Search

Purpose: To assess the pain, swelling, infection, and alteration in sensation following the flapless placement of zygomatic implants guided by dynamic navigation. Materials and Methods: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 20 patients. In group 1, the placement of the zygomatic implants was carried out without reflecting a mucoperiosteal flap (flapless). In group 2, a mucoperiosteal flap was raised (flapped). Two zygomatic implants were placed in each patient (one on each side) under local anesthesia, guided by dynamic navigation. Postoperative evaluations included pain (using the visual analogue scale [VAS]), swelling (using standard measurements), maxillary sinus infection, and alteration of sensation (using mechanical stimuli, thermal threshold detection, and a two-point discrimination test). The assessments were carried out at 2 days, 1 week, and then 1, 2, and 3 months postoperatively. Results: In group 1, all implants except for one were successfully osseointegrated. Immediate postoperative pain and swelling were both significantly greater in group 2 (P < .01). No alteration in sensation was detected in any case in the two groups. There were a total of three cases of chronic sinusitis: one in group 1 and two in group 2. Conclusions: The flapless placement of zygomatic implants guided by dynamic navigation and under local anesthesia improves postoperative recovery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Maxillary sinus augmentation with a lateral approach is known to present more postoperative complications than other atrophic posterior maxilla treatment modalities because it is more invasive. These complications include infections that occur in the form of chronic or acute sinusitis. According to the literature, the frequency of these complications ranges from 3% to 5%. They can result from an inadequate management of intraoperative complications or from a poor evaluation of maxillary sinus particularities and pathology before the surgery. Therefore, the prevention of postoperative complications lies in the selection of cases that will allow for the identification and evaluation of infectious risk. Only a multidisciplinary approach that includes an implantologist, a rhinologist, and the treating physician will allow this. On the other hand, in infectious complication cases, the intervention of the otorhinolaryngologist (ENT) specialist is necessary. Based on the available literature and the author's experience, the methodology described in this article will allow for the prevention and management of postoperative complications related to this surgical technique. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]