Search

The list of standard abbreviations for JDS is available at adsa.org/jds-abbreviations-24. Nonstandard abbreviations are available in the Notes. Traits related to calving have a significant impact on animal welfare and farm profitability in dairy production systems. Identifying genomic regions associated with calving traits could contribute to refining dairy cattle breeding programs and management practices in the dairy industry. Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters and perform GWAS and functional enrichment analyses for stillbirth, gestation length, calf size, and calving ease traits in North American Jersey cattle. A total of 40,503 animals with phenotypic records and 5,398 animals genotyped for 45,101 SNPs were included in the analyses. Genetic parameters were estimated based on animal models and Bayesian methods. The effects of SNPs were estimated using the single-step GBLUP method. The heritability (SE) estimates ranged from 0.01 (0.01) for stillbirths in heifers to 0.11 (0.01) for gestation length in cows. The genetic correlations ranged from −0.58 (0.11) between calving ease and stillbirths in heifers to 0.44 (0.14) between calving ease and calf size in cows. Calving ease showed the highest genetic correlation between heifers and cows, 0.8 (0.22) respectively. The candidate genes identified, including MTHFR , SERPINA5 , IGFBP3 , and ZRANB1 , are involved in key biological processes and metabolic pathways related to the studied traits. Reducing environmental variation and identifying novel indicators of reproduction traits in the Jersey breed are needed given the low heritability estimates for most traits evaluated in this study. In conclusion, this study provides a characterization of the genetic background of calving-related traits in Jersey cattle. The estimates obtained can be used to improve or build selection indexes in Jersey cattle breeding programs in North America. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT: Traits related to calving have a significant impact on animal welfare and farm profitability in dairy production systems. Identifying genomic regions associated with calving traits could contribute to refining dairy cattle breeding programs and management practices in the dairy industry. Therefore, the primary objectives of this study were to estimate genetic parameters and perform GWAS and functional enrichment analyses for stillbirth, gestation length, calf size, and calving ease traits in North American Jersey cattle. A total of 40,503 animals with phenotypic records and 5,398 animals genotyped for 45,101 SNPs were included in the analyses. Genetic parameters were estimated based on animal models and Bayesian methods. The effects of SNPs were estimated using the single-step GBLUP method. The heritability (SE) estimates ranged from 0.01 (0.01) for stillbirths in heifers to 0.11 (0.01) for gestation length in cows. The genetic correlations ranged from −0.58 (0.11) between calving ease and stillbirths in heifers to 0.44 (0.14) between calving ease and calf size in cows. Calving ease showed the highest genetic correlation between heifers and cows, 0.8 (0.22) respectively. The candidate genes identified, including MTHFR, SERPINA5, IGFBP3, and ZRANB1, are involved in key biological processes and metabolic pathways related to the studied traits. Reducing environmental variation and identifying novel indicators of reproduction traits in the Jersey breed are needed given the low heritability estimates for most traits evaluated in this study. In conclusion, this study provides a characterization of the genetic background of calving-related traits in Jersey cattle. The estimates obtained can be used to improve or build selection indexes in Jersey cattle breeding programs in North America.

The prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values using traditional best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) methods was investigated in two breeding populations of Litopenaeus vannamei, using simulated data with varying levels of marker density. Additionally, the impact of the number of generations with phenotypic and genotypic data on the prediction accuracy was also investigated.The simulated breeding populations consisted of 25 families with 40 animals each, or 50 families with 20 animals each. Each population consisted of 20 non-overlapping generations, with 1000 animals per generation. Only the last ten generations were genotyped, and phenotypes and pedigrees were available for all the animals. Phenotypes from the 20th generation were masked in data analysis to mimic the selection of young animals without phenotypes. A trait with a heritability of 0.1 was simulated, and 100 % of the genetic variance was explained by 1000 QTLs evenly distributed across chromosomes and randomly located across the genome. Genomic information consisted of 44 chromosomes that mimicked the genome structure of L. vannamei, with 6, 11, 22, 45, and 90 K markers evenly distributed across the 44 chromosomes.Results indicated that expanding family sizes with fewer family numbers improved the prediction accuracy in both PBLUP and ssGBLUP. In all scenarios, ssGBLUP outperformed PBLUP in terms of the prediction accuracy. The greater the number of generations of data in which genotypes and phenotypes were included in the ssGBLUP approach, the better the prediction accuracy. However, genotyping for more than six generations did not substantially improve prediction accuracy. Additionally, maximum accuracy was achieved with 45 K SNPs in both scenarios, with no substantial improvement in accuracy by increasing the marker density to 90 K. Overall, more accurate predictions were obtained with ssGBLUP with more genotyped animals per family and could be a suitable method for genomic selection for traits with low heritability in L. vannamei.

ABSTRACT: In local chickens targeted for niche markets, genotyping costs are relatively high due to the small population size and diverse breeding goals. The single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) model, which combines pedigree and genomic information, has been introduced to increase the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). Therefore, this model may be more beneficial than the genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model for genomic selection in local chickens. Additionally, the single-step genome-wide association study (ssGWAS) can be used to extend the ssGBLUP model results to animals with available phenotypic information but without genotypic data. In this study, we compared the accuracy of (G)EBVs using the pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP), GBLUP, and ssGBLUP models. Moreover, we conducted single-SNP GWAS (SNP-GWAS), GBLUP-GWAS, and ssGWAS methods to identify genes associated with egg production traits in the NCHU-G101 chicken to understand the feasibility of using genomic selection in a small population. The average prediction accuracy of (G)EBV for egg production traits using the PBLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP models is 0.536, 0.531, and 0.555, respectively. In total, 22 suggestive- and 5% Bonferroni genome-wide significant-level SNPs for total egg number (EN), average laying rate (LR), average clutch length, and total clutch number are detected using 3 GWAS methods. These SNPs are mapped onto Gallus gallus chromosomes (GGA) 4, 6, 10, 18, and 25 in NCHU-G101 chicken. Furthermore, through SNP-GWAS and ssGWAS methods, we identify 2 genes on GGA4 associated with EN and LR: ENSGALG00000023172 and PPARGC1A. In conclusion, the ssGBLUP model demonstrates superior prediction accuracy, performing on average 3.41% than the PBLUP model. The implications of our gene results may guide future selection strategies for Taiwan Country chickens. Our results highlight the applicability of the ssGBLUP model for egg production traits selection in a small population, specifically NCHU-G101 chicken in Taiwan.

Introduction: Xinjiang Brown cattle constitute the largest breed of cattle in Xinjiang. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a genomic evaluation system, especially for those with low levels of breed improvement. Methods: This study aimed to establish a cross breed joint reference population by analyzing the genetic structure of 485 Xinjiang Brown cattle and 2,633 Chinese Holstein cattle (Illumina GeneSeek GGP bovine 150 K chip). The Bayes method single-step genome-wide best linear unbiased prediction was used to conduct a genomic evaluation of the joint reference population for the milk traits of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The reference population of Chinese Holstein cattle was randomly divided into groups to construct the joint reference population. By comparing the prediction accuracy, estimation bias, and inflation coefficient of the validation population, the optimal number of joint reference populations was determined. Results and Discussion: The results indicated a distinct genetic structure difference between the two breeds of adult cows, and both breeds should be consideredwhen constructing multi-breed joint reference and validation populations. The reliability range of genome prediction of milk traits in the joint reference population was 0.142-0.465. Initially, it was determined that the inclusion of 600 and 900 Chinese Holstein cattle in the joint reference population positively impacted the genomic prediction of Xinjiang Brown cattle to certain extent. It was feasible to incorporate the Chinese Holstein into Xinjiang Brown cattle population to forma joint reference population for multi-breed genomic evaluation. However, for different Xinjiang Brown cattle populations, a fixed number of Chinese Holstein cattle cannot be directly added duringmulti-breed genomic selection. Pre-evaluation analysis based on the genetic structure, kinship, and other factors of the current population is required to ensure the authenticity and reliability of genomic predictions and improve estimation accuracy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Planting tested forest reproductive material is crucial to ensure the increased resilience of intensively managed productive stands for timber and wood product markets under climate change scenarios. Single-step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction (ssGBLUP) analysis is a cost-effective option for using genomic tools to enhance the accuracy of predicted breeding values and genetic parameter estimation in forest tree species. Here, we tested the efficiency of ssGBLUP in a tropical multipurpose tree species, Cordia africana, by partial population genotyping. A total of 8070 trees from three breeding seedling orchards (BSOs) were phenotyped for height. We genotyped 6.1% of the phenotyped individuals with 4373 single nucleotide polymorphisms. The results of ssGBLUP were compared with pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) and genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), based on genetic parameters, theoretical accuracy of breeding values, selection candidate ranking, genetic gain, and predictive accuracy and prediction bias. Results Genotyping a subset of the study population provided insights into the level of relatedness in BSOs, allowing better genetic management. Due to the inbreeding detected within the genotyped provenances, we estimated genetic parameters both with and without accounting for inbreeding. The ssGBLUP model showed improved performance in terms of additive genetic variance and theoretical breeding value accuracy. Similarly, ssGBLUP showed improved predictive accuracy and lower bias than the pedigree-based relationship matrix (ABLUP). Conclusions This study of C. africana, a species in decline due to deforestation and selective logging, revealed inbreeding depression. The provenance exhibiting the highest level of inbreeding had the poorest overall performance. The use of different relationship matrices and accounting for inbreeding did not substantially affect the ranking of candidate individuals. This is the first study of this approach in a tropical multipurpose tree species, and the analysed BSOs represent the primary effort to breed C. africana.

Genomic selection methods are particularly useful for traits that are difficult or expensive to measure. We investigated the impact of using predictor growth traits and/or genomic information to increase the breeding value (BV) predictive accuracies for target scarcely recorded wood quality traits in an open-pollinated Eucalyptus grandis population. The performance of single- and multiple-trait single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction and conventional pedigree-based models were compared in terms of the predictive accuracies (PA) of estimated BV for the target traits. We also derived the contributions of the BV for candidate trees to better understand our results. The inclusion of predictor traits in both, the training and the validation sets, together with genomic information, improved the PA (up to 17.7%) for pulp yield and cellulose. However, significant improvements in PA were not observed when predictor traits were recorded only in the training set or when the impact of genomic information alone was assessed. Changes in the PA were explained by the variations in the maternal contributions, contribution/s from all the predictor/s trait/s, and from genotyped trees. We conclude that there is not a "universal" rule regarding the use of genomic information and records on predictor traits. However, assessing the contributions to the BV of validation trees may help to better design how to benefit from predictor traits in forest tree breeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) is an economically important disease of salmonid fish caused by the IHN virus (IHNV). Under industrial aquaculture settings, IHNV can cause substantial mortality and losses. Actually, there is no confirmed and cost-effective method for IHNV control. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. has been performing family-based selective breeding to increase genetic resistance to IHNV in their rainbow trout breeding program. In an earlier study, we used siblings cross-validation to estimate the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) for IHNV resistance in this breeding population. In the present report, we used empirical progeny testing data to evaluate whether genomic selection (GS) can improve the accuracy of breeding value predictions over traditional pedigree-based best linear unbiased predictions (PBLUP). We found that the GP accuracy with single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) outperformed PBLUP by 15% (from 0.33 to 0.38). Furthermore, we found that ssGBLUP had higher GP accuracy than weighted ssGBLUP (wssGBLUP) and single-step Bayesian multiple regression (ssBMR) models with BayesB and BayesC priors which supports our previous findings that the underlying liability of genetic resistance against IHNV in this breeding population might be polygenic. Our results show that GS can be more effective than either the traditional pedigree-based PBLUP model or the marker-assisted selection approach for improving genetic resistance against IHNV in this commercial rainbow trout population.

In local chickens targeted for niche markets, genotyping costs are relatively high due to the small population size and diverse breeding goals. The single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP) model, which combines pedigree and genomic information, has been introduced to increase the accuracy of genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV). Therefore, this model may be more beneficial than the genomic BLUP (GBLUP) model for genomic selection in local chickens. Additionally, the single-step genome-wide association study (ssGWAS) can be used to extend the ssGBLUP model results to animals with available phenotypic information but without genotypic data. In this study, we compared the accuracy of (G)EBVs using the pedigree-based BLUP (PBLUP), GBLUP, and ssGBLUP models. Moreover, we conducted single-SNP GWAS (SNP-GWAS), GBLUP-GWAS, and ssGWAS methods to identify genes associated with egg production traits in the NCHU-G101 chicken to understand the feasibility of using genomic selection in a small population. The average prediction accuracy of (G)EBV for egg production traits using the PBLUP, GBLUP, and ssGBLUP models is 0.536, 0.531, and 0.555, respectively. In total, 22 suggestive- and 5% Bonferroni genome-wide significant-level SNPs for total egg number (EN), average laying rate (LR), average clutch length, and total clutch number are detected using 3 GWAS methods. These SNPs are mapped onto Gallus gallus chromosomes (GGA) 4, 6, 10, 18, and 25 in NCHU-G101 chicken. Furthermore, through SNP-GWAS and ssGWAS methods, we identify 2 genes on GGA4 associated with EN and LR: ENSGALG00000023172 and PPARGC1A. In conclusion, the ssGBLUP model demonstrates superior prediction accuracy, performing on average 3.41% than the PBLUP model. The implications of our gene results may guide future selection strategies for Taiwan Country chickens. Our results highlight the applicability of the ssGBLUP model for egg production traits selection in a small population, specifically NCHU-G101 chicken in Taiwan. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to estimate economic returns and costs associated with 4 scenarios of genetic evaluation that combine genotypes, phenotypes, and pedigree information from a vertically integrated purebred (PB) and commercial (CM) beef cattle system. Inference was to a genetic evaluation for a production system producing Charolais terminal sires for 10,000 CM cows. The first genetic evaluation scenario, denoted PB_A, modeled a genetic evaluation in which pedigree information and phenotypes are available for PB seedstock animals. Scenario PB_H contained the same information as PB_A with the addition of 25K density (GeneSeek Genomic Profiler LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes from PB animals. Scenario PBCM_A contained pedigree records and phenotypes from PB and CM cattle. Scenario PBCM_H contained phenotypes, pedigree, and genotypes from the PB and CM animals. Estimates of prediction error variance, (co)variance, and selection index parameters were used to estimate accuracy of selection candidates (rTI) and genetic gain resulting from selection on an economic index in US dollars (ΔG). Annual costs and incomes were used to determine the 30-yr cumulative net present value (CNPV) per CM calf resulting from selection in these genetic evaluation scenarios. Adding genotypes and CM production phenotypes to genetic evaluation increased the rTI of selection candidates and ΔG across all 4 scenarios. Scenario PBCM_H produced the highest annual ΔG in the PB herd at US$11.91 per head. Including CM phenotypes and parentage testing in the genetic evaluation increased the time to breakeven from 12 yr in PB_A to 19 years in PBCM_A after accounting for the cost of that information. Adding CM phenotypes and genotypes increased the breakeven time from 12 yr in PB_H to 18 yr in PBCM_H. Scenario PB_H produced the highest 30-yr CNPV per slaughtered CM calf at US$371.16. These results using field data indicate that economically relevant rTI and ΔG can be realized by adding 25K SNP genotypes and CM phenotypes to genetic evaluation, but the additional cost of that data significantly delays the economic return to the enterprise.

In unstructured dairy programs, pedigree is usually shallow, which leads to biased prediction of breeding values using best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP). The objective of this study was to come out with a genomic prediction strategy that can utilize shallow pedigree information and predict unbiased and more accurate GEBV for sex-limited traits in a small population using single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The data and models for a population under selection were simulated. Out of current 10 generations, 10th generation with 1000 candidates served as validation population. For the complete pedigree scenario, pedigree (P)BLUP estimated breeding values (EBV) were unbiased with accuracy (r) of 0.35 ± 0.02 and 0.26 ± 0.01 for 0.3 and 0.1 h2 scenario, respectively. For the shallow pedigree, biased prediction of breeding values and low accuracies were obtained with linear decline in the accuracy of EBV for removal of information on more distant pedigree. Accuracy and bias (ρ) for scenario with removing 4 distant generations from pedigree were 0.30 ± 0.02 and 0.55 ± 0.03, respectively, in moderate h2 scenario. Use of Genomic (G)BLUP, especially with “extreme phenotypic contrast selective genotyping,” (TB) resulted in higher accuracy for a small reference of females; however, GEBV were highly biased. We observed that ssGBLUPF, where the numerator relationship matrix is corrected for inbreeding, resulted in more accurate and unbiased estimates of GEBV across shallow pedigree scenario, with TB all female reference (missing 4 distant generations: r = 0.50 ± 0.02; ρ = 0.96 ± 0.02). We recommend use of ssGBLUPF with two tailed selectively genotyped all female reference in shallow pedigree scenarios, to obtain unbiased and accurate GEBV for sex-limited traits, when resources are limited. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Compared to BLUP, in single-step genomic BLUP, G − 1 − A 22 − 1 is added to the inverse of the pedigree relationship matrix ( A − 1 ), forming H − 1 , where G is the genomic relationship matrix, and A 22 is the block of A for genotyped animals. Incompatibility between G and A may cause inflated genetic variance. Blending and tuning G with A 22 partially solves the problem. However, conditioning H − 1 might still be needed, which is usually performed via τ G − 1 − ω A 22 − 1 . This may violate the properties upon which H is built. Alternative ways of weighting the H − 1 components are presented to prevent/minimise violations of the properties of H. The single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is used worldwide for the simultaneous genetic evaluation of genotyped and non-genotyped animals. It is easily extendible to all BLUP models by replacing the pedigree-based additive genetic relationship matrix (A) with an augmented pedigree–genomic relationship matrix (H). Theoretically, H does not introduce any artificially inflated variance. However, inflated genetic variances have been observed due to the incomparability between the genomic relationship matrix (G) and A used in H. Usually, G is blended and tuned with A 22 (the block of A for genotyped animals) to improve its numerical condition and compatibility. If deflation/inflation is still needed, a common approach is weighting G − 1 − A 22 − 1 in the form of τ G − 1 − ω A 22 − 1 , added to A − 1 to form H − 1 . In some situations, this can violate the conditional properties upon which H is built. Different ways of weighting the H − 1 components ( A − 1 , G − 1 , A 22 − 1 , and H − 1 itself) were studied to avoid/minimise the violations of the conditional properties of H. Data were simulated on ten populations and twenty generations. Responses to weighting different components of H − 1 were measured in terms of the regression of phenotypes on the estimated breeding values (the lower the slope, the higher the inflation) and the correlation between phenotypes and the estimated breeding values (predictive ability). Increasing the weight on H − 1 increased the inflation. The responses to weighting G − 1 were similar to those for H − 1 . Increasing the weight on A − 1 (together with A 22 − 1 ) was not influential and slightly increased the inflation. Predictive ability is a direct function of the slope of the regression line and followed similar trends. Responses to weighting G − 1 − A 22 − 1 depend on the inflation/deflation of evaluations from A − 1 to H − 1 and the compatibility of the two matrices with the heritability used in the model. One possibility is a combination of weighting G − 1 − A 22 − 1 and weighting H − 1 . Given recent advances in ssGBLUP, conditioning H − 1 might become an interim solution from the past and then not be needed in the future. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genetic groups have been widely adopted in tree breeding to account for provenance effects within pedigree-derived relationship matrices. However, provenances or genetic groups have not yet been incorporated into single-step genomic BLUP (“HBLUP”) analyses of tree populations. To quantify the impact of accounting for population structure in Eucalyptus globulus, we used HBLUP to compare breeding value predictions from models excluding base population effects and models including either fixed genetic groups or the marker-derived proxies, also known as metafounders. Full-sib families from 2 separate breeding populations were evaluated across 13 sites in the “Green Triangle” region of Australia. Gamma matrices (C) describing similarities among metafounders reflected the geographic distribution of populations and the origins of 2 land races were identified. Diagonal elements of C provided population diversity or allelic covariation estimates between 0.24 and 0.56. Genetic group solutions were strongly correlated with metafounder solutions across models and metafounder effects influenced the genetic solutions of base population parents. The accuracy, stability, dispersion, and bias of model solutions were compared using the linear regression method. Addition of genomic information increased accuracy from 0.41 to 0.47 and stability from 0.68 to 0.71, while increasing bias slightly. Dispersion was within 0.10 of the ideal value (1.0) for all models. Although inclusion of metafounders did not strongly affect accuracy or stability and had mixed effects on bias, we nevertheless recommend the incorporation of metafounders in prediction models to represent the hierarchical genetic population structure of recently domesticated populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aims of this study were to: (1) estimate genetic correlation for milk production traits (milk, fat and protein yields and fat and protein contents) and fatty acids (FA: C16:0, C18:1 cis-9, LCFA, SFA, and UFA) over days in milk, (2) investigate the performance of genomic predictions using single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) based on random regression models (RRM), and (3) identify the optimal scaling and weighting factors to be used in the construction of the H matrix. A total of 302 684 test-day records of 63.875 first lactation Walloon Holstein cows were used. Positive genetic correlations were found between milk yield and fat and protein yield (rg from 0.46 to 0.85) and between fat yield and milk FA (rg from 0.17 to 0.47). On the other hand, negative correlations were estimated between fat and protein contents (rg from −0.22 to −0.59), between milk yield and milk FA (rg from −0.22 to −0.62), and between protein yield and milk FA (rg from −0.11 to −0.19). The selection for high fat content increases milk FA throughout lactation (rg from 0.61 to 0.98). The test-day ssGBLUP approach showed considerably higher prediction reliability than the parent average for all milk production and FA traits, even when no scaling and weighting factors were used in the H matrix. The highest validation reliabilities (r2 from 0.09 to 0.38) and less biased predictions (b1 from 0.76 to 0.92) were obtained using the optimal parameters (i.e., ω = 0.7 and α = 0.6) for the genomic evaluation of milk production traits. For milk FA, the optimal parameters were ω = 0.6 and α = 0.6. However, biased predictions were still observed (b1 from 0.32 to 0.81). The findings suggest that using ssGBLUP based on RRM is feasible for the genomic prediction of daily milk production and FA traits in Walloon Holstein dairy cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The effectiveness of genomic selection in pig breeding depends largely on genomic prediction accuracy. The relatively short generation interval and the high selection intensity make the issue of the selection criterion accuracy extremely important. Genotyping animals by SNP markers makes it possible to increase the accuracy of breeding criteria for young replacement animals. However, the applied computational algorithm plays an equally important role, that is, the method of calculating the genomic estimates. The study compared three methods (BLUP AM, ssGBLUP, wssGBLUP) for the assessment of pigs' breeding value according to five main breeding traits. Changes in the accuracy of the genomic estimates obtained by the ssGBLUP and wssGBLUP methods were evaluated using different reference groups. The weighting procedure's reasonableness of application Pwas considered to improve the accuracy of genomic predictions for meat, fattening and reproduction traits in pigs. Six reference groups were formed to assess the genomic data quantity impact on the accuracy of predicted values (groups of genotyped animals). The datasets included 62,927 records of meat and fattening productivity (fat thickness over 6–7 ribs (BF1, mm)), muscle depth (MD, mm) and precocity up to 100 kg (age, days) and 16,070 observations of reproductive qualities (the number of all born piglets (TNB) and the number of live-born piglets (NBA), according to the results of the first farrowing). The wssGBLUP method has an advantage over ssGBLUP in terms of estimation reliability. When using a small reference group, the difference in the accuracy of ssGBLUP over BLUP AM is from −1.9 to +7.3 percent points, while for wssGBLUP, the change in accuracy varies from +18.2 to +87.3 percent points. Furthermore, the superiority of the wssGBLUP is also maintained for the largest group of genotyped animals: from +4.7 to +15.9 percent points for ssGBLUP and from +21.1 to +90.5 percent points for wssGBLUP. However, for all analyzed traits, the number of markers explaining 5% of genetic variability varied from 71 to 108, and the number of such SNPs varied depending on the size of the reference group (79–88 for BF1, 72–81 for MD, 71–108 for age). The results of the genetic variation distribution have the greatest similarity between groups of about 1000 and about 1500 individuals. Thus, the size of the reference group of more than 1000 individuals gives more stable results for the estimation based on the wssGBLUP method, while using the reference group of 500 individuals can lead to distorted results of GEBV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic selection has been increasingly implemented in the animal breeding industry, and it is becoming a routine method in many livestock breeding contexts. However, its use is still limited in several small-population local breeds, which are, nonetheless, an important source of genetic variability of great economic value. A major roadblock for their genomic selection is accuracy when population size is limited: to improve breeding value accuracy, variable selection models that assume heterogenous variance have been proposed over the last few years. However, while these models might outperform traditional and genomic predictions in terms of accuracy, they also carry a proportional increase of breeding value bias and dispersion. These mutual increases are especially striking when genomic selection is performed with a low number of phenotypes and high shrinkage value—which is precisely the situation that happens with small local breeds. In our study, we tested several alternative methods to improve the accuracy of genomic selection in a small population. First, we investigated the impact of using only a subset of informative markers regarding prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion. We used different algorithms to select them, such as recursive feature eliminations, penalized regression, and XGBoost. We compared our results with the predictions of pedigree-based BLUP, single-step genomic BLUP, and weighted single-step genomic BLUP in different simulated populations obtained by combining various parameters in terms of number of QTLs and effective population size. We also investigated these approaches on a real data set belonging to the small local Rendena breed. Our results show that the accuracy of GBLUP in small-sized populations increased when performed with SNPs selected via variable selection methods both in simulated and real data sets. In addition, the use of variable selection models—especially those using XGBoost—in our real data set did not impact bias and the dispersion of estimated breeding values. We have discussed possible explanations for our results and how our study can help estimate breeding values for future genomic selection in small breeds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic data are widely used in predicting the breeding values of dairy cattle. The accuracy of genomic prediction depends on the size of the reference population and how related the candidate animals are to it. For populations with limited numbers of progeny‐tested bulls, the reference populations must include cows and data from external populations. The aim of this study was to implement state‐of‐the‐art single‐step genomic evaluations for milk and fat yield in Holstein and Russian Black & White cattle in the Leningrad region (LR, Russia), using only a limited number of genotyped animals. We complemented internal information with external pseudo‐phenotypic and genotypic data of bulls from the neighbouring Danish, Finnish and Swedish Holstein (DFS) population. Three data scenarios were used to perform single‐step GBLUP predictions in the LR dairy cattle population. The first scenario was based on the original LR reference population, which constituted 1,080 genotyped cows and 427 genotyped bulls. In the second scenario, the genotypes of 414 bulls related to the LR from the DFS population were added to the reference population. In the third scenario, LR data were further augmented with pseudo‐phenotypic data from the DFS population. The inclusion of foreign information increased the validation reliability of the milk yield by up to 30%. Suboptimal data recording practices hindered the improvement of fat yield. We confirmed that the single‐step model is suitable for populations with a low number of genotyped animals, especially when external information is integrated into the evaluations. Genomic prediction in populations with a low number of progeny‐tested bulls can be based on data from genotyped cows and on the inclusion of genotypes and pseudo‐phenotypes from the external population. This approach increased the validation reliability of the implemented single‐step model in the milk yield, but shortcomings in the LR data recording scheme prevented improvements in fat yield. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Genomic selection has been increasingly implemented in the animal breeding industry, and it is becoming a routine method in many livestock breeding contexts. However, its use is still limited in several small-population local breeds, which are, nonetheless, an important source of genetic variability of great economic value. A major roadblock for their genomic selection is accuracy when population size is limited: to improve breeding value accuracy, variable selection models that assume heterogenous variance have been proposed over the last few years. However, while these models might outperform traditional and genomic predictions in terms of accuracy, they also carry a proportional increase of breeding value bias and dispersion. These mutual increases are especially striking when genomic selection is performed with a low number of phenotypes and high shrinkage value—which is precisely the situation that happens with small local breeds. In our study, we tested several alternative methods to improve the accuracy of genomic selection in a small population. First, we investigated the impact of using only a subset of informative markers regarding prediction accuracy, bias, and dispersion. We used different algorithms to select them, such as recursive feature eliminations, penalized regression, and XGBoost. We compared our results with the predictions of pedigree-based BLUP, single-step genomic BLUP, and weighted single-step genomic BLUP in different simulated populations obtained by combining various parameters in terms of number of QTLs and effective population size. We also investigated these approaches on a real data set belonging to the small local Rendena breed. Our results show that the accuracy of GBLUP in small-sized populations increased when performed with SNPs selected via variable selection methods both in simulated and real data sets. In addition, the use of variable selection models—especially those using XGBoost—in our real data set did not impact bias and the dispersion of estimated breeding values. We have discussed possible explanations for our results and how our study can help estimate breeding values for future genomic selection in small breeds.

Genomic prediction has become the new standard for genetic improvement programs, and currently, there is a desire to implement this technology for the evaluation of Angus cattle in Brazil. Thus, the main objective of this study was to assess the feasibility of evaluating young Brazilian Angus (BA) bulls and heifers for 12 routinely recorded traits using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) with and without genotypes from American Angus (AA) sires. The second objective was to obtain estimates of effective population size (Ne) and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in the Brazilian Angus population. The dataset contained phenotypic information for up to 277,661 animals belonging to the Promebo breeding program, pedigree for 362,900, of which 1,386 were genotyped for 50k, 77k, and 150k single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels. After imputation and quality control, 61,666 SNPs were available for the analyses. In addition, genotypes from 332 American Angus (AA) sires widely used in Brazil were retrieved from the AA Association database to be used for genomic predictions. Bivariate animal models were used to estimate variance components, traditional EBV, and genomic EBV (GEBV). Validation was carried out with the linear regression method (LR) using young-genotyped animals born between 2013 and 2015 without phenotypes in the reduced dataset and with records in the complete dataset. Validation animals were further split into progeny of BA and AA sires to evaluate if their progenies would benefit by including genotypes from AA sires. The Ne was 254 based on pedigree and 197 based on LD, and the average LD (±SD) and distance between adjacent single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) across all chromosomes were 0.27 (±0.27) and 40743.68 bp, respectively. Prediction accuracies with ssGBLUP outperformed BLUP for all traits, improving accuracies by, on average, 16% for BA young bulls and heifers. The GEBV prediction accuracies ranged from 0.37 (total maternal for weaning weight and tick count) to 0.54 (yearling precocity) across all traits, and dispersion (LR coefficients) fluctuated between 0.92 and 1.06. Inclusion of genotyped sires from the AA improved GEBV accuracies by 2%, on average, compared to using only the BA reference population. Our study indicated that genomic information could help us to improve GEBV accuracies and hence genetic progress in the Brazilian Angus population. The inclusion of genotypes from American Angus sires heavily used in Brazil just marginally increased the GEBV accuracies for selection candidates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Most of the genomic studies in plants and animals have used additive models for studying genetic parameters and prediction accuracies. In this study, we used genomic models with additive and nonadditive effects to analyze the genetic architecture of growth and wood traits in an open-pollinated (OP) population of Eucalyptus pellita. We used two progeny trials consisting of 5742 trees from 244 OP families to estimate genetic parameters and to test genomic prediction accuracies of three growth traits (diameter at breast height - DBH, total height - Ht and tree volume - Vol) and kraft pulp yield (KPY). From 5742 trees, 468 trees from 28 families were genotyped with 2023 pre-selected markers from candidate genes. We used the pedigree-based additive best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) model and two marker-based models (single-step genomic BLUP – ssGBLUP and genomic BLUP – GBLUP) to estimate the genetic parameters and compare the prediction accuracies. Analyses with the two genomic models revealed large dominant effects influencing the growth traits but not KPY. Theoretical breeding value accuracies were higher with the dominance effect in ssGBLUP model for the three growth traits. Accuracies of cross-validation with random folding in the genotyped trees have ranged from 0.60 to 0.82 in different models. Accuracies of ABLUP were lower than the genomic models. Accuracies ranging from 0.50 to 0.76 were observed for within family cross-validation predictions with low relationships between training and validation populations indicating part of the functional variation is captured by the markers through short-range linkage disequilibrium (LD). Within-family phenotype predictive abilities and prediction accuracies of genetic values with dominance effects are higher than the additive models for growth traits indicating the importance of dominance effects in predicting phenotypes and genetic values. This study demonstrates the importance of genomic approaches in OP families to study nonadditive effects. To capture the LD between markers and the quantitative trait loci (QTL) it may be important to use informative markers from candidate genes.

Abstract Background The traditional way to estimate variance components (VC) is based on the animal model using a pedigree-based relationship matrix (A) (A-AM). After genomic selection was introduced into breeding programs, it was anticipated that VC estimates from A-AM would be biased because the effect of selection based on genomic information is not captured. The single-step method (H-AM), which uses an H matrix as (co)variance matrix, can be used as an alternative to estimate VC. Here, we compared VC estimates from A-AM and H-AM and investigated the effect of genomic selection, genotyping strategy and genotyping proportion on the estimation of VC from the two methods, by analyzing a dataset from a commercial broiler line and a simulated dataset that mimicked the broiler population. Results VC estimates from H-AM were severely overestimated with a high proportion of selective genotyping, and overestimation increased as proportion of genotyping increased in the analysis of both commercial and simulated data. This bias in H-AM estimates arises when selective genotyping is used to construct the H-matrix, regardless of whether selective genotyping is applied or not in the selection process. For simulated populations under genomic selection, estimates of genetic variance from A-AM were also significantly overestimated when the effect of genomic selection was strong. Our results suggest that VC estimates from H-AM under random genotyping have the expected values. Predicted breeding values from H-AM were inflated when VC estimates were biased, and inflation differed between genotyped and ungenotyped animals, which can lead to suboptimal selection decisions. Conclusions We conclude that VC estimates from H-AM are biased with selective genotyping, but are close to expected values with random genotyping.VC estimates from A-AM in populations under genomic selection are also biased but to a much lesser degree. Therefore, we recommend the use of H-AM with random genotyping to estimate VC for populations under genomic selection. Our results indicate that it is still possible to use selective genotyping in selection, but then VC estimation should avoid the use of genotypes from one side only of the distribution of phenotypes. Hence, a dual genotyping strategy may be needed to address both selection and VC estimation.

Genomic information allows for a more accurate calculation of relationships among animals than the pedigree information, leading to an increase in accuracy of breeding values. Here, we used pedigree‐based and single‐step genomic approaches to estimate variance components and breeding values for β‐hydroxybutyrate milk content (BHB). Additionally, we performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) to depict its genetic architecture. BHB concentrations within the first 90 days of lactation, estimated from milk medium infrared spectra, were available for 30,461 cows (70,984 records). Genotypes at 42,152 loci were available for 9,123 animals. Low heritabilities were found for BHB using pedigree‐based (0.09 ± 0.01) and genomic (0.10 ± 0.01) approaches. Genetic correlation between BHB and milk traits ranged from −0.27 ± 0.06 (BHB and protein percentage) to 0.13 ± 0.07 (BHB and fat‐to‐protein ratio) using pedigree and from −0.26 ± 0.05 (BHB and protein percentage) to 0.13 ± 0.06 (BHB and fat‐to‐protein ratio) using genomics. Breeding values were validated for 344 genotyped cows using linear regression method. The genomic EBV (GEBV) had greater accuracy (0.51 vs. 0.45) and regression coefficient (0.98 vs. 0.95) compared to EBV. The correlation between two subsequent evaluations, without and with phenotypes for validation cows, was 0.85 for GEBV and 0.82 for EBV. Predictive ability (correlation between (G)EBV and adjusted phenotypes) was greater when genomic information was used (0.38) than in the pedigree‐based approach (0.31). Validation statistics in the pairwise two‐trait models (milk yield, fat and protein percentage, urea, fat/protein ratio, lactose and logarithmic transformation of somatic cells count) were very similar to the ones highlighted for the single‐trait model. The GWAS allowed discovering four significant markers located on BTA20 (57.5–58.2 Mb), where the ANKH gene is mapped. This gene has been associated with lactose, alpha‐lactalbumin and BHB. Results of this study confirmed the usefulness of genomic information to provide more accurate variance components and breeding values, and important insights about the genomic determination of BHB milk content. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) is used worldwide for the simultaneous genetic evaluation of genotyped and non-genotyped animals. It is easily extendible to all BLUP models by replacing the pedigree-based additive genetic relationship matrix (A) with an augmented pedigree–genomic relationship matrix (H). Theoretically, H does not introduce any artificially inflated variance. However, inflated genetic variances have been observed due to the incomparability between the genomic relationship matrix (G) and A used in H. Usually, G is blended and tuned with A22 (the block of A for genotyped animals) to improve its numerical condition and compatibility. If deflation/inflation is still needed, a common approach is weighting G−1−A22−1 in the form of τG−1−ωA22−1, added to A−1 to form H−1. In some situations, this can violate the conditional properties upon which H is built. Different ways of weighting the H−1 components (A−1, G−1, A22−1, and H−1 itself) were studied to avoid/minimise the violations of the conditional properties of H. Data were simulated on ten populations and twenty generations. Responses to weighting different components of H−1 were measured in terms of the regression of phenotypes on the estimated breeding values (the lower the slope, the higher the inflation) and the correlation between phenotypes and the estimated breeding values (predictive ability). Increasing the weight on H−1 increased the inflation. The responses to weighting G−1 were similar to those for H−1. Increasing the weight on A−1 (together with A22−1) was not influential and slightly increased the inflation. Predictive ability is a direct function of the slope of the regression line and followed similar trends. Responses to weighting G−1−A22−1 depend on the inflation/deflation of evaluations from A−1 to H−1 and the compatibility of the two matrices with the heritability used in the model. One possibility is a combination of weighting G−1−A22−1 and weighting H−1. Given recent advances in ssGBLUP, conditioning H−1 might become an interim solution from the past and then not be needed in the future.

There has been a growing interest in the genetic improvement of carcass traits as an important and primary breeding goal in the beef cattle industry over the last few decades. The use of correlated traits and molecular information can aid in obtaining more accurate estimates of breeding values. This study aimed to assess the improvement in the accuracy of genetic predictions for carcass traits by using ultrasound measurements and yearling weight along with genomic information in Hanwoo beef cattle by comparing four evaluation models using the estimators of the recently developed linear regression method. We compared the performance of single-trait pedigree best linear unbiased prediction [ST-BLUP and single-step genomic (ST-ssGBLUP)], as well as multi-trait (MT-BLUP and MT-ssGBLUP) models for the studied traits at birth and yearling date of steers. The data comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight and ultrasound traits as well as 5,622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness, carcass weight, eye muscle area, and marbling score), resulting in 43,949 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from 4,284 steers and 2,332 bulls. Our results indicated that averaged across all traits, the accuracy of ssGBLUP models (0.52) was higher than that of pedigree-based BLUP (0.34), regardless of the use of single- or multi-trait models. On average, the accuracy of prediction can be further improved by implementing yearling weight and ultrasound data in the MT-ssGBLUP model (0.56) for the corresponding carcass traits compared to the ST-ssGBLUP model (0.49). Moreover, this study has shown the impact of genomic information and correlated traits on predictions at the yearling date (0.61) using MT-ssGBLUP models, which was advantageous compared to predictions at birth date (0.51) in terms of accuracy. Thus, using genomic information and high genetically correlated traits in the multi-trait model is a promising approach for practical genomic selection in Hanwoo cattle, especially for traits that are difficult to measure.

Accuracy of genomic predictions is an important component of the selection response. The objectives of this research were: 1) to investigate trends for prediction accuracies over time in a broiler population of accumulated phenotypes, genotypes, and pedigrees and 2) to test if data from distant generations are useful to maintain prediction accuracies in selection candidates. The data contained 820K phenotypes for a growth trait (GT), 200K for two feed efficiency traits (FE1 and FE2), and 42K for a carcass yield trait (CY). The pedigree included 1,252,619 birds hatched over 7 years, of which 154,318 from the last 4 years were genotyped. Training populations were constructed adding 1 year of data sequentially, persistency of accuracy over time was evaluated using predictions from birds hatched in the three generations following or in the years after the training populations. In the first generation, before genotypes became available for the training populations (first 3 years of data), accuracies remained almost stable with successive additions of phenotypes and pedigree to the accumulated dataset. The inclusion of 1 year of genotypes in addition to 4 years of phenotypes and pedigree in the training population led to increases in accuracy of 54% for GT, 76% for FE1, 110% for CY, and 38% for FE2; on average, 74% of the increase was due to genomics. Prediction accuracies declined faster without than with genomic information in the training populations. When genotypes were unavailable, the average decline in prediction accuracy across traits was 41% from the first to the second generation of validation, and 51% from the second to the third generation of validation. When genotypes were available, the average decline across traits was 14% from the first to the second generation of validation, and 3% from the second to the third generation of validation. Prediction accuracies in the last three generations were the same when the training population included 5 or 2 years of data, and a decrease of ~7% was observed when the training population included only 1 year of data. Training sets including genomic information provided an increase in accuracy and persistence of genomic predictions compared with training sets without genomic data. The two most recent years of pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic data were sufficient to maintain prediction accuracies in selection candidates. Similar conclusions were obtained using validation populations per year. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The unique adaptation of Eucalyptus benthamii to low temperatures coupled to fast growth and versatile wood quality has made it a valued plantation species in frost-prone areas worldwide, but little is known on its quantitative genetic parameters for key industrial traits. We used GBLUP additive (GA), additive-dominant (GAD), single-step (HBLUP), and pedigree-based predictive models to estimate lignin, extractives, carbohydrates, and wood density at age 4 and tree volume at age 6. By capturing hidden relatedness and correcting pedigree errors, SNP data disentangled non-additive from additive variance providing more realistic estimates of narrow-sense heritability than pedigrees, and more accurate predictions of trait values. Predictive abilities (PAs) ranged from 0.12 for volume (pedigree-based model) to 0.44 for wood density (models H, GA, and GAD). Considerable dominance variance was seen for all traits, growth was the trait most influenced by it, resulting in PAs 48.9% higher when this effect is considered, a result with important consequences both for clonal propagation and overall selection efficiency (Seff). Using a HBLUP model, phenotypes of non-genotyped trees increased PAs by increasing sample size and provided realized relationships with reduced genotyping cost. In a recurrent selection program, the preclusion of progeny testing provides an increase in Seff between 232% and 299%. In a clonal selection program, the elimination of both progeny and initial clonal trial may increase Seff between 134% and 277%. Increasing selection intensity by genomic prediction resulted in an additional impact on Seff. This study provides groundwork to implement genomic selection in E. benthamii breeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There has been a growing interest in the genetic improvement of carcass traits as an important and primary breeding goal in the beef cattle industry over the last few decades. The use of correlated traits and molecular information can aid in obtaining more accurate estimates of breeding values. This study aimed to assess the improvement in the accuracy of genetic predictions for carcass traits by using ultrasound measurements and yearling weight along with genomic information in Hanwoo beef cattle by comparing four evaluation models using the estimators of the recently developed linear regression method. We compared the performance of single-trait pedigree best linear unbiased prediction [ST-BLUP and single-step genomic (ST-ssGBLUP)], as well as multi-trait (MT-BLUP and MT-ssGBLUP) models for the studied traits at birth and yearling date of steers. The data comprised of 15,796 phenotypic records for yearling weight and ultrasound traits as well as 5,622 records for carcass traits (backfat thickness, carcass weight, eye muscle area, and marbling score), resulting in 43,949 single-nucleotide polymorphisms from 4,284 steers and 2,332 bulls. Our results indicated that averaged across all traits, the accuracy of ssGBLUP models (0.52) was higher than that of pedigree-based BLUP (0.34), regardless of the use of single- or multi-trait models. On average, the accuracy of prediction can be further improved by implementing yearling weight and ultrasound data in the MT-ssGBLUP model (0.56) for the corresponding carcass traits compared to the ST-ssGBLUP model (0.49). Moreover, this study has shown the impact of genomic information and correlated traits on predictions at the yearling date (0.61) using MT-ssGBLUP models, which was advantageous compared to predictions at birth date (0.51) in terms of accuracy. Thus, using genomic information and high genetically correlated traits in the multi-trait model is a promising approach for practical genomic selection in Hanwoo cattle, especially for traits that are difficult to measure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Improvement of prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) can lead to increased profitability for swine breeding companies. This study was performed to compare the accuracy of different popular genomic prediction methods and traditional best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for future performance of back-fat thickness (BFT), average daily gain (ADG), and loin muscle depth (LMD) in Canadian Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire swine breeds. In this study, 17,019 pigs were genotyped using Illumina 60K and Affymetrix 50K panels. After quality control and imputation steps, a total of 41,304, 48,580, and 49,102 single-nucleotide polymorphisms remained for Duroc (n = 6,649), Landrace (n = 5,362), and Yorkshire (n = 5,008) breeds, respectively. The breeding values of animals in the validation groups (n = 392–774) were predicted before performance test using BLUP, BayesC, BayesCπ, genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods. The prediction accuracies were obtained using the correlation between the predicted breeding values and their deregressed EBVs (dEBVs) after performance test. The genomic prediction methods showed higher prediction accuracies than traditional BLUP for all scenarios. Although the accuracies of genomic prediction methods were not significantly (P > 0.05) different, ssGBLUP was the most accurate method for Duroc-ADG, Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, and Yorkshire-BFT scenarios, and BayesCπ was the most accurate method for Duroc-BFT, Landrace-LMD, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Furthermore, BayesCπ method was the least biased method for Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, Yorkshire-BFT, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Our findings can be beneficial for accelerating the genetic progress of BFT, ADG, and LMD in Canadian swine populations by selecting more accurate and unbiased genomic prediction methods.

Improvement of prediction accuracy of estimated breeding values (EBVs) can lead to increased profitability for swine breeding companies. This study was performed to compare the accuracy of different popular genomic prediction methods and traditional best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) for future performance of back-fat thickness (BFT), average daily gain (ADG), and loin muscle depth (LMD) in Canadian Duroc, Landrace, and Yorkshire swine breeds. In this study, 17,019 pigs were genotyped using Illumina 60K and Affymetrix 50K panels. After quality control and imputation steps, a total of 41,304, 48,580, and 49,102 single-nucleotide polymorphisms remained for Duroc (n = 6,649), Landrace (n = 5,362), and Yorkshire (n = 5,008) breeds, respectively. The breeding values of animals in the validation groups (n = 392–774) were predicted before performance test using BLUP, BayesC, BayesCπ, genomic BLUP (GBLUP), and single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) methods. The prediction accuracies were obtained using the correlation between the predicted breeding values and their deregressed EBVs (dEBVs) after performance test. The genomic prediction methods showed higher prediction accuracies than traditional BLUP for all scenarios. Although the accuracies of genomic prediction methods were not significantly (P > 0.05) different, ssGBLUP was the most accurate method for Duroc-ADG, Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, and Yorkshire-BFT scenarios, and BayesCπ was the most accurate method for Duroc-BFT, Landrace-LMD, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Furthermore, BayesCπ method was the least biased method for Duroc-LMD, Landrace-BFT, Landrace-ADG, Yorkshire-BFT, and Yorkshire-ADG scenarios. Our findings can be beneficial for accelerating the genetic progress of BFT, ADG, and LMD in Canadian swine populations by selecting more accurate and unbiased genomic prediction methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to predict genomic breeding values for milk yield of crossbred dairy cattle under different scenarios using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). The data set included 13,880,217 milk yield measurements on 6,830,415 cows. Genotypes of 89,558 Holstein, 40,769 Jersey, and 22,373 Holstein-Jersey crossbred animals were used, of which all Holstein, 9,313 Jersey, and 1,667 crossbred animals had phenotypic records. Genotypes were imputed to 45K SNP markers. The SNP effects were estimated from single-breed evaluations for Jersey (JE), Holstein (HO) and crossbreds (CROSS), and multibreed evaluations including all Jersey and Holstein (JE_HO) or approximately equal proportions of Jersey, Holstein, and crossbred animals (MIX). Indirect predictions (IP) of the validation animals (358 crossbred animals with phenotypes excluded from evaluations) were calculated using the resulting SNP effects. Additionally, breed proportions (BP) of crossbred animals were applied as a weight when IP were estimated based on each pure breed. The predictive ability of IP was calculated as the Pearson correlation between IP and phenotypes of the validation animals adjusted for fixed effects in the model. Regression of adjusted phenotypes on IP was used to assess the inflation of IP. The predictive ability of IP for CROSS, JE, HO, JE_HO, and MIX scenario was 0.50, 0.50, 0.47, 0.50, and 0.46, respectively. Using BP was the least successful, with a predictive ability of 0.32. The inflation of the IP for crossbred animals using CROSS, JE, HO, JE_HO, MIX, and BP scenarios were 1.17, 0.65, 0.55, 0.78, 1.00, and 0.85, respectively. The IP of crossbred animals can be predicted using single-step GBLUP under a scenario that includes purebred genotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Combining populations that diverged at some point is a common practice, especially in poultry, where generation intervals are short and genetic evaluations should be available often. This study assessed whether combining large, divergent broiler populations into one genomic evaluation is feasible and the best strategy for doing that in single-step GBLUP. The pedigree for populations 1 and 2 included 397,954 and 411,780 animals, of which 154,911 and 168,429 were genotyped. Phenotypes for body weight (g), carcass yield (%), mortality (0-1), and feet health (0-6) were available for 397,954 animals in population 1 and 411,780 in population 2. A four-trait model was used in the analyses, and the genetic differences between the two populations were modeled in different ways: M1) included an extra fixed effect that accounted for population origin; M2) added origin-specific fixed effects, where the animal origin was concatenated with all fixed effects in the model. The two models were compared against a conventional model without accounting for the animal origin as a fixed effect (M0). Unknown parent groups (UPG) were fit to account for the genetic differences in M0, M1, and M2; therefore, they were set based origin population of the animal and sex. The models were evaluated based on accuracy, bias, and dispersion from the linear regression (LR) method and predictive ability (PA), where GEBV in the reduced data was compared against phenotypes adjusted for fixed effects. Validations were done separately in single and multipopulations to better assess the benefits of combining the two populations. Overall, the accuracy obtained by PA was less than by LR. No apparent accuracy, PA, bias, and dispersion differences were observed among the multi-population models across all traits. This was also true when comparing validation parameters in a multi-population against the ones from a single population. However, we observed that animals from one population were always superior to the other. A multitrait model was applied, treating the same trait in each population differently. Genetic correlations between the same trait in different populations were moderate to low, suggesting that the two lines should possibly be evaluated separately. Defining whether populations should be combined in a single evaluation may go beyond validation parameters. Identifying if traits are the same across populations is crucial for the feasibility of combined evaluations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Changes in the accuracy of the genomic estimates obtained by the ssGBLUP and wssGBLUP methods were evaluated using different reference groups. The weighting procedure’s reasonableness of application Pwas considered to improve the accuracy of genomic predictions for meat, fattening and reproduction traits in pigs. Six reference groups were formed to assess the genomic data quantity impact on the accuracy of predicted values (groups of genotyped animals). The datasets included 62,927 records of meat and fattening productivity (fat thickness over 6–7 ribs (BF1, mm)), muscle depth (MD, mm) and precocity up to 100 kg (age, days) and 16,070 observations of reproductive qualities (the number of all born piglets (TNB) and the number of live-born piglets (NBA), according to the results of the first farrowing). The wssGBLUP method has an advantage over ssGBLUP in terms of estimation reliability. When using a small reference group, the difference in the accuracy of ssGBLUP over BLUP AM is from −1.9 to +7.3 percent points, while for wssGBLUP, the change in accuracy varies from +18.2 to +87.3 percent points. Furthermore, the superiority of the wssGBLUP is also maintained for the largest group of genotyped animals: from +4.7 to +15.9 percent points for ssGBLUP and from +21.1 to +90.5 percent points for wssGBLUP. However, for all analyzed traits, the number of markers explaining 5% of genetic variability varied from 71 to 108, and the number of such SNPs varied depending on the size of the reference group (79–88 for BF1, 72–81 for MD, 71–108 for age). The results of the genetic variation distribution have the greatest similarity between groups of about 1000 and about 1500 individuals. Thus, the size of the reference group of more than 1000 individuals gives more stable results for the estimation based on the wssGBLUP method, while using the reference group of 500 individuals can lead to distorted results of GEBV.

Introduction: Xinjiang Brown cattle constitute the largest breed of cattle in Xinjiang. Therefore, it is crucial to establish a genomic evaluation system, especially for those with low levels of breed improvement. Methods: This study aimed to establish a cross breed joint reference population by analyzing the genetic structure of 485 Xinjiang Brown cattle and 2,633 Chinese Holstein cattle (Illumina GeneSeek GGP bovine 150 K chip). The Bayes method single-step genome-wide best linear unbiased prediction was used to conduct a genomic evaluation of the joint reference population for the milk traits of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The reference population of Chinese Holstein cattle was randomly divided into groups to construct the joint reference population. By comparing the prediction accuracy, estimation bias, and inflation coefficient of the validation population, the optimal number of joint reference populations was determined. Results and Discussion: The results indicated a distinct genetic structure difference between the two breeds of adult cows, and both breeds should be considered when constructing multi-breed joint reference and validation populations. The reliability range of genome prediction of milk traits in the joint reference population was 0.142-0.465. Initially, it was determined that the inclusion of 600 and 900 Chinese Holstein cattle in the joint reference population positively impacted the genomic prediction of Xinjiang Brown cattle to certain extent. It was feasible to incorporate the Chinese Holstein into Xinjiang Brown cattle population to form a joint reference population for multi-breed genomic evaluation. However, for different Xinjiang Brown cattle populations, a fixed number of Chinese Holstein cattle cannot be directly added during multi-breed genomic selection. Pre-evaluation analysis based on the genetic structure, kinship, and other factors of the current population is required to ensure the authenticity and reliability of genomic predictions and improve estimation accuracy., Competing Interests: Author JZ was employed by Shijiazhuang Molbreeding Biotechnology Co., Ltd. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Zhang, Xu, Lu, Luo, Zhou, Wang, Zhang, Huang and Wang.)

Infectious hematopoietic necrosis (IHN) is an economically important disease of salmonid fish caused by the IHN virus (IHNV). Under industrial aquaculture settings, IHNV can cause substantial mortality and losses. Actually, there is no confirmed and cost-effective method for IHNV control. Clear Springs Foods, Inc. has been performing family-based selective breeding to increase genetic resistance to IHNV in their rainbow trout breeding program. In an earlier study, we used siblings cross-validation to estimate the accuracy of genomic prediction (GP) for IHNV resistance in this breeding population. In the present report, we used empirical progeny testing data to evaluate whether genomic selection (GS) can improve the accuracy of breeding value predictions over traditional pedigree-based best linear unbiased predictions (PBLUP). We found that the GP accuracy with single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP) outperformed PBLUP by 15% (from 0.33 to 0.38). Furthermore, we found that ssGBLUP had higher GP accuracy than weighted ssGBLUP (wssGBLUP) and single-step Bayesian multiple regression (ssBMR) models with BayesB and BayesC priors which supports our previous findings that the underlying liability of genetic resistance against IHNV in this breeding population might be polygenic. Our results show that GS can be more effective than either the traditional pedigree-based PBLUP model or the marker-assisted selection approach for improving genetic resistance against IHNV in this commercial rainbow trout population.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data for dairy cattle breeding through two different approaches: (i) estimating the genetic parameters for 30 measured milk traits and their FTIR predictions and investigating the additive genetic correlation between them and (ii) evaluating the effectiveness of FTIR-derived phenotyping to replicate a candidate bull’s progeny testing or breeding value prediction at birth. Records were available from 1,123 cows phenotyped using gold standard laboratory methodologies (LAB data). This included phenotypes related to fine milk composition and milk technological characteristics, milk acidity, and milk protein fractions. The dataset used to generate FTIR predictions comprised 729,202 test-day records from 51,059 Brown Swiss cows (FIELD data). A first approach consisted of estimating genetic parameters for phenotypes available from LAB and FIELD datasets. To do so, a set of bivariate animal models were run, and genetic correlations between LAB and FIELD phenotypes were estimated using FIELD information obtained at the population level. Heritability estimates were generally higher for FIELD predictions than for the corresponding LAB measures. The additive genetic correlations (ra) between LAB and FIELD phenotypes had different magnitudes across traits but were generally strong. Overall, these results demonstrated the potential of using FIELD information as indicator traits for the indirect genetic improvement of LAB measures. In the second approach, we included genotype information for 1,011 cows from the LAB dataset, 1,493 cows from the FIELD dataset, 181 sires with daughters in both LAB and FIELD datasets, and 540 sires with daughters in the FIELD dataset only. Predictions were obtained using the single-step GBLUP method. A four fold cross-validation was used to assess the predictive ability of the different models, assessed as the ability to predict masked LAB records from daughters of progeny testing bulls. The correlation between observed and predicted LAB measures in validation was averaged over the four training-validation sets. Different sets of phenotypic information were used sequentially in cross-validation schemes: (i) LAB cows from the training set; (ii) FIELD cows from the training set; and (iii) FIELD cows from the validation set. Models that included FIELD records showed an improvement for the majority of traits. This study suggests that breeding programs for difficult-to-measure traits could be implemented using FTIR information. While these programs should use progeny testing, acceptable values of accuracy can be achieved also for bulls without phenotyped progeny. Robust calibration equations are, deemed as essential.

Metabolites, substrates or products of metabolic processes, are involved in many biological functions, such as energy metabolism, signaling, stimulatory and inhibitory effects on enzymes and immunological defense. Metabolomic phenotypes are influenced by combination of genetic and environmental effects allowing for metabolome-genome-wide association studies (mGWAS) as a powerful tool to investigate the relationship between these phenotypes and genetic variants. The objectives of this study were to estimate genomic heritability and perform mGWAS and in silico functional enrichment analyses for a set of plasma metabolites in Canadian crossbred beef cattle. Thirty-three plasma metabolites and 45,266 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were available for 475 animals. Genomic heritability for all metabolites was estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) including genomic breed composition as covariates in the model. A single-step GBLUP implemented in BLUPF90 programs was used to determine SNP P values and the proportion of genetic variance explained by SNP windows containing 10 consecutive SNPs. The top 10 SNP windows that explained the largest genetic variation for each metabolite were identified and mapped to detect corresponding candidate genes. Functional enrichment analyses were performed on metabolites and their candidate genes using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Eleven metabolites showed low to moderate heritability that ranged from 0.09 ± 0.15 to 0.36 ± 0.15, while heritability estimates for 22 metabolites were zero or negligible. This result indicates that while variations in 11 metabolites were due to genetic variants, the majority are largely influenced by environment. Three significant SNP associations were detected for betaine (rs109862186), L-alanine (rs81117935), and L-lactic acid (rs42009425) based on Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (family wise error rate

One-step genomic selection is a method for improving the reliability of the breeding value estimation. This study aimed to compare the reliability of pedigree-based best linear unbiased prediction (PBLUP) and single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction (ssGBLUP), single-trait and multitrait models, and the restricted maximum likelihood (REML) and Bayesian methods. Data were collected from the production performance records of 2207 Xinjiang Brown cattle in Xinjiang from 1983 to 2018. A cross test was designed to calculate the genetic parameters and reliability of the breeding value of 305 daily milk yield (305 dMY), milk fat yield (MFY), milk protein yield (MPY), and somatic cell score (SCS) of Xinjiang Brown cattle. The heritability of 305 dMY, MFY, MPY, and SCS estimated using the REML and Bayesian multitrait models was approximately 0.39 (0.02), 0.40 (0.03), 0.49 (0.02), and 0.07 (0.02), respectively. The heritability and estimated breeding value (EBV) and the reliability of milk production traits of these cattle calculated based on PBLUP and ssGBLUP using the multitrait model REML and Bayesian methods were higher than those of the single-trait model REML method; the ssGBLUP method was significantly better than the PBLUP method. The reliability of the estimated breeding value can be improved from 0.9% to 3.6%, and the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value (GEBV) for the genotyped population can reach 83%. Therefore, the genetic evaluation of the multitrait model is better than that of the single-trait model. Thus, genomic selection can be applied to small population varieties such as Xinjiang Brown cattle, in improving the reliability of the genomic estimated breeding value.

Most of the genomic studies in plants and animals have used additive models for studying genetic parameters and prediction accuracies. In this study, we used genomic models with additive and nonadditive effects to analyze the genetic architecture of growth and wood traits in an open-pollinated (OP) population of Eucalyptus pellita. We used two progeny trials consisting of 5742 trees from 244 OP families to estimate genetic parameters and to test genomic prediction accuracies of three growth traits (diameter at breast height - DBH, total height - Ht and tree volume - Vol) and kraft pulp yield (KPY). From 5742 trees, 468 trees from 28 families were genotyped with 2023 pre-selected markers from candidate genes. We used the pedigree-based additive best linear unbiased prediction (ABLUP) model and two marker-based models (single-step genomic BLUP – ssGBLUP and genomic BLUP – GBLUP) to estimate the genetic parameters and compare the prediction accuracies. Analyses with the two genomic models revealed large dominant effects influencing the growth traits but not KPY. Theoretical breeding value accuracies were higher with the dominance effect in ssGBLUP model for the three growth traits. Accuracies of cross-validation with random folding in the genotyped trees have ranged from 0.60 to 0.82 in different models. Accuracies of ABLUP were lower than the genomic models. Accuracies ranging from 0.50 to 0.76 were observed for within family cross validation predictions with low relationships between training and validation populations indicating part of the functional variation is captured by the markers through short-range linkage disequilibrium (LD). With in family phenotype predictive abilities and prediction accuracies of genetic values with dominance effects are higher than the additive models for growth traits indicating the importance of dominance effects in predicting phenotypes and genetic values. This study demonstrates the importance of genomic approaches in OP families to study nonadditive effects. To capture the LD between markers and the quantitative trait loci (QTL) it may be important to use informative markers from candidate genes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The objective of this study was to evaluate the contribution of Fourier-transformed infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data for dairy cattle breeding through two different approaches: (i) estimating the genetic parameters for 30 measured milk traits and their FTIR predictions and investigating the additive genetic correlation between them and (ii) evaluating the effectiveness of FTIR-derived phenotyping to replicate a candidate bull's progeny testing or breeding value prediction at birth. Records were available from 1,123 cows phenotyped using gold standard laboratory methodologies (LAB data). This included phenotypes related to fine milk composition and milk technological characteristics, milk acidity, and milk protein fractions. The dataset used to generate FTIR predictions comprised 729,202 test-day records from 51,059 Brown Swiss cows (FIELD data). A first approach consisted of estimating genetic parameters for phenotypes available from LAB and FIELD datasets. To do so, a set of bivariate animal models were run, and genetic correlations between LAB and FIELD phenotypes were estimated using FIELD information obtained at the population level. Heritability estimates were generally higher for FIELD predictions than for the corresponding LAB measures. The additive genetic correlations (r a ) between LAB and FIELD phenotypes had different magnitudes across traits but were generally strong. Overall, these results demonstrated the potential of using FIELD information as indicator traits for the indirect genetic improvement of LAB measures. In the second approach, we included genotype information for 1,011 cows from the LAB dataset, 1,493 cows from the FIELD dataset, 181 sires with daughters in both LAB and FIELD datasets, and 540 sires with daughters in the FIELD dataset only. Predictions were obtained using the single-step GBLUP method. A four fold cross-validation was used to assess the predictive ability of the different models, assessed as the ability to predict masked LAB records from daughters of progeny testing bulls. The correlation between observed and predicted LAB measures in validation was averaged over the four training-validation sets. Different sets of phenotypic information were used sequentially in cross-validation schemes: (i) LAB cows from the training set; (ii) FIELD cows from the training set; and (iii) FIELD cows from the validation set. Models that included FIELD records showed an improvement for the majority of traits. This study suggests that breeding programs for difficult-to-measure traits could be implemented using FTIR information. While these programs should use progeny testing, acceptable values of accuracy can be achieved also for bulls without phenotyped progeny. Robust calibration equations are, deemed as essential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Metabolites, substrates or products of metabolic processes, are involved in many biological functions, such as energy metabolism, signaling, stimulatory and inhibitory effects on enzymes and immunological defense. Metabolomic phenotypes are influenced by combination of genetic and environmental effects allowing for metabolome-genome-wide association studies (mGWAS) as a powerful tool to investigate the relationship between these phenotypes and genetic variants. The objectives of this study were to estimate genomic heritability and perform mGWAS and in silico functional enrichment analyses for a set of plasma metabolites in Canadian crossbred beef cattle. Thirty-three plasma metabolites and 45,266 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were available for 475 animals. Genomic heritability for all metabolites was estimated using genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP) including genomic breed composition as covariates in the model. A single-step GBLUP implemented in BLUPF90 programs was used to determine SNP P values and the proportion of genetic variance explained by SNP windows containing 10 consecutive SNPs. The top 10 SNP windows that explained the largest genetic variation for each metabolite were identified and mapped to detect corresponding candidate genes. Functional enrichment analyses were performed on metabolites and their candidate genes using the Ingenuity Pathway Analysis software. Eleven metabolites showed low to moderate heritability that ranged from 0.09 ± 0.15 to 0.36 ± 0.15, while heritability estimates for 22 metabolites were zero or negligible. This result indicates that while variations in 11 metabolites were due to genetic variants, the majority are largely influenced by environment. Three significant SNP associations were detected for betaine (rs109862186), L-alanine (rs81117935), and L-lactic acid (rs42009425) based on Bonferroni correction for multiple testing (family wise error rate <0.05). The SNP rs81117935 was found to be located within the Catenin Alpha 2 gene (CTNNA2) showing a possible association with the regulation of L-alanine concentration. Other candidate genes were identified based on additive genetic variance explained by SNP windows of 10 consecutive SNPs. The observed heritability estimates and the candidate genes and networks identified in this study will serve as baseline information for research into the utilization of plasma metabolites for genetic improvement of crossbred beef cattle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The traditional way to estimate variance components (VC) is based on the animal model using a pedigree-based relationship matrix (A) (A-AM). After genomic selection was introduced into breeding programs, it was anticipated that VC estimates from A-AM would be biased because the effect of selection based on genomic information is not captured. The single-step method (H-AM), which uses an H matrix as (co)variance matrix, can be used as an alternative to estimate VC. Here, we compared VC estimates from A-AM and H-AM and investigated the effect of genomic selection, genotyping strategy and genotyping proportion on the estimation of VC from the two methods, by analyzing a dataset from a commercial broiler line and a simulated dataset that mimicked the broiler population. Results: VC estimates from H-AM were severely overestimated with a high proportion of selective genotyping, and overestimation increased as proportion of genotyping increased in the analysis of both commercial and simulated data. This bias in H-AM estimates arises when selective genotyping is used to construct the H-matrix, regardless of whether selective genotyping is applied or not in the selection process. For simulated populations under genomic selection, estimates of genetic variance from A-AM were also significantly overestimated when the effect of genomic selection was strong. Our results suggest that VC estimates from H-AM under random genotyping have the expected values. Predicted breeding values from H-AM were inflated when VC estimates were biased, and inflation differed between genotyped and ungenotyped animals, which can lead to suboptimal selection decisions. Conclusions: We conclude that VC estimates from H-AM are biased with selective genotyping, but are close to expected values with random genotyping.VC estimates from A-AM in populations under genomic selection are also biased but to a much lesser degree. Therefore, we recommend the use of H-AM with random genotyping to estimate VC for populations under genomic selection. Our results indicate that it is still possible to use selective genotyping in selection, but then VC estimation should avoid the use of genotypes from one side only of the distribution of phenotypes. Hence, a dual genotyping strategy may be needed to address both selection and VC estimation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Early application of genomic selection relied on SNP estimation with phenotypes or de-regressed proofs (DRP). Chips of 50k SNP seemed sufficient for an accurate estimation of SNP effects. Genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) were composed of an index with parent average, direct genomic value, and deduction of a parental index to eliminate double counting. Use of SNP selection or weighting increased accuracy with small data sets but had minimal to no impact with large data sets. Efforts to include potentially causative SNP derived from sequence data or high-density chips showed limited or no gain in accuracy. After the implementation of genomic selection, EBV by BLUP became biased because of genomic preselection and DRP computed based on EBV required adjustments, and the creation of DRP for females is hard and subject to double counting. Genomic selection was greatly simplified by single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP). This method based on combining genomic and pedigree relationships automatically creates an index with all sources of information, can use any combination of male and female genotypes, and accounts for preselection. To avoid biases, especially under strong selection, ssGBLUP requires that pedigree and genomic relationships are compatible. Because the inversion of the genomic relationship matrix (G) becomes costly with more than 100k genotyped animals, large data computations in ssGBLUP were solved by exploiting limited dimensionality of genomic data due to limited effective population size. With such dimensionality ranging from 4k in chickens to about 15k in cattle, the inverse of G can be created directly (e.g., by the algorithm for proven and young) at a linear cost. Due to its simplicity and accuracy, ssGBLUP is routinely used for genomic selection by the major chicken, pig, and beef industries. Single step can be used to derive SNP effects for indirect prediction and for genome-wide association studies, including computations of the P-values. Alternative single-step formulations exist that use SNP effects for genotyped or for all animals. Although genomics is the new standard in breeding and genetics, there are still some problems that need to be solved. This involves new validation procedures that are unaffected by selection, parameter estimation that accounts for all the genomic data used in selection, and strategies to address reduction in genetic variances after genomic selection was implemented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In genomic prediction, single-step method has been demonstrated to outperform multi-step methods. This study investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction for seven body measurement traits in Yorkshire population and simulated data using single-step method. For Yorkshire population, in total, 592 individuals were genotyped with Illumina PorcineSNP80 marker panel. We compared the prediction accuracy obtained from a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP), a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) through 20 replicates of 5-fold cross-validation (CV). In addition, we also compared the performance of two-trait ssGBLUP and single-trait ssGBLUP for the traits with different gradients of genetic correlation. Our results indicated the GBLUP method generally provided lower accuracies of prediction than BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, and the average standard deviation of unbiasedness was as large as 0.278. For single-step methods, the accuracies of ssGBLUP for seven body measurement traits ranged from 0.543 to 0.785, and the unbiasedness of ssGBLUP ranged from 0.834 to 1.026, respectively. ssGBLUP generally generated 1% on average higher prediction accuracy than traditional BLUP, the improvement of ssGBLUP and the performance of GBLUP was lower than expected mainly due to the small number of genotyped animals, it was further demonstrated by our simulation study. We simulated two traits with heritabilities 0.1, 0.3, and with high genetic correlation 0.7, our results also showed that the prediction accuracies were low for GBLUP compared with other three methods with different genotyped reference population sizes and the accuracies were improved with increasing the genotyped reference population size. However, the increase was small for ssGBLUP compared with BLUP when the genotyped reference population size was

The breeding scheme in the Rubia Gallega cattle population is based upon traits measured in farms and slaughterhouses. In recent years, genomic evaluation has been implemented by using a ssGBLUP (single-step Genomic Best Linear Unbiased Prediction). This procedure can reparameterized to perform ssGWAS (single-step Genome Wide Association Studies) by backsolving the SNP (single nucleotide polymorphisms) effects. Therefore, the objective of this study was to identify genomic regions associated with the genetic variability in growth and carcass quality traits. We implemented a ssGBLUP by using a database that included records for Birth Weight (BW-327,350 records-), Weaning Weight (WW-83,818-), Cold Carcass Weight (CCW-91,621-), Fatness (FAT-91,475-) and Conformation (CON-91,609-). The pedigree included 464,373 individuals, 2449 of which were genotyped. After a process of filtering, we ended up using 43,211 SNP markers. We used the GBLUP and SNPBLUP model equivalences to obtain the effects of the SNPs and then calculated the percentage of variance explained by the regions of the genome between 1 Mb. We identified 7 regions of the genome for CCW; 8 regions for BW, WW, FAT and 9 regions for CON, which explained the percentage of variance above 0.5%. Furthermore, a number of the genome regions had pleiotropic effects, located at: BTA1 (131–132 Mb), BTA2 (1–11 Mb), BTA3 (32–33 Mb), BTA6 (36–38 Mb), BTA16 (24–26 Mb), and BTA 21 (56–57 Mb). These regions contain, amongst others, the following candidate genes: NCK1, MSTN, KCNA3, LCORL, NCAPG, and RIN3.

Reference populations for genomic selection usually involve selected individuals, which may result in biased prediction of estimated genomic breeding values (GEBV). In a simulation study, bias and accuracy of GEBV were explored for various genetic models with individuals selectively genotyped in a typical nucleus breeding program. We compared the performance of three existing methods, that is, Best Linear Unbiased Prediction of breeding values using pedigree‐based relationships (PBLUP), genomic relationships for genotyped animals only (GBLUP) and a Single‐Step approach (SSGBLUP) using both. For a scenario with no‐selection and random mating (RR), prediction was unbiased. However, lower accuracy and bias were observed for scenarios with selection and random mating (SR) or selection and positive assortative mating (SA). As expected, bias disappeared when all individuals were genotyped and used in GBLUP. SSGBLUP showed higher accuracy compared to GBLUP, and bias of prediction was negligible with SR. However, PBLUP and SSGBLUP still showed bias in SA due to high inbreeding. SSGBLUP and PBLUP were unbiased provided that inbreeding was accounted for in the relationship matrices. Selective genotyping based on extreme phenotypic contrasts increased the prediction accuracy, but prediction was biased when using GBLUP. SSGBLUP could correct the biasedness while gaining higher accuracy than GBLUP. In a typical animal breeding program, where it is too expensive to genotype all animals, it would be appropriate to genotype phenotypically contrasting selection candidates and use a Single‐Step approach to obtain accurate and unbiased prediction of GEBV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In genomic prediction, single-step method has been demonstrated to outperform multi-step methods. This study investigated the efficiency of genomic prediction for seven body measurement traits in Yorkshire population and simulated data using single-step method. For Yorkshire population, in total, 592 individuals were genotyped with Illumina PorcineSNP80 marker panel. We compared the prediction accuracy obtained from a traditional pedigree-based method (BLUP), a genomic BLUP (GBLUP) and a single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) through 20 replicates of 5-fold cross-validation (CV). In addition, we also compared the performance of two-trait ssGBLUP and single-trait ssGBLUP for the traits with different gradients of genetic correlation. Our results indicated the GBLUP method generally provided lower accuracies of prediction than BLUP and ssGBLUP methods, and the average standard deviation of unbiasedness was as large as 0.278. For single-step methods, the accuracies of ssGBLUP for seven body measurement traits ranged from 0.543 to 0.785, and the unbiasedness of ssGBLUP ranged from 0.834 to 1.026, respectively. ssGBLUP generally generated 1% on average higher prediction accuracy than traditional BLUP, the improvement of ssGBLUP and the performance of GBLUP was lower than expected mainly due to the small number of genotyped animals, it was further demonstrated by our simulation study. We simulated two traits with heritabilities 0.1, 0.3, and with high genetic correlation 0.7, our results also showed that the prediction accuracies were low for GBLUP compared with other three methods with different genotyped reference population sizes and the accuracies were improved with increasing the genotyped reference population size. However, the increase was small for ssGBLUP compared with BLUP when the genotyped reference population size was <500. Our results also demonstrated that the accuracies of genomic prediction can be further improved by implementing two-trait ssGBLUP model, the maximum gain on accuracy was 2 and 2.6% for trait of chest width compared to single-trait ssGBLUP and traditional BLUP, while the gain was decreased with the weakness of genetic correlation. Two-trait ssGBLUP even performed worse than single trait analysis in the scenario of low genetic correlation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Journal of the Chinese Society of Animal Science is the property of Chinese Society of Animal Science and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The single-step method (ssGBLUP) allows for simultaneous evaluations of populations composed of genotyped and non-genotyped animals. As a GBLUP-based method, the output of ssGBLUP is breeding values. However, interest might rely on the estimation of SNP effects and on how genome segments are associated with the phenotype of interest. When that is the case, SNP effects can be obtained from a linear transformation of breeding values, and P-values can be used as a measure of estimation certainty. P-values are derived from the prediction error variance of SNP effects, which relies on the prediction error (co) variance matrix of breeding values obtained from the inverse of the left-hand side of the mixed model equations (LHS). However, inverting the LHS becomes unfeasible with large, genotyped populations. Therefore, alternative strategies to overcome this problem and obtain p-values with increasing genotyped populations might be evaluated. In this study, we aimed to estimate marker effect p-values when the algorithm for proven and young (APY) was used to approximate the predictor error (co)variance for animals in a large, genotyped population. We estimate P-values of SNP marker effects for PWG in an Angus cattle population. The dataset was composed of around 844K phenotyped animals, 450K genotypes, and 1.8M pedigree records. Analyses were split into two sets. In the first set, a reduced genotype data of 50K was used, so p-values obtained from a direct-inverse of LHS using the regular G-1 (Exact_G) or APY G-1 (Exact_GAPY) were compared with APY G-1 and an approximation of the prediction error variance that did not require the inversion of the LHS (Approx_GAPY). In the second set of analyses, P-values with Approx_GAPY were estimated with the full genomic set of 450K (Approx_ GAPY_450K), and computational requirements were recorded. All analyses were performed in three replicates. In the first set of analyses, genome-wide association with Exact_G uncovered two significant regions in chromosomes 7 and 20. Along all replicates, the same regions were also identified with Exact_GAPY and Approx_GAPY, indicating that similar resolutions are obtained with exact and approximated p-values. Results from Approx_GAPY_450K showed that, with a complete genome set, besides the two regions in chromosomes 7 and 20, two new regions in chromosomes 6 and 14 were identified. On average, the entire procedure for obtaining P-values with 450K genotyped animals had an elapsed wall clock time of 24h with a maximum memory usage of 87.6 GB. Altogether, our results suggest that with APY and the approximation of the prediction error variance, current computational boundaries for obtaining marker effect P-values for large genotyped populations should be lifted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]