Search

Background: Recent studies showed that an early strategy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation resulted in reduction of VT episodes or mortality. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived border zone channel (BZC) mass has proved to be a strong non-invasive predictor of VT in post-myocardial infarction (MI). CMR-guided VT substrate ablation proved to be safe and effective for reducing sudden cardiac death (SCD) and VA occurrence. Methods: PREVENT-VT is a prospective, randomized, multicenter, and controlled trial designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic CMR-guided VT substrate ablation in chronic post-MI patients with CMR-derived arrhythmogenic scar characteristics. Chronic post-MI patients with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR will be evaluated. CMR images will be post-processed and the BZC mass measured: patients with a BZC mass > 5.15 g will be eligible. Consecutive patients will be enrolled at 3 centers and randomized on a 1:1 basis to undergo a VT substrate ablation (ABLATE arm) or optimal medical treatment (OMT arm). Primary prevention ICD will be implanted following guideline recommendations, while non-ICD candidates will be implanted with an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM). The primary endpoint is a composite outcome of sudden cardiac death (SCD) or sustained monomorphic VT, either treated by an ICD or documented with ICM. Secondary endpoints are procedural safety and efficiency outcomes of CMR-guided ablation. Discussion: In some patients, the first VA episode causes SCD or severe neurological damage. The aim of the PREVENT-VT is to evaluate whether primary preventive substrate ablation may be a safe and effective prophylactic therapy for reducing SCD and VA occurrence in patients with previous MI and high-risk scar characteristics based on CMR. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04675073, registered on January 1, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Techniques for catheter ablation have evolved to effectively treat a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Pre-operative electrocardiographic and cardiac imaging data are very useful in understanding the arrhythmogenic substrate and can guide mapping and ablation. In this review, we focus on best practices for catheter ablation, with emphasis on tailoring ablation strategies, based on the presence or absence of structural heart disease, underlying clinical status, and hemodynamic stability of the ventricular arrhythmia. We discuss steps to make ablation safe and prevent complications, and techniques to improve the efficacy of ablation, including optimal use of electroanatomical mapping algorithms, energy delivery, intracardiac echocardiography, and selective use of mechanical circulatory support. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Frequently, low voltage areas (LVAs) and diastolic potentials (DPs) are present at ablation sites in sinus rhythm in patients with idiopathic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs). Objective: Validate these findings as substrates for PVCs and evaluate the feasibility of a simplified substrate approach based on LVAs and DPs for ablation of idiopathic outflow tract PVCs, in patients with a low PVC burden during the procedure. Methods: Prospective single‐arm clinical trial at two centers with comparison with a historical group, matched to age and gender. The study group consisted of consecutive patients referred for ablation of frequent idiopathic PVCs with inferior axis, that presented with less than two PVCs/min in first 5 min of the procedure. The ablation was based on fast mapping of the right ventricular outflow tract in sinus rhythm looking for LVAs and DPs, defined as isolated small amplitude potentials occurring after the T wave of the surface echocardiogram. The area with LVAs and DPs was tagged, and a simplified activation mapping of the PVCs was done in that area. The procedure time, success rate, and recurrence rate were compared with the historical group in whom ablation was performed based on activation and pace mapping only. A validation group without PVCs was also studied to assess the prevalence of LVAs and DPs in the general population. Results: The study (n = 38), historical (n = 38), and validation (n = 38) groups did not differ in relation to age or gender. Prevalence of LVAs and DPs was significantly higher in the study group in comparison with the validation group, respectively, 71% versus 11%, p < 0.0001 and 87% versus 8%, p < 0.0001. Procedure time was significantly lower in the study group when comparing to the historical group, 130 (100–164) versus 183 (160–203) min, p < 0.0001 and the success rate was significantly higher, 90% versus 64%, p = 0.013. The recurrence rate in patients with a successful ablation was not significantly different between both groups, Log‐rank = 0.125. Conclusion: The prevalence of LVAs and DPs was significantly higher in the study group than in the validation group. The proposed approach proved to be feasible, faster, and more efficient than the historical approach. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) reduce ICD shocks, but the most effective approach remains uncertain.Objectives: This trial compares the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation vs AAD as first-line therapy in ICD patients with symptomatic ventricular tachycardias (VTs).Methods: The SURVIVE-VT (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial including patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and appropriated ICD shock. Patients were 1:1 randomized to complete endocardial substrate-based catheter ablation or antiarrhythmic therapy (amiodarone + beta-blockers, amiodarone alone, or sotalol ± beta-blockers). The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, unplanned hospitalization for worsening heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications.Results: In this trial, 144 patients (median age, 70 years; 96% male) were randomized to catheter ablation (71 patients) or AAD (73 patients). After 24 months, the primary outcome occurred in 28.2% of patients in the ablation group and 46.6% of those in the AAD group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.52; 95% CI: 0.30-0.90; P = 0.021). This difference was driven by a significant reduction in severe treatment-related complications (9.9% vs 28.8%, HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.13-0.71; P = 0.006). Eight patients were hospitalized for heart failure in the ablation group and 13 in the AAD group (HR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.23-1.35; P = 0.198). There was no difference in cardiac mortality (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.19-4.61; P = 0.929).Conclusions: In ICD patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and symptomatic VT, catheter ablation reduced the composite endpoint of cardiovascular death, appropriate ICD shock, hospitalization due to heart failure, or severe treatment-related complications compared to AAD. (Substrate Ablation vs Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy for Symptomatic Ventricular Tachycardia [SURVIVE-VT]: NCT03734562). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Radiofrequency ablation has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for scar-related ventricular arrhythmias (VA). Recent preliminary studies have shown that real time integration of late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) images with electroanatomical map (EAM) data may lead to increased procedure efficacy, efficiency, and safety.Methods: VOYAGE is a prospective, randomized, multicenter controlled open label study designed to compare in terms of efficacy, efficiency, and safety a CMR aided/guided workflow to standard EAM-guided ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Patients with an ICD or with ICD implantation expected within 1 month, with scar related VT, suitable for CMR and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) will be randomized to a CMR-guided or CMR-aided approach, whereas subjects unsuitable for imaging or with image quality deemed not sufficient for postprocessing will be allocated to standard of care ablation. Primary endpoint is defined as VT recurrences (sustained or requiring appropriate ICD intervention) during 12 months follow-up, excluding the first month of blanking period. Secondary endpoints will include procedural efficiency, safety, impact on quality of life and comparison between CMR-guided and CMR-aided approaches. Patients will be evaluated at 1, 6 and 12 months.Discussion: The clinical impact of real time CMR-guided/aided ablation approaches has not been thoroughly assessed yet. This study aims at defining whether such workflow results in more effective, efficient, and safer procedures. If proven to be of benefit, results from this study could be applied in large scale interventional practice. Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04694079, registered on January 1, 2021. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Atypical atrial flutter usually occurs in the setting of prior ablation or cardiac surgery where iatrogenic scares serve as the electrophysiologic substrate for re-entry. Idiopathic atypical atrial flutter is an uncommon variant. Whether the standard anatomical or substrate ablation approach is the best treatment option for this type of arrhythmia remains a debate1,2. Case report: A middle-aged female patient with a history of ischemic heart disease and percutaneous coronary intervention, ICD implantation for secondary prevention, and no prior history of atrial fibrillation, cardiac surgery, or ablation presented with new onset persistent atrial flutter (Figure 1). An electrophysiology study was conducted with entrainment suggesting atypical atrial flutter from the left atrium. 3-dimensional mapping of the left atrium using the Carto 3 system and multipolar catheter (Biosense Webster) was performed, showing a scar with the zone of slow conduction (critical isthmus) on the anterior wall near the roof and the left superior pulmonary vein (Figure 2). Ablation of critical isthmus terminated tachycardia (Figure 3). A few additional lesions for substrate ablation were applied avoiding linear anatomical lines. After ablation, tachycardia was non-inducible. Conclusion: There are still no clear recommendations regarding ablation of atypical atrial flutter and our case highlights the need for an individual approach when considering between anatomical or substrate ablation approaches, thus potentially avoiding excessive ablation lines. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: It has not been fully elucidated which patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF) should undergo substrate ablation plus pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). This study aimed to identify PerAF patients who required substrate ablation using intraprocedural assessment of the baseline rhythm and the origin of atrial fibrillation (AF) triggers., Methods and results: This was a post hoc subanalysis using extended data of the EARNEST-PVI trial, a prospective multicenter randomized trial comparing PVI-alone and PVI-plus (i.e., PVI with added catheter ablation) arms. We divided 492 patients into 4 groups according to baseline rhythm and the location of AF triggers before PVI: Group A (n=22), sinus rhythm with pulmonary vein (PV)-specific AF triggers (defined as reproducible AF initiation from PVs only); Group B (n=211), AF with PV-specific AF triggers; Group C (n=94), sinus rhythm with no PV-specific AF trigger; Group D (n=165), AF with no PV-specific AF trigger. Among the 4 groups, only in Group D (AF at baseline and no PV-specific AF triggers) was arrhythmia-free survival significantly lower in the PVI-alone than PVI-plus arm (P=0.032; hazard ratio 1.68; 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.70)., Conclusions: Patients with sinus rhythm or PV-specific AF triggers did not receive any benefit from substrate ablation, whereas patients with AF and no PV-specific AF trigger benefited from substrate ablation.

In patients with structural heart disease and ventricular tachycardia (VT) undergoing catheter ablation, the response to programmed electrical stimulation (PES) at the end of the procedure has been traditionally used to evaluate the acute success and predict long-term outcomes. Although noninducibility at PES has been extensively investigated and validated in clinical trials and large multicenter registries, its performance in predicting long-term freedom from VT is suboptimal. In addition, PES has inherent limitations related to the influence of background antiarrhythmic drug therapy, periprocedural use of anesthesia, and the heterogeneity in PES protocols. The increased utilization of substrate-based ablation approaches that focus on ablation of abnormal electrograms identified with mapping in sinus or paced rhythm has been paralleled by a need for additional procedural endpoints beyond VT noninducibility at PES. This article critically appraises the relative merits and limitations of different procedural endpoints according to different ablation techniques for catheter ablation of scar-related VT., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Funded in part by the William and Kristin Loomis Donation to the Cleveland Clinic Electrophysiology Research Fund. Dr Santangeli is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Abbott, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Defining diastolic slow-conduction channels within the borderzone (BZ) of scar-dependent re-entrant ventricular tachycardia (VT) is key for effective mapping and ablation strategies. Understanding wavefront propagation is driving advances in high-density (HD) mapping. The newly developed Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter (HD GRID) has equidistant spacing of 16, 1 mm electrodes in a 4 × 4 3 mm interspaced arrangement allowing bipolar recordings along and uniquely across the splines (orthogonal vector) to facilitate substrate mapping in a WAVE configuration (WAVE). The purpose of this study was to determine the relative importance of the WAVE configuration compared to the STANDARD linear-only bipolar configuration (STANDARD) in defining VT substrate.Methods: Thirteen patients underwent VT ablation at our institution. In all cases, a substrate map was constructed with the HD GRID in the WAVE configuration (conWAVE) to guide ablation strategy. At the end of the procedure, the voltage map was remapped in the STANDARD configuration (conSTANDARD) using the turbo-map function. Detailed post-hoc analysis of the WAVE and STANDARD maps was performed blinded to the configuration. Quantification of total scar area, BZ and dense scar area with assessment of conduction channels (CC) was performed.Results: The substrate maps conSTANDARD vs conWAVE showed statistically significant differences in the total scar area (56 ± 32 cm2 vs 51 ± 30 cm2; p = 0.035), dense scar area (36 ± 25 cm2 vs 29 ± 22 cm2; p = 0.002) and number of CC (3.3 ± 1.6 vs 4.8 ± 2.5; p = 0.026). conWAVE collected more points than the conSTANDARD settings (p = 0.001); however, it used fewer points in map construction (p = 0.023).Conclusions: The multipolar Advisor™ HD Grid Mapping Catheter in conWAVE provides more efficient point acquisition and greater VT substrate definition of the borderzone particularly at the low-voltage range compared to conSTANDARD. This greater resolution within the low-voltage range facilitated CC definition and quantification within the scar, which is essential in guiding the ablation strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precision Cardiology is a targeted strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment that accounts for individual variability. Computational heart modeling is one of the novel approaches that have been developed under the umbrella of Precision Cardiology. Personalized computational modeling of patient hearts has made strides in the development of models that incorporate the individual geometry and structure of the heart as well as other patient‐specific information. Of these developments, one of the potentially most impactful is the research aimed at noninvasively predicting the targets of ablation of lethal arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia (VT), using patient‐specific models. The approach has been successfully applied to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy in proof‐of‐concept studies. The goal of this paper is to review the strategies for computational VT ablation guidance in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, from model developments to the intricacies of the actual clinical application. To provide context in describing the road these computational modeling applications have undertaken, we first review the state of the art in VT ablation in the clinic, emphasizing the benefits that personalized computational prediction of ablation targets could bring to the clinical electrophysiology practice. This article is characterized under: Analytical and Computational Methods > Computational Methods Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Organ, Tissue, and Physiological Models Translational, Genomic, and Systems Medicine > Translational Medicine [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endo-epicardial radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of ventricular tachycardia (VT) as a first-line strategy has been shown to improve outcomes. This study sought to evaluate the feasibility and validity of open-chest epicardial and transapical endocardial substrate ablation for VT with left ventricular aneurysm (LVA) applying to routine cardiac surgery. Methods: Porcine models of LVA with VT were developed and were divided into a study group (RFCA from the epicardium via direct-view and endocardium via transapical access) and a control group (endocardial RFCA via retrograde transaortic access). Substrate-based mapping and ablation targeting abnormal potentials were performed under thoracotomy. Outcomes, including procedural success and acute freedom from VT, were analysed. Results: Twenty-four of 35 (68.57%) acute myocardial infarction (AMI) pigs developed LVA with VT in a 6-week survival period and were randomly divided into a study group (n=12) and a control group (n=12). All animals in the study group successfully underwent endocardial mapping and ablation by transapical access. The scar size of the endocardium and the left ventricular chamber volume were similar in the two groups. Acute freedom from VT in the study group was remarkably superior to that in the control group (88.33% vs. 58.33%, p=0.04). Conclusions: Combined, direct epicardial and transapical endocardial substrate mapping and ablation appeared to be feasible and effective for treating VT with LVA under thoracotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients with transmural myocardial infarction (MI) who undergo endocardial-only substrate ablation are at increased risk for ventricular tachycardia recurrence. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (LGE-CMR) can be used to assess infarct transmurality (IT). However, the degree of IT associated with an epicardial arrhythmogenic substrate (AS) has not been determined.Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of IT observed by LGE-CMR and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) that predicts the presence of epicardial AS.Methods: The study included 38 post-MI patients. Ten patients with a subendocardial infarction underwent endocardial-only mapping, and 28 with a classic transmural MI (C-TMI), defined as hyperenhancement ≥75% of myocardial wall thickness (WT), underwent endo-epicardial mapping. LGE-CMR/MDCT data were registered to high-density endocardial or epicardial maps to be analyzed for the presence of AS.Results: Of the 28 post-MI patients with C-TMI, 18 had epicardial AS (64%) and 10 (36%) did not. An epicardial scar area ≥14 cm2 on LGE-CMR identified patients with epicardial AS (sensitivity 1, specificity 1). Mean WT in the epicardial scar area in these patients was lower than in patients without epicardial AS (3.14 ± 1.16 mm vs 5.54 ± 1.78 mm; P = .008). A mean WT cutoff value ≤3.59 mm identified patients with epicardial AS (sensitivity 0.91, specificity 0.93).Conclusion: An epicardial scar area ≥14 cm2 on LGE-CMR and mean CT-WT ≤3.59 mm predict epicardial AS in post-MI patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation is based on detailed electroanatomical maps (EAM). This study analyses whether high-density multielectrode mapping (MEM) is superior to conventional point-by-point mapping (PPM) in guiding VT substrate ablation procedures.Methods and results: This was a randomized controlled study (NCT02083016). Twenty consecutive ischemic patients undergoing VT substrate ablation were randomized to either group A [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by PPM (Navistar) and secondly by MEM (PentaRay) ablation guided by PPM] or group B [n = 10; substrate mapping performed first by MEM and second by PPM ablation guided by MEM]. Ablation was performed according to the scar-dechanneling technique. Late potential (LP) pairs were defined as a Navistar-LP and a PentaRay-LP located within a three-dimensional distance of ≤ 3 mm. Data obtained from EAM, procedure time, radiofrequency time, and post-ablation VT inducibility were compared between groups. Larger bipolar scar areas were obtained with MEM (55.7±31.7 vs. 50.5±26.6 cm2; P = 0.017). Substrate mapping time was similar with MEM (19.7±7.9 minutes) and PPM (25±9.2 minutes); P = 0.222. No differences were observed in the number of LPs identified within the scar by MEM vs. PPM (73±50 vs. 76±52 LPs per patient, respectively; P = 0.965). A total of 1104 LP pairs were analysed. Using PentaRay, far-field/LP ratio was significantly lower (0.58±0.4 vs. 1.64±1.1; P = 0.01) and radiofrequency time was shorter [median (interquartile range) 12 (7-20) vs. 22 (17-33) minutes; P = 0.023]. No differences were observed in VT inducibility after procedure.Conclusion: MEM with PentaRay catheter provided better discrimination of LPs due to a lower sensitivity for far-field signals. Ablation guided by MEM was associated with a shorter radiofrequency time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Identification of local abnormal electrograms (EGMs) during ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (VTSA) is challenging when they are hidden within the far-field signal. This study analyses whether the response to a double ventricular extrastimulus during substrate mapping could identify slow conducting areas that are hidden during sinus rhythm.Methods and results: Consecutive patients (n = 37) undergoing VTSA were prospectively included. Bipolar EGMs with >3 deflections and duration <133 ms were considered as potential hidden slow conduction EGMs (HSC-EGM) if located within/surrounding the scar area. Whenever a potential HSC-EGM was identified, a double ventricular extrastimulus was delivered. If the local potential delayed, it was annotated as HSC-EGM. The incidence of HSC-EGM in core, border-zone, and normal-voltage regions was determined. Ablation was delivered at conducting channel entrances and HSC-EGMs. VT inducibility after VTSA obtained was compared with data from a historic control group. 2417 EGMs were analyzed. 575 (23.7%) qualified as potential HSC-EGM, and 198 of them were tagged as HSC-EGMs. Scars in patients with HSC-EGMs (n = 21, 56.7%) were smaller (35.424.7 vs 67.639.1 cm2; P = 0.006) and more heterogeneous (core/scar area ratio 0.250.2 vs 0.450.19; P = 0.02). 28.8% of HSC-EGMs were located in normal-voltage tissue; 81.3% were targeted for ablation. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis needed less radiofrequency time (17.411 vs 2310.7 minutes; P = 0.016) and had a lower rate of VT inducibility after VTSA than the historic controls (24.3% vs 50%; P = 0.018).Conclusion: Ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating HSC analysis allowed further arrhythmic substrate identification (especially in normal-voltage areas) and reduced RF time and VT inducibility after VTSA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could enable major advantages when guiding in real-time cardiac electrophysiology procedures offering high-resolution anatomy, arrhythmia substrate, and ablation lesion visualization in the absence of ionizing radiation. Over the last decade, technologies and platforms for performing electrophysiology procedures in a CMR environment have been developed. However, performing procedures outside the conventional fluoroscopic laboratory posed technical, practical and safety concerns. The development of magnetic resonance imaging compatible ablation systems, the recording of high-quality electrograms despite significant electromagnetic interference and reliable methods for catheter visualization and lesion assessment are the main limiting factors. The first human reports, in order to establish a procedural workflow, have rationally focused on the relatively simple typical atrial flutter ablation and have shown that CMR-guided cavotricuspid isthmus ablation represents a valid alternative to conventional ablation. Potential expansion to other more complex arrhythmias, especially ventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation, would be of essential impact, taking into consideration the widespread use of substrate-based strategies. Importantly, all limitations need to be solved before application of CMR-guided ablation in a broad clinical setting., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors have no conflicts to disclose., (©The Author(s) 2023. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Functional substrate mapping during baseline rhythm can identify arrhythmogenic tissue during ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation. Wall thinning and wall thickness channels (WTCs) derived from computed tomography angiography have been shown to correlate with low voltage and VT isthmuses. The correlation between functional substrate mapping, wall thinning, and WTCs in patients with infarct- or non-infarct-related cardiomyopathies (ICM and NICM, respectively) has not been previously described., Objectives: The purpose of this study was to correlate cardiac CTA-derived myocardial wall thinning with functional VT substrate mapping using isochronal late activation mapping., Methods: In 34 patients with ICM or NICM undergoing VT ablation who had a preprocedure computed tomography angiography, myocardial wall thinning was segmented in layers of 1 to 5 mm. Areas of wall thinning and WTCs were then spatially correlated with deceleration zones (DZs) from registered left ventricular endocardial isochronal late activation maps., Results: In 21 ICM patients and 13 NICM patients, ICM patients had greater surfaces areas of wall thinning (P < 0.001). In ICM patients, 94.1% of primary DZs were located on areas of wall thinning, compared to 20% of DZs in NICM patients overall but 50% if there was any wall thinning present. Fifty-nine percent of DZs in ICM patients and 56% of DZs in NICM patients were located near WTCs. The positive predictive value for WTC in localizing DZs was 22.5% and 37.8% in ICM and NICM patients, respectively., Conclusions: Wall thinning is highly sensitive for functional substrate in ICM patients. WTCs had modest sensitivity for functional substrate but low positive predictive value for identifying DZs in ICM and NICM patients. These findings suggest that wall thinning may facilitate more efficient mapping in ICM patients, but WTCs are insufficient to localize wavefront discontinuities., Competing Interests: Funding support and author disclosures Dr Maher has received consulting honoraria from Biosense Webster, Inc. Ms Tracey is an employee of Biosense Webster, Inc. Dr Waks is on the advisory board for HeartCor Solutions. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The role and optimal sequence of ventricular tachycardia (VT) induction, mapping, and ablation when combined with substrate modification is unclear.Objective: The purpose of this study was to test the benefits of starting the scar-related VT ablation procedure with substrate modification vs the standard protocol of VT induction, mapping, and ablation as the first step.Methods: Forty-eight consecutive patients with structural heart disease and clinical VTs were randomized to simplified substrate ablation procedure with scar dechanneling as the first step (group 1, n = 24) or standard procedure with VT induction, mapping, and ablation followed by scar dechanneling (group 2, n = 24). Procedure and fluoroscopy times, the need for external cardioversion, acute results, and VT recurrence during follow-up were compared between groups.Results: Thirty-seven patients had ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 nonischemic cardiomyopathy, and 1 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Before substrate ablation, 32 VTs were induced and targeted for ablation in 23 patients of group 2. Procedure time (209 ± 70 minutes vs 262 ± 63 minutes; P = .009), fluoroscopy time (14 ± 6 minutes vs 21± 9 minutes; P = .005), and electrical cardioversion (25% vs 54%; P = .039) were lower in group 1. After substrate ablation, 16 patients (66%) of group 1 and 12 patients (50%) of group 2 were noninducible (P = .242). End-procedure success (after residual inducible VT ablation) was achieved in 87.5% and 70.8% of patients, respectively (P = .155). There were no differences in VT recurrence rate between groups during a mean follow-up of 22 ± 14 months (log rank, P = .557).Conclusion: VT induction and mapping before substrate ablation prolongs the procedure, radiation exposure, and the need for electrical cardioversion without improving acute results and long-term ablation outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A 69-year-old male with dilated non-ischemic cardiomyopathy and history of sustained monomorphic VT (SMVT) underwent an unsuccessful VT substrate ablation due to the proximity of the earliest activation site to the conduction system. A second attempt was performed using an ablation catheter with mini-electrodes (ME) and multiple extrastimuli to unveil hidden slow conduction (HSC) sites, allowing the performance of a successful ablation. No SMVT was induced thereafter. ME-obtained electrograms permit to accurately localize areas of HSC sites within ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrates. In our case, this allowed safe ablation during sinus rhythm to eliminate the VT substrate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia worldwide and represents a heterogeneous disorder with a complex pathological basis. While significant technological advances have taken place over the last decade in the field of catheter ablation of AF, response to ablation varies and long-term success rates in those with persistent AF remain modest. Mechanistic studies have highlighted potentially different sustaining factors for AF in the persistent AF population with substrate-driven focal and re-entrant sources in the body of the atria identified on invasive and non-invasive mapping studies. Translation to clinical practice, however, remains challenging and the application of such mapping techniques to clinical ablation has yet to demonstrate a significant benefit beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone in the persistent AF cohort. Recent advances in catheter and ablation technology have centered on improving the durability of ablation lesions at index procedure and although encouraging results have been demonstrated with early studies, large-scale trials are awaited. Further meaningful improvement in clinical outcomes in the persistent AF population requires ongoing advancement in the understanding of AF mechanisms, coupled with continuing progress in catheter technology capable of delivering durable transmural lesions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The electrophysiology-guided noninvasive cardiac radioablation, also known as STAR (stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation) is an emerging treatment method for persistent ventricular tachycardia. Since its first application in 2012 in Stanford Cancer Institute, and a year later in University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic, the authors from all around the world have published case reports and case series, and several prospective trials were established. In this article, we would like to discuss the available clinical evidence, analyze the potentially clinically relevant differences in methodology, and address some of the unique challenges that come with this treatment method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Precision Cardiology is a targeted strategy for cardiovascular disease prevention and treatment that accounts for individual variability. Computational heart modeling is one of the novel approaches that have been developed under the umbrella of Precision Cardiology. Personalized computational modeling of patient hearts has made strides in the development of models that incorporate the individual geometry and structure of the heart as well as other patient-specific information. Of these developments, one of the potentially most impactful is the research aimed at noninvasively predicting the targets of ablation of lethal arrhythmia, ventricular tachycardia (VT), using patient-specific models. The approach has been successfully applied to patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy in proof-of-concept studies. The goal of this paper is to review the strategies for computational VT ablation guidance in ischemic cardiomyopathy patients, from model developments to the intricacies of the actual clinical application. To provide context in describing the road these computational modeling applications have undertaken, we first review the state of the art in VT ablation in the clinic, emphasizing the benefits that personalized computational prediction of ablation targets could bring to the clinical electrophysiology practice. This article is characterized under: Analytical and Computational Methods > Computational Methods Models of Systems Properties and Processes > Organ, Tissue, and Physiological Models Translational, Genomic, and Systems Medicine > Translational Medicine., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objectives: This study assessed the feasibility and potential benefit of performing ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate ablation procedures guided by cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived pixel signal intensity (PSI) maps., Background: CMR-aided VT ablation using PSI maps from late gadolinium enhancement-CMR (LGE-CMR), together with electroanatomical map (EAM) information, has been shown to improve outcomes of VT substrate ablation., Methods: Eighty-four patients with scar-dependent monomorphic VT who underwent substrate ablation were included in the study. In the last 28 (33%) consecutive patients, the procedure was guided by CMR. Procedural data, as well as acute and follow-up outcomes, were compared between patients who underwent guided CMR and 2 control groups: 1) patients who had PSI maps were available but the EAM was acquired and used to select the ablation targets (CMR aided); and 2) patients with no CMR-derived PSI maps available (no CMR)., Results: Mean procedure duration was lower in CMR-guided substrate ablation compared with CMR-aided and no CMR (107 ± 59 min vs. 203 ± 68 min and 227 ± 52 min; p < 0.001 for both comparisons). CMR-guided ablation required less fluoroscopy time than CMR-aided ablation and no CMR (10 ± 4 min vs. 23 ± 11 min and 20 ± 9 min, respectively; p < 0.001 for both comparisons) and less radiofrequency time (15 ± 8 min vs. 20 ± 15 min and 26 ± 10 min; p = 0.16 and p < 0.001, respectively). After substrate ablation, VT inducibility was lower in CMR-guided ablation compared with CMR-aided ablation and no CMR (18% vs. 32% and 46%; p = 0.35 and p = 0.04, respectively), without significant differences in complications. After 12 months, VT recurrence was lower in those who underwent CMR-guided ablation compared with no CMR (log-rank: 0.019), with no differences with CMR-aided ablation., Conclusions: CMR-guided VT ablation is feasible and safe, significantly reduces the procedural, fluoroscopy, and radiofrequency times, and is associated with a higher noninducibility rate and lower VT recurrence after substrate ablation., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to determine whether ablation of hidden substrate unmasked by right ventricular extrastimulation (RVE) improves ablation outcome of post-myocardial infarction (MI) ventricular tachycardia (VT)., Background: In patients with small or nontransmural scars after MI, part of the VT substrate may be functional and, in addition, masked by high-voltage far-field signals arising from adjacent normal myocardium., Methods: In 60 consecutive patients, systematic analysis of electrograms recorded from the presumed infarct area was performed during sinus rhythm, RV pacing at 500 ms, and during a short-coupled RV extrastimulus. Sites showing low-voltage, near-field potentials with evoked conduction delay in response to RVE were targeted., Results: In 37 (62%) patients, ablation target sites located in areas with normal voltage during sinus rhythm were unmasked by RVE (hidden substrate group). These patients had better left ventricular function (36 ± 11% vs. 26 ± 12%; p = 0.003), smaller electroanatomical scars (<1.5 mV), and smaller dense scars (<0.5 mV) (median 59 and 14 cm 2 vs. 82 and 44 cm 2 ; p = 0.044 and p = 0.003) than did those in whom no hidden substrate was identified (overt substrate group). During a median follow-up of 16 months, 13 (22%) patients had VT recurrence. Patients with hidden substrate had a lower incidence of VT recurrence (12-month VT-free survival 89% vs. 50% in patients with overt substrate; p = 0.005). Compared with a historical cohort of 90 post-MI patients matched for left ventricular function and electroanatomical scar area, in whom no RVE was performed, patients in the hidden substrate group had a higher 1-year VT-free survival (89% vs. 73%; p = 0.039)., Conclusions: Hidden substrate ablation unmasked by RVE improves ablation outcome in post-MI patients with small or nontransmural scars., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The authors conducted a multicenter study of decrement-evoked potential (DEEP)-based functional ventricular tachycardia (VT) substrate modification to evaluate if such a mechanistic and physiological strategy is feasible and efficient in clinical practice and provides reduction in the VT burden., Background: Only a fraction of the myocardium targeted in current VT substrate modification procedures is involved in the initiation and perpetuation of VT. The physiological basis of the DEEP strategy for identification of areas of initiation and maintenance of VT was recently established., Methods: We included 20 consecutive patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. During substrate mapping, fractionated and late potentials (LPs) were tagged, and an extra stimulus was performed to determine which LPs displayed decrement (DEEPs). All patients underwent DEEP-focused ablation: elimination of DEEP + further radiofrequency (RF) if VT was still inducible. Patients were followed during 6 months., Results: Patients were predominantly male (95%), and their mean age was 64.6 ± 17.1 years. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 33.4 ± 11.4%. Mean ablation time was 30.6 ± 20.4 min. Specificity of DEEPs to detect the isthmus of VT was better than that of LPs (0.97 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95 to 0.98] vs. 0.82 [95% CI: 0.73 to 0.89]), without significant differences in terms of sensitivity (0.61 [95% CI: 0.52 to 0.69] vs. 0.60 [95% CI: 0.44 to 0.74], respectively). Fifteen of 20 (75%) patients were free of any VT after DEEP-RF at 6 months of follow-up and there was a strong reduction in VT burden compared to 6 months pre-ablation., Conclusions: In a multicenter prospective study, DEEP substrate mapping identified the functional substrate critical to the VT circuit with high specificity. DEEP-guided VT ablation, by its physiological nature, may enable greater access to focused ablation therapy for patients requiring VT treatment., (Copyright © 2018 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: Identification of local abnormal electrograms (EGMs) during ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation (VTSA) is challenging when they are hidden within the far-field signal. This study analyses whether the response to a double ventricular extrastimulus during substrate mapping could identify slow conducting areas that are hidden during sinus rhythm., Methods and Results: Consecutive patients (n = 37) undergoing VTSA were prospectively included. Bipolar EGMs with >3 deflections and duration <133 ms were considered as potential hidden slow conduction EGMs (HSC-EGM) if located within/surrounding the scar area. Whenever a potential HSC-EGM was identified, a double ventricular extrastimulus was delivered. If the local potential delayed, it was annotated as HSC-EGM. The incidence of HSC-EGM in core, border-zone, and normal-voltage regions was determined. Ablation was delivered at conducting channel entrances and HSC-EGMs. VT inducibility after VTSA obtained was compared with data from a historic control group. 2417 EGMs were analyzed. 575 (23.7%) qualified as potential HSC-EGM, and 198 of them were tagged as HSC-EGMs. Scars in patients with HSC-EGMs (n = 21, 56.7%) were smaller (35.424.7 vs 67.639.1 cm2; P = 0.006) and more heterogeneous (core/scar area ratio 0.250.2 vs 0.450.19; P = 0.02). 28.8% of HSC-EGMs were located in normal-voltage tissue; 81.3% were targeted for ablation. Patients undergoing VTSA incorporating HSC analysis needed less radiofrequency time (17.411 vs 2310.7 minutes; P = 0.016) and had a lower rate of VT inducibility after VTSA than the historic controls (24.3% vs 50%; P = 0.018)., Conclusion: Ventricular tachycardia substrate ablation incorporating HSC analysis allowed further arrhythmic substrate identification (especially in normal-voltage areas) and reduced RF time and VT inducibility after VTSA., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2016. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: The aim of this paper was to investigate the prevalence of resting and exercise-induced left atrial hypertension (LAH) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), association of the LAH with other cardiac abnormalities, and its implications for AF catheter ablation., Background: The clinical role of LAH in patients with established AF is largely unknown., Methods: Patients scheduled for catheter ablation of AF (n = 240; age 60 ± 10 years; 67% men, 62% paroxysmal AF) underwent detailed echocardiography, assessment of quality of life (QoL), left atrial (LA) voltage mapping, and measurement of the LA pressure at rest and during isometric handgrip exercise. After ablation they were followed for AF recurrence for 16 ± 6 months., Results: Resting and exercise-induced LAH (mean LA pressure >15 mm Hg) occurred in 15% and 34% of the patients, respectively. Both the patients with resting and exercise-induced LAH had typical features of latent heart failure with preserved ejection fraction associated with advanced LA structural and functional remodeling. AF recurred after ablation in 45% of the patients. LAH was an independent risk factor for arrhythmia recurrence (hazard ratio: 1.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.2 to 2.2). The patients with LAH had worse baseline QoL, but they benefited significantly more from a successful ablation than the patients without LAH., Conclusions: Presence of either resting or exercise-induced LAH identified AF patients with a distinct clinical profile, extensive LA substrate, and different clinical response to catheter ablation. Stratification of AF patients based on the LA exercise hemodynamics could help in the future to tailor the ablation strategy., (Copyright © 2017 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Surviving myocytes within scar may form channels that support ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits. There are little data on the properties of channels that comprise VT circuits and those that are non-VT supporting channels., Methods and Results: In 22 patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy and VT, high-density mapping was performed with the PentaRay catheter and Ensite NavX system during sinus rhythm. A channel was defined as a series of matching pace-maps with a stimulus (S) to QRS time of ≥40 ms. Sites were determined to be part of a VT channel if there were matching pace-maps to the VT morphology. This was confirmed with entrainment mapping when possible. Of the 238 channels identified, 57 channels corresponded to an inducible VT. Channels that were part of a VT circuit were more commonly located within dense scar than non-VT channels (97% versus 82%; P=0.036). VT supporting channels were of greater length (mean±SEM, 53±5 versus 33±4 mm), had higher longest S-QRS (130±12 versus 82±12 ms), longer conduction time (103±14 versus 43±13 ms), and slower conduction velocity (0.87±0.23 versus 1.39±0.21 m/s) than non-VT channels (P<0.001). Of all the fractionated, late, and very late potentials located in scar, only 21%, 26%, and 29%, respectively, were recorded within VT channels., Conclusions: High-density mapping shows substantial differences among channels in ventricular scar. Channels supporting VT are more commonly located in dense scar, longer than non-VT channels, and have slower conduction velocity. Only a minority of scar-related potentials participate in the VT supporting channels.