Search

Acute Severe Ulcerative Colitis (ASUC) is a severe form of ulcerative colitis relapse which requires hospitalization and intensive medical intervention to avoid colectomy. The timely recognition of patients at risk of corticosteroid failure and the early initiation of medical rescue therapy are paramount in the management of ASUC. The choice of medical rescue therapy is influenced by multiple factors, especially patient's prior treatment history. This decision should involve the patient and ideally a multidisciplinary team of healthcare professionals, including gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons and enterostomal therapists. Although several predictive models have been developed to predict corticosteroid failure in ASUC, there is no single validated tool that is universally utilized. At present, infliximab and cyclosporine are the only agents systematically evaluated and recommended for medical rescue therapy, with recent reports of off-label utilization of tofacitinib and upadacitinib in small case series. The available evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these oral small molecules for ASUC is insufficient to provide definitive recommendations. Early decision-making to assess the response to medical rescue therapy is essential, and the decision to pursue surgery in the case of treatment failure should not be delayed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). Methods The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). Results Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-β and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-β (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-β tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). Conclusions For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). GVHD is characterized as either acute or chronic based on symptomatology and histopathological findings. Despite advancements in disease-targeting therapeutics, steroid-refractory GVHD remains a significant contributor to mortality inHSCT recipients, highlighting the gaps in our understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment strategies. We present the case of a 46-year-old woman diagnosed with acute undifferentiated leukemia, who exhibited persistently elevated levels of serum total bilirubin (T.Bili), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and liver function tests (LFTs) beginning on [day +201] posthaploidentical peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. The patient received fludarabine/total body irradiation (Flu/TBI) as a myeloablative conditioning regimen and post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/ Tac/MMF)asGVHDprophylaxis.Aliver biopsyconfirmedthediagnosis ofGVHD,while other possible etiologieswere excluded by corresponding tests. Initial treatment with prednisone and tacrolimus, and the later addition of ruxolitinib, all showed poor response indicated by worsening T.Bili, ALP, and LFTs at the same time. Based on a multidisciplinary comprehensive assessment,we decided to administer 1,000mg/m2 (1,600 mg) of cyclophosphamide ("pulse Cy"), which resulted in a dramatic improvement in T.Bili and transaminases starting from the very next day. A durable response to pulse cyclophosphamide was observed, as all indicators normalized ("complete response") within 55 days without relapses. The patient remains in good health with no recurrence of hepaticGVHD. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which Grade IV hepatic GVHD, refractory to multiple agents including steroids, tacrolimus, and ruxolitinib, demonstrated a complete response to pulse cyclophosphamide. The success highlights the potential therapeutic role of cyclophosphamide, a potent and cost-effective chemotherapy agent, in treating multi-agent-refractory GVHD. Large-scale clinical trials are warranted to validate its efficacy in this setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Extracorporal Photophoresis (ECP) is in clinical use for steroidrefractory and steroid-dependent acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD). Based on recent Phase-III study results, ruxolitinib has become the new standard of care for SRaGVHD. Our aim was to collect comparative data between ruxolitinib and ECP in SR-aGVHD in order to improve the evidence base for clinical decision making. Methods: We asked EBMT centers if they were willing to participate in this study by completing a data form (Med-C) with detailed information on GVHD grading, -therapy, -dosing, -response and complications for each included patient. Results: 31 centers responded positively (14%) and we included all patients receiving alloSCT between 1/2017-7/2019 and treated with ECP or ruxolitinib for SR-aGVHD grades II-IV from these centers. We identified 53 and 40 patients with grades II-IV SR-aGVHD who were treated with ECP and ruxolitinib, respectively. We performed multivariate analyses adjusted on grading and type of SR-aGVHD (steroid dependent vs. refractory). At day+90 after initiation of treatment for SR-aGVHD we found no statistically significant differences in overall response. The odds ratio in the ruxolitinib group to achieve overall response vs. the ECP group was 1.13 (95% CI = [0.41; 3.22], p = 0.81). In line, we detected no statistically significant differences in overall survival, progressionfree survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence. Discussion: The clinical significance is limited by the retrospective study design and the current data can’t replace prospective studies on ECP in SR-aGVHD. However, the present results contribute to the accumulating evidence on ECP as an effective treatment option in SR-aGVHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis. Methods We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1–2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1–10) in adults and 7 (2–11) in children. Results The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–55%) in adults and 64% (45–80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38–56%), 35% (27–44%) and 30% (22–39%) for adults, and 59% (40–74%), 42% (24–58%) and 35% (19–53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months). Conclusion A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD.

Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication in patients receiving allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). GVHD is characterized as either acute or chronic based on symptomatology and histopathological findings. Despite advancements in disease-targeting therapeutics, steroid-refractory GVHD remains a significant contributor to mortality in HSCT recipients, highlighting the gaps in our understanding of its pathophysiology and treatment strategies. We present the case of a 46-year-old woman diagnosed with acute undifferentiated leukemia, who exhibited persistently elevated levels of serum total bilirubin (T.Bili), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and liver function tests (LFTs) beginning on [day +201] post-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplantation. The patient received fludarabine/total body irradiation (Flu/TBI) as a myeloablative conditioning regimen and post-transplant cyclophosphamide/tacrolimus/mycophenolate mofetil (PTCy/Tac/MMF) as GVHD prophylaxis. A liver biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of GVHD, while other possible etiologies were excluded by corresponding tests. Initial treatment with prednisone and tacrolimus, and the later addition of ruxolitinib, all showed poor response indicated by worsening T.Bili, ALP, and LFTs at the same time. Based on a multidisciplinary comprehensive assessment, we decided to administer 1,000 mg/m2 (1,600 mg) of cyclophosphamide (“pulse Cy”), which resulted in a dramatic improvement in T.Bili and transaminases starting from the very next day. A durable response to pulse cyclophosphamide was observed, as all indicators normalized (“complete response”) within 55 days without relapses. The patient remains in good health with no recurrence of hepatic GVHD. To our knowledge, this is the first case in which Grade IV hepatic GVHD, refractory to multiple agents including steroids, tacrolimus, and ruxolitinib, demonstrated a complete response to pulse cyclophosphamide. The success highlights the potential therapeutic role of cyclophosphamide, a potent and cost-effective chemotherapy agent, in treating multi-agent-refractory GVHD. Large-scale clinical trials are warranted to validate its efficacy in this setting.

IntroductionExtracorporal Photophoresis (ECP) is in clinical use for steroid-refractory and steroid-dependent acute GVHD (SR-aGVHD). Based on recent Phase-III study results, ruxolitinib has become the new standard of care for SR-aGVHD. Our aim was to collect comparative data between ruxolitinib and ECP in SR-aGVHD in order to improve the evidence base for clinical decision making. MethodsWe asked EBMT centers if they were willing to participate in this study by completing a data form (Med-C) with detailed information on GVHD grading, -therapy, -dosing, -response and complications for each included patient.Results31 centers responded positively (14%) and we included all patients receiving alloSCT between 1/2017-7/2019 and treated with ECP or ruxolitinib for SR-aGVHD grades II-IV from these centers. We identified 53 and 40 patients with grades II-IV SR-aGVHD who were treated with ECP and ruxolitinib, respectively. We performed multivariate analyses adjusted on grading and type of SR-aGVHD (steroid dependent vs. refractory). At day+90 after initiation of treatment for SR-aGVHD we found no statistically significant differences in overall response. The odds ratio in the ruxolitinib group to achieve overall response vs. the ECP group was 1.13 (95% CI = [0.41; 3.22], p = 0.81). In line, we detected no statistically significant differences in overall survival, progression-free survival, non-relapse mortality and relapse incidence.DiscussionThe clinical significance is limited by the retrospective study design and the current data can’t replace prospective studies on ECP in SR-aGVHD. However, the present results contribute to the accumulating evidence on ECP as an effective treatment option in SR-aGVHD.

Background: Patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD) not tolerating/responding to ruxolitinib (RR-aGvHD) have a dismal prognosis. Methods: We retrospectively assessed real-world outcomes of RR-aGvHD treated with the random-donor allogeneic MSC preparation MSC-FFM, available via Hospital Exemption in Germany. MSC-FFM is provided as frozen cell dispersion for administration as i.v. infusion immediately after thawing, at a recommended dose of 1–2 million MSCs/kg body weight in 4 once-weekly doses. 156 patients, 33 thereof children, received MSC-FFM; 5% had Grade II, 40% had Grade III, and 54% had Grade IV aGvHD. Median (range) number of prior therapies was 4 (1–10) in adults and 7 (2–11) in children. Results: The safety profile of MSC-FFM was consistent with previous reports for MSC therapies in general and MSC-FFM specifically. The overall response rate at Day 28 was 46% (95% confidence interval [CI] 36–55%) in adults and 64% (45–80%) in children; most responses were durable. Probability of overall survival at 6, 12 and 24 months was 47% (38–56%), 35% (27–44%) and 30% (22–39%) for adults, and 59% (40–74%), 42% (24–58%) and 35% (19–53%) for children, respectively (whole cohort: median OS 5.8 months). Conclusion: A recent real-world analysis of outcomes for 64 adult RR-aGvHD patients not treated with MSCs reports survival of 20%, 16% and 10% beyond 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively (median 28 days). Our data thus suggest effectiveness of MSC-FFM in RR-aGvHD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a pillar of treatment for numerous cancers with increasing use in combination with other ICIs and in earlier stages of disease treatment. Although effective, ICI use is accompanied by a milieu of potentially bothersome or even life-threatening toxicities known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), necessitating careful monitoring and early intervention. In this review, we provide an overview of recent advances surrounding toxicity pathophysiology and treatment in the context of relevant organ systems. An emphasis on current treatments by toxicity, as well as updates on steroid-refractory toxicities, chronic toxicities, and biomarkers will be a focus of this update on the current understanding of irAEs. ICI toxicities are a major limitation on the deployment of multi-agent ICI regimens and are thus a major priority to understand, treat, and prevent. Recent developments have led to greater understanding of the pathophysiology of these events, which may lead to improved prevention or mitigation strategies. Further, early studies have also suggested steroid-sparing approaches that may be useful. Ultimately, preventing and managing irAEs will be a key goal toward successful ICI treatment across a broader range of patients with cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic steroids are still the first-line approach in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and the backbone of chronic GvHD management. Refractoriness to steroid represent a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In both backgrounds, several second-line immunosuppressive agents have been tested with variable results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Solid evidence regarding these approaches is still lacking in the pediatric setting where results are mainly derived from adult experiences. Furthermore, the number of treated patients is limited and the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD is lower, resulting in a very heterogeneous approach to this complication by pediatric hematologists. Some conventional therapies and anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies used in the adult setting have been evaluated in children. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of GvHD justified the efforts toward the adoption of targeted therapies and non-pharmacologic approaches, with higher response rates and lower immunosuppressive effects. Moreover, many questions regarding the precise timing and setting in which to integrate these new approaches remain unanswered. This Review aims to critically explore the current evidence regarding novel approaches to treat SR-GvHD in pediatric HSCT recipients.

Checkpoint inhibitor-induced steroid-refractory (sr) and steroid-dependent (sd) immune-related adverse events (irAE) account for about 11 % of irAE. Although these patients face worse outcomes due to irAE mortality and/or sustained immunosuppression, which impairs anti-tumor response, there is no established second-line treatment based on prospective trial data. This prospective comparative study investigates outcomes of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), an immunomodulating therapy, versus second-line immunosuppressants (SLI) in sr/sd-irAE. The primary endpoint was longitudinal change in immunophenotype; secondary endpoints were outcome of irAE and tumor response. Patient demographics, quality of life (EORTC QLQ-C30; global health status (GHS/QoL)) and longitudinal blood samples were analyzed at baseline; in weeks 1, 4, 8, and 12. At interim analysis, 21 patients (11 ECP, 10 SLI) with 7 different sr/sd-irAE were included. Compared with the SLI group, the ECP group demonstrated a higher clinical response rate of irAE (93 % vs. 80 %; 95 % CI 0.83–1.92; P = 0.54) and a better GHS/QoL score throughout all follow-up visits. ECP patients showed a numerically higher overall survival (23 vs. 12 months; 95 % CI 0.02–3.02; P = 0.27) and lower cancer progression rates (33 % vs. 67 %; 95 % CI 0.09–1.60; P = 0.52). Immunophenotyping revealed changes in immune cell populations and the regulation of immune checkpoints. There were no significant safety issues in either treatment group. This prospective comparative study supports the clinical efficacy of ECP in the treatment of sr/sd-irAE in comparison to the SLI cohort. Thus, ECP represents a potential treatment option for this indication, given its good safety profile while maintaining anti-tumor response. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05700565 , https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05700565. • Steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events (sr-irAE) are a clinical challenge. • Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is effective for sr-irAE and improves QoL. • Preserved anti-tumor effect with longer overall survival compared to immunosuppression. • Immune modulation with ECP is a novel option for treating sr-irAE in tumor patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Immune therapy has ushered in a new era of tumor treatment, at the expense of immune-related adverse events, including rare but fatal adverse cardiovascular events, such as myocarditis. Steroids remain the cornerstone of therapy for immune-related myocarditis, with no clear consensus on additional immunosuppressive treatment for steroid-refractory cases yet. Case report: Here, we report a patient with stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma who developed immune-related myocarditis in the fourth course of therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patient presented with precordial discomfort with elevation of cardiac enzymes and interleukin-6, atypical electrocardiographic abnormalities, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Coronary computed tomography angiography excluded the possibility of acute coronary syndrome. The therapy with tofacitinib targeting the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signal pathway was successfully conducted, since there was no significant improvement in troponin under high-dose steroid and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. The patient recovered without major adverse cardiac events during hospitalization. Discussion: The safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in a patient with steroidrefractory immune-related myocarditis were investigated, hoping to provide a basis for prospective therapeutic strategies. Tofacitinib led to remarkable remissions in primary autoimmune disease by blocking the inflammatory cascade, indicating its potential therapeutic use in immune-related adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: Despite known short-term mortality risk of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) pneumonitis, its impact on 1-year mortality, long-term pulmonary function, symptom persistence, and radiological resolution remains unclear., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 71 nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with anti-PD(L)1 monoclonal antibodies between 2018-2021, who developed pneumonitis. Clinical and demographic covariates were collected from electronic medical record. Cox regression assessed associations with mortality, while logistic regression evaluated associations with persistent symptoms, hypoxemia, and radiological resolution., Results: Steroid-refractory pneumonitis (hazard ratio [HR] = 15.1, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]:3.9-57.8, P < .0001) was associated with higher 1-year mortality compared to steroid-responsive cases. However, steroid-resistant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.4, 95% CI: 0.4-5.1, P = .58) and steroid-dependent (OR = 0.4, 95% CI: 0.1-1.2, P = .08) pneumonitis were not. Nonadenocarcinoma histology (OR = 6.7, 95% CI: 1.6-46.6, P = .01), grade 3+ pneumonitis (OR = 4.6, 95% CI: 1.3-22.7, P = .03), and partial radiological resolution (OR = 6.3, 95% CI: 1.8-23.8, P = .004) were linked to increased pulmonary symptoms after pneumonitis resolution. Grade 3+ pneumonitis (OR = 8.1, 95% CI: 2.3-31.5, P = .001) and partial radiological resolution (OR = 5.45, 95% CI: 1.29-37.7, P = .03) associated with residual hypoxemia. Nonadenocarcinoma histology (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.01-17.6, P = .06) and pretreatment ILAs (OR = 4.8, 95% CI: 1.14-33.09, P = .05) were associated with partial radiological resolution., Conclusions: Steroid refractory pneumonitis increases 1-year mortality in NSCLC patients. Pretreatment ILAs may signal predisposition to fibrosis-related outcomes, seen as partial resolution, which in turn is associated with postresolution symptoms and residual hypoxemia. These findings offer insights for identifying patients at risk of adverse outcomes post-pneumonitis resolution., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Idiopathic Pneumonia Syndrome (IPS) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is a life-threatening complication with high morbidity and mortality. IPS is thought to arise from damage caused by various inflammatory mediators. This study assesses the effectiveness of Ruxolitinib, a Janus Kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor that blocks cytokine production, in combination with corticosteroids (CS) for managing IPS after allo-HSCT, compared to the conventional use of CS alone in a case series and a systematic review of previously published literature., Methods: The study includes a retrospective case series of three patients treated for IPS with Ruxolitinib and CS from the University of Kansas Medical Center and a systematic review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement 2020 guidelines. The systematic review encompassed seven studies involving 346 cases including three cases from the case series. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS v.25., Results: The case series included three patients with IPS after allo-HSCT who received ruxolitinib and CS with favorable results. All patients showed substantial improvement with no IPS-associated mortality. Two of the three patients in the case series were discharged on a 2 L nasal cannula, which was later discontinued during follow-up visits, while the third was discharged on room air. There was marked improvement observed on the computed tomography (CT) following the use of ruxolitinib. Of the total 346 cases included in the systematic review, the median age was 46.6 years (Range 5-72), and 62 % were males. The primary disorders were acute leukemia (52 %), chronic myeloid leukemia (12 %), myelodysplastic syndrome (11 %), Lymphoma (10 %), and others (21 %). Stem cell sources were peripheral blood (45 %), bone marrow (49 %), and cord blood (6 %). Donor types involved match unrelated (55 %), match related (36 %), and mismatched related (4.5 %). Most patients received myeloablative conditioning (81 %). Acute GVHD was observed in 47 %, and chronic GVHD in 38 %. The primary treatment was CS (96 %), with limited use of ruxolitinib (1 %) and etanercept (9.5 %). The mortality rate was 63.3 %, whereas in our case series with the use of ruxolitinib, it was zero., Conclusion: The combination of Ruxolitinib and CS for treating IPS post-allo-HSCT suggested promising results in the case series, with favorable response and improved survival by blocking the cytokine production contributing to IPS. The significant mortality difference in the systematic review supports the need for innovative treatment approaches, highlighting the potential role of Ruxolitinib in CS-refractory cases. Despite the positive outcomes in the case series, the absence of randomized controlled trials emphasizes the necessity for further research., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest No relevant conflict of interest. NA has advisory role in Bristol Myers Squibb and consulting role with Kite/Gilead. SHA has consulting role with Incyte, and research funding from CSL Behring and Miltenyi Biotec. JPM has consulting and advisory role in Bristol Myers Squibb, Kite, Novartis, AlloVir, Envision, Autolus, Nektar Therapeutics, CRISPR therapeutics, Caribou Bio, Sana Technologies, Legend Biotech, and Cargo Therapeutics. MUM has research funding from Iovance Biotherapeutics. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Late acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) with little data regarding treatment and outcomes. There is no standard treatment for gastrointestinal (GI) late aGVHD, especially for steroid-refractory (SR) GI late aGVHD. Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting the migration of both naive and activated lymphocytes into the GI endothelium, has been verified to be effective for SR GI aGVHD., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical efficacy and safety of vedolizumab as the second line for SR GI late aGVHD in seven patients after allo-HSCT., Results: Four patients received two doses of vedolizumab infusion, while three patients received only one dose of vedolizumab infusion. The complete response and partial response rates were 57.1% (4/7) and 42.9% (3/7), respectively. No patient progressed to chronic GVHD during the period of follow-up. There was no severe adverse event related to vedolizumab., Conclusion: Our data suggest that vedolizumab is expected to ameliorate SR GI late aGVHD. Further data on the treatment timing, efficacy, and safety of vedolizumab are warranted in prospective clinical trials., Competing Interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest., (© The Author(s), 2024.)

Steroid-refractory (SR) acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major cause of mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ruxolitinib plus basiliximab for treating SR-aGVHD after unrelated cord blood transplantation (UCBT). Among the 1154 patients with hematological malignancies who underwent UCBT between February 2014 and May 2022, 198 patients with grade II to IV SR-aGVHD were enrolled, 112 of whom were treated with basiliximab alone (basiliximab group) and 86 of whom received basiliximab plus ruxolitinib (combined therapy group). The combined therapy group demonstrated a significantly higher complete response rate (CRR) on day 28 (36.0%) than did the basiliximab group (12.5%, P < .001). SR-aGVHD patients were further stratified into standard-risk and high-risk groups using the refined Minnesota aGVHD risk score. For standard-risk patients, combined therapy significantly improved the CRR (51.1% versus 13.6%, P < .001) and 3-year overall survival (74.5% versus 52.4%, P = .033). However, high-risk patients did not exhibit the same benefits. Compared with basiliximab monotherapy, ruxolitinib plus basiliximab therapy was an effective therapy for patients with standard-risk SR-aGVHD following UCBT. The effectiveness of combined therapy in high-risk patients was not apparent, indicating the need for other treatments., (Copyright © 2024 The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Cong Wei,1,&ast; Xiaoting Zhang,1,&ast; Dan Liang,1 Jilong Yang,1 Jingwen Du,1 Chunyan Yue,1 Lan Deng1,2 1Department of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Lan DengDepartment of Hematology, Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200011, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 13724862939Email denglan_76@126.comChunyan YueDepartment of Hematology, Zhujiang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510280, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +86 15521117300Email doctor_yy@126.comBackground: Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a main complication following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and is a leading cause of non-relapse-related death. Unsatisfactory response to standard first-line therapy with glucocorticoids is a predictor of a poor prognosis in patients with GVHD. Ruxolitinib is a selective Janus kinases 1/2 inhibitor which has been shown to control acute (a) and chronic (c) GVHD while maintaining graft-versus-tumor effects.Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ruxolitinib in the treatment of steroid-refractory GVHD (SR-GVHD) in a population of Chinese patients.Methods: We report the results of 55 patients, including 23 patients with aGVHD and 32 patients with cGVHD, who were treated with ruxolitinib as salvage therapy between August, 2017 and December, 2020.Results: In patients with aGVHD, the overall response rate (ORR) was 86.9%, and the 1-year overall survival (OS) was 82.6% (95% CI, 67.1– 98.1%). The 1-year OS was significantly improved in responders than in non-responders (90.0% vs 33.3%, P=0.004). In patients with cGVHD, the ORR was 78.1%, and the 1-year OS was 81.3% (95% CI, 67.8– 94.8%). There was no significant difference in the 1-year OS between responders and non-responders (84.0% vs 71.4%, P=0.327). Cytopenia, cytomegalovirus-reactivation and infections were common adverse events, particularly in patients with aGVHD.Conclusion: Our real-world data from Chinese patients further confirm that ruxolitinib is a safe and effective treatment for SR-GVHD.Keywords: ruxolitinib, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, graft-versus-host disease, steroid-refractory

IntroductionImmune therapy has ushered in a new era of tumor treatment, at the expense of immune-related adverse events, including rare but fatal adverse cardiovascular events, such as myocarditis. Steroids remain the cornerstone of therapy for immune-related myocarditis, with no clear consensus on additional immunosuppressive treatment for steroid-refractory cases yet.Case reportHere, we report a patient with stage IV nasopharyngeal carcinoma who developed immune-related myocarditis in the fourth course of therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The patient presented with precordial discomfort with elevation of cardiac enzymes and interleukin-6, atypical electrocardiographic abnormalities, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Coronary computed tomography angiography excluded the possibility of acute coronary syndrome. The therapy with tofacitinib targeting the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription signal pathway was successfully conducted, since there was no significant improvement in troponin under high-dose steroid and intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. The patient recovered without major adverse cardiac events during hospitalization.DiscussionThe safety and efficacy of tofacitinib in a patient with steroid-refractory immune-related myocarditis were investigated, hoping to provide a basis for prospective therapeutic strategies. Tofacitinib led to remarkable remissions in primary autoimmune disease by blocking the inflammatory cascade, indicating its potential therapeutic use in immune-related adverse events.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated promising therapeutic outcomes in treating a variety of malignancies, but immune-related adverse events (irAE) may develop. Among all the irAE, immune-related pneumonitis was relatively common and life-threatening. High-dose corticosteroid was recommended for the initial management, but a part of patients developed steroid-refractory pneumonitis. Other immunosuppressants were recommended, but the optimal treatment is still controversial. Here, we report two cases of steroid-refractory immune-related pneumonitis who were successfully treated with pulse corticosteroid therapy. Case 1 was hepatocellular carcinoma treated with nivolumab for 5 months. She developed acute respiratory distress syndrome due to grade 4 immune- related pneumonitis that was refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/day treatment. Methylprednisolone 500 mg for 3 days followed by 2 mg/kg/day steroid as maintenance therapy was given. Subsequently, her pneumonitis was regressed, and the endotracheal tube was successfully removed on day 9 after the start of pulse therapy. Case 2 presented with grade 4 immune-related pneumonitis in spite the use of methylprednisolone 1 mg/kg for his skin rash. Pulse corticosteroid therapy was prescribed, then his pneumonitis was completely regressed on day 12. In this report, we demonstrated the potential role of pulse corticosteroid therapy for steroid- refractory pneumonitis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SRGVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68-0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40-0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10-0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45-0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31-0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SRcGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I-IV) and severe (grades III-IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%-90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0-100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%-44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0-27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%-75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%-100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%-90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%-82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We aimed to identify the characteristics of immune reconstitution (IR) in patients who recovered from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) after basiliximab treatment. A total of 179, 124, 80, and 92 patients were included in the analysis for IR at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively, after haploidentical donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). We observed that IR was fastest for monocytes and CD8+ T cells, followed by lymphocytes, CD3+ T cells, and CD19+ B cells and slowest for CD4+ T cells. Almost all immune cell subsets recovered comparably between patients receiving <5 doses and =5 doses of basiliximab. Most immune cell subsets recovered comparably between SR-aGVHD patients who recovered after basiliximab treatment and event-free HID HSCT recipients. Patients who recovered from SR-aGVHD after basiliximab treatment experienced satisfactory IR, which suggested that basiliximab may not have prolonged the negative impact on IR in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Incidence of ulcerative colitis (UC) in children has increased worldwide. Objectives: In the current study, we summarized our clinical experience using infliximab (IFX) in the treatment of children with steroid-refractory UC. Methods: The clinical data of 9 steroid-refractory UC patients with average age of 8 years who were treated with IFX in our hospital were analyzed. Results: At the end of the induction period, 6 achieved a clinically significant response. Of the 6 children, 4 had mucosal healing and 2 had endoscopic remission. At week 30, among the 6 children who achieved a clinically significant response, 3 had persistent clinical remission and mucosal healing, 1 achieved mucosal healing from endoscopic remission, 1 had mild disease, and the other child had not reached 30 weeks of treatment as of this writing. At week 54, 6 of 9 children achieved clinical remission and 5 had mucosal healing. The hemoglobin concentration in the children who achieved a clinically significant response was higher than pre-treatment and the inflammation markers were lower than pre-treatment. During IFX treatment, five children had a loss of response, three had a primary non-response, and two had a secondary non-response. The latter children achieved clinical remission with optimized treatment. Conclusions: IFX is a salvage treatment option for children with moderate-to-severe steroid-refractory UC. The course of treatment and the timing of drug withdrawal warrants further study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ruxolitinib is an important treatment for steroid refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). Therefore, we reported the updated results of a systematic review and meta-analysis of ruxolitinib as treatment for SR-GVHD. In addition, we wanted to compare the efficacy and safety between children and adults with SR-GVHD. Overall response rate (ORR) after ruxolitinib treatment was chosen as the primary end point. Complete response rate (CRR), infection, myelosuppression, and overall survival (OS) were chosen as secondary end points. A total of 37 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and 1,580 patients were enrolled. ORR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.77 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68–0.84] and 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74–0.81), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. CRR at any time after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.40–0.57) and 0.15 (95% CI: 0.10–0.23), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The ORRs at any time after treatment was highest in mouth SR-cGVHD, followed by skin, gut, joints and fascia, liver, eyes, esophagus, and lung SR-cGVHD. The incidence rate of infections after ruxolitinib treatment was 0.61 (95% CI: 0.45–0.76) and 0.47 (95% CI: 0.31–0.63), respectively, for SR-aGVHD and SR-cGVHD. The incidence rates of overall (grades I–IV) and severe (grades III–IV) cytopenia were 53.2% (95% CI: 16.0%–90.4%) and 31.0% (95% CI: 0.0–100.0%), respectively, for SR-aGVHD, and were 28.8% (95% CI:13.0%–44.6%) and 10.4% (95% CI: 0.0–27.9%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The probability rate of OS at 6 months after treatment was 63.9% (95% CI: 52.5%–75.2%) for SR-aGVHD. The probability rates of OS at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment were 95% (95% CI: 79.5%–100.0%), 78.7% (95% CI: 67.2%–90.1%), and 75.3% (95% CI: 68.0%–82.7%), respectively, for SR-cGVHD. The ORR, CRR, infection events, and myelosuppression were all comparable between children and adults with SR-GVHD. In summary, this study suggests that ruxolitinib is an effective and safe treatment for SR-GVHD, and both children and adults with SR-GVHD could benefit from ruxolitinib treatment.

Immune checkpoint blockade has demonstrated durable clinical benefits in a variety of malignancies. These immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) produce unwanted autoimmune reactions due to an impaired self-tolerance. Hematologic immune-related adverse events (heme-irAEs) have been increasingly reported in the literature with a reported fatality rate of 12%. In this review, we illustrate 3 cases treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital for ICI-induced agranulocytosis, aplastic anemia, and thrombocytopenia. We then summarize the available evidence regarding the incidence and prevalence of heme-irAEs. We identified immune thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia as the most commonly reported heme-irAEs which are more commonly observed with nivolumab therapy. Median time to onset of heme-irAEs varies between patients but occurs earlier with CTLA-4 inhibitors than with anti-PD-L1/PD-1 agents. We also describe the current challenges regarding the recurrence of heme-irAEs despite immune checkpoint blockade termination. We provide the available evidence supporting a mixed T-cell and B-cell immune-mediated response. Finally, we review the treatment algorithm of these complications and provide treatment alternatives to steroid-refractory cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Corticosteroid is first-line therapy in immune thrombocytopenia. However, nearly 30% of patients appear in steroid-resistance. Our research analyses the relevant indicators of patients and develops a risk prediction model to predict the poor response to steroid-therapy in ITP patients. We collected data from 111 ITP patients admitted to Xiamen University Zhongshan Hospital from 2013 to 2019 as the training cohort and 65 ITP patients during 2019–2020 as the external validation cohort. Screening significant factors(P < 0.05) in univariate analysis, and further identified to be independent variables in multivariable logistic regression analysis. Incorporated the significant risk factors in and presented them with a nomogram based on independent risk predictors. The nomogram was assessed by receiver operating characteristics curves and decision curve analysis. We constructed a steroid-resistance prediction model based on the potential predictors including age, serum ferritin and expression of HBsAg. As a result, based on the area under the ROC curves, the training cohort (AUC: 0.718, 95% CI: 0.615–0.821) and the external validation cohort (AUC:0.799,95%CI:0.692–0.905), which displayed good discrimination. The decision curve showed that predicting the steroid-refractory risk in ITP patients using this nomogram with a range of the threshold probability between >16% and <70%. The nomogram appears good performance in predicting steroid-refractory ITP patients. Prediction model shows that elder patients with a high level of ferritin and positive expression of HBsAg may appear a high possibility of steroid-resistance. For these patients, TPO-RAs can be considered to help patients to get better treatment effects and develop a better health-related quality of life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become one of the cornerstones of current oncology treatment, and immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myocarditis (IRM) is the most fatal of all immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events (irAEs). Methylprednisolone pulse therapy (500-1,000 mg/day) is the initial treatment for IRM recommended by almost all relevant guidelines. However, subsequent treatment regimens remain unclear for patients who do not respond to methylprednisolone pulse therapy (who are defined as steroid-refractory patients). We propose a potential treatment approach for steroid-refractory IRM., Methods: The PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were searched using keywords related to IRM. Relevant English-language articles published from January 2000 to February 2024 were included in this narrative review., Key Content and Findings: Abatacept is the preferred choice for the treatment of isolated steroid-refractory IRM. For rapidly progressive or interleukin-6 abnormally elevated steroid-refractory IRM, alemtuzumab or tocilizumab/tofacitinib are the preferred therapeutic agents, respectively. For steroid-refractory IRM comorbid with myositis or comorbid with myasthenia gravis, abatacept + ruxolitinib/mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)/intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), or MMF + pyridostigmine/IVIG are the preferred therapeutic agents, respectively., Conclusions: The pathogenesis of steroid-refractory IRM and the treatment regimen remain unclear. A large number of studies need to be conducted to validate or update our proposed treatment approach., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://cdt.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/cdt-24-114/coif). Y.W. and Q.W. report that they are now employees of Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2024 Cardiovascular Diagnosis and Therapy. All rights reserved.)

We conducted a multicenter interventional study to assess the efficacy of Therakos ECP to treat steroid‐resistant graft‐vs‐host disease (SRes‐GVHD) after allogeneic HSCT and to identify biomarkers of GVHD response. A total of 62 patients were treated for acute SRes‐GVHD (n = 37) or chronic SRes‐GVHD (n = 25). Median time to best response was 35 days (range, 28‐85) and 90 days (range, 27‐240) in acute and chronic SRes‐GVHD, respectively. Overall, 27 patients (72.9%) with SRes‐aGVHD responded to treatment (40.5% CR and 32.4% PR). The response rate was significantly higher in grade I‐II than in grade III‐IV aGVHD (100% vs 50.0%, respectively, P‐value =.001). In chronic SRes‐GVHD, 22 patients (88%) achieved a clinical response (24.0% CR and 64% PR). Response was higher in moderate than in severe SRes‐cGVHD (100% vs 75%, P =.096). In both acute and chronic SRes‐GVHD patients, the percentage of peripheral blood CD3+CD4+ was higher and CD3+CD8+ lower in responding than nonresponding patients. Acute SRes‐GVHD responding patients presented a higher number of Treg cells (CD4+CD25+CD127low/−) at day 0 (P =.028) than nonresponding patients, differences that were maintained over the observation period. Phenotypic analysis of T‐cell maturation showed a trend toward reduction in TCD8 naive cells, along with an increased percentage of TCD8 Mem Efect T cells after starting ECP in responding patients. None of the studied serum cytokines displayed statistically significant changes in either acute or chronic SRes‐GVHD. ECP is an effective treatment for patients with SRes‐GVHD. Biomarkers could help guide decision‐making on ECP treatment initiation and duration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroid is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, but its response rate is only approximately 50%. At present, no uniformly accepted treatment for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) is available. Blocking interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2Rs) on donor T cells using pharmaceutical antagonists alleviates SR-aGVHD. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four commercially available IL-2R antagonists (IL-2RAs) in SR-aGVHD treatment. A total of 31 studies met the following inclusion criteria (1): patients of any race, any sex, and all ages (2); those diagnosed with SR-aGVHD after HSCT; and (3) those using IL-2RA-based therapy as the treatment for SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74–0.87)] and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56–0.82), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39–0.68) and denileukin diftitox 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35–0.76). The complete response rate (CRR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42–0.68) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.29–0.56), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16–0.51) and denileukin diftitox 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24–0.52). The ORR and CRR were better after 1-month treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab than after treatment with inolimomab and denileukin diftitox. The incidence of the infection was higher after inolimomab treatment than after treatment with the other IL-2RAs. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs varied. The response rate of basiliximab was the highest, followed by that of daclizumab. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is a major complication after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Corticosteroid is the first-line treatment for aGVHD, but its response rate is only approximately 50%. At present, no uniformly accepted treatment for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD) is available. Blocking interleukin-2 receptors (IL-2Rs) on donor T cells using pharmaceutical antagonists alleviates SR-aGVHD. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of four commercially available IL-2R antagonists (IL-2RAs) in SR-aGVHD treatment. A total of 31 studies met the following inclusion criteria (1): patients of any race, any sex, and all ages (2); those diagnosed with SR-aGVHD after HSCT; and (3) those using IL-2RA-based therapy as the treatment for SR-aGVHD. The overall response rate (ORR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.81 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.74–0.87)] and 0.71 (95% CI: 0.56–0.82), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.54 (95% CI: 0.39–0.68) and denileukin diftitox 0.56 (95% CI: 0.35–0.76). The complete response rate (CRR) at any time after treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.42–0.68) and 0.42 (95%CI: 0.29–0.56), respectively, which was better than that of inolimomab 0.30 (95% CI: 0.16–0.51) and denileukin diftitox 0.37 (95% CI: 0.24–0.52). The ORR and CRR were better after 1-month treatment with basiliximab and daclizumab than after treatment with inolimomab and denileukin diftitox. The incidence of the infection was higher after inolimomab treatment than after treatment with the other IL-2RAs. In conclusion, the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs varied. The response rate of basiliximab was the highest, followed by that of daclizumab. Prospective, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the efficacy and safety of different IL-2RAs.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) induce adverse events (irAEs) that do not respond to steroids, i.e. steroid-refractory (sr) irAEs, and irAEs in which steroids cannot be tapered, i.e. steroid-dependent (sd) irAEs, in about 10% of cases. An evidence-based analysis of the effectiveness of second-line immunosuppressive agents with regard to irAE and tumor control is lacking. The international web-based Side Effect Registry Immuno-Oncology (SERIO; http://serio-registry.org) is a collaborative initiative with the Paul-Ehrlich-Institute to document rare, severe, complex or therapy-refractory immunotherapy-induced side effects. The registry was queried on August 1, 2023 for cases of irAEs which were treated with second-line therapies. From a total of 1330 cases, 217 patients (16.3%) received 249 second‐line therapies. A total of 19 different second-line therapies were employed, including TNF-alpha antagonists (46.5%), intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG; 19.1%), mycophenolate mofetil (15.9%), and methotrexate (3.6%). Therapy choices were determined by the type of irAE. The time to onset of sr-/sd-irAEs after ICI initiation did not consistently differ from steroid-responsive irAEs. While 74.3% of sr-/sd-irAEs resolved and 13.1% had improved, 4.3% persisted, 3.9% resulted in permanent sequelae, and 4.3% in death with ongoing symptoms. Infliximab exhibited potential for earlier symptom improvement compared to mycophenolate mofetil or IVIG. Tumor response in patients with second-line treated sd-/sr-irAE was similar to patients with irAEs treated with steroids only. Several second-line therapies are effective against sr-/sd-irAEs, the second-line therapies show no clear negative impact on tumor response, and infliximab shows potential for faster improvement of symptoms. However, prospective comparative data are needed. • Steroid-refractory immune-related adverse events pose a clinical challenge. • Analysis of the SERIO-registry: 19 different second-line therapies were used. • Therapy choice was determined by the type of immune-related adverse event. • Similar onset of steroid-responsive and steroid-refractory irAEs. • Similar tumor responses in second-line treated and steroid-only treated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anemia associated with Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is usually hemolytic and regenerative. Cases of non-regenerative pure red cell aplasia are rare, and typically improve upon drug discontinuation and after corticotherapy. We herein report a case of nivolumab-related erythroblastopenia refractory to steroids in a melanoma patient that improved only after treatment with cyclosporin. Nivolumab had been well tolerated for 2 months after being introduced as an adjuvant treatment. Hemoglobin level then progressively decreased from 12.7 g/dl as baseline value to a nadir of 4.3 g/dL despite transfusion with a total of 29 packed red blood cells in 3 months. Extensive workup including repeated bone marrow examinations led to the diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. Anemia persisted despite nivolumab discontinuation and over a month of corticotherapy, but improved dramatically 3 days after cyclosporin initiation and did not recur upon cyclosporin tapering. The patient remains cancer-free 9 months after nivolumab withdrawal. This case highlights the under-recognized risk of erythroblastopenia in patients treated with ICI and proves cyclosporin is a valid alternative for the treatment of steroid-refractory cases.

Background: In steroid-refractory acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), cyclosporine (CYS) or infliximab (IFX) may be considered as a second-line alternative to avoid colectomy. There are short-term data reported, but until now, there is no meta-analysis regarding long-term outcomes of CYS and IFX in patients with ASUC.Aim: To compare long-term efficacy and safety of CYS and IFX in a meta-analysis.Methods: Three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for studies which compared CYS vs. IFX in adults with ASUC. Long-term colectomy-free rate from 1 to 10 years during CYS or IFX therapy was collected, last updated up to 22nd May 2019. Primary outcome was long-term colectomy-free rate, secondary outcomes were adverse events (AE), serious adverse events (SAE), and mortality. Long-term colectomy-free survival and safety measures were pooled with the random-effect model. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.Results: Data from 1,607 patients in 15 trials were extracted. In the first 3 years, pooled OR for colectomy-free survival was higher with IFX than with CYS (OR = 1.59, 95% CI: 1.11–2.29, p = 0.012; OR = 1.57, 95% CI: 1.14–2.18, p = 0.006; and OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 1.08–2.84, p = 0.024; at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). However, the significant difference remained undetected from the fourth year of follow-up and in subgroup of RCTs (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 0.90–2.01, p = 0.143; OR = 1.41, 95% CI: 0.94–2.12, p = 0.096; and OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 0.89–2.00, p = 0.157; at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). No significant difference was detected regarding adverse events, serious adverse events and mortality between the groups. The neutral associations proved to be underpowered with trial sequential analysis.Conclusion: However observational studies show IFX as a better choice, according to the RCTs, choosing either CYS or IFX as rescue therapy for ASUC, the long-term outcomes are not different, although further large RCTs are warranted.

Introduction. Steroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (srGVHD) is one of the most severe and life-threatening complications of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Currently, there is no standard treatment for this complication. In addition, there is no data on the pharmacoeconomics of various methods in the Russian Federation. The objective is to compare the effectiveness and cost of treatment of acute and chronic srGVHD, as well as the use of different approaches in therapy. Material and methods. We have conducted a pilot study in 12 srGVHD patients treated with ruxolitinib and in 24 patients of wellmatched historical control, who treated with etanercept for the acute srGVHD and with extracorporeal photopheresis for chronic srGVHD. Results. The 6-month therapy of acute GVHD was associated with significantly higher cost than therapy of chronic GVHD (4.138±2.672 vs 1.862±1.122 thd. rub., р=0.004). The major factors driving up the costs were bacterial infections (р=0.022), opportunistic viral infections (р

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related pneumonitis is a relatively rare but clinically serious and potentially life-threatening adverse event. The majority of cases can be managed by drug discontinuation, with the administration of corticosteroids added in severe cases. However, worsening of pneumonitis can develop in a subset of patients despite treatment with high doses of corticosteroids. We herein report a case of steroid-refractory ICI-related pneumonitis in a recurrent non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient treated with pembrolizumab that was successfully improved by triple combination therapy (high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide). After 3 weeks of initial pembrolizumab administration, the patient was diagnosed with ICI-related pneumonitis. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed patchy distributed bilateral consolidation and ground-glass opacities (GGOs) with traction bronchiectasis and bronchiolectasis resembling the diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) radiographic pattern. Although methylprednisolone pulse therapy was initiated, worsening of respiratory failure resulted in the patient being transferred to the intensive care unit. Because of an insufficient therapeutic response to high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus and cyclophosphamide pulse therapy were additively performed as triple combination therapy according to the treatment strategy for pulmonary complications of clinically amyopathic dermatomyositis (CADM). In response to this triple combination therapy, the patient's respiratory condition gradually improved, and chest CT showed the marked amelioration of pulmonary opacities. This is the first report suggesting the efficacy of triple combination therapy (high-dose corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide) for steroid-refractory ICI-related pneumonitis complicated with respiratory failure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anemia associated with Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is usually hemolytic and regenerative. Cases of non-regenerative pure red cell aplasia are rare, and typically improve upon drug discontinuation and after corticotherapy. We herein report a case of nivolumab-related erythroblastopenia refractory to steroids in a melanoma patient that improved only after treatment with cyclosporin. Nivolumab had been well tolerated for 2 months after being introduced as an adjuvant treatment. Hemoglobin level then progressively decreased from 12.7 g/dl as baseline value to a nadir of 4.3 g/dL despite transfusion with a total of 29 packed red blood cells in 3 months. Extensive workup including repeated bone marrow examinations led to the diagnosis of pure red cell aplasia. Anemia persisted despite nivolumab discontinuation and over a month of corticotherapy, but improved dramatically 3 days after cyclosporin initiation and did not recur upon cyclosporin tapering. The patient remains cancer-free 9 months after nivolumab withdrawal. This case highlights the under-recognized risk of erythroblastopenia in patients treated with ICI and proves cyclosporin is a valid alternative for the treatment of steroid-refractory cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Satohiro Matsumoto, Haruna Kawamura, Takeshi Nishikawa, Noriyoshi Sagihara, Hiroyuki Miyatani, Hirosato Mashima Department of Gastroenterology, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Saitama, Japan Background and aims: At Saitama Medical Center, for remission induction in active ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with endoscopic evidence of severe disease, we tend to preferentially use tacrolimus (TAC) over anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-a agents. We conducted this study to evaluate the validity of our therapeutic strategies. Patients and methods: This retrospective study was conducted in 52 steroid-refractory active UC patients with a Clinical Activity Index (CAI) score of ≥7 who were receiving remission induction therapy with TAC or anti-TNF-a agents. The patients were divided into a TAC treatment group (TAC group, n = 29) and an anti-TNF-a agent treatment group (anti-TNF group, n = 23). The CAI, Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and incidence of events (relapse, hospitalization and surgery) were retrospectively analyzed. Results: At treatment initiation, the CAI score was 12.6 in the TAC group and 11.5 in the anti-TNF group (P = 0.09), while the corresponding values of the UCEIS were 6.5 and 5.1, respectively (P = 0.0035). The clinical remission rate at 12 weeks was 55% (65% when only the subgroup that received rapid induction therapy was included in the analysis) in the TAC group and 57% in the anti-TNF group, with no significant difference. The cumulative event-free rates at 1, 6 and 12 months were 65.5%, 39.4%, and 39.4%, respectively, in the TAC group and 95.7%, 77.2% and 71.7%, respectively, in the anti-TNF group (P = 0.0037). Conclusion: Rapid induction therapy with TAC tended to be selected for active UC patients with endoscopic evidence of severe disease, and the present study supported the validity of this therapeutic approach. However, transition to the remission-maintenance phase was more favorable in the anti-TNF group. Keywords: ulcerative colitis, tacrolimus, infliximab, adalimumab, steroid refractory

• In 203 steroid-refractory acute GVHD patients, day 28 response was 38%. • Age was the only predictor of survival. • No response at day 28 increased the risk of overall mortality 2.4-fold. The prognosis of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) is poor, and predictors of response and survival are unclear. In an exploratory analysis of 203 steroid-refractory aGVHD patients with prospectively collected GVHD data who received antithymocyte globulin, etanercept, or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) as second-line treatment, we determined the predictors of day 28 response, 2-year overall survival, and 2-year nonrelapse mortality (NRM). To minimize the risk of finding false-positive results, we used least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, aggressively eliminating variables that are unlikely to be associated with outcome. Day 28 response to second-line therapy was 38% (complete response, 23%), with a 2-year overall survival of 25% and a 2-year NRM of 62%. Factors associated with response were GVHD prophylaxis, organ involvement, and initial aGVHD to steroid-refractory aGVHD interval. Specifically, compared with cyclosporine/MMF as GVHD prophylaxis, the odds ratio (OR) for calcineurin inhibitor/methotrexate was.8 and for cyclosporine/prednisone.6. The OR for aGVHD to steroid-refractory aGVHD interval ≥ 14 versus <14 days was 1.3. The ORs for skin only involvement and gut or liver only involvement when compared with multiorgan involvement were 1.4 and 1.2, respectively. The only variable associated with worse survival was age, with a hazard ratio (HR) per decade of 1.04 for overall mortality. Similarly, age was the only variable associated with NRM (HR per decade, 1.02). When compared with complete response, no response at day 28 increased the risk of death (HR, 2.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.5 to 3.7). In conclusion, by means of an underused statistical technique in the field of transplantation, we identified predictors of response and survival in steroid-refractory aGVHD. Our results highlight the importance of developing novel treatment strategies because current treatments yield poor outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a rare, chronic inflammatory condition of the gastrointestinal tract. Little is known about its natural history and treatment outcomes. The aims of our analysis were to describe clinical presentation, response to current medical treatments, and to evaluate the response of refractory EGE to anti-integrin therapy.Methods: Patients with confirmed diagnosis of EGE fulfilling the diagnostic criteria: (1) the presence of gastrointestinal symptoms, (2) dense eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal mucosa, and (3) exclusion of other conditions leading to gastrointestinal eosinophilia were included in this analysis. In patients non-responding to corticosteroids and/or anti-TNF treatment the integrin blocker vedolizumab was used.Results: EGE patients (n = 22) were predominantly female (63%) with a median age at diagnosis of 41.5 years. The most frequent symptoms were abdominal pain (100%), diarrhea (59%), nausea/vomiting (36%), and bloating (27%). No pathognomonic endoscopic alterations were found. Eosinophilic infiltration was observed in the majority of patients in more than one segment. Patients were treated with systemic steroids, topical, and enteral release steroids in 21/22 (95%) patients, proton pump inhibitors in 7/22 (32%), TNFα inhibitors in 3/22 (14%), and vedolizumab in 4/22 (18%) patients. In 3/4 of steroid-refractory patients vedolizumab induced a clinical and histological improvement.Conclusions: The combination of highly variable clinical presentation, subtle endoscopic abnormalities, and involvement of several GI segments undermines the difficulty to diagnose EGE and the need for structured biopsy sampling. Corticosteroids were efficient in the majority of patients to induce remission. Response to the integrin blocker vedolizumab suggests further assessment in refractory cases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Our data support the use of ruxolitinib for patients with both acute and chronic SR-GVHD. • Infection is a common complication among ruxolitinib-treated patients with SR-GVHD and a particular problem among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD. • Infection is not limited to viral reactivation; a number of bacterial events were detected among ruxolitinib-treated patients for SR-GVHD. Corticosteroid-refractory graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD) remains a significant source of morbidity after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. No standard therapy exists in this setting; however, recent studies have demonstrated a very promising role for ruxolitinib, an oral Janus kinase 1/2 inhibitor. With increasing evidence of efficacy for SR-GVHD, limited data exist describing complications of ruxolitinib use, specifically infectious complications during use in SR-GVHD. In this study we report outcomes and infectious complications at our institution with ruxolitinib use. Overall, 43 patients were treated with ruxolitinib for SR-GVHD, 19 for acute SR-GVHD and 24 for chronic SR-GVHD. With respect to acute SR-GVHD, 15 patients had grade III acute GVHD and 4 patients had grade IV acute GVHD. At 28 days, a response rate of 84% was detected. With respect to chronic SR-GVHD, 16 patients had moderate refractory disease and 8 had severe refractory disease. At around 28 days, a 63% response rate was detected. Overall, 42% of patients (n = 18) treated with ruxolitinib had a documented infectious event. Infectious events were significantly more common among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD (P <.005). Among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD, both viral (n = 11) and bacterial (n = 10) events were frequently encountered. Cytomegalovirus reactivation was detected in 4 patients without organ involvement in any patient. Bacteremia was the most common bacterial event (n = 8), and 2 patients died after development of bacteremia. Only 5 of 24 patients treated with ruxolitinib for chronic SR-GVHD developed infectious complications after initiation of therapy. Nearly an even number of viral (n = 3) and bacterial (n = 4) were detected. This study supports the use of ruxolitinib in SR-GVHD, with impressive responses observed in both acute and chronic SR-GVHD. Infectious complications were particularly frequent among patients treated for acute SR-GVHD, and nearly all these patients were concurrently on high-dose steroids while on ruxolitinib. This study suggests careful monitoring for viral reactivation is required for patients initiated on ruxolitinib, supports the role of continuing prophylactic antimicrobial measures in ruxolitinib-treated GVHD patients, and raises the question of whether bacterial prophylaxis should be considered among patients initiated on ruxolitinib for acute SR-GVHD, particularly while on high-dose steroids. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Systemic steroids are still the first-line approach in acute graft-versus-host disease (aGvHD), and the backbone of chronic GvHD management. Refractoriness to steroid represent a major cause of morbidity and non-relapse mortality after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In both backgrounds, several second-line immunosuppressive agents have been tested with variable results in terms of efficacy and toxicity. Solid evidence regarding these approaches is still lacking in the pediatric setting where results are mainly derived from adult experiences. Furthermore, the number of treated patients is limited and the incidence of acute and chronic GvHD is lower, resulting in a very heterogeneous approach to this complication by pediatric hematologists. Some conventional therapies and anti-cytokine monoclonal antibodies used in the adult setting have been evaluated in children. In recent years, the increasing understanding of the biological mechanisms underpinning the pathogenesis of GvHD justified the efforts toward the adoption of targeted therapies and non-pharmacologic approaches, with higher response rates and lower immunosuppressive effects. Moreover, many questions regarding the precise timing and setting in which to integrate these new approaches remain unanswered. This Review aims to critically explore the current evidence regarding novel approaches to treat SR-GvHD in pediatric HSCT recipients., Competing Interests: The author (RM) declared that he was an editorial board member of Frontiers at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Gottardi, Leardini, Muratore, Baccelli, Cerasi, Venturelli, Zanaroli, Belotti, Prete and Masetti.)