Search

Aims: We aimed to compare the analgesic efficacy of oral clonidine vs intrathecal clonidine added as an adjuvant to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in cesarean section Materials and Methods: A prospective randomized double blind controlled studyenrolled 50 patients for elective caesarean sections under spinal anesthesia and were allocated into 2 groups (25 each) after fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Group O received 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 2cc(10mg) plus 0.5 cc NS intrathecally and 200µg oral clonidine was given 90 mins before spinal anesthesia and group I received 0.5 % Hyperbaric bupivacaine 2cc(10mg) + 45 µg (0.5cc) of clonidine intrathecally with oral vitamin c tablets 90 mins before spinal anesthesia. Results: Both the groups had comparable demographics in age, height,weight, BMI. There was a statistically significant difference in terms of duration of analgesia between the two groups. Duration of analgesia was prolonged more in Group I than in Group O with a p value 0.0001.There was a statistically significant difference in terms of onset of sensory and motor blockade which was faster in Group I than in Group O. (P=0.0001). There was a statistically significant difference in terms of duration of sensory and motor blockade which was prolonged in Group I than in Group O. (P=0.0001). There was a significant reduction in pulse rate and hypotensive episodes encountered with Group O than Group I which was statistically significant. The sedation, fetal well being and adverse effects were all comparable between the two groups. Conclusion: Intrathecal clonidine when added as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine prolongs the duration of analgesia, sensory and motor block than oral clonidine without significant adverse effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Spinal anesthesia is commonly used in various surgical procedures but is often associated with hypotension, which can lead to significant complications. The Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index (IVCCI) and Caval Aorta Index (CAI) are potential predictors of fluid responsiveness and can help anticipate hypotension after spinal anesthesia. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of IVCCI and CAI in predicting hypotension following spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods A total of 100 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under spinal anesthesia were enrolled in this prospective clinical study. Preoperative IVCCI and CAI measurements were obtained using ultrasound. Spinal anesthesia was administered using 0.5% bupivacaine. Blood pressure was monitored every 5 minutes for 30 minutes post-anesthesia. Hypotension was defined as a systolic blood pressure decrease of more than 20% from baseline or below 90 mmHg. Statistical analysis was performed using logistic regression to assess the predictive value of IVCCI and CAI for hypotension. Results Out of 100 patients, 35 developed hypotension after spinal anesthesia. The mean IVCCI for the hypotensive group was 45%, compared to 25% in the non-hypotensive group (p < 0.01). The mean CAI was 0.8 in the hypotensive group and 0.6 in the non-hypotensive group (p < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis revealed that both IVCCI and CAI were significant predictors of hypotension, with IVCCI having a higher predictive accuracy (AUC = 0.85) compared to CAI (AUC = 0.78). Conclusion The Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index and Caval Aorta Index are effective predictors of hypotension following spinal anesthesia. IVCCI, in particular, demonstrates superior predictive accuracy. Incorporating these indices into preoperative assessments may enhance the management and prevention of hypotension, improving patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal anesthesia is the technique of choice for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) surgeries. Levobupivacaine, an S-enantiomer of bupivacaine, is less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine; therefore, a low dose of local anesthetic with fentanyl as an adjuvant has been used to decrease toxicity and increase efficacy. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare and evaluate the efficacy of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5%, isobaric levobupivacaine 0.5%, and hyperbaric levobupivacaine 0.5% with fentanyl as an adjuvant. Materials and Methods: One hundred and five patients scheduled for elective TURP surgeries were randomly divided into three groups. Group BH (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25 µg of fentanyl, Group LH (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% hyperbaric levobupivacaine with 25 µg of fentanyl, and Group LP (n=35) received 1.5 mL of 0.5% isobaric levobupivacaine with 25 µg of fentanyl intrathecally. Results: The onset of sensory and motor block was earlier and the duration of analgesia and motor block were longer in the BH group (P<0.001) as compared to LH and LP groups. The demographic data, duration of surgery, heart rate, SpO2, pruritus, and shivering were comparable between the groups (P>0.05). The visual analog scale score was higher in the LP group. Hypotension, nausea, and vomiting were seen in the BH group. Conclusion: Hyperbaric is better than isobaric group due to quicker onset and longer duration. Levobupivacaine is better than bupivacaine in terms of the early mobilization and a lesser incidence of side effects, making hyperbaric levobupivacaine a better alternative to isobaric levobupivacaine and hyperbaric bupivacaine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Ventricular arrhythmia is commonly provoked by acute cardiac ischemia through sympathetic exaggeration and is often resistant to anti-arrhythmic therapies. Thoracic epidural anesthesia has been reported to terminate fatal ventricular arrhythmia; however, its underlying mechanism is unknown. Methods: Rats were randomly divided into four groups: sham, sham plus bupivacaine, ischemia/reperfusion (IR), and IR plus bupivacaine groups. Bupivacaine (1 mg/mL, 0.05 mL/100 g body weight) was injected intrathecally into the L5–L6 intervertebral space prior to establishing a myocardial IR rat model. Thereafter, cardiac arrhythmia, cardiac function, myocardial injury, and electrical activities of the heart and spinal cord were evaluated. Results: Intrathecal bupivacaine inhibited spinal neural activity, improved heart rate variability, reduced ventricular arrhythmia score, and ameliorated cardiac dysfunction in IR rats. Furthermore, intrathecal bupivacaine attenuated cardiac injury and myocardial apoptosis and regulated cardiomyocyte autophagy and connexin-43 distribution during myocardial IR. Conclusion: Our results indicate that intrathecal bupivacaine blunts spinal neural activity to prevent cardiac arrhythmia and dysfunction induced by IR and that this anti-arrhythmic activity may be associated with regulation of autonomic balance, myocardial apoptosis and autophagy, and cardiac gap junction function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Cesarean section may result in adverse psychosocial and behavioral outcomes because women put considerable emphasis on the process of birth. Virtual reality treatment has been shown by many studies to reduce anxiety and improve patient satisfaction. Therefore, we designed a randomized controlled trial to investigate whether the application of virtual reality technology during cesarean section can reduce maternal anxiety and improve satisfaction. Methods: We recruited 128 women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with proposed spinal anesthesia and randomly assigned them to either virtual reality or routine care. The virtual reality intervention was a virtual reality program tailored specifically for women undergoing cesarean section. Primary outcome was the change in anxiety score (change = preoperative–intraoperative score). Secondary outcomes included patient satisfaction score, requirement of intraoperative sedative and analgesic drugs, and respiratory rate. Results: The change in anxiety score in the virtual reality group was significantly higher than that in the routine care group (30 [20, 47.5] vs 10 [− 10, 23.8], respectively; P < 0.001, with Hodges–Lehmann median difference estimate of 20 (95% confidence interval CI, 15–30)). There were no significant differences between the two groups in patient satisfaction scores, the requirement of intraoperative sedative and analgesic drugs, and respiratory rate and side effects. Conclusion: Virtual reality treatment could reduce the anxiety of women undergoing elective cesarean section, which is beneficial to the mother and baby. Trialregistration This study was registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200061936) on July 11, 2022, and can be reached at https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=173329. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Quality of life (QoL) may be affected due to various reasons such as low back or leg pains with accompanying neurologic problems. Lumbar disk surgery is one of the most common performed surgeries to relieve those symptoms. Various anesthetic techniques can be used safely to perform lumbar disk surgeries. Properties that make an anesthetic technique good are mainly the quick onset and returning of the effects. This large retrospective study with patients who have undergone lumbar disk surgery under spinal anesthesia aims to evaluate the perioperative and postoperative parameters of the spinal anesthesia and review the literature. Methods Cases operated under spinal anesthesia between January 2017 and December 2020 were investigated, and 617 patients who underwent simple lumbar disk surgery were included in the study. Demographic characteristics and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status of the patients were recorded. Visual analog scale (VAS) and QoLscores were obtained before and after the operation. Results There were 282 (45.7%) male and 335 (54.3%) female patients with a mean age of 39.48 ± 16.71 years (range: 18–58 years) at symptom onset. The mean operating time was 46.3 minutes (range: 22–68 minutes). Average blood loss was 85 mL (range: 55–125 mL). All the patients were mobilized 6 to 12 hours after surgery. In our patient group, there were both high- and normal-risk groups in terms of the ASA physical status. During the clinical follow-up, a statistically significant improvement was found for the VAS and QoL scores (p < 0.05). Conclusions In this large retrospective study, our results have confirmed that spinal anesthesia is at least comparable to general anesthesia and even superior to it in some aspects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Aortic stenosis is a cause of mortality or morbidity. It complicates the selection and management of anesthetic procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, hemodynamic effects and postoperative outcome of unilateral spinal anesthesia in geriatric patients with hip fractures with moderate or severe aortic stenosis. Material and Method: A retrospective observational study was conducted on geriatric high-risk patients with cardiac conditions who underwent surgery for hip fractures under unilateral spinal anesthesia with low-dose hyperbaric bupivacaine. The study period spanned from January 2018 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were individuals with moderate to severe aortic stenosis, as defined by the American Heart Association Criteria. Data on demographic information, cardiac pathologies, hemodynamic data, data on motor and sensory block, perioperative complications, and mortality rates at 30th and 180th days were collected. Results: Mortality rates at the 30th day and 180th day were 8.9% (n:4) and 24.4% (n:11), respectively. T6 level was predominantly obtained level of anesthesia (44.4%). Motor and sensory block formation times averaged 7.6 and 4.8 minutes, respectively. Surgical procedures were performed mostly within 1 hour (66.7%), and complications were rare (11.1% hypotension). Initial analgesic effect showed a rapid resolution, with 64.4% of patients requiring analgesic within the first hour postoperatively. Conclusion: In elderly patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis scheduled for hip fracture surgery, we posit that unilateral spinal anesthesia with ultra-low dose is safe and effective option. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Spinal anesthesia (SA) is a conventional method for proper nerve block in abdominopelvic and lower extremity surgeries. Compared to general anesthesia, SA has reduced perioperative complications significantly. The hyperbaric type of bupivacaine hydrochloride (HB) induces spinal anesthesia more efficiently with a lower incidence of life-threatening adverse reactions like Perioperative hemodynamic changes and respiratory depression. More investigations are needed to define the best dosage that provides adequate anesthesia while reducing adverse effects for each surgical procedure. Methods: This double-blinded randomized clinical trial compared the consequences of the (12.5mg,15mg,20mg) dosages of HB-bupivacaine in elective lower limb orthopedic surgery. Using block randomization, we allocated 60 participants to three (n = 20) study groups. Utilizing the same protocol of anesthesia induction, outcome variables assumed and measured as the incidence of the adverse effects (Hypotension, Anxiety, Bradycardia, Nausea and Vomiting(N/V), Hypoventilation, and Decreased o2 saturation), and the requirement for intervention to control the unwanted reaction. Addressing that, outcome variables were measured 10 times perioperatively. One-way ANOVA test, the chi2 test, or repeated measures ANOVA test with the Bonferroni adjustment were utilized as appropriate. Results: We found that the incidence of hypotension (P-value:0.02) and the N/V (P-value < 0.001) are associated with the HB-bupivacaine dosage. Contrary, our findings indicate that the incidence of apnea, bradycardia, and hypoventilation did not exhibit a significant dose-dependent pattern between the groups. Repeated measures analysis revealed significant intergroup differences for Herat rate, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (group*time Pvalue < 0.001). The observed differences were more prominent 10–30 min after injection of HB-bupivacaine. The regression model claimed that gender (P-value:0.002) and drug dosage (P-value:0.03) significantly predict the incidence of adverse effects. Conclusion: Our results, suggest that the administration of the 12.5mg HB-bupivacaine provides adequate anesthesia while minimizing the risk of adverse events for lower limb orthopedic surgeries lasting up to 180 min. Trial registration: The study was registered at the Clinical Trial Registry Center (IRCT20160202026328N7), Registered on 2022.01.10. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Respiratory functions may be impaired in cesarean section (C/S) delivery performed under spinal anesthesia (SA) and oxygen supplementation may be required. Therefore, we conducted a randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the effects of different oxygen administrations in pregnant women on the lungs during C/S under SA using ultrasound and oxygen reserve index (ORI). Methods: We conducted a randomized, controlled, single-center study from May 1, 2021, to March 31, 2022. A total of 90 patients scheduled for C/S under SA were randomly divided into 3 groups. Following the SA, patients in group 0 were treated with room air, in Group 3 were administered 3 L/min O₂ with a nasal cannula (NC), in Group 6 were administered 6 L/min O₂ with a simple face mask. In addition to routine monitoring, ORI values were measured. Lung aeration was evaluated through the modified lung ultrasound score (LUS) before the procedure (T0), at minute 0 (T1), 20 (T2), and hour 6 (T3) after the procedure, and ∆LUS values were recorded. Results: After SA, the ORI values of Group 3 were higher than Group 0 at all times (p < 0.05), while the intraoperative 1st minute and the 10th, 25th and 40th minutes after delivery (p = 0.001, p = 0.027, p = 0.001, p = 0.019) was higher than Group 6. When the LUS values of each group were compared with the T0 values a decrease was observed in Group 3 and Group 6 (p < 0.001, p = 0.016). While ∆LUS values were always higher in Group 3 than in Group 0, they were higher only in T1 and T2 in Group 6. Conclusion: We determined that it would be appropriate to prefer 3 L/min supplemental oxygen therapy with NC in C/S to be performed under SA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pregnancy in a woman with heart and chronic renal failure can lead to life-threatening complications for both mother and child. Although such cases are often delivered by cesarean section, few reports have described anesthesia methods. Case presentation: We encountered a case in which cesarean section was performed using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia for a pregnant woman with chronic renal and heart failure. The 35-year-old Japanese woman had been undergoing hemodialysis for several years. Heart failure symptoms that appeared during pregnancy initially improved with treatments such as increasing hemodialysis, but recurred. She was admitted to the intensive care unit. The initial plan was to deliver the baby after a few weeks, but further progression of heart failure became a concern. After a clinical conference among staff, a cesarean section with combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was scheduled for 24 weeks, 0 days of gestation. The anticoagulant for dialysis was also changed from heparin to nafamostat in preparation for cesarean section. Monitoring was started with central venous and radial artery pressures before induction of anesthesia. Combined spinal and epidural anesthesia was induced and the cesarean section was completed without complications. Surgery was initiated under continuous administration of phenylephrine, which was intended to avoid hypotension due to anesthesia. The hemodynamic and respiratory status of the patient remained stable postoperatively. After the cesarean section, morphine was administered epidurally and the epidural catheter was removed. Conclusion: Cesarean section was safely performed for a pregnant woman with renal and heart failure using combined spinal and epidural anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine are the commonly used drugs in spinal anesthesia. The efficacy of these drugs along with adjuvant fentanyl, remains better but the question remains unsolved that whether bupivacaine plus fentanyl or ropivacaine plus fentanyl, which works better. Hence this study was undertaken to compare the efficacy, hemodynamic stability and side effects of these drugs for lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries. Methods: This prospective randomized, control study was conducted among patients undergoing lower abdominal and lower limb surgeries in Rohilkhand Medical College Hospital, Bareilly for elective surgical procedures. Ninety four patients were included in the study with forty seven cases in group A (0.75% hyperbaric Ropivacaine-3ml plus 25mcg fentanyl) and forty cases in group B (0.5% hyperbaric bupivacine-3ml plus 25mcg fentanyl). Data analysis was done using SPSS version 17. Results: Intrathecal 0.5% Hyperbaric bupivacaine plus fentanyl combination produces a significantly longer duration of analgesia, sensory block and motor block when compared to intrathecal hyperbaricbaric ropivacaine plus fentanyl combination. Greater hemodynamic stability was observed in Ropivacaine plus fentanyl group. Conclusion: Ropivacaine plus fentanyl provides a higher degree of hemodynamic stability plus allows early ambulation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) is usually done spinal anesthesia but it does not prevent the obturator reflex leading to bladder perforation, bleeding, or incompletely resection of resection of the tumor which could be prevented by obturator nerve block (ONB) in TURBT. Aims and Objectives: The aim of our study is to compare the effectiveness of ONB by peripheral nerve stimulator (PNS) and ultrasonography (USG) in TURBT and also compare morbidity between USG- and PNS-guided ONB in TURBT under spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups. Group (1) patients had a PNS-guided ONB and Group (2) patients had ONBguided ONB. The presence or absence of adductor muscles reflexes was recorded. Bladder perforation and bleeding during surgery were also recorded. Results: A success rate of 90% was achieved in the Group (2) compared to 66% in Group (1) which was clinically significant with P=0.049. Complete bladder perforation was detected in four patients in Group (1) whereas no perforation was observed in Group (2). Bleeding was observed in both groups but severe bleeding was present in five patients in Group (1) and required a blood transfusion. Conclusion: We concluded that USG-guided ONB is more efficient and safer as compared to PNS-guided ONB. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Urological operations frequently involve the use of spinal anesthesia. In the present scenario, adding different adjuvants to local anesthetic improve its quality and duration has become common. Aims and Objectives: In patients undergoing elective urological procedures, the purpose of this study was to assess the effects of intrathecal fentanyl or tramadol with 0.5% bupivacaine heavy. Materials and Methods: Patients were divided into two groups of 30 patients each, a total of 60 patients aged 20-60 years undergoing elective urological surgeries participated in this prospective, randomized study in which 25 μg fentanyl and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group F, while 25 mg tramadol and 2.5 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine heavy were given to Group M. The onset and duration of sensory and motor blockage, the duration of analgesia, post-operative Visual Analog Scale score, hemodynamic changes, and adverse effects were evaluated. Results: Fentanyl had a lower mean time of onset for sensory (2:33±0:22 min vs. 4:50±0:33 min) and motor block (3:36±0:28 min vs. 5:52±0:38 min) (P<0.001), the duration of sensory (185.67±3.155 min vs. 152.60±4.264), motor block (172.00±4.177 min vs. 136.40±5.575 min), and post-operative analgesia was longer in the fentanyl group (P<0.001), whereas the incidence of adverse effects such as pruritus, shivering, and nausea was lower in the tramadol group. Conclusion: The quality and duration of spinal anesthesia were found to be significantly increased by the use of fentanyl as an adjuvant in our study. However, tramadol also produced stable hemodynamics and exhibited fewer adverse effects than fentanyl. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: This study aimed to determine the most effective dose of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prilocaine in spinal anesthesia. Methods: Sixty-nine adult patients (21 to 65 y) scheduled for elective surgeries under spinal anesthesia were included in the study. Patients received spinal anesthesia with 3 mL of prilocaine and 0.5 mL dexmedetomidine of dose according to randomization of 5,10 and15 µg (D5, D10 and D15 respectively). Time of the first request of analgesia was set as a primary outcome. Results: Time of the first request of rescue opioid was significantly shorter in D5 group (8 ± 6 h) compared to D15 group (21 ± 4 h) (P < 0.018). 24 h of postoperative Nalbuphine consumption was higher in D5 group (4.67 ± 0.59 mg) compared to D15 group (2.5 ± 0.71 mg) (P = 0.012). The onset of sensory and motor blocks was significantly earlier in group D15 and D10 compared to group D5. Group D15 showed a significantly prolonged duration of sensory and motor blockade than Groups D10 and D5. The duration of sensory and motor blockade was significantly prolonged in group D10 compared with group D5 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: 10 and 15 μg dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to prilocaine in spinal anesthesia shortened the onset of both sensory and motor block, prolonged the duration of sensory block, motor block, and the time to first analgesic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nalbuphine, a synthetic k-agonist and µ-antagonist, provides efficient pain relief while reducing opioid-related adverse effects. This study aims to compare the efficacy of intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) with intrathecal morphine (ITM) for post-TKA pain. Methods: A retrospective cohort analysis of 131 patients who underwent TKA with spinal anesthesia (SA), a single shot of adductor canal block, and periarticular injections was conducted. The patients were divided into 2 groups, Group N received 0.8 mg nalbuphine, and Group M received 0.2 mg morphine as an adjuvant to SA. Propensity-score matching was employed to compare the visual analog scales (VAS) of postoperative pain intensity, cumulative morphine use (CMU), maximum knee flexion angle, straight leg raise (SLR) ability, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and length of hospital stay (LHS). Results: The mean VAS of group M were significantly lower than group N at 6, 12, 18, and 24 h (P < 0.01). Group M had lower CMU than group N at 24 h (P < 0.01) and 48 h (P < 0.01), while there was no significant difference between groups in terms of knee flexion angle and SLR at any time point. Additionally, 29.3 and 57.9% of patients in group N and M experienced PONV, respectively (p = 0.04), and group N had significantly shorter LHS compared to group M (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Although, intrathecal morphine (ITM) still provides better pain control particularly in the first 24 h, patients who received intrathecal nalbuphine (ITN) had significantly fewer incidence of PONV, and shorter LHS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim of the study: To compare the efficacy of spinal anaesthesia alone versus spinal anesthesia augmented with ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve (LFCN) block in improving perioperative analgesia and functional recovery in patients undergoing THA. Methods: In a prospective, randomized clinical trial we included 66 patients scheduled for THA were divided into two groups: one receiving spinal anaesthesia alone (SA group; n = 32) and the other receiving spinal anaesthesia with regional analgesia blocks PENG + LFCN (SRAB group; n = 34). In the SRAB group, PENG followed by LFCN blocks were administered under ultrasound guidance before spinal anaesthesia. Results: There were significant differences between the two groups in the onset of postoperative pain (p < 0.01) and the total amount of analgesics required in the first 36 postoperative hours (p < 0.01). Conclusion: The combined approach of spinal anaesthesia with PENG and LFCN blockade, enables opioid-free analgesia and may contribute to a safer and more comfortable postoperative experience for THA patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To investigate whether transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) at PC6 could reduce hypotension after spinal anesthesia (SA) in parturients and to compare the effect of TEAS at different frequencies. Methods: From February 20, 2023, to August 29, 2023, 90 parturients scheduled for c-section under SA were randomly assigned to receive no treatment (Control), TEAS at high frequency (TEAS-HF), or TEAS at low frequency (TEAS-LF). Treatments started immediately after SA and lasted for 30 min. The primary endpoint was incidence of hypotension by 30 min after SA. Secondary endpoints included lowest systolic blood pressure (SBP) during 30 min after SA, dose of ephedrine, dose of atropine, Apgar score at 1 min, and adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, dizziness, dyspnea, and chest congestion. Results: In the TEAS-HF group, the incidence of hypotension by 30 min after SA was lower (13.3%) than in the Control (53.3%, p = 0.001; OR 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–2.8) and TEAS-LF group (40.0%, p = 0.02, OR 1.4, 95% CI: 1.0–2.0). The lowest SBP during 30 min after SA was higher in the TEAS-HF group (100.0 ± 9.4 mm Hg) than in the Control group (91.5 ± 16.5 mm Hg) and TEAS-LF group (93.9 ± 16.6 mm Hg). Patients who received TEAS showed a lower score of nausea and vomiting (both p = 0.02). Patients in the group TEAS-HF showed a lower incidence of dizziness, dyspnea, and of chest congestion than those in the other two groups. There was no difference with respect to atropine consumption and neonatal Apgar score. Conclusions: TEAS-HF at PC6 reduced hypotension after SA in parturients, while TEAS-LF did not. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05724095) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Commonly, general anesthesia (GA) with endotracheal intubation is the standard anesthesiology approach in gynecological laparoscopic surgery; neuraxial anesthesia (NA) can also be used, but its application is very low and limited to few indications. This study assessed NA feasibility for almost all kinds of gynecologic laparoscopies. Materials and Methods: Data on laparoscopic surgeries performed under NA were collected retrospectively. A total of 76 patients had laparoscopic interventions at the Donatello Clinic in Florence, Italy, between October 2019 and August 2022. Adnexectomies, ovarian cyst enucleations, multiple myomectomies, total hysterectomies, radical hysterectomies with sentinel lymph-node biopsies, and complete excisions of endometriosis and adhesiolysis were performed under regional anesthesia. All procedures but 1 were completed with no change from NA. Results: All cases but 1 were completed under NA. There were (1) spontaneously breathing patients; (2) no pulmonary complications; (3) satisfactory muscle relaxation; (4) fast postoperative bowel function recovery; (5) reduced postoperative pain; (6) reduced postoperative narcotics use; and (6) absence of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Conclusions: These procedures appear to comprise the largest series of complex gynecologic laparoscopies performed under NA reported in the literature. Preliminary data seems to support the concept that this approach might be feasible and safe in selected and motivated patients, but further research is needed to confirm these encouraging data. (J GYNECOL SURG 20XX:000) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Intraoperative hypotension remains a serious adverse event of photodynamic diagnosis‐assisted transurethral resection of bladder tumor with oral administration of 5‐aminolevulinic acid. We conducted a re‐analysis of perioperative hypotension in photodynamic diagnosis‐assisted transurethral resection of the bladder tumor with oral 5‐aminolevulinic acid to ascertain its safety. Methods: A total of 407 cases who underwent transurethral resection of bladder tumors in our institution were reviewed (274 cases for the PDD group with photodynamic diagnosis and 133 for the white light (WL) group without). A classification of hypotension severity was devised to identify risk factors for clinically troublesome hypotension. The distribution of hypotension severity in each of the PDD and WL groups was compared. Additionally, the patient background and perioperative data by hypotension severity were compared only in the PDD group. Results: More patients with moderate and severe hypotension were noted in the PDD group. The renal function was lower with increasing hypotension severity in the PDD group. More patients on general anesthesia were included in the mild and moderate hypotension group, whereas more patients on spinal anesthesia were included in the severe hypotension group. Furthermore, the frequency of side effects other than hypotension tended to increase with hypotension severity. Conclusions: Renal function impairment and the other adverse effects of 5‐aminolevulinic acid may be risk factors for severe hypotension. Mild or moderate hypotension may be caused by general anesthesia and severe hypotension may be caused by spinal anesthesia. To elucidate specific risk factors, further case–control studies are warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is used in lumbar surgery, but initial adequate analgesia fails in some patients. In these cases, spinal redosing or conversion to general endotracheal anesthesia is required, both of which are detrimental to the patient experience and surgical workflow. We reviewed cases of lumbar surgery performed under SA from 2017–2021. We identified 12 cases of inadequate first dose and then selected 36 random patients as controls. We used a measurement tool to approximate the volume of the dural sac for each patient using T2-weighted sagittal magnetic resonance imaging sequences. Patients who had an inadequate first dose of anesthesia had a significantly larger dural sac volume, 22.8 ± 7.9 cm3 in the inadequate dose group and 17.4 ± 4.7 cm3 in controls (P = 0.043). The inadequate dose group was significantly younger, 54.2 ± 8.8 years in failed first dose and 66.4 ± 11.9 years in controls (P = 0.001). The groups did not differ by surgical procedure (P = 0.238), level (P = 0.353), American Society of Anesthesia score (P = 0.546), or comorbidities. We found that age, larger height, and dural sac volume are risk factors for an inadequate first dose of SA. The availability of spinal magnetic resonance imaging in patients undergoing spine surgery allows the preoperative measurement of their thecal sac size. In the future, these data may be used to personalize spinal anesthesia dosing on the basis of individual anatomic variables and potentially reduce the incidence of failed spinal anesthesia in spine surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Avascular Necrosis (AVN) of the femoral head, a condition characterized by the interruption of blood supply leading to bone tissue death, presents significant therapeutic challenges. Recent advancements in orthobiologics, including the use of Autologous Adult Live-Cultured Osteoblasts (AALCO), combined with core decompression, offer a novel approach for managing AVN. This study assesses the efficacy of this treatment modality in improving functional outcomes and hindering disease progression. Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study encompassed 30 patients treated between 2020 and 2023 for idiopathic AVN of the femoral head, grades I to III, who had not responded to conservative treatment. Patients were excluded based on specific criteria including age, secondary AVN causes, and certain health conditions. The treatment involved a two-stage surgical procedure under spinal anesthesia with OSSGROW® for AALCO generation. Post-operative care emphasized early mobilization, DVT prevention, and avoidance of NSAIDs. Outcome measures were evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, modified Harris Hip Score, and annual MRI imaging for up to 36 months. Results: Among 26 patients (41 hips) completing the study, statistically significant improvements in pain and hip functionality were documented, alongside positive radiological signs of osteogenesis in the majority of cases. However, four instances required advancement to total hip replacement due to disease progression. Conclusion: The combination of core decompression and AALCO implantation shows promise as an effective treatment for AVN of the femoral head, with notable improvements in functional and radiological outcomes. This study supports the potential of orthobiologic approaches in AVN treatment, warranting further investigation through comprehensive randomized controlled trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: To reduce maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality, it is becoming increasingly important for anesthetists to understand and implement enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) cesarean delivery guidelines. Our aim was to reveal the knowledge of anesthesia assistants in Turkey about ERAS during cesarean delivery and to increase their awareness of ERAS. Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in the city of Isparta, Turkey in 2023. The survey, which was approved by the ethics committee, was distributed to participants across Turkey via e-mail and online messages. The survey comprises of a total of 42 questions evaluating perioperative ERAS recommendations. Results: Of the 404 participants in our survey, 59.9% were associated with university hospitals and 65.8% had completed three or more years of education. A total of 87.9% of the participants were familiar with ERAS; however, only 42.8% had received ERAS training. Although 93.8% of the participants' institutions performed a cesarean delivery, ERAS recommendations were only implemented at a rate of 48%. This may be due to the absence of an ERAS team, which was identified in our survey at a high rate of 66.6%. Conclusion: Awareness about ERAS was high among the participants, but the implementation rates of some recommendations were low. The reason for this may be the inability to form a multidisciplinary team and inadequate training of participants. For this purpose, we recommend the formation of a multidisciplinary team for ERAS protocol implementation and increased participant training opportunities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The number of cesarean sections performed is increasing every year, and obstetric anesthesia is of great interest to physicians and research scholars because of its specificity, high risk, and high complication rate. To investigate the effects of combined spinal epidural anesthesia (CSEA) with different intervertebral spaces during cesarean section on anesthesia effect, anesthesia onset time, anesthesia recovery time, maternal adverse reactions, and neonates. Ninety-two women who underwent cesarean section in our hospital from September 2022 to February 2023 were selected as the study subjects and randomly divided them into two groups (group A and group B), 46 women in each group. Group A underwent CSEA via an L2-3 gap and group B underwent CSEA via an L3-4 gap puncture. The anesthesia effect, anesthesia onset time, sensory recovery time, adverse effects, and neonatal Apgar score were compared between the two groups. When CSEA was performed from L2-3, the anesthesia efficiency was higher, but the difference was not statistically significant. When anesthesia was performed by puncture from L2-3, the onset of anesthesia and recovery time was shorter, and the incidence of intraoperative maternal nausea and vomiting, hypotension, respiratory depression, and other adverse reactions was low with a statistically significant difference. However, the Apgar scores of the neonates in the two groups have no difference. When CSEA is induced via L2-3 interspace, anesthesia has a rapid onset of action, shorter recovery time, and few maternal adverse effects, without affecting the final anesthetic outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patients treated at a health safety-net hospital have increased medical complexity and social determinants of health that are associated with an increasing risk of complications after TKA and THA. Fast-track rapid recovery protocols (RRPs) are associated with reduced complications and length of stay in the general population; however, whether that is the case among patients who are socioeconomically disadvantaged in health safety-net hospitals remains poorly defined. Questions/purposes: When an RRP protocol is implemented in a health safety-net hospital after TKA and THA: (1) Was there an associated change in complications, specifically infection, symptomatic deep venous thromboembolism (DVT), symptomatic pulmonary embolism (PE), myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality? (2) Was there an associated difference in inpatient opioid consumption? (3) Was there an associated difference in length of stay and 90-day readmission rate? (4) Was there an associated difference in discharge disposition?. Methods: An observational study with a historical control group was conducted in an urban, academic, tertiary-care health safety-net hospital. Between May 2022 and April 2023, an RRP consistent with current guidelines was implemented for patients undergoing TKA or THA for arthritis. We considered all patients aged 18 to 90 years presenting for primary TKA and THA as eligible. Based on these criteria, 562 patients with TKAs or THAs were eligible. Of these 33% (183) were excluded because they were lost before 90 days of follow-up and had incomplete datasets, leaving 67% (379) for evaluation. Patients in the (615 of 1993) in the historical control group. The main elements of the RRP were standardization of preoperative visits, nutritional management, neuraxial anesthesia, accelerated physical therapy, and pain management. The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients with 90-day complications and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, 90-day readmission, and discharge disposition. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, BMI, gender, race, American Society of Anaesthesiologists class, and anesthesia type was performed by a staff biostatistician using R statistical programming. historical control group (September 2014 to May 2022) met the same criteria, and 2897 were eligible. Of these, 31% (904) were excluded because they were lost before 90 days of follow-up and had incomplete datasets, leaving 69% (1993) for evaluation. The mean age in the historical control group was 61 6 10 years and 63 6 10 years in the RRP group. Both groups were 36% (725 of 1993 and 137 of 379) men. In the historical control group, 39% (770 of 1993) of patients were Black and 33% (658 of 1993) were White, compared with 38% (142 of 379) and 32% (121 of 379) in the RRP group, respectively. English was the mostspoken primary language, by 69% (1370 of 1993) and 68% (256 of 379) of the historical and RRP groups, respectively. A total of 65% (245 of 379) of patients in the RRP group had a peripheral nerve block compared with 54% (1070 of 1993) in the historical control group, and 39% (147 of 379) of them received spinal anesthesia, compared with 31% (615 of 1993) in the historical control group. The main elements of the RRP were standardization of preoperative visits, nutritional management, neuraxial anesthesia, accelerated physical therapy, and pain management. The primary outcomes were the proportions of patients with 90-day complications and opioid consumption. The secondary outcomes were length of stay, 90-day readmission, and discharge disposition. A multivariate analysis adjusting for age, BMI, gender, race, American Society of Anaesthesiologists class, and anesthesia type was performed by a staff biostatistician using R statistical programming. Results: After controlling for the confounding variables as noted, patients in the RRP group had fewer complications after TKA than those in the historical control group (odds ratio 2.0 [95% confidence interval 1.3 to 3.3]; p = 0.005), and there was a trend toward fewer complications in THA (OR 1.8 [95% CI 1.0 to 3.5]; p = 0.06), decreased opioid consumption during admission (517 versus 676 morphine milligram equivalents; p = 0.004), decreased 90-day readmission (TKA: OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.3 to 2.9]; p = 0.002; THA: OR 2.0 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.8]; p = 0.03), and increased proportions of discharge to home (TKA: OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.6 to 3.6]; p = 0.01; THA: OR 2.5 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.6]; p = 0.002). Patients in the RRP group had no difference in the mean length of stay (TKA: 3.2 ± 2.6 days versus 3.1 ± 2.0 days; p = 0.64; THA: 3.2 ± 2.6 days versus 2.8 ± 1.9 days; p = 0.33). Conclusion: Surgeons should consider developing an RRP in health safety-net hospitals. Such protocols emphasize preparing patients for surgery and supporting them through the acute recovery phase. There are possible benefits of neuraxial and nonopioid perioperative anesthesia, with emphasis on early mobility, which should be further characterized in comparative studies. Continued analysis of opioid use trends after discharge would be a future area of interest. Analysis of RRPs with expanded inclusion criteria should be undertaken to better understand the role of these protocols in patients who undergo revision TKA and THA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate whether the administration of intrathecal dexmedetomidine as a bupivacaine adjuvant for caesarean section can prolong the duration of analgesia compared with bupivacaine alone. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain, the time interval to the first analgesic request, the level of sedation, the incidence of adverse effects, and the fetal outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted. The study compared the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (group BD) to the intrathecal administration of bupivacaine alone (group B) for cesarean sections. RESULTS: Fourteen publications were included. Among patients who underwent spinal anesthesia for a cesarean section, 514 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine alone, and 533 patients received intrathecal bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine. The onset of sensory and motor block was essentially the same in both groups; the time for sensory and motor block regression was significantly longer in the BD group. Postoperative Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) values were similar in group BD when compared to group B. Postoperative VAS scores remained consistently low in Group BD compared to Group B, starting from 1 hour after surgery. The level of sedation measured at the end of the cesarean section in both groups was almost similar. No difference in terms of safety, adverse events, and neonatal outcomes was found between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Use of intrathecal dexmedetomidine for spinal anesthesia in cesarean section significantly prolongs sensory and motor block compared to using bupivacaine alone as an adjuvant. It also improves analgesia after 1 hour with no difference in the incidence of maternal and neonatal adverse effects compared to bupivacaine alone. The optimal dose of dexmedetomidine to use remains to be ingested. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Spinal anesthesia (SA) is commonly used within the specialties of orthopedic surgery, obstetrics and gynecology, spine surgery, and general surgery, and offers several benefits over general anesthesia (GA). However, SA is used much less frequently in plastic surgery. This review analyzed currently existing data on SA use across various surgical specialties and compared the benefits and complications of SA to those of GA, to assess its utility and potential for more widespread use in plastic surgery. A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases to evaluate the utility of SA in plastic surgery. Indications, contraindications, and data on the use of SA across various surgical specialties were reviewed. Benefits, complications, and cost-effectiveness were also assessed. Finally, the utility of SA in plastic surgery was evaluated based on the available literature. SA has been shown to yield several benefits and fewer risks than GA, including a higher possibility of early discharge, decreased costs, better pain and postoperative nausea and vomiting control, and decreased risk of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Although commonly used for procedures across various surgical specialties such as obstetrics and gynecology, urology, and orthopedic surgery, SA is less frequently used within plastic surgery. Plastic surgery procedures that would benefit from the use of SA include those below the umbilicus such as liposuction, lower extremity procedures, and perineal procedures, and owing to its benefits, we recommend that SA be used more often within plastic surgery under appropriate clinical circumstances. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Forensic Science & Technology is the property of Institute of Forensic Science, Ministry of Public Security and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia / Journal Canadien d'Anesthésie is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Postoperative shivering control without lengthening recovery time and worsening cardiovascular system is important and necessary. The main objective of the present study was to evaluate the efficiency of Meperidine and Oxycodone in preventing shivering in patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair with spinal anesthesia. The present study consisted of patients with herniorrhaphy in the Fatemi and Imam Hospital of Ardabil who were studied through a double-blind clinical trial. with spinal anesthesia from 2017 through 18. In the study110 cases with hernia were included. In both studied groups of Meperidine or oxycodone, patients were allocated randomly. Interventions began half an hour before spinal anesthesia in the operating room. Each groups had their own structured treatment plan so that the first and the second groups received 5 mg of oxycodone and placebo respectively. After the patients being stable, Meperidine 0.4 mg/kg (2 CC) was injected to the second group following the spinal anesthesia. Normal saline (2 CC) injected to the first group as placebo. Patients were evaluated for shivering, nausea, vomiting and other complications up to 4 hours after surgery. After the operation, an uninformed questioner asked for shivering, nausea and vomiting and other complications of the operation, including dizziness and headache, for up to 4 hours (at intervals of 0, 2 and 4 hours), filling the relevant questionnaire and then the data were entered into SPSSv 21 and analyzed using Chi Square, T test and Fisher exact tests. A significance Level of 0.05 was considered for all the tests. The incidence of shivering in the oxycodone group at zero time (in recovery room) was significantly lower than the Meperidine group. But in other times, oxycodone had no significant effect on shivering compared to Meperidine. In both studied groups, there was not significant differences between rate of nausea and vomiting. We showed that oxycodone pills immediately after surgery may reduce the incidence of shivering significantly and also effective in shivering control as much as Meperidine at the other times of recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: The frontal QRS-T angle is a novel parameter of myocardial repolarization. Weight gain during pregnancy and physiological changes during a cesarian section may affect the frontal QRS-T angle. We aimed to assess the effect of body mass index (BMI) on the frontal QRS-T angle in pregnant women undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. Method and materials: This study included 90 pregnant women. BMI was calculated for all pregnant women. The study population was divided into two groups: BMI < 30 (n = 66) and BMI ≥ 30 (n = 24). QT interval measurements and the frontal QRS-T angle were obtained from the report of an electrocardiography machine. Results: It was found that the pre-operative and post-operative frontal QRS-T angle (p = 0.045 and p = 0.007) and QTc interval (p = 0.037 and p < 0.001) were higher in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 than in pregnant women with a BMI < 30. In addition, when compared to pre-operative values, the post-operative frontal QRS-T angle (from 24.0 [20.0–41.5] to 34.5 [19.5–50.0], p = 0.031) and QTc interval (from 420.6 ± 13.3 to 431.7 ± 18.3, p = 0.010) were increased in the BMI ≥ 30 group, whereas no significant post-operative increase was observed in the BMI < 30 group. In correlation analysis, BMI was positively correlated with the frontal QRS-T angle and QTc interval. Conclusions: The frontal QRS-T angle and QTc interval were importantly increased in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 than in pregnant women with a BMI < 30. Also, after cesarean section operation with spinal anesthesia, the frontal QRS-T angle and QTc were increased significantly in the BMI ≥ 30 group, whereas no significant change was observed in the BMI < 30 group. Therefore, it is suggested to perform close post-operative monitoring in pregnant women with a BMI ≥ 30 undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Aortic dissection, a rare but serious condition, requires timely diagnosis and treatment. Case report: A case report involving a 33-year-old female with Stanford type B aortic dissection at 32 + 3 weeks gestational age highlights the importance of being alert to the symptoms and signs of this condition, particularly in patients with hypertension or a history of connective tissue disorders. The case report suggests a delivery first strategy followed by TEVAR procedure as the preferred approach for managing aortic dissection in pregnancy. This approach can alleviate pressure on the aorta, reduce the risk of rupture, and provide time for stabilization and preparation for the TEVAR procedure. Conclusion: The case report emphasizes the criticality of recognizing and treating aortic dissection in pregnant patients promptly, given its potential life-threatening impact on both mother and fetus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Delayed spinal epidural hematoma (SEH) following central neuraxial block (CNB) is a rare but serious complication. The underlying causes of SEH associated with neuraxial anesthesia are still unclear. Furthermore, the decision between surgical intervention and conservative management for SEH remains a complex and unresolved issue. Case Presentation: We report a case of delayed SEH in a 73-year-old woman who underwent vaginal hysterectomy under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia, with the administration of postoperative anticoagulants to prevent deep vein thrombosis on the 1st postoperative day (POD). She experienced symptoms 56 h after CNB. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed a dorsal SEH at the L1-L4 level with compression of the thecal sac. On conservative treatment, full recovery was achieved after six months. Conclusions: This case reminds anesthesiologists should be alert to the possible occurrence of a delayed SEH following CNB, particularly with the administration of anticoagulants. Immediate neurological evaluation of neurological deficit and MRI are advised. Conservative treatment combined with close and dynamic neurological function monitoring may be feasible for patients with mild or nonprogressive symptoms even spontaneous recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background:Spinal route of approach is the standard mode of regional anesthesia for conducting caesarean section is considered the standard mode of anaesthesia in caesarean section and it is considered safe, low cost with patient compliance. Spinal anesthesia induced sympathetic blockade, supine hypotension syndrome and low baseline vascular tone cause post spinal hypotension in the mothers. Perfusion index is a real time non-invasive parameter for early detection of this post spinal hypotension. Therefore the aim of this study was early prediction of anypost spinal hypotension and its degree of correlation withperfusion index. Materialsand Methods:A prospective observation study was conduct on200parturient, based on inclusion exclusion criteria devoid of any co-morbidities undergoing elective caesarean section subjected to spinal anesthesia. After routine investigations parturient were posted for elective caesarean section maintaining proper fasting guidelines. The perfusion index was measured with pulse oximeter at fixed time interval along with other vital parameters. The final data were analyzed with appropriate statistical software. Results:The parturient whose baseline finger perfusion index (P.I) is >3.5 have more chance of post spinal hypotension with a significance of p< 0.0001. Finger P.I with degree of decrease of SBP has positive correlation with highly significant value (r=0.7,p value<0.0001) whereas for MAP, it is highly significant but notpositively correlated(r=0.4, p value<0.0001). Conclusion:Finger perfusion index is an effective non- invasive predictor for the post spinal hypotension undergoing elective caesarean section. Additionally, the finger perfusion index is a reliable indicator of the extent to which systolic and mean arterial pressure decreases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Aims: Postoperative analgesia after caesarean section is important because it enables early ambulation. Several case reports have shown that local anaesthetic injection around the quadratus lumborum muscle is effective in providing pain relief after various abdominal operations and in patients with chronic pain. The aim of our trial was to access the analgesic efficacy of transmuscular quadratus lumborum block (TQLB) after caesarean section. Methods: This study was done in 80 women posted for caesarean section who were divided into two groups of 40 each.TQLB was given bilaterally, in group R with 20 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine and in group S with 20 ml saline. Patients were operated under spinal anaesthesia and were examined for pain at different time points postoperatively. Time required for first analgesic demand was our primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were total rescue analgesia (paracetamol)required in 24 hrs, pain scores, nausea, vomiting, sedation and any other complications. Results:The time required for first analgesic demand was 5.9± 0.8hrs in R group and 2.1± 0.2 hrs in group S which was statistically significant. The total paracetamol consumption in 24 hours was 2.2± 0.4gm in group R and 3.9± 0.7gmin group S, the difference being significant. Conclusion: Transmuscular quadratus lumborum block can produce quality analgesia after caesarean section. TQLB not only improves the visual analogue scale (VAS) score but also decreases the rescue analgesic consumption without any complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND Spinal anaesthesia is the most common procedure for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. Fentanyl, a synthetic opioid and dexmedetomidine, a selective α2 agonist have been used in this study as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. AIM The main aim of the study is to compare the efficacy, analgesic effects, hemodynamic stability and side effects of intrathecal fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS 100 patients of ASA class 1 and 2 posted for lower limb orthopaedic surgeries were taken for this study. Patients were randomly allocated using sealed envelopes into 2 groups. Group F - 17.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 25mcg fentanyl intrathecally and group D - 17.5mg of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine with 10 mcg of dexmedetomidine intrathecally. RESULTS In patients who have received dexmedetomidine observed to have significantly longer analgesic effects than the other group who received fentanyl as adjuvant. Mean duration of sensory blockade for group D was 455.54 ± 43.09 mins when compared to Group F which was 283.32 ± 23.994 mins. Post operative shivering was more in Group F patients when compared to Group D patients. CONCLUSION Using dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anaesthesia in lower limb orthopaedic surgeries has longer duration of sensory and motor block and longer postoperative analgesia when compared to intrathecal fentanyl. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: C-section is usually performed under spinal anesthesia also known as a subarachnoid block (SAB) over general anesthesia. Because of the lesser amount of dose used, there is a lower risk of local anesthetic toxicity and minimal transfer of drugs to the fetus. Obstetric patients have a higher risk of having post-dural puncture headache (PDPH). PDPH occurs due to leakage of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) through the hole created by a spinal needle. There are many elements affecting the frequency of PDPH, these elements can also consist of age, female sex, needle size, and types, pregnancy, preceding records of PDPH, median-paramedian distinction in approach, a puncture level. PDPH is commonly in the form of a frontal, occipital, or retro-orbital headache that starts in 12-72 h after the dural puncture and will increase when standing and decrease when lying down or resting. We aimed to learn about headache frequency between elective and emergency lower segment cesarean section using 26-G Quincke spinal needle in full-term pregnant patients. Objectives: To study the incidence of PDPH using the 26G Quincke spinal needle. To analyze the causal factors/determinants such as adequate preloading of fluids, size of spinal needle, number of pricks, and technique of lumbar puncture effects on the incidence of PDPH. Methodology: This study is a prospective questionnaire-based comparative observational study using the convenience sampling method. The patients were interviewed with a structured questionnaire at the Symbiosis University Hospital and Research Centre, Lavale, Pune. The patients observed for the study were between 20 and 40 of age group, posted for emergency or elective lower segment cesarean section, with body mass index (BMI) less than 14.5 to 24.9 and with ASA I and II grades. Patients with any comorbidities, recurrent headaches, obesity, and spine deformity were excluded. According to the review of the literature and with the help of a formula, the sample size was calculated as 20; 10 patients for elective LSCS, and 10 patients for emergency LSCS. Results: Out of 20 patients, 10 patients were posted for elective LSCS, and the rest 10 patients were for emergency LSCS under spinal anesthesia. The incidence of PDPH was found only in 2 out of 10 emergency LSCS patients, and no patients from elective LSCS cases showed up with the incidence of PDPH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of intrathecal (IT) dexamethasone during subarachnoid block (SAB) has not been evaluated. There are no pooled data available to decide on the optimal regimen of IT dexamethasone during SAB, irrespective of the type of surgery. There is uncertainty about its dosage, effectiveness, and safety, and a need to establish clear guidelines on its use. Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of use of IT dexamethasone during SAB. We performed a meta-analysis (PROSPERO, CRD42022304944) of trials that included patients who underwent a variety of surgical procedures under SAB. Patients received concomitant IT dexamethasone as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetics. The analyzed outcomes included sensory and motor effects as well as adverse and/or beneficial side effects. Subgroup analysis was planned based on different doses used. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was used to estimate the required sample size information (RIS) for each outcome. Eighteen studies (2531 participants) were included in this analysis. Addition of IT dexamethasone (4-8 mg) to heavy bupivacaine effectively prolonged the duration of sensory blockade (mean difference, MD = 63.8 minutes; [95% confidence interval, CI, 33.1-94.5], P < 0.0001), two-segment regression time (MD = 20.1[95% CI, 0.96-39.2], P = 0.04) and first rescue analgesic time (MD = 143.3 [95% CI, 90.3-196.0], P = 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed superior effects of 8 mg dose over 4 mg for sensory and analgesic effects. The effect of dexamethasone on duration of motor blockade was inconclusive. Additionally, lower risk ratios (RRs) were recorded for spinal anesthesia-related hypotension (RR = 0.74 [95% CI, 0.6-0.9], P = 0.0003) and nausea/vomiting (RR = 0.62 [95% CI, 0.41-0.93], P = 0.02) in the dexamethasone group. For outcomes such as sensory blockade, analgesia, and hypotension, the required information size was reached during TSA. In conclusion, IT dexamethasone, used as an adjuvant to spinal local anesthetic, especially at the dose of 8 mg, increases sensory blockade duration and the time for request of the first rescue analgesic. SAB-induced side effects such as hypotension, nausea, and vomiting are lesser with the use of IT dexamethasone. However, further studies are necessary to draw meaningful conclusions on its safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]