillin-tazobactam (20.5%) was the most common combination used. Average duration of postoperative prophylactic antimicrobial administration was 8.23 days. Conclusion: This study showed antibiotics were used as prophylactic in almost every patient. Still, many patients do suffer from SSI as average duration of antibiotic usage is around 8 days. To combat inappropriate antibiotic usage, there is need to make the SAP guidelines and to adhere to these guidelines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]