Search

Introduction: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices that provide high seal pressures are found to be suitable for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, as they have a separate port for gastric tube insertion, effectively separating the airway and the oesophagus. The present study compares the usage of two such second-generation supraglottic devices-AuraGain™ and i-gel® in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries. Aim: To compare the Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) and airway pressures achieved by the i-gel® and Ambu AuraGain™ after insertion in the supine position and during laparoscopic carbon dioxide peritoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical, single-blinded study conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, Andhra pradesh, India involved 100 female patients undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. The primary objective was to compare the clinical performance of Ambu AuraGain™ (Group-A) and i-gel® (Group-I) concerning their oropharyngeal seal pressures and airway pressures in gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries. The secondary outcomes measured included the time taken for insertion, ease of insertion of the device, effects on postinsertion haemodynamic parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, ease of gastric tube insertion, and fibreoptic bronchoscopic grading of the visualised glottic structures after device placement, as well as postoperative side effects like blood staining upon removal of the device and sore throat. Data were analysed using Student’s t-test and chi-square test. Results: The mean age in Group-A was 39.62±4.085 years, and in Group-I, it was 39.48±2.468 years. The mean peak inspiratory pressures after device insertion were 14.34 mmHg in Group-A and 16.66 mmHg in Group-I. Haemodynamic parameters postinsertion were similar in both groups {Group-A: Mean Heart Rate (HR) 87.22 bpm, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) 89.72 mmHg, Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) 99.58%; Group-I: Mean HR 87.50 bpm, MAP 89.72 mmHg, SpO2 99.72%). Fibreoptic bronchoscopic grading in Group-A was 0/0/9/41, and in Group-I, it was 0/0/11/39. Blood staining upon removal was noted in four patients (8%) in Group-A and in 3 patients (6%) in Group-I. Sore throat in the postoperative period was noted in 14% of patients in Group-A and 8% in Group-I. Conclusion: Ambu AuraGain™ was found to provide a better seal and higher OLP compared to the i-gel® in gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries and therefore provide safer and more effective ventilation for patients undergoing such surgeries. I-gel® was found to be easier and quicker to insert than the AuraGain™.

Introduction: Second-generation supraglottic airway devices that provide high seal pressures are found to be suitable for patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery, as they have a separate port for gastric tube insertion, effectively separating the airway and the oesophagus. The present study compares the usage of two such second-generation supraglottic devices-AuraGain™ and i-gel® in patients undergoing gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries. Aim: To compare the Oropharyngeal Leak Pressure (OLP) and airway pressures achieved by the i-gel® and Ambu AuraGain™ after insertion in the supine position and during laparoscopic carbon dioxide peritoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Materials and Methods: This randomised clinical, singleblinded study conducted at the Department of Anaesthesiology, Narayana Medical College, Nellore, Andhra pradesh, India involved 100 female patients undergoing elective gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries under general anaesthesia with controlled ventilation. The primary objective was to compare the clinical performance of Ambu AuraGain™ (Group-A) and i-gel® (Group-I) concerning their oropharyngeal seal pressures and airway pressures in gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries. The secondary outcomes measured included the time taken for insertion, ease of insertion of the device, effects on postinsertion haemodynamic parameters like heart rate, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, ease of gastric tube insertion, and fibreoptic bronchoscopic grading of the visualised glottic structures after device placement, as well as postoperative side effects like blood staining upon removal of the device and sore throat. Data were analysed using Student's t-test and chi-square test. Results: The mean age in Group-A was 39.62±4.085 years, and in Group-I, it was 39.48±2.468 years. The mean peak inspiratory pressures after device insertion were 14.34 mmHg in Group-A and 16.66 mmHg in Group-I. Haemodynamic parameters postinsertion were similar in both groups {Group-A: Mean Heart Rate (HR) 87.22 bpm, Mean Arterial Pressure (MAP) 89.72 mmHg, Oxygen Saturation (SpO2) 99.58%; Group-I: Mean HR 87.50 bpm, MAP 89.72 mmHg, SpO2 99.72%). Fibreoptic bronchoscopic grading in Group-A was 0/0/9/41, and in Group-I, it was 0/0/11/39. Blood staining upon removal was noted in four patients (8%) in Group-A and in 3 patients (6%) in Group-I. Sore throat in the postoperative period was noted in 14% of patients in Group-A and 8% in Group-I. Conclusion: Ambu AuraGain™ was found to provide a better seal and higher OLP compared to the i-gel® in gynaecological laparoscopic surgeries and therefore provide safer and more effective ventilation for patients undergoing such surgeries. I-gel® was found to be easier and quicker to insert than the AuraGain™. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Primary aim of the study was to evaluate the performance of Intubating LMA (ILMA) and blockbuster LMA in terms of first pass success rate, ease and duration taken for blind tracheal intubation. Material and Methods: The present prospective randomised study was conducted on 70 patients of either sex aged 18-60 years belonging to ASA physical status I or II. Patients were randomly allocated to either, group I and group B of n = 35 each. In group I and B patients were intubated using ILMA and LMA BlockBuster respectively. Insertion time and ease of placement of supraglottic device, total time taken for successful intubation, number of attempts for endotracheal tube (ETT) placement, and ease of placement of ETT, were recorded. Results: In both groups, the supraglottic device was placed on the first attempt in 88.6% patients. The first-attempt success rate for ETT placement was 71.4% in group I versus 94.3% in group B, (P = 0.01) with an overall success rate of 88.5% in group I and 100% in group. More failure rate was observed in group I (11.4%) compared to group B (0%). The total time taken for successful intubation in group I was 11.53 ± 6.410 sec and 9.17 ± 2.749 sec in group B (P = 0.04). Conclusion: We conclude that the modifications in the design of LMA Blockbuster (>95° angle, availability of the parker flex tube 27-30°angle of the emergence of airway tube) make it a more convenient, effective, simpler, and faster intubating device than ILMA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The passage of a Ryle's tube through the drain port on the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ProtectorTM has been reported to be arduous despite the larger gastric channel. There are no studies on the evaluation of the guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM to achieve adequate gastrointestinal drainage function. Methods: This randomised study included 132 patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. The gum elastic bougie (GEB)-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM (group I) was compared with the conventional method (group II), and the alignment of the tip of the drain tube with the oesophagus was assessed. The insertion characteristics of the device, accuracy of LMA ProtectorTM placement, haemodynamic parameters, and post-operative airway morbidity following the insertion of the device were also compared between the two groups. Results: The first-attempt success rate for the placement of LMA ProtectorTM and the patency of oesophagus was higher in group I patients than in group II (100% vs 84.8%; P < 0.001). However, the time taken for device insertion and associated haemodynamic changes were significantly longer in group I. The patients in group I had better visualisation of laryngeal structures. The GEB-assisted insertion of LMA ProtectorTM resulted in less incidence of blood staining at the cuff of the device. Conclusion: GEB-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM achieved better oesophageal patency than the conventional insertion method. This method also had higher first-attempt success at the placement of the device and was observed to be less traumatic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The passage of a Ryle's tube through the drain port on the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) ProtectorTM has been reported to be arduous despite the larger gastric channel. There are no studies on the evaluation of the guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM to achieve adequate gastrointestinal drainage function. Methods: This randomised study included 132 patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. The gum elastic bougie (GEB)-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM (group I) was compared with the conventional method (group II), and the alignment of the tip of the drain tube with the oesophagus was assessed. The insertion characteristics of the device, accuracy of LMA ProtectorTM placement, haemodynamic parameters, and post-operative airway morbidity following the insertion of the device were also compared between the two groups. Results: The first-attempt success rate for the placement of LMA ProtectorTM and the patency of oesophagus was higher in group I patients than in group II (100% vs 84.8%; P < 0.001). However, the time taken for device insertion and associated haemodynamic changes were significantly longer in group I. The patients in group I had better visualisation of laryngeal structures. The GEB-assisted insertion of LMA ProtectorTM resulted in less incidence of blood staining at the cuff of the device. Conclusion: GEB-guided insertion of LMA ProtectorTM achieved better oesophageal patency than the conventional insertion method. This method also had higher first-attempt success at the placement of the device and was observed to be less traumatic.

Background: Airway gadgetry is expanding at an exponential rate. It is imperative to understand the intubating characteristics of supraglottic devices so that the choice of device in patients is based on evidence rather than just the design. The present study was conducted to compare blind intubation with blockbuster LMA and Ambu Aura-i. Methodology: Sixty patients of either sex, 20 to 60 years of age, ASA I–III, scheduled to undergo elective surgery under general anesthesia, were included in this prospective, randomized, comparative study. Group A (n = 30) patients were intubated with AmbuAura-i, and Group B (n = 30) patients were intubated using BlockBuster LMA. Results: Endotracheal intubation was found easy in 76% of the patients and difficult in 10% of the patients intubated with Ambu Aura −i. A 13.3% failure rate was observed in group A. Intubation success rate of 100% was observed in Group B. 86.6% of patients were easily intubated, and seven patients were intubated with a bit of difficulty (P-value 0.010). The mean time of SGD insertion in Group A was 14.77 ± 5.563 seconds, and in Group B was 21.87 ± 7.186 seconds (P-value 0.000). SGD insertion attempts were significantly higher in Group B when compared to Group A (P-value 0.025). Conclusion: Although AA-i requires less time for the placement of SGD, blockbuster LMA remains the better choice with a 100% success rate of blind orotracheal intubation.

Copyright of Italian Journal of Nursing (IJN) / Giornale Italiano di Infermieristica is the property of Collegio IPASVI MI-LO-MB - Ordine Professioni Infermieristiche MI-LO-MB and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Airway management of patients with maxillofacial trauma remains a challenging task for an anesthesiologist in the emergency and perioperative settings due to anatomical distortion. Detailed knowledge of maxillofacial and airway anatomy is desired for the correct diagnosis of extent and severity of the injury. Basic principles of advanced trauma life support protocols should be followed while managing such patients. Establishing unobstructed airway remains the top priority while maintaining C-spine immobilization and preventing aspiration. Although multiple options exist for securing the airway, a universal technique of airway management may not be applicable to all the patients. Hence, a high index of suspicion along with timely and skillful management is warranted. In this brief review, issues affecting the airway management in cases of maxillofacial trauma are addressed with the possible uses of a wide range of airway management devices available in emergency and elective scenarios.

There are many treatment suggestions for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus during the coronavirus epidemic. The most common patterns of practice, which are publicly available on social media and medical portals, mainly concern mechanical ventilation methods, but these are examples used in intensive care units. After a retrospective analysis of most recommendations, good practices, guidelines, and primarily based on our experience, the authors of this article prepared a short compendium on safe oxygen therapy in patients suspected or confirmed with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and safe methods of instrumental airway management, minimizing production aerosol. The methods of conducting passive oxygen therapy, controlling breathing, clear upper airway with use of supraglottic devices and modified endotracheal intubation will allow medical personnel to increase their safety in supplying airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. This is extremely important in times of epidemic, where medical personnel in prehospital care is at high risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Airway management of patients with maxillofacial trauma remains a challenging task for an anesthesiologist in the emergency and perioperative settings due to anatomical distortion. Detailed knowledge of maxillofacial and airway anatomy is desired for the correct diagnosis of extent and severity of the injury. Basic principles of advanced trauma life support protocols should be followed while managing such patients. Establishing unobstructed airway remains the top priority while maintaining C-spine immobilization and preventing aspiration. Although multiple options exist for securing the airway, a universal technique of airway management may not be applicable to all the patients. Hence, a high index of suspicion along with timely and skillful management is warranted. In this brief review, issues affecting the airway management in cases of maxillofacial trauma are addressed with the possible uses of a wide range of airway management devices available in emergency and elective scenarios. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Geriatric patients are susceptible to respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events during endotracheal intubation and extubation due to anatomic and physiological changes with aging. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) provide reduced airway morbidity and increased hemodynamic stability in adults. However, studies that have compared the clinical performance of SADs in geriatric patients are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical performance of airway management with i-gel® and laryngeal mask airway Supreme (LMA SupremeTM) in geriatric patients. Methods The subjects were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I–III geriatric (65–85 years) patients who underwent elective surgery with general anesthesia and were randomly allocated into the i-gel® group and the LMA SupremeTM group. We compared the time for successful insertion on a first attempt as a primary outcome, and the secondary outcomes were success rate, ease of insertion, maneuver for successful ventilation, oropharyngeal leak pressure, gastric insufflation, fiberoptic view grades, ventilator problems, and adverse events. Results Insertion time was significantly shorter for the i-gel® than the LMA SupremeTM (21.4 ± 6.8 vs. 29.3 ± 9.9 s; P = 0.011). The i-gel® was also easier to insert than the LMA SupremeTM (P = 0.014). Gastric insufflation was less frequent with the i-gel® than the LMA SupremeTM (0% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.013). Other measurements were comparable between groups. Conclusions Both devices can be safely applied to geriatric patients with similar success rates and oropharyngeal leak pressures. However, inserting the i-gel® was faster and easier compared to the LMA SupremeTM in geriatric patients.

Airway devices were first used in children since 1940 and thereafter an increasingly large number of paediatric airway devices have come into our armamentarium. To control and protect the airway in children during anaesthesia, in intensive care unit or in emergency department either tracheal intubation is performed under direct or indirect visualization of vocal cords with the help of laryngoscopes or video-laryngoscopes respectively or it can be done blindly or by using special instruments such as fiberoptic laryngoscope, lighted stylet or Bullard laryngoscope to name a few. Airway also can be maintained with the help of Laryngeal mask airways, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways. Updating our information and knowledge regarding these developments is pivotal to our practice of paediatric anaesthesia. With a thorough search of books, MEDLINE, MEDNET, clinical trials.gov.in, this article aims at focusing and understanding a brief basis of paediatric devices and their use.

Prehospital emergency airway management challenges every paramedic. Emergencies evacuated from difficult areas by armed forces need airway maintenance throughout evacuation. Effective use of supraglottic airway (SGA) devices during prehospital transfer is life saving. This study compared use of four commonly available SGAs by Armed Forces paramedics in simulated emergency situations. This prospective observational study conducted in a tertiary care institution, included 58 volunteer paramedics. They were trained on manikins before the study in basic airway skills and insertion of the four SGA devices under study viz. Classic laryngeal mask airway (cLMA), laryngeal tube (LT), I-gel, and Combitube. SGA device insertions were performed on 474 patients scheduled for short elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia. All volunteers inserted and assessed the four SGA devices equal number of times in different patients. Overall success rate, time for successful insertion, first attempt success rate, number of attempts for successful insertion, oro-pharyngeal leak pressures, ease of insertion, durability of device, and complications were recorded. Differences among the four groups were statistically significant in all parameters. Intergroup comparison revealed that both I-gel and LT were comparable to each other, however superior to cLMA and Combitube in all outcome measures except ease of insertion and durability of device where I-gel was better and oro-pharyngeal seal pressures where Combitube was better. Considering all parameters, I-gel proved superior with minimal complications compared with other SGA devices tested. I-gel may be recommended for emergency airway rescue use in patients by military paramedics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: In adults, video laryngoscopy is recommended for supraglottic airway device (SGAD) placement as it results in better device position and higher oropharyngeal leak pressures. In children, there is a paucity of studies evaluating the impact of visually guided techniques on SGAD placement. Aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of visual‑guided techniques of SGAD placement in children. Methods: Totally, 75 children, scheduled for elective surgery, were randomly allocated into three groups, that is, standard (S), direct laryngoscopy (DL), and video laryngoscopy (VL). Ambu AuraGain was placed blindly in group S, and under visual guidance with video laryngoscopy and direct laryngoscopy in groups VL and DL, respectively. Ambu AuraGain position was determined by flexible videoendoscope. First attempt success rate, time for successful insertion, oropharyngeal leak and any complications were studied. Results: Incidence of malposition was not significantly different in group S (44%), DL (48%), and VL (64%); P = 0.32. The first attempt success rate was 100% in DL and 92% each in S and VL. Time to insert (seconds) was significantly higher in VL (37.9 ± 21.6), compared to S (18.4 ± 7.9) and DL (27.4 ± 14.5); P < 0.001. Incidence of oropharyngeal leak, impact on ventilation, and complications were similar in all three groups. Conclusion: In this study, there was no advantage of visually guided techniques for Ambu AuraGain placement in children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Inguinal hernia is one of the most common conditions presented for surgical repair in children and laparoscopic approaches are increasingly performed. Previous studies have shown safety and efficacy in the use of supraglottic devices (SGD) as an alternative to tracheal intubation, which fits particularly well with outpatient anesthesia. Methodology: we conduct a retrospective observational study, collecting data from the electronic anesthetic form, from all patients aged 0 to 17 y who underwent ambulatory laparoscopic percutaneous internal ring suturing between February 2015 and August 2019, if I-gel TM was used to airway management. Results: We found 230 patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 5.2 y old, mean weight 20.1 kg. All patients were ASA I (n=203) or ASA II (n=27). The mean surgery duration was 38 minutes. We found 4 respiratory adverse events, three bronchospasms, and one laryngospasm, managed in the operating room. Ninety percent of the surgeries were performed without neuromuscular blockade. Conclusion: I-gel™ was a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to airway management to laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in the ambulatory setting. According to available literature, our practice did not represent an increased risk for the studied respiratory events. SGD obviates the need for neuromuscular blockade. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are many treatment suggestions for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus during the coronavirus epidemic. The most common patterns of practice, which are publicly available on social media and medical portals, mainly concern mechanical ventilation methods, but these are examples used in intensive care units. After a retrospective analysis of most recommendations, good practices, guidelines, and primarily based on our experience, the authors of this article prepared a short compendium on safe oxygen therapy in patients suspected or confirmed with the SARS-CoV-2 virus and safe methods of instrumental airway management, minimizing production aerosol. The methods of conducting passive oxygen therapy, controlling breathing, clear upper airway with use of supraglottic devices and modified endotracheal intubation will allow medical personnel to increase their safety in supplying airway management in patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. This is extremely important in times of epidemic, where medical personnel in prehospital care is at high risk of being infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The design evolution of the pediatric supraglottic airway device has experienced a long and productive journey. We have a wealth of clinical studies to support progress and advancements in pediatric clinical practice. While all of the supraglottic airway devices have been used successfully in millions of children, it is important to be aware of design advantages and disadvantages of the different models of supraglottic airway devices. Current pediatric supraglottic airway devices may be improved in design to be more ideal. Industry‐changing technological advancements are likely to occur in the near future, which may further improve clinical performance of these devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of supraglottic airway devices (SADs) is becoming more widespread. However, there is little evidence to show which device is best in an emergent clinical scenario. We compared both fiberoptic-guided and blind tracheal intubation through the Intubating Laryngeal Tube Suction-Disposal (iLTS-D), the AuraGain™, and the i-gel® in an airway manikin. Thirty residents were included in a randomized trial to perform both fiberoptic-guided and blind tracheal intubation using the iLTS-D, the AuraGain, and the i-gel. The main endpoint was the total time taken to achieve successful fiberoptic intubation through the SAD. Additional endpoints included total time for blind intubation, SAD insertion time, tracheal tube insertion time, intubation success rate, fiberoptic view, and maneuvers performed to achieve tracheal intubation. All participants performed fiberoptic intubation using all three SADs on the first attempt. The total time to fiberoptic tracheal intubation using the i-gel, AuraGain, and iLTS-D was 42 s, 56 s, and 56 s, respectively. The blind tracheal intubation success rate was 80% with the iLTS-D, 43% with the i-gel, and 0% with the AuraGain. The total time for blind tracheal intubation through the i-gel and the iLTS-D was 29 s and 40 s, respectively. Laryngeal view grades were significantly poorer with the iLTS-D compared to the other devices. The iLTS-D required significantly more maneuvers to achieve successful tracheal intubation. In an airway manikin, the iLTS-D, AuraGain, and i-gel appear to be reliable devices for airway rescue and fiberoptic-guided tracheal intubation. The iLTS-D is recommended for blind tracheal intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Airway devices were first used in children since 1940 and thereafter an increasingly large number of paediatric airway devices have come into our armamentarium. To control and protect the airway in children during anaesthesia, in intensive care unit or in emergency department either tracheal intubation is performed under direct or indirect visualization of vocal cords with the help of laryngoscopes or video-laryngoscopes respectively or it can be done blindly or by using special instruments such as fiberoptic laryngoscope, lighted stylet or Bullard laryngoscope to name a few. Airway also can be maintained with the help of Laryngeal mask airways, oropharyngeal and nasopharyngeal airways. Updating our information and knowledge regarding these developments is pivotal to our practice of paediatric anaesthesia. With a thorough search of books, MEDLINE, MEDNET, clinical trials.gov.in, this article aims at focusing and understanding a brief basis of paediatric devices and their use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The most important duty of an anesthesiologist is to protect the patient's airway and to provide adequate ventilation. The anesthesiologist should be skilled enough to make decisions at the circumstances of difficult intubations. We compared the success rate of blind tracheal intubation through two different supraglottic airway devices, I-GEL and ILMA using PVC endotracheal tube. We studied the complications in both the techniques. The aim of the study: To compare the advanced I-GEL, to ILMA as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation for patients posted for elective procedures under general anesthesia. Materials and methods: A Prospective randomized study was conducted in 80 adult patients who undergone elective surgery under general anesthesia. They were divided into 2 groups-each group included 40 patients. Group A - I-GEL, Group B-ILMA. We noted the Ease of insertion, Duration of successful attempts, No. of failed attempts, Total intubation time and First attempt success rate. We recorded Heart rate, Blood pressure, Pulse oximetry, EtCO2 and Complications of I-gel and ILMA insertion. Results: Supraglottic device insertion time (15.62s vs 17.17s) and Supraglottic device removal time (15.82s vs 16.55s) were the least I-GEL group. The first attempt success rate for tracheal intubation (87.5% vs 60%) and Success rate for insertion (95% vs 72.5%) were high in the ILMA group. There was no statistical difference in Total intubation time, Complications, Hemodynamic response to intubation, No. of attempts for supraglottic device insertion and Time for first attempt tracheal intubation. Conclusion: We concluded I-GEL aids easy and rapid insertion as a supraglottic airway device, but when it is used as a conduit for blind endotracheal intubation, the failure rate is high as there is more incidence of oesophageal intubation. On the contrary, ILMA being a gold standard device meant for intubation guide has a high first attempt success rate for blind endotracheal intubation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: The passage of a Ryle's tube through the drain port on the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) Protector TM has been reported to be arduous despite the larger gastric channel. There are no studies on the evaluation of the guided insertion of LMA Protector TM to achieve adequate gastrointestinal drainage function., Methods: This randomised study included 132 patients who underwent surgery under general anaesthesia. The gum elastic bougie (GEB)-guided insertion of LMA Protector TM (group I) was compared with the conventional method (group II), and the alignment of the tip of the drain tube with the oesophagus was assessed. The insertion characteristics of the device, accuracy of LMA Protector TM placement, haemodynamic parameters, and post-operative airway morbidity following the insertion of the device were also compared between the two groups., Results: The first-attempt success rate for the placement of LMA Protector TM and the patency of oesophagus was higher in group I patients than in group II (100% vs 84.8%; P < 0.001). However, the time taken for device insertion and associated haemodynamic changes were significantly longer in group I. The patients in group I had better visualisation of laryngeal structures. The GEB-assisted insertion of LMA Protector TM resulted in less incidence of blood staining at the cuff of the device., Conclusion: GEB-guided insertion of LMA Protector TM achieved better oesophageal patency than the conventional insertion method. This method also had higher first-attempt success at the placement of the device and was observed to be less traumatic., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest., (Copyright: © 2023 Indian Journal of Anaesthesia.)

Second generation supraglottic airway devices providing high seal airway pressures are suitable for patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopy. We compared the seal pressure achieved by the new Ambu AuraGain™ versus LMA Supreme™ following pneumoperitoneum in the Trendelenburg position. Sixty female patients were randomly allocated to ventilation with either the AuraGain or the Supreme. A target-controlled system was used to administer total intravenous anesthesia. Intracuff pressure was maintained below 60 cm H2O. The following parameters were registered: Time, number of attempts and manoeuvres required for insertion; seal pressure and peak inspiratory pressure at four time points; ease of gastric tube insertion, flexible scope view, complications and postoperative morbidity. Both devices were quick and easily inserted, although the Supreme required less rotation manoeuvres (16 in AuraGain vs. 6 in LMA Supreme; p = 0.01). The AuraGain achieved higher seal pressures (34 ± 5 in AuraGain vs. 29 ± 5 in LMA Supreme; p = 0.0002). Following pneumoperitoneum in head-down position, peak airway pressure increased 9 ± 3 cm H2O in both groups, exceeding seal pressure in 3 patients in the Supreme group (p = 0.06). The vocal cords were seen through all AuraGain and 90% of the Supreme devices; epiglottis was often visible inside the tube (68%). No differences were found in the incidence of traces of blood on the mask or postoperative symptoms. Both devices allowed effective ventilation in patients undergoing gynaecologic laparoscopic surgery with a low rate of complications. The Ambu AuraGain provided higher seal pressures and a clear view of glottic inlet in all patients offering the possibility to guide direct tracheal intubation if required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND: Quality airway management is essential for the proper treatment of vitally endangered patients. An adequate oxygenation and ventilation are the main emergency procedures. A method of opening and maintaining the airway is rather simple, but effective i.e. it is done in a short time and with minimal equipment. Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is the best procedure, the so-called 'gold standard', but it is not always possible in the prehospital conditions. Every prehospital intubation can be difficult, so there are various alternative methods and devices to be considered. In our Department we have access to some supraglottic devices: a Laryngeal mask, a Combitube (the double-lumen airway), a King laryngeal tube and an I-gel. OBJECTIVE: To show the alternative ways of maintaining the airway in prehospital conditions, according to the prearranged plan in case when the airway problem occurs and to point out all the advantages and disadvantages of the process. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of protocol in SHMP Subotica over the period from 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2013 RESULTS: Out of the total number of resuscitation, which is 83, 78 of them (94%) were realized in the field (i.e. in the patients' home or public places) and 5 (6%) were realized during the transportation of patients with an acute myocardial infarction to ICVDV (The Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases) in Sremska Kamenica. 23 patients (27,7%) were intubated and the remaining 20 patients (33,3%) returned to normal sinus rhythm after the first/ second defibrillation and started to breathe spontaneously, on 21 patients (35%) were used supraglottic devices and 19 patients (31,7%) were provided with medical care with the mask ventilation balloon. The supraglottic device most commonly used was i-gel, among 12 patients (57,14%). CONCLUSION: In cases when the endotracheal intubation was not possible, the i-gel proved to be the best second generation supraglottic airway device among all the other alternative devices. It is designed to be applied quickly and easily and no extensive experience is needed when operating. It allows adequate inflation, but the main drawback is that it does not enable suction.

Background: No study has ever compared the efficacy of various types of supraglottic devices (SGDs) for securing the airway under cricoid pressure.Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of six SGDs, LMA-ProSeal (ProSeal), LMA-Classic (Classic), Laryngeal Tube (LT), LMA-Supreme (Supreme), air-Q (air-Q), and i-gel (i-gel), in airway management under cricoid pressure using a manikin.Methods: Fifteen novice doctors and 16 experienced doctors used the six SGDs under cricoid or sham pressure on an adult manikin. Insertion time, successful ventilation rate, and subjective insertion difficulty on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured.Results: Both novice and experienced doctors had a significantly lower ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Novice doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all SGDs. Experienced doctors required a significantly longer insertion time under cricoid pressure than with sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs. Subjective insertion difficulty on VAS was significantly higher under cricoid pressure than under sham pressure with all six SGDs.Conclusion: Ventilation success rate under cricoid pressure was significantly lower than under sham pressure when using the ProSeal, Classic, and LT, but not when using the other three SGDs in both novice and experienced doctors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Second generation supraglottic airways are increasingly being used in surgical patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Preventing aspiration at higher airway pressures may be at the expense of a higher cuff pressure which can impair mucosal perfusion. We attempted to elucidate whether Ambu AuraGain™ (AAU) would provide a higher oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP) with a lower mucosal pressure in comparison to ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway (PLMA). Methods: This was a prospective randomised study involving sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under general anaesthesia, using either AAU (Group AAU [n = 30]) or PLMA (Group PLMA [n = 30]) for elective ventilation. Primary outcome measure was the OLP. Number of insertion attempts, ease of insertion, time required for placement and calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure were the secondary outcome measures. Data were analysed using Student's t-test and Chi-square test. Results: No significant difference in the OLP was noted in both groups. The ease of insertion and success rate at first attempt was similar between the groups. Time taken for insertion in Group AAU was longer than Group PLMA (13.57 ± 1.94 vs. 11.60 ± 2.22 s). The calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressures were lower with Group AAU than Group PLMA for all 3 sizes. The minimum cuff pressure and minimum cuff volume required to prevent leak were found similar in both groups. Conclusion: AAU provides adequate sealing pressures and effective ventilation with lower calculated pharyngeal mucosal pressure, compared to PLMA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study examined the intubation manoeuvres performed by Piacenza local health authority ambulance service nurses in patients with sudden cardiac arrest of nontraumatic origin. The study has a retrospective observational design and analyzes all the intubation manoeuvres performed by ambulance service nurses in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2013. The success of the procedure with subglottic tubes was 97.7% (P>0.60), while it was 100% (P>0.50) with supraglottic devices. The success rate of the procedures is encouraging and the statistical analysis showed that there are no significant differences between literature data and the experience of Piacenza ambulance system crews. An increase in the use of supraglottic devices was also observed. The results show that the Piacenza ambulance service nursing staff has a good level of skills and competence in advanced airway management. A future development of this ability could involve intubation also in situations other than cardiac arrest using specific medication.

Introduction: LMA Proseal™ is considered the premier supraglottic airway device in children. I-gel circumvents the cuff related problems of second generation devices as its seal is made of thermoplastic elastomer. Its potential advantages include easy insertion, minimal tissue compression and good stability. We planned this study to assess the clinical performance of i-gel, LMA Proseal™ and LMA classic in children breathing spontaneously. Methodology: 90 patients of ASA grade I and II, weighing between 10-25 kg, posted for elective surgery with a duration of less than 2 hrs, were randomly divided into three groups (30 each). Standard general anesthesia was administered to all children. Ease of insertion of the device and nasogastric tube, oropharyngeal seal pressure, hemodynamic parameters and intra- and postoperative complications were noted. Results: The patients were comparable with respect to demographic data. Insertion was assessed as very easy in all three groups. Success rate of insertion in first attempt was >90% in each group. I-gel showed shortest mean time for insertion (16 ± 4 seconds). I-gel had highest seal pressure (25.2 ± 2.8). followed by LMA Proseal™ (22.6 ± 2.8) and Classic LMA (16.8 ± 2.6). Conclusion: I-gel is comparable to LMA Proseal™ and Classic LMA in clinical performance. I-gel had highest oropharyngeal seal pressure and required least time for insertion. Therefore, it can be reliably used in pediatric anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: During out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation, several factors can render tracheal intubation more difficult, such as when rescuers must secure the airway in complete darkness or with limited illumination. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of six supraglottic devices (SGDs), ProSeal (ProSeal), Classic (Classic), Supreme (Supreme), Laryngeal Tube (LT), air-Q (air-Q), and i-gel (i-gel), for airway management under light and dark conditions using a manikin. Methods: Seventeen novice doctors and 15 experienced doctors performed insertion of six SGDs under light and dark conditions using an adult manikin. Insertion time, successful ventilation rate, and subjective insertion difficulty on a visual analogue scale (VAS) were measured. Results: Both novice and experienced doctors had a significantly lower ventilation success rate in the dark than in the light when ProSeal and Classic were used, but not with the other four SGDs. Novice doctors required a significantly longer insertion time in the dark than in the light with all SGDs. Experienced doctors required a significantly longer insertion time in the dark than in the light with ProSeal or Classic, but not with the other four SGDs. VAS was significantly higher for both novice and experienced doctors when ProSeal and Classic were used, as compared with the other four SGDs in the dark. Conclusions: Compared to ProSeal and Classic, Supreme, i-gel, LT, and air-Q are more effective for airway management in the dark. Our findings suggest that anatomically shaped SGDs may help novice doctors secure the airway under dark conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The study examined the intubation manoeuvres performed by Piacenza local health authority ambulance service nurses in patients with sudden cardiac arrest of nontraumatic origin. The study has a retrospective observational design and analyzes all the intubation manoeuvres performed by ambulance service nurses in patients with non-traumatic cardiac arrest between January 2010 and December 2013. The success of the procedure with subglottic tubes was 97.7% (P>0.60), while it was 100% (P>0.50) with supraglottic devices. The success rate of the procedures is encouraging and the statistical analysis showed that there are no significant differences between literature data and the experience of Piacenza ambulance system crews. An increase in the use of supraglottic devices was also observed. The results show that the Piacenza ambulance service nursing staff has a good level of skills and competence in advanced airway management. A future development of this ability could involve intubation also in situations other than cardiac arrest using specific medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: It is strongly advised by the European Resuscitation Council not to interrupt chest compressions for airway management. An alternative to tracheal intubation is the use of a supraglottic airway device (SAD) which should shorten "hands-off" time during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Chest compression fraction (CCF) should be above 0.6 to ensure the probability of successful CPR. We compared the performance of airway management during CPR provided by paramedics using the laryngeal mask (LMA) Supreme, Combitube and endotracheal intubation (ET) in a manikin model. Materials and Methods: Thirty sophomore students of emergency medicine school for paramedics took part in the study. The primary endpoint was to assess the influence of the type of airway management on CCF. The time to successful airway management (TA) was measured and the minute ventilation was assessed using the respirator Medumat Easy and program AMBU® CPR SOFTWARE during uninterrupted CPR. CCF was measured using CPRmeter - QCPR (Laerdal). Results. Mean CCF was significantly better for LMA Supreme (0.8 vs 0.71 vs 0.65), mean TA was significantly shorter for LMA supreme: 16.5 sec vs 24.37 sec vs 28,3 sec, the success rate in the first attempt was 100% vs 66.6% vs 100%, mean air leak during chest compressions was 14% vs 8% vs 15% for LMA Supreme, ET and Combitube respectively. Conclusion: The LMA Supreme is an effective tool for airway management during chest compression and provides adequ-ate ventilation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) are routinely used for securing the airway. In this study, the clinical performance of three SADs in adult patients under general anesthesia was compared., Methods: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III subjects were randomly assigned to the i-gelTM (I), LMA SupremeTM (L), or Ambu AuraGainTM (A) group (30 per group). The primary objective of this study was to compare insertion times. Additionally, the ease of insertion, number of attempts, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), airway maneuver requirement, difficulty with gastric tube placement, and complications were assessed., Results: Demographic data did not differ between the groups. Group I (16.9 ± 4.9 s) had a significantly shorter time of insertion than Group L (19.6 ± 5.2 s) and Group A (22.1 ± 5.7 s) (P = 0.001). The OLP for Group A (29.8 ± 3.0 cmH2O) was higher than those for Group L (24.1 ± 6.3 cmH2O) and Group I (9.4 ± 6.1 cmH2O) (P < 0.001). The number of insertion attempts (P = 0.232), ease of insertion (P = 0.630), airway maneuver requirement (P = 0.585), difficulty with gastric tube placement (P = 0.364), and complications (P = 0.873) were not significantly different between the groups., Conclusions: All three devices are convenient and effective for airway management in adults under general anesthesia. However, the shorter insertion time required for the i-gel may make it more suitable for resuscitation and emergencies, while aspiration risk may be reduced with the Ambu AuraGain, given its high OLP.

Background: Geriatric patients are susceptible to respiratory and hemodynamic adverse events during endotracheal intubation and extubation due to anatomic and physiological changes with aging. Supraglottic airway devices (SADs) provide reduced airway morbidity and increased hemodynamic stability in adults. However, studies that have compared the clinical performance of SADs in geriatric patients are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical performance of airway management with i-gel® and laryngeal mask airway Supreme (LMA SupremeTM) in geriatric patients., Methods: The subjects were American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification I-III geriatric (65-85 years) patients who underwent elective surgery with general anesthesia and were randomly allocated into the i-gel® group and the LMA SupremeTM group. We compared the time for successful insertion on a first attempt as a primary outcome, and the secondary outcomes were success rate, ease of insertion, maneuver for successful ventilation, oropharyngeal leak pressure, gastric insufflation, fiberoptic view grades, ventilator problems, and adverse events., Results: Insertion time was significantly shorter for the i-gel® than the LMA SupremeTM (21.4 ± 6.8 vs. 29.3 ± 9.9 s; P = 0.011). The i-gel® was also easier to insert than the LMA SupremeTM (P = 0.014). Gastric insufflation was less frequent with the i-gel® than the LMA SupremeTM (0% vs. 31.3%; P = 0.013). Other measurements were comparable between groups., Conclusions: Both devices can be safely applied to geriatric patients with similar success rates and oropharyngeal leak pressures. However, inserting the i-gel® was faster and easier compared to the LMA SupremeTM in geriatric patients.

Abstract: Various supraglottic devices are currently available for airway management and are used widely in emergency situations because they are easy to position. We undertook a systematic review of the literature comparing laryngeal tubes and various laryngeal mask airway devices (LMAs) to determine which ones can be used most efficiently in emergencies. Nine databases were searched, as follows: Cochrane Library Plus, MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), Dialnet, Global Health, Nursing & Allied Health Database, CUIDEN, the Web of Science, and ScienceDirect. We collected studies published between 2014 and 2019 in Spanish, English, French, and Portuguese that compared laryngeal tubes to LMAs of different types for supraglottic airway management. Eighteen studies were selected for analysis after critical reading. Significant differences were not seen between tubes and LMAs with respect to most variables, but in certain contexts the oropharyngeal seal and speed of insertion were superior with laryngeal tubes; however, when fiberoptic bronchoscopes were then inserted the view of the glottis was poor. The different contexts in which these devices are used and the scarcity of studies comparing laryngeal tubes to LMAs does not allow us to identify clear differences among them with respect to efficiency. However, tubes seem to offer poorer visibility of the glottis according to evaluation with fiberoptic scopes, a factor to bear in mind if tracheal intubation, which is considered the gold standard, might become necessary.